Indications for caesarean section in a consultant obstetric unit over three decades

References

• Al-Mufti R., McCarthy A. and Fisk N.M. (1997) Survey of obstetricians' personal preference and discretionary practice. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 73, 1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson G.M. and Lomas J. (1984) Determinants of the increasing Cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982. New England Journal of Medicine, 311, 887–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskett T.F. (1978) Cesarean section: what is an accept-able rate? Canadian Medical Association Journal, 118, 1019–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodmer B., Benjamin A., McLean F.H. and Usher R.H. (1986) Has use of cesarean section reduced the risk of delivery in breech presentation? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 154, 244–250.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd M.E., Usher R.H., McLean F.H. and Norman B.E. (1986) Failed forceps. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 68, 779–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler N.R. and Bonham D.G. (1963) Perinatal Mortality. Edinburgh and London, E. & S. Livingston.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain G., Philip E., Howlett B. and Masters K. (1978) British Births 1970, Volume 2. Obstetric Care. London, Heinemann Medical Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain G. (1993) What is the correct caesarean section rate? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 100, 403–404.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS) (1969) Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in England and Wales, 1964–1966. London, DHSS.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (DoH) (1993) Changing Childbirth, Part II. Survey of Good Communication Practice in Maternity Services, London, DoH.
   Google Scholar
• Graham W.J., Hundley V., McCheyne AL., Hall M.H., Gurney E. and Milne J. (1999) An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 106, 213–220.
   Google Scholar
• Grant A. (1989) Monitoring the fetus during labour. In: Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, edited by Chalmers I., Enkin M. and Keirse M.N.J.C., pp. 846–882. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah ME., Hannah W.J., Hewson S.A., Hodnett ED., Saigal S. and William A.R. (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet, 356, 1375–1383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr G.J. and Drakeley A.J. (1998) Delivery of twins. Bailhere's Clincial Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 12, 91–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughey M.J., LaPata RE., McElin T.W. and Lussky R. (1977) The effect of fetal monitoring on the incidence of cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 49, 513–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson R., Pusey J., Livera N. and Jones P. (1989) North Staffordshire/Wigan assisted delivery trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 96, 537–544.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keirse M.J.N.C. (1989) Pretem delivery. In: Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, edited by Chalmers I, Enkin M. and Keirse M.N.J.C., pp. 1270–1290. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso I .M ., Parsons R.J., Lawrence G.F., Arora S.S., Edmonds D.K. and Cooke I.D. (1978) An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labour: a random-ized trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 131, 526–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie I.Z., Bradley S. and Embrey M.P. (1984) Vaginal prostaglandins and labour induction for patients previously delivered by caesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 91, 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie I.Z. and Gould S.J. (1997) Stillbirth and Caesarean section. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 17, 431–434.
   Google Scholar
• McIlwaine G.M., Cole S.K. and Mcnaughton M.C. (1985) The rising caesarean section rate—a matter of concern? Health Bulletin, 43, 301–305.
   Google Scholar
• Moir J.C. (1956) Munro Kerr's Operative Obstetrics. London, Ballière Tindall and Cox.
   Google Scholar
• Mould T.A.J., Chong S., Spencer J.A.D. and Gallivan S. (1996) Women's involvement with the decision preceding their caesarean section and their degree of satisfaction. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 103, 1074–1077.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2001) Induction of Labour. Inherited Clinical Guidelines D. London, National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Okunwobi-Smith Y., Cooke I.E. and MacKenzie I.Z. (2000) Decision to delivery intervals for assisted vaginal vertex delivery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 107, 467–471.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Radcliffe Hospital Neonatal Unit (1999) 1998 Perinatal Statistics Report. Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Register of Early Childhood Impairment Management Group (ORECI) (2000) Oxford Register of Early Childhood Impairment Annual Report 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson C.M. and Saunders N.J.S. (1991) Mode of delivery after one caesarean section: audit of current practice in a health region. British Medical Journal, 303, 818–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul R.H. and Miller D.A. (1995) Cesarean birth: how to reduce the rate. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 172, 1903–1907.
   Google Scholar
• Peel J. and Chamberlain G.V.P. (1968) Caesarean section 1949–64. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, 75, 1282–1286.
   Google Scholar
• Quinlivan J.A., Peterson R.W. and Nichols C.N. (1999) Patient preference—the leading indication for elective Caesarean section in public patients—results of a 2 year prospective audit in a teaching hospital. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obsterics and Gynaecology, 39, 207–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryding E.L. (1993) Investigation of 33 women who demanded a cesarean section for personal reasons. Acta Obstetricia Gynecologica Scandinavica, 72, 280–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage W. and Francome C. (1993) British caesarean section rates: have we reached a plateau? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 101, 645.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson C., McIlwaine G.M., Boulton-Jones C. and Cole S.K. (1998) Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 105, 45–52.
   Google Scholar