Continuous enhancement of educational quality – fostering a quality culture: AMEE Guide No. 147

References

• Anderson T, Shattuck J. 2012. Design-based research: a decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher. 41(1):16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab SA, Barnett M, Squire K. 2002. Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 11(4):489–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendermacher GWG. 2021. Navigating from Quality Management to Quality Culture [dissertation]. Maastricht: Ipskamp Printing.
   Google Scholar
• Bendermacher GWG, De Grave WS, Wolfhagen IHAP, Dolmans DHJM, Oude Egbrink MGA. 2020. Shaping a culture for continuous quality improvement in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 95(12):1913–1920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendermacher GWG, Dolmans DHJM, de Grave WS, Wolfhagen IHAP, Oude Egbrink MGA. 2021. Advancing quality culture in health professions education: experiences and perspectives of educational leaders. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 26(2):467–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendermacher GWG, Oude Egbrink MGA, Wolfhagen IHAP, Dolmans DHJM. 2017. Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review. High Educ. 73(1):39–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berings D, Grieten S. 2012. Dialectical reasoning around quality culture. 7th European Quality Assurance Forum (EQAF) of the European University Association (EUA), Tallinn.
   Google Scholar
• Bland CJ, Starnaman S, Wersal L, Moorehead-Rosenberg L, Zonia S, Henry R. 2000. Curricular change in medical schools: how to succeed. Acad Med. 75(6):575–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blouin D. 2019. Quality improvement in medical schools: vision meets culture. Med Educ. 53(11):1100–1110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerboom TBB, Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DHJM, Jaarsma DADC. 2015. How feedback can foster professional growth of teachers in the clinical workplace: a review of the literature. Stud Educ Eval. 46:47–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolman LG, Deal TE. 2003. Reframing organizations. Artistry, choice, and Leadership. 3rd ed. San Fransisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill C, Cook‐Sather A, Felten P. 2011. Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers. Int J Acad Devel. 16(2):133–145.
   Google Scholar
• Bovill C, Cook-Sather A, Felten P, Millard L, Moore-Cherry N. 2016. Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. High Educ. 71(2):195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden J, Marton F. 1999. The university of learning. Educa + Train. 41(5):ii–ii.
   Google Scholar
• Braskamp LA, Ory JC. 1994. Assessing faculty work. Enhancing individual and institutional performance. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron KS, Quinn RE. 1999. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture based on the competing values framework. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillon P, D'Eath M, De Grave W, Dornan T. 2016. How do clinicians become teachers? A communities of practice perspective. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 21(5):991–1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright MJ. 2007. The rhetoric and reality of “quality” in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education. 15(3):287–301.
   Google Scholar
• Cashin WE. 1999. Learner ratings of teaching: uses and misuses. In: Seldin P, editor. Changing practices in evaluating teaching Anker: Bolton (MA): Anker Publishing Co., Inc; p. 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Coates H. 2005. The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Qual Higher Educ. 11(1):25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Collins A, Brown JS, Newman SE. 1989. Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In: Knowing, learning, and instruction: essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; p. 453–494.
   Google Scholar
• de Carvalho-Filho MA, Tio RA, Steinert Y. 2020. Twelve tips for implementing a community of practice for faculty development. Med Teach. 42(2):143–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNisi AS, Kluger AN. 2000. Feedback effectiveness: can 360-degree appraisals be improved? AMP. 14(1):129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans DHJM. 2019. How theory and design-based research can mature PBL practice and research. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 24(5):879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans DHJM, Stalmeijer RE, Van Berkel HJM, Wolfhagen IHAP. 2011. Quality assurance of teaching and learning: enhancing the quality culture. In: Dornan T, Mann K, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, editors. Medical education theory and practice. Edinburgh: Elsevier; p. 257–264.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Scherpbier AJJA. 2003. From quality assurance to total quality management: how can quality assurance result in continuous improvement in health professions education? Educ Health (Abingdon). 16(2):210–217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Dillon JR, Roloff KS. 2007. Three perspectives on team learning: outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. ANNALS. 1(1):269–314.
   Google Scholar
• Ehlers UD. 2009. Understanding quality culture. Qual Assur Educ. 17(4):343–363.
   Google Scholar
• Elassy N. 2013. A model of student involvement in the quality assurance system at institutional level. Qual Assur Educ. 21(2):162–198.
   Google Scholar
• EUA 2006. Quality culture in European universities: a bottom-up approach. Brussels: European University Association.
   Google Scholar
• EUA 2009. ENQA report on standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area. Brussels: ENQA.
   Google Scholar
• Frick TW, Chadha R, Watson C, Zlatkovska E. 2010. Improving course evaluations to improve instruction and complex learning in higher education. Educ Tech Res Dev. 58(2):115–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye AW, Hemmer PA. 2012. Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67. Med Teach. 34(5):e288–e299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldie J. 2006. AMEE Education Guide no. 29: evaluating educational programmes. Med Teach. 28(3):210–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin A, Cook V. 2009. Acting on evaluation: Twelve tips from a national conference on student evaluations. Med Teach. 31(2):101–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey L. 2004–2021. Analytic quality glossary. http://www.qualityresearchinternational.com/glossary/
   Google Scholar
• Harvey L, Green D. 1993. Defining quality. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 18(1):9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey L, Stensaker B. 2008. Quality Culture: understandings, boundaries and linkages. Eur J Educ. 43(4):427–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashweh MZ. 2003. Teacher accommodative change. Teach Teach Educ. 19(4):421–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey M, Bovill C, Jenkins A. 2015. Students as partners in learning. In: Enhancing learning and teaching in higher education: engaging with the dimensions of practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press; p. 141–172.
   Google Scholar
• Healey M, Flint A, Harrington K. 2016. Students as partners: reflections on a conceptual model. Teach Learn Inq. 4(2):8–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hill F, Stephens C. 2005. Building leadership capacity in medical education: developing the potential of course coordinators. Med Teach. 27(2):145–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges BD, Maniate JM, Martimianakis MA, Alsuwaidan M, Segouin C. 2009. Cracks and crevices: globalization discourse and medical education. Med Teach. 31(10):910–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikukawa M, Stalmeijer R, Matsuguchi T, Oike M, Sei E, Schuwirth LWT, Scherpbier AJJA. 2021. How culture affects validity: understanding Japanese residents' sense-making of evaluating clinical teachers. BMJ Open. 11(8):e047602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikukawa M, Stalmeijer RE, Okubo T, Taketomi K, Emura S, Miyata Y, Yoshida M, Schuwirth LWT, Scherpbier AJJA. 2017. Development of culture-sensitive clinical teacher evaluation sheet in the Japanese context. Med Teach. 39(8):844–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen J. 2012. Internal quality management and organisational values in higher education; conceptions and perceptions of teaching staff [dissertation]. Maastricht: School of Health Professions Education/Heerlen; Zuyd University of Applied Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Kleijnen J, Dolmans DHJM, Willems J, van Hout H. 2014. Effective quality management requires a systematic approach and a flexible organisational culture: a qualitative study among academic staff. Quality in Higher Education. 20(1):103–126.
   Google Scholar
• Knight PT, Trowler PR. 2000. Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching. Stud Higher Educ. 25(1):69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieff SJ, Albert M. 2010. The mindsets of medical education leaders: how do they conceive of their work? Acad Med. 85(1):57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW. 2007. Students’ evaluations of university teaching: dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In: Perry RP, Smart JC, editors. The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: an evidence-based perspective. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; p. 319–383.
   Google Scholar
• Martens SE, Meeuwissen SNE, Dolmans DHJM, Bovill C, Könings KD. 2019. Student participation in the design of learning and teaching: disentangling the terminology and approaches. Med Teach. 41(10):1203–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens SE, Wolfhagen IHAP, Whittingham JRD, Dolmans DHJM. 2020. Mind the gap: teachers’ conceptions of student-staff partnership and its potential to enhance educational quality. Med Teach. 42(5):529–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKimm J, Lieff SJ. 2013. Medical education leadership. In: Dent J, Harden RM, Hunt D, editor. A practical guide for medical teachers. London: Churchill Livingstone-Elsevier; p. 343–351.
   Google Scholar
• McKimm J, O’Sullivan H. 2016. When I say … leadership. Med Educ. 50(9):896–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeuwissen SN, Stalmeijer RE, Govaerts MJB. 2019. Multiple-role mentoring: mentors’ conceptualisations, enactments and role conflicts. Med Educ. 53(6):605–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeuwissen SNE, Gijselaers WH, Wolfhagen IHAP, Oude Egbrink MGA. 2020. How teachers meet in interdisciplinary teams: hangouts, distribution centers, and melting pots. Acad Med. 95(8):1265–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton J. 2000. Feeding the Beast or Improving Quality?: Academics' perceptions of quality assurance and quality monitoring. Quality in Higher Education. 6(2):153–163.
   Google Scholar
• Nordquist J, Grigsby RK. 2011. Medical schools viewed from a political perspective: how political skills can improve education leadership. Med Educ. 45(12):1174–1180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan PS, Irby DM. 2011. Reframing research on faculty development. Acad Med. 86(4):421–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn RE, Rohrbaugh J. 1983. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Manag Sci. 29(3):363–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overeem K, Wollersheim H, Driessen EW, Lombarts K, Van De Ven G, Grol R, Arah O. 2009. Doctors’ perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study. Med Educ. 43(9):874–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QAA. 2003. Handbook for enhancement-led institutional review: Scotland. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson V, Placier P. 2001. Teacher change. In: Richardson V, editor. Handbook of research on teaching. Washington (DC): American Educational Research Association; p. 905–947.
   Google Scholar
• Romme S, Bosveld MH, Van Bokhoven MA, De Nooijer J, Van den Besselaar H, Van Dongen JJJ. 2020. Patient involvement in interprofessional education: a qualitative study yielding recommendations on incorporating the patient’s perspective. Health Expect. 23(4):943–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhu D. 2019. Healthcare educational leadership in the twenty-first century. Med Teach. 41(6):614–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van der Vleuten CPM, Metsemakers J. 2008. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 13(3):275–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale A. 2009. A contextualised model for accessible e-learning in higher education: understanding the students’ perspective. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Sehlbach C, Govaerts MJB, Mitchell S, Teunissen TGJ, Smeenk FWJM, Driessen EW, Rohde GGU. 2020. Perceptions of people with respiratory problems on physician performance evaluation-a qualitative study. Health Expect. 23(1):247–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seldin P. 1999. Changing practices in evaluating teaching: a practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Vol. 10. San-Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP, Muijtjens AMM, Scherpbier AJJA. 2008. The development of an instrument for evaluating clinical teachers: involving stakeholders to determine content validity. Med Teach. 30(8):e272–e277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP, Muijtjens AMM, Scherpbier AJJA. 2010a. The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers. Acad Med. 85(11):1732–1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP, Peters WG, van Coppenolle L, Scherpbier AJJA. 2010b. Combined student ratings and self-assessment provide useful feedback for clinical teachers. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 15(3):315–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Whittingham JRD, de Grave WS, Dolmans DHJM. 2016. Strengthening internal quality assurance processes: facilitating student evaluation committees to contribute. Assess Eval Higher Educ. 41(1):53–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand P, Sjöborg K, Stalmeijer R, Wichmann-Hansen G, Jakobsson U, Edgren G. 2013. Development and psychometric evaluation of the undergraduate clinical education environment measure (UCEEM). Med Teach. 35(12):1014–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg K, Josephson A, Reeves S, Nordquist J. 2017. Power and resistance: leading change in medical education. Stud Higher Educ. 42(3):445–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sursock A. 2011. Examining quality culture part II: processes and tools-participation, ownership and bureaucracy. Brussel: EUA Publications. https://wbc-rti.info/object/document/7543/attach/Examining_Quality_Culture_Part_II.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Svinicki MD, Marilla D. 2001. Encouraging your students to give feedback. New Dir Teach Learn. 2001(87):17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Tourish D. 2019. Is complexity leadership theory complex enough? A critical appraisal, some modifications and suggestions for further research. Organ Stud. 40(2):219–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien M, Riggio RE, Lowe KB, Carsten MK. 2014. Followership theory: a review and research agenda. Leadersh Quart. 25(1):83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Leeuw RM, Slootweg IA, Heineman MJ, Lombarts MJMH. 2013. Explaining how faculty members act upon residents’ feedback to improve their teaching performance. Med Educ. 47(11):1089–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lierop M, de Jonge L, Metsemakers J, Dolmans DHJM. 2018. Peer group reflection on student ratings stimulates clinical teachers to generate plans to improve their teaching. Med Teach. 40(3):302–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams J. 2016. Quality assurance and quality enhancement: is there a relationship? Qual Higher Educ. 22(2):97–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar