4,661
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
AMEE Guide

Redefining scholarship for health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 142

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Acai A, Ahmad A, Fenton N, Graystone L, Phillips K, Smith R, Stockley D, McMaster University. 2018. The 3M National Teaching Fellowship: a high impact community of practice in higher education. T&LI. 6(2):50–66.
  • Acker S, Webber M. 2016. Uneasy academic subjectivities in the contemporary Ontario university. In: Smith J, Rattray J, Peseta T, Loads D, editors. Identity work in the contemporary university. Rotterdam (Netherlands): Sense; p. 61–75.
  • Adendorff H. 2011. Strangers in a strange land–on becoming scholars of teaching. London Rev Educ. 9(3):305–315.
  • Allen MN, Field PA. 2005. Scholarly teaching and scholarship of teaching: noting the difference. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarship. 2:12.
  • Bailey E, Le Vin A, Miller L, Price K, Sneddon S, Stapleton G, Wolfe L. 2021. Bridging the transition to a new expertise in the scholarship of teaching and learning through a faculty learning community. Int J Acad Dev. In press. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/235781/.
  • Bell S, Bohan J, Brown A, Burke J, Cogdell B, Jamieson S, MacKenzie J, McAdam J, McKerlie R, Morrow L, et al. 2006. The scholarship of teaching and learning: a university teacher learning community’s work in progress. Pract Evid Scholarship Teach Learn Higher Educ. 1(1):3–12.
  • Boughey C. 2005. Epistemological'access to the university: an alternative perspective. South Afr J Higher Educ. 19(3):230–242.
  • Boyer EL. 1990. Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Lawrenceville (NJ): Princeton University Press.
  • Brookfield S. 1998. Critically reflective practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 18(4):197–205.
  • Chou CL, Kalet A, Cost MJ, Cleland JA, Winston K. 2019. Guidelines: the dos, don'ts and don't knows of remediation in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 8(6):322–338.
  • Clark R, Ivanič R. 1997. The politics of writing. Sussex: Psychology Press.
  • Cleland JA, Dowell J, Nicholson S, Patterson F. 2013. How can greater consistency in selection between medical schools be encouraged? A project commissioned by the Selecting for Excellence Group (SEEG). [accessed 2013 Jan]. http://www.medschools.ac.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/Selecting-for-Excellence-research-Professor-Jen-Cleland-et-al.pdf.
  • Cleland JA, Arnold R, Chesser A. 2005. Failing finals is often a surprise for the student but not the teacher: identifying difficulties and supporting students with academic difficulties. Med Teach. 27(6):504–508.
  • Cleland JA, Knight L, Rees C, Tracey S, Bond CB. 2008. Is it me or is it them? Factors that influence the passing of underperforming students? Med Educ. 42(8):800–809.
  • Cleland JA, Leggett H, Sandars J, Costa MJ, Patel R, Moffat M. 2013. The remediation challenge: theoretical and methodological insights from a systematic review. Med Educ. 47(3):242–251.
  • Cleland JA, MacKenzie R, Ross S, Sinclair HK, Lee AJ. 2010. A remedial intervention linked to a formative assessment is effective in terms of improving student performance in subsequent degree examinations. Med Teach. 32(4):e185–e190.
  • Cleland JA, Milne A, Sinclair HK, Lee AJ. 2008. Predicting performance cohort study: is performance on early MBChB assessments predictive of later undergraduate grades? Med Educ. 42(7):676–683.
  • Cleland JA, Nicholson S, Kelly N, Moffat M. 2015. Taking context seriously: explaining widening access policy enactments in UK medical schools. Med Educ. 49(1):25–35.
  • Cohen J, Barton R, Fast A. 1999. The growth of the scholarship of teaching in doctoral programs. J Mass Commun Educ. 54(4):4–13.
  • Colyvas JA. 2012. Performance metrics as formal structures and through the lens of social mechanisms: when do they work and how do they influence? Am J Educ. 118(2):167–197.
  • Cox MD. 2004. Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Dir Teach Learn. 2004(97):5–23.
  • Dall’Alba G, Barnacle R. 2007. An ontological turn for higher education. Stud Higher Educ. 32(6):679–691.
  • de la Croix A, Veen M. 2018. The reflective zombie: problematizing the conceptual framework of reflection in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 7(6):394–400.
  • Denison AR, Currie AE, Laing MR, Heys SD. 2006. Good for them or good for us? The role of academic guidance interviews. Med Educ. 40(12):1188–1191.
  • Diamond RM, Adam BE. 2004. Balancing institutional, disciplinary and faculty priorities with public and social needs: defining scholarship for the 21st century. Arts Humanities Higher Educ. 3(1):29–40.
  • Eysenbach G. 2011. Can Tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 13(4):e123.
  • Fanghanel J, Pritchard J, Potter J, Wisker G, McGowan S, McConnell C, Masika R, Canning J, Parker P, Bracegirdle L, et al. 2016. Executive summary defining and supporting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): a sector-wide study. Higher Education Academy, York. [accessed 2020 Nov]. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/defining-and-supporting-scholarship-teaching-and-learning-sotl-sector-wide-study.
  • Finlay L. 2008. Reflecting on ‘reflective practice’. Practice-based Professional Learning Paper 52. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
  • Giroux HA. 2010. Bare pedagogy and the scourge of neoliberalism: rethinking higher education as a democratic public sphere. Educ Forum. 74(3):184–196.
  • Glassick CE, Huber MT, Maeroff GI. 1997. Scholarship assessed: evaluation of the professoriate (special report). San Francisco (CA): Jossey Bass Inc., Publishers.
  • Grierson L, Winemaker S, Taniguchi A, Howard M, Marshall D, Zazulak J. 2020. The reliability characteristics of the REFLECT rubric for assessing reflective capacity through expressive writing assignments: a replication study. Perspect Med Educ. 9(5):281–285.
  • Gruppen LD, Frohna AZ, Anderson RM, Lowe KD. 2003. Faculty development for educational leadership and scholarship. Acad Med. 78(2):137–141.
  • Healey M. 2000. Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: a discipline-based approach. Higher Educ Res Dev. 19(2):169–189.
  • Helmreich RL, Foushee HC. 1993. Why crew resource management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in aviation. In: Wiener EL, Kanki BG, Helmreich RL, editors. Cockpit resource management. London: Academic Press; p. 3–45.
  • Hessler M, Pöpping DM, Hollstein H, Ohlenburg H, Arnemann PH, Massoth C, Seidel LM, Zarbock A, Wenk M. 2018. Availability of cookies during an academic course session affects evaluation of teaching. Med Educ. 52(10):1064–1072.
  • Hofmeyer A, Newton M, Scott C. 2007. Valuing the scholarship of integration and the scholarship of application in the academy for health sciences scholars: recommended methods. Health Res Policy Syst. 5:5.
  • Houglum L, Weiser CJ. 1998. Scholarship unbound for the 21st century. J Extension. 36(4):4.
  • Hunt D, Harden RM. 2016. ASPIRE to excellence: a novel approach toward benchmarking excellence in medical schools. Educ Méd. 17(3):97–100.
  • Hutchings P, Shulman LS. 1999. The scholarship of teaching: new elaborations, new developments. Change Mag Higher Learn. 31(5):10–15.
  • Jacob ER, McKenna L, D'Amore A. 2014. Senior nurse role expectations of graduate registered and enrolled nurses in Australia: content analysis of open-ended survey questions. Contemp Nurse. 48(2):212–218.
  • Kamler B, Thomson P. 2014. Helping doctoral students write: pedagogies for supervision. London: Routledge.
  • Kanuka H. 2011. Keeping the scholarship in the scholarship of teaching and learning. IJ-SOTL. 5(1):1–12.
  • Kelly N, Nesbit S, Oliver C. 2013. A difficult journey: transitioning from STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) to SoTL. Int J Scholarship Teach Learn. 6(1):175–192.
  • Ker J, Bradley P. 2018. Simulation in medical education. In: Swanwick T, Forrest K, O’Brien B, editors. Understanding medical education. New York (NY): Wiley.
  • Kreber C. 2003. The scholarship of teaching: a comparison of conceptions held by experts and regular academic staff. Higher Educ. 46(1):93–121.
  • Kreber C. 2005. Reflection on teaching and the scholarship of teaching: focus on science instructors. High Educ. 50(2):323–359.
  • Lave J, Wenger E. 1991. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lingard L. 2015. Joining a conversation: the problem/gap/hook heuristic. Perspect Med Educ. 4(5):252–253.
  • MacDougall J, Drummond MJ. 2005. The development of medical teachers: an enquiry into the learning histories of 10 experienced medical teachers. Med Educ. 39(12):1213–1220.
  • Macfarlane B. 2011. Prizes, pedagogic research and teaching professors: lowering the status of teaching and learning through bifurcation. Teach Higher Educ. 16(1):127–130.
  • MacKenzie J, Bell S, Bohan J, Brown A, Burke J, Cogdell B, Jamieson S, McAdam J, McKerlie R, Morrow L, et al. 2010. From anxiety to empowerment: a learning community of university teachers. Teach Higher Educ. 15(3):273–284.
  • Mak-van der Vossen M, Peerdeman SM, Kleinveld JH, Kusurkar RA. 2013. How we designed and implemented teaching, training, and assessment of professional behaviour at VUmc School of Medical Sciences Amsterdam. Med Teach. 35(9):709–714.
  • Mak-van der Vossen M, Peerdeman SM, Van Mook W, Croiset G, Kusurkar RA. 2014. Assessing professional behaviour: overcoming teachers' reluctance to fail students. BMC Res Notes. 7:368.
  • Mak-van der Vossen M, Teherani A, Van Mook W, Croiset G, Kusurkar RA. 2019. A roadmap for remediation of medical students’ unprofessional behavior. Acad Med. 94(4):570–578.
  • Mak-van der Vossen MC, de la Croix A, Teherani A, van Mook WNKA, Croiset G, Kusurkar RA. 2019. Developing a two-dimensional model of unprofessional behaviour profiles in medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 24(2):215–232.
  • Mak-van der Vossen M, van Mook W, van der Burgt S, Kors J, Ket JCF, Croiset G, Kusurkar R. 2017. Descriptors for unprofessional behaviours of medical students: a systematic review and categorisation. BMC Med Educ. 17(1):164.
  • Mak-van der Vossen MC, Van Mook W, Kors JM, Van Wieringen WN, Peerdeman SM, Croiset G, Kusurkar RA. 2016. Distinguishing three unprofessional behavior profiles of medical students using latent class analysis. Acad Med. 91(9):1276–1283.
  • McKinney K. 2006. Attitudinal and structural factors contributing to challenges in the work of the scholarship of teaching and learning. New Dir Inst Res. 2006(129):37–50.
  • Mezirow J. 1998. On critical reflection. Adult Educ Q. 48(3):185–198.
  • Miller-Young JE, Yeo M, Manarin K. 2018. Challenges to disciplinary knowing and identity: experiences of scholars in a SoTL development program. IJ-SOTL. 12(1):3.
  • Morris C. 2018. Work‐based learning. In: Swanwick T, Forrest K, O’Brien B, editors. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory, and practice. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell; pp. 163–175.
  • Park TJ, Braxton JM. 2013. Delineating scholarly types of college and university faculty members. J Higher Educ. 84(3):301–328.
  • Prokkola E-K. 2009. Unfixing borderland identity: border performances and narratives in the construction of self. J Borderlands Stud. 24(3):21–38.
  • Ramani S, McKimm J, Findyartini A. 2020. Twelve tips for developing a global community of scholars in health professions education. Med Teach. DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1839034.
  • Regehr G. 2010. It's NOT rocket science: rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ. 44(1):31–39.
  • Rice RE. 2002. Beyond scholarship reconsidered: toward an enlarged vision of the scholarly work of faculty members. New Dir Teach Learn. 2002(90):7–18.
  • Schimanski LA, Alperin JP. 2018. The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: past, present, and future. F1000Res. 7:1605.
  • Shapiro ED, Coleman DL, 2000. Guest editors: The Council of Academic Societies Task Force on the scholarship of application. Acad Med. 75:895–898.
  • Simpson D, Fincher RME, Hafler JP, Irby DM, Richards BF, Rosenfeld GC, Viggiano TR. 2007. Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship. Med Educ. 41(10):1002–1009.
  • Sinclair H, Cleland JA. 2007. Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback? Med Educ. 41(6):580–582.
  • Smith R. 2001. Expertise and the scholarship of teaching. New Dir Teach Learn. 2001(86):69–78.
  • Srinivasan M, Li S-TT, Meyers FJ, Pratt DD, Collins JB, Braddock C, Skeff KM, West DC, Henderson M, Hales RE, et al. 2011. “Teaching as a Competency”: competencies for medical educators. Acad Med. 86(10):1211–1220.
  • Theall M, Centra JA. 2001. Assessing the scholarship of teaching: valid decisions from valid evidence. New Dir Teach Learn. 2001(86):31–43.
  • Tierney A. 2020. The scholarship of teaching and learning and pedagogic research within the disciplines: should it be included in the research excellence framework? Stud Higher Educ. 45(1):176–186.
  • Tierney AM, Aidulis D, Park J, Clark K. 2020. Supporting SoTL development through communities of practice. TLI. 8(2):32–52.
  • Trigwell K, Shale S. 2004. Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Stud Higher Educ. 29(4):523–536.
  • Van Schalkwyk S, Cilliers F, Adendorff H, Cattell K, Herman N. 2013. Journeys of growth towards the professional learning of academics: understanding the role of educational development. Int J Acad Dev. 18(2):139–151.
  • Wald HS, Borkan JM, Taylor JS, Anthony D, Reis SP. 2012. Fostering and evaluating reflective capacity in medical education: developing the REFLECT rubric for assessing reflective writing. Acad Med. 87(1):41–50.
  • Weston CB, McAlpine L. 2001. Making explicit the development toward the scholarship of teaching. New Dir Teach Learn. 2001(86):89–97.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.