References
- Agarwala N, Hasiak N, Shade M. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with Gynemesh as graft material-experience and results. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2007; 14: 577–583
- Bensinger G, Lind L, Lesser M. Abdominal sacral suspensions: analysis of complications using permanent mesh. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 193: 2094–2098
- Hopkins M P, Rooney C. Entero mesh vaginal fistula secondary to abdominal sacral colpopexy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 103: 1035–1036
- Jia X, Glazener C, Mowatt G, et al. Systematic review of theefficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery foruterine or vaginal vault prolapse. NICE guidelines 2008, Availableat:http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/POP2_SR_and_appendices_for_consultation_220808d.pdf (Accessed 11 November 2008)
- Ross J W. The use of a xenogenic barrier to prevent mesh erosion with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2007; 14: 470–474
- Stepanian A A, Miklos J R, Moore R D, et al. Risk of mesh extrusion and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2008; 15: 188–196
- Whitehead W E, Bradley C S, Brown M B, et al. Gastrointestinal complications following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007; 197: 78, e1–e7