401
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What have we learned about constructed response short-answer questions from students and faculty? A multi-institutional study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all

References

  • Bierer SB, Taylor CA, Dannefer EF. 2009. Evaluation of essay questions used to assess medical students’ application and integration of basic and clinical science knowledge. Teach Learn Med. 21(4):344–350. doi:10.1080/10401330903230980.
  • Bird JB, Olvet DM, Willey JM, Brenner J. 2019. Patients don’t come with multiple choice options: essay-based assessment in UME. Med Educ Online. 24(1):1649959. doi:10.1080/10872981.2019.1649959.
  • Boscardin CK, Earnest G, Hauer KE. 2020. Predicting performance on clerkship examinations and USMLE step 1: what is the value of open-ended question examination? Acad Med. 95:S109–S113. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003629.
  • Brauer DG, Ferguson KJ. 2015. The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96. Med Teach. 37(4):312–322. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.970998.
  • Cannings R, Hawthorne K, Hood K, Houston H. 2005. Putting double marking to the test: a framework to assess if it is worth the trouble. Med Educ. 39(3):299–308. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02093.x.
  • Case SM, Swanson DB. 1993. Extended-matching items: a practical alternative to free-response questions. Teach Learn Med. 5(2):107–115. doi:10.1080/10401339309539601.
  • Frambach JM, van der Vleuten CP, Durning SJ. 2013. AM last page. Quality criteria in qualitative and quantitative research. Acad Med. 88(4):552.
  • Ginzburg S, Brenner J, Willey J. 2015. Integration: a strategy for turning knowledge into action. MedSciEduc. 25(4):533–543. doi:10.1007/s40670-015-0174-y.
  • Gulikers JTM, Bastiaens TJ, Kirschner PA. 2004. A five-dimensional rramework for authentic assessment. ETR&D. 52(3):67–86. doi:10.1007/BF02504676.
  • Hanson JL, Balmer DF, Giardino AP. 2011. Qualitative research methods for medical educators. Acad Pediatr. 11(5):375–386. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2011.05.001.
  • Hattie J, Timperley H. 2007. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 77(1):81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
  • Hauer KE, Boscardin C, Brenner JM, van Schaik SM, Papp KK. 2020. Twelve tips for assessing medical knowledge with open-ended questions: designing constructed response examinations in medical education. Med Teach. 42(8):880–885. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1629404.
  • Hodges B. 2013. Assessment in the post-psychometric era: learning to love the subjective and collective. Med Teach. 35(7):564–568. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.789134.
  • Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 15(9):1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
  • Hubbard JK, Potts MA, Couch BA. 2017. How question types reveal student thinking: an experimental comparison of multiple-true-false and free-response formats. CBE Life Sci Educ. 16(2):1–13. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-12-0339.
  • Ji YA, Nam SJ, Kim HG, Lee J, Lee SK. 2018. Research topics and trends in medical education by social network analysis. BMC Med Educ. 18(1):222. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1323-y.
  • Kang SHK, McDermott KB, Roediger HL. III 2007. Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. Eur J Cognitive Psychol. 19(4-5):528–558. doi:10.1080/09541440601056620.
  • Khan JS, Mukhtar O, Tabasum S, Shaheen N, Farooq M, Irfan MA, Sattar A, Nabeel M, Imran M, Rafique S, et al. 2010. Relationship of awards in multiple choice questions and structured answer questions in the undergraduate years and their effectiveness in evaluation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 22(2):191–195.
  • King A, Hoppe RB. 2013. Best practice" for patient-centered communication: a narrative review. J Grad Med Educ. 5(3):385–393. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-13-00072.1.
  • Kogan JR, Hauer KE. 2020. Sparking change: how a shift to step 1 pass/fail scoring could promote the educational and catalytic effects of assessment in medical education. Acad Med. 95(9):1315–1317. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003515.
  • Konopasek L, Norcini J, Krupat E. 2016. Focusing on the formative: building an assessment system aimed at student growth and development. Acad Med. 91(11):1492–1497. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001171.
  • Larsen DP, Butler AC, Roediger HL. 3rd. 2008. Test-enhanced learning in medical education. Med Educ. 42(10):959–966. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03124.x.
  • Lupi CS, Tempest HG, Ward-Peterson M, Ory SJ. 2018. The educational effects of a summative diagnostic reasoning examination among second-year medical students. MedSciEduc. 28(4):667–673. doi:10.1007/s40670-018-0610-x.
  • Malik AS, Malik RH. 2011. Twelve tips for developing an integrated curriculum. Med Teach. 33(2):99–104. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2010.507711.
  • Mayer RE. 2010. Applying the science of learning to medical education. Med Educ. 44(6):543–549. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03624.x.
  • McDaniel MA, Roediger HL, 3rd, McDermott KB. 2007. Generalising test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom. Psychon Bull Rev. 14(2):200–206. doi:10.3758/bf03194052.
  • Melovitz Vasan CA, DeFouw DO, Holland BK, Vasan NS. 2018. Analysis of testing with multiple choice versus open-ended questions: outcome-based observations in an anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 11(3):254–261. doi:10.1002/ase.1739.
  • National Board of Medical Examiners. 2018. New information about new item formats on the medicine clinical science subject examination. [accessed January 23 2023]. https://www.nbme.org/sites/default/files/2020-01/NBME%20Updates%20New%20Item%20Formats%20on%20Medicine%20Exam.pdf.
  • Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Galbraith R, Hays R, Kent A, Perrott V, et al. 2011. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 33(3):206–214. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559.
  • Norman GR, Smith EK, Powles AC, Rooney PJ, Henry NL, Dodd PE. 1987. Factors underlying performance on written tests of knowledge. Med Educ. 21(4):297–304. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00367.x.
  • Olvet DM, Bird JB, Fulton TB, Kruidering M, Papp KK, Qua K, Willey JM, Brenner JM. 2022. A Multi-institutional study of the feasibility and reliability of the implementation of constructed response exam questions. Teach Learn Med. doi:10.1080/10401334.2022.2111571.
  • Palmer EJ, Duggan P, Devitt PG, Russell R. 2010. The modified essay question: its exit from the exit examination? Med Teach. 32(7):e300-307–e307. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2010.488705.
  • Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. 2009. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health. 36(1):24–34. doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4.
  • Roediger 3rd, HL, Butler AC. 2011. The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends Cogn Sci. 15(1):20–27. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003.
  • Roediger III, Henry L., Adam L. Putnam, and Megan A. Smith. 2011. Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. Psychol Learn Motiv. 55:1–36.
  • Rotgans JI. 2012. The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988-2010: content analysis of abstracts from six journals. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 17(4):515–527. doi:10.1007/s10459-011-9328-x.
  • Rudolph MJ, Daugherty KK, Ray ME, Shuford VP, Lebovitz L, DiVall MV. 2019. Best practices related to examination item construction and post-hoc review. Am J Pharm Educ. 83(7):7204. doi:10.5688/ajpe7204.
  • Sam AH, Field SM, Collares CF, van der Vleuten CPM, Wass VJ, Melville C, Harris J, Meeran K. 2018. Very-short-answer questions: reliability, discrimination and acceptability. Med Educ. 52(4):447–455. doi:10.1111/medu.13504.
  • Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. 2004a. Changing education, changing assessment, changing research? Med Educ. 38(8):805–812. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01851.x.
  • Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. 2004b. Different written assessment methods: what can be said about their strengths and weaknesses? Med Educ. 38(9):974–979. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01916.x.
  • Scouller K. 1998. The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: mulitple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Educ. 35(4):453–472. doi:10.1023/A:1003196224280.
  • Scudder DR, Sherry AD, Jarrett RT, Fernando S, Kuhn AW, Fleming AE. 2019. Fundamental curriculum change with 1-year pre-clerkship phase and effect on stress associated with residency specialty selection. Med Sci Educ. 29(4):1033–1042. doi:10.1007/s40670-019-00800-7.
  • Shilo G. 2015. Formulating good open-ended questions in assessment. Educ Res Q. 38(4):3–30.
  • Stranger-Hall KF. 2012. Multiple-choice exams: an obstacle for higher-level thinking in introductory science classes. CBE Life Sci Educ. 11(3):294–306.
  • Sumeracki MA, Weinstein Y. 2018. Six strategies for effective learning. Acad Med. 93(4):666. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002091.
  • United States Medical Licensing Examination. 2021a. USMLE step 1 transition to pass/fail only score reporting.
  • United States Medical Licensing Examination. 2021b. Work to relaunch USMLE Step 2 CS discontinued. [accessed 2023 January 18]. https://www.usmle.org/work-relaunch-usmle-step-2-cs-discontinued.
  • Wainer H, Thissen D. 1993. Combining multiple-choice and constructed response test scores: toward a Marxist Theory of test construction. Applied Measurement in Education. 6(2):103–118. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0602_1.
  • Wlodarczyk S, Muller-Juge V, Hauer KE, Tong MS, Ransohoff A, Boscardin C. 2021. Assessment to optimize learning strategies: a qualitative study of student and faculty perceptions. Teach Learn Med. 33(3):245–257.
  • Yedidia MJ, Gillespie CC, Kachur E, Schwartz MD, Ockene J, Chepaitis AE, Snyder CW, Lazare A, Lipkin M. Jr. 2003. Effect of communications training on medical student performance. JAMA. 290(9):1157–1165. doi:10.1001/jama.290.9.1157.
  • Yudkowsky R, Szauter K. 2021. Farewell to the step 2 clinical skills exam: new opportunities, obligations, and next steps. Acad Med. 96(9):1250–1253. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004209.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.