Time to pregnancy recognition among users of an FDA-cleared fertility application

References

• Ali, R., Gürtin, Z. B. and Harper, J. C., 2020. Do fertility tracking applications offer women useful information about their fertile window? Reproductive Biomedicine Online. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.09.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2005. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 313, September 2005. The importance of preconception care in the continuum of women’s health care. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 106 (3), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoola, A. B., 2015. Late recognition of unintended pregnancies. Public Health Nursing (Boston, Mass.), 32 (5), 462–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoola, A. B., Stommel, M. and Nettleman, M. D., 2009. Late recognition of pregnancy as a predictor of adverse birth outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 201 (2), 156.e1–6–156.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branum, A. M. and Ahrens, K. A., 2017. Trends in timing of pregnancy awareness among US women. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 21 (4), 715–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dott, M., National Birth Defects Prevention Study., et al., 2010.Association between pregnancy intention and reproductive-health related behaviors before and after pregnancy recognition, national birth defects prevention study, 1997-2002. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14 (3), 373–381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, S., et al., 2021. Use of menstruation and fertility app trackers: a scoping review of the evidence. BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health, 47 (2), 90–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finer, L. B., et al., 2006. Timing of steps and reasons for delays in obtaining abortions in the United States. Contraception, 74 (4), 334–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. L., et al., 2013. A national action plan for promoting preconception health and health care in the United States (2012-2014). Journal of Women’s Health (2002), 22 (10), 797–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, D. G., Gould, H. and Biggs, M. A., 2021. Timing of pregnancy discovery among women seeking abortion. Contraception, 104 (6), 642–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, H. E., et al., 2017. First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada. PLoS One, 12 (10), e0186487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., et al., 2019. Predicting pregnancy using large-scale data from a women’s health tracking mobile application. Proceedings of the. International World-Wide Web Conference. International WWW Conference, 2019, 2999–3005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lum, K. J., et al., 2016. A Bayesian joint model of menstrual cycle length and fecundity. Biometrics, 72 (1), 193–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M., et al., 2018. Predictors of timing of pregnancy discovery. Contraception, 97 (4), 303–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozilla 2022. In Post Roe v. Wade Era, Mozilla Labels 18 of 25 Popular Period and Pregnancy Tracking Tech With *Privacy Not Included Warning. Accessed 27th April 2023, https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/blog/in-post-roe-v-wade-era-mozilla-labels-18-of-25-popular-period-and-pregnancy-tracking-tech-with-privacy-not-included-warning/.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J. T., et al., 2021. Contraceptive effectiveness of an FDA-cleared birth control app: results from the natural cycles U.S. Cohort. Journal of Women’s Health (2002), 30 (6), 782–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ralph, L. J., et al., 2022. Home pregnancy test use and timing of pregnancy confirmation among people seeking health care. Contraception, 107, 10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanford, J. B., et al., 2020. Fecundability in relation to use of mobile computing apps to track the menstrual cycle. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 35 (10), 2245–2252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, J., et al., 2023. Pregnancy recognition trajectories: a needed framework. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 31 (1), 2167552.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swanson, M., et al., 2014. Delayed pregnancy testing and second-trimester abortion: can public health interventions assist with earlier detection of unintended pregnancy? Contraception, 89 (5), 400–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau 2023. Quick facts, United states. Available at: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/RHI825221#RHI825221
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay, U. D., et al., 2015. Incidence of emergency department visits and complications after abortion. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 125 (1), 175–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay, U. D., et al., 2022. Trends in self-pay charges and insurance acceptance for abortion in the United States, 2017-20. Health Affairs (Millwood), 41 (4), 507–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, K. and Angelotta, C., 2022. The frequency of pregnancy recognition across the gestational spectrum and its consequences in the United States. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 54 (2), 32–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar