The role of episiotomy in instrumental delivery: Is it preventative for severe perineal injury?

References

• Andrews V, Sultan A H, Thakar R, Jones P W. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. Birth 2006; 33: 117–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angioli R, Gomez-Marin O, Cantuaria G, O'Sullivan M J. Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: the University of Miami experience. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000; 182: 1083–1085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aukee P, Sundstrom H, Kairaluoma M V. The role of mediolateral episiotomy during labour: Analysis of risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2006; 85: 856–860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barter R H, Parks J, Tyndal C. Median episiotomies and complete perineal lacerations. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1960; 80: 654–662
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumann P, Hammoud A O, McNeeley S G, Derose E, Kudish B, Hendrix S. Factors associated with anal sphincter laceration in 40,923 primiparous women. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 2007; 18: 985–990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bek K M, Laurberg S. Risks of anal incontinence from subsequent vaginal delivery after a complete obstetric anal sphincter tear. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1992; 99: 724–726
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benifla J L, Abramowitz L, Sobhani I, et al. [Postpartum sphincter rupture and anal incontinence: Prospective study with 259 patients]. Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite 2000; 28: 15–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bodner K, Bodner-Adler B, Wagenbichler P, et al. Perineal lacerations during spontaneous vaginal delivery. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 2001; 113: 743–746
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Kaider A, et al. Risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in vaginal delivery, with an analysis of episiotomy types. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2001; 46: 752–756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buekens P, Lagasse R, Dramaix M, Wollast E. Episiotomy and third-degree tears. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1985; 92: 820–823
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carley M E, Carley J M, Vasdev G, et al. Factors that are associated with clinically overt postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002; 187: 430–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaliha C, Sultan A H, Bland J M, Monga A K, Stanton S L. Anal function: effect of pregnancy and delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001; 185: 427–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combs C A, Robertson P A, Laros R K, Jr. Risk factors for third-degree and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in forceps and vacuum deliveries. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990; 163: 100–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leeuw J W, de Wit C, Kuijken J PJA, Bruinse H W. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2008; 115: 104–108
   Google Scholar
• De Leeuw J W, Vierhout M E, Struijk P C, Hop W C, Wallenburg H C. Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: Functional outcome and risk factors for faecal incontinence. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2001; 80: 830–834
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ecker J L, Tan W M, Bansal R K, Bishop J T, Kilpatrick S J. Is there a benefit to episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery? Observations over ten years in a stable population. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997; 176: 411–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eogan M D L, O'Connell P R, O'Herlihy C. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006; 556: 190–194
   Google Scholar
• Faltin DL B M, Floris L A, Irion O. Diagnosis of anal sphincter tears to prevent faecal incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 106: 6–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fenner D E, Genberg B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey J O. Faecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. American. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 189: 1543–1549, discussion 1549–1550
   Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Kiran T U, Mulik V, Bethel J, Bhal K. The incidence, risk factors and obstetric outcome in primigravid women sustaining anal sphincter tears. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2003; 82: 736–743
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haadem K, Dahlstrom J A, Lingman G. Anal sphincter function after delivery: a prospective study in women with sphincter rupture and controls. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 1990; 35: 7–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helwig J T, Bowes T J, Jr. Does midline episiotomy increase the risk of third- and fourth-degree lacerations in operative vaginal deliveries. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993; 82: 276–279
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henriksen T B, Bek K M, Hedegaard M, Secher N J. Episiotomy and perineal lesions in spontaneous vaginal deliveries. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1992; 99: 950–954
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudelist G, Gelle'n J, Singer C, et al. Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: Role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 192: 875–881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jander C, Lyrenas S. Third and fourth degree perineal tears. Predictor factors in a referral hospital. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2001; 80: 229–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein M C, Gauthier R J, Robbins J M, et al. Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994; 171: 591–598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudish B, Blackwell S, McNeeley S G, et al. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006; 195: 749–754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleod M, Murphy D J. Operative vaginal delivery and the use of episiotomy – A survey of practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2007; 136: 178–183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakai A, Yoshida A, Yamaguchi S, et al. Incidence and risk factors for severe perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in Japanese patients. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2006; 274: 222–226
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nygaard I E, Rao S S, Dawson J D. Anal incontinence after anal sphincter disruption: a 30-year retrospective cohort study. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997; 89: 896–901
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poen A C, Felt-Bersma R J, Dekker G A, Deville W, Cuesta M A, Meuwissen S G. Third degree obstetric perineal tears: Risk factors and the preventive role of mediolateral episiotomy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1997; 104: 563–566
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheiner E, Levy A, Walfisch A, Hallak M, Mazor M. Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2005; 271: 307–310
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shiono P, Klebanoff M A, Carey J C. Midline episiotomies: more harm than good. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990; 75: 765–770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieber E H, Kroon J D. Morbidity in the third-degree laceration. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1962; 19: 677–680
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Signorello L B, Harlow B L, Chekos A K, Repke J T. Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: retrospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 2000; 320: 86–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Starck M B M, Valentin L. Results of endosonographic imaging of the anal sphincter 2–7 days after primary repair of third- or fourth-degree obstetric sphincter tears. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 22: 609–615
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sultan A H, Kamm M A, Hudson C N, Bartram C I. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: Risk factors and outcome of primary repair. British Medical Journal 1994; 308: 887–891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyvodic F, Rieger N A, Skinner S, Schloithe A C, Saccone G T, Sage M R, et al. Endosonographic imaging of anal sphincter injury: does the size of the tear correlate with the degree of dysfunction. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2003; 46: 735–741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef R, Ramalingam U, Macleod M, Murphy D J. Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal delivery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2005; 112: 941–945
   Google Scholar