Challenges for integrated design (ID) in sustainable buildings

References

• Adams, R., Bessant, J., and Phelps, R., 2006. Innovation management measurement: a review. International journal of management reviews, 8, 21–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AIA. 2007. Integrated project delivery: a guide. Washington, DC: AIA National and AIA California.
   Google Scholar
• Akintoye, A. and Main, J., 2007. Collaborative relationships in construction: the UK contractors’ perception. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 14, 597–617.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, H.W., 2008. Building information modeling: a framework for collaboration. The construction lawyer, 5, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, H.W., Jr, 2014. The transformation of project delivery. The construction lawyer. pp. 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., and Sambrook, S., 2009. Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management decision, 47, 1323–1339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, P., 2009. A global agenda for revaluing construction: the client’s role. In: Clients driving innovation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, P. and Sutrisna, M., 2009. Methodological strategies to gain insights into informality and emergence in construction project case studies. Construction management and economics, 27, 935–948.
   Google Scholar
• Belloni, K., Kojima, J., and Pinto Seppaa, I., 2009. Champions for integrated design solutions. In: Improving construction and use through integrated design solutions. Espoo, Finland: CIB.
   Google Scholar
• Blayse, A.M. and Manley, K., 2004. Key influences on construction innovation. Construction innovation, 4, 143–154.
   Google Scholar
• Bonham, M.B., 2013. Leading by example: new professionalism and the government client. Building research & information, 41, 77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossink, B.A., 2004. Managing drivers of innovation in construction networks. Journal of construction engineering and management, 130, 337–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossink, B., 2012. Managing environmentally sustainable innovation: insights from the construction industry. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, P.S. and Lu, S.-L., 2008. Clients driving innovation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M., Goussevskaia, A., and Swan, J., 2005. Managing projects as complex social settings. Building research & information, 33, 487–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., Kleinman, L., and Dial, A., 2015. Energy performance of campus LEED® buildings: implications for green building and energy policy. Journal of green building, 10, 137–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiocchio, F., et al. 2011. Teamwork in integrated design projects: understanding the effects of trust, conflict, and collaboration on performance. Project management journal, 42, 78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R.J., et al. 2008. Re-contextualizing the notion of comfort. Building research & information, 36, 323–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R.J. and Larsson, N.K., 1999. GBC ‘98 and GBTool: background. Building research & information, 27, 221–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossan, M.M. and Apaydin, M., 2010. A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of management studies, 47, 1154–1191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amour, D., et al. 2005. The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of interprofessional care, 19 (1), 116–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dulaimi, M.F., Nepal, M.P., and Park, M., 2005. A hierarchical structural model of assessing innovation and project performance. Construction management and economics, 23, 565–577.
   Google Scholar
• Dulaimi, M.F., et al. 2002. Enhancing integration and innovation in construction. Building research & information, 30, 237–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• du Plessis, C., CIB., 2016. Research roadmap sustainable construction. South Africa: University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J., 1998. Rethinking construction. Report of the Construction Task Force, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Egbu, C.O., 2004. Managing knowledge and intellectual capital for improved organizational innovations in the construction industry: an examination of critical success factors. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 11, 301–315.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. and Infeld, L., 1961. The evolution of physics: the growth of ideas from early concepts to relativity and quanta. New York, USA: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E., 2007. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50, 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erik eriksson, P., Atkin, B., and Nilsson, T., 2009. Overcoming barriers to partnering through cooperative procurement procedures. Engineering, construction and architectural management, 16, 598–611.
   Google Scholar
• Evbuomwan, N.F.O. and Anumba, C.J., 1998. An integrated framework for concurrent life-cycle design and construction. Advances in Engineering Software, 29, 587–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabricio, M.M., 2002. Projeto simultâneo na construção de edifícios (Doctoral dissertation). Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Fedoruk, L.E., Cole, R.J., Robinson, J.B., et al. 2015. Learning from failure: understanding the anticipated–achieved building energy performance gap. Building research & information, 43(6), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellows, R. and Liu, A., 2008. Research methods for construction. Oxford, UK: Malden, MA, Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Forgues, D. and Koskela, L.J., 2008. Can procurement affect design performance? Journal of construction procurement, 14, 130–141.
   Google Scholar
• Forgues, D. and Koskela, L.J., 2009. The influence of a collaborative procurement approach using integrated design in construction on project team performance. International journal of managing projects in business, 2, 370–385.
   Google Scholar
• Gambatese, J.A. and Hallowell, M., 2011. Enabling and measuring innovation in the construction industry. Construction management and economics, 29, 553–567.
   Google Scholar
• Gann, D.M. and Salter, A.J., 2000. Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems. Research policy, 29, 955–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier, N., 2015. Enquête sur la règlementation de la juridiction des métiers et ses impacts sur la planification des travaux et la gestion des contrats de construction au Québec. Montréal: École de technologie supérieure.
   Google Scholar
• Globe-Advisors 2013. BC residential construction industry profile study. Vancouver, BC: Globe Advisors.
   Google Scholar
• Gluch, P., Gustafsson, M., and Thuvander, L., 2009. An absorptive capacity model for green innovation and performance in the construction industry. Construction management and economics, 27, 451–464.
   Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan, S. and Damanpour, F., 1997. A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. Omega, 25, 15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, S.C. and Haugbølle, K., 2013. Contradictions and collaboration: partnering in-between systems of production, values and interests. Construction management and economics, 31, 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S.D., et al. 2004. Learning across business sectors: knowledge sharing between aerospace and construction. The University of Reading, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., 2003. Construction waste minimisation: good practice guide. Cardiff, UK: Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, A., 2006. The role of organizational culture in motivating innovative behaviour in construction firms. Construction innovation, 6, 159–172.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, A., 2005. Innovativeness among small businesses: theory and propositions for future research. Industrial marketing management, 34, 773–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayton, J.C. and Kelley, D.J., 2006. A competency‐based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship. Human resource management, 45, 407–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herazo, B. and Lizarralde, G., 2015. The influence of green building certifications in collaboration and innovation processes. Construction management and economics, 33, 279–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horman, M.J., et al. 2004. Lean and green: integrating sustainability and lean construction. Toronto, Canada: CIB World Building Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Horman, M.J. and Kenley, R., 2005. Quantifying levels of wasted time in construction with meta-analysis. Journal of construction engineering and management, 131, 52–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huovila, P., Koskela, L., and Lautanala, M., 1997. Fast or concurrent: the art of getting construction improved. Lean construction, 143, 159.
   Google Scholar
• Ivory, C., 2005. The cult of customer responsiveness: is design innovation the price of a client‐focused construction industry? Construction management and economics, 23, 861–870.
   Google Scholar
• Jalonen, H. and Lehtonen, A., 2011. Uncertainty in the innovation process. European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 486–503). Aberdeen: Academic Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasena, H. S. and Senevirathna, N. S., 2012. Adaptability of integrated project delivery in a construction industry. In World Construction Conference (Ed.), Global challenges in construction industry (pp. 188–195). Colombo: BEMRU, University of Moratuwa.
   Google Scholar
• Kaatz, E., et al. 2006. Advancing key outcomes of sustainability building assessment. Building research & information, 34, 308–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamara, J.M., Anumba, C.J., and Cutting-Decelle, A.-F., 2007. Introduction to concurrent engineering in construction. Concurrent Engineering in construction projects, 1, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, D. and Becerik-Gerber, B., 2010. Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136, 815–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibert, C.J., 2013. Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Klopp, R., 2012. The nature of judgment in the design professions: exploring the dynamics of action and reflection thesis (ms), university of cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, A. and Ruddock, L., 2008. Advanced research methods in the built environment. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., Howell, G., and Lichtig, W., 2006. Contracts and production. University of Salford, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacic, I. and Müller, C., 2014. Challenges for the implementation of integrated design in the planning practice. Procedia - social and behavioral sciences, 119, 529–538.
   Google Scholar
• Kulatunga, K., et al. 2011. Client’s championing characteristics that promote construction innovation. Construction innovation: information, process, management, 11, 380–398.
   Google Scholar
• Kulatunga, K.J., Amaratunga, R.D.G., and Haigh, R., 2006. Construction innovation: a literature review on current research. Sixth International Postgraduate Research Conference in the Built and Human Environment. Delft, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kvan, T., 2000. Collaborative design: what is it? Automation in construction, 9, 409–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laborde, M. and Sanvido, V., 1994. Introducing new process technologies into construction companies. Journal of construction engineering and management, 120, 488–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, N., 2002. The integrated design process: report on a national workshop held in Toronto in October 2001. Ottawa, Canada: Natural Resources Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, S.M., 1994. Constructing the team, HM Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Liedtka, J.M., 1996. Collaboration across lines of business for competitive advantage. Academy of management perspectives, 10, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, F.Y.Y., 2003. Managing the implementation of construction innovations. Construction management and economics, 21, 635–649.
   Google Scholar
• Lizarralde, G. and Davidson, C., 2008. Building abroad procurement of construction and reconstruction projects in the international context: colloque-atelier, 25-28 octobre 2008 [Online]. Montréal, Canada: Groupe de Recherche IF grif Faculté de l’aménagement Université de Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Lorange, P. and Roos, J., 1991. Why some strategic alliances succeed and others fail. Journal of business strategy, 12, 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Love, P.E.D., Smith, J., and Li, H., 1999. The propagation of rework benchmark metrics for construction. International journal of quality & reliability management, 16, 638–658.
   Google Scholar
• Love, P.E., Gunasekaran, A., and Li, H., 1998. Concurrent engineering: a strategy for procuring construction projects. International journal of project management, 16, 375–383.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, S.-L. and Sexton, M., 2009. Innovation in small professional practices in the built environment. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Magent, C.S., 2005. A process and competency-based approach to high performance building design. Thesis (Ph.D.), The Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Magent, C.S., et al. 2009. A design process evaluation method for sustainable buildings. Architectural engineering and design management, 5, 62–74.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, A.J., Durepos, G., and Wiebe, E., 2010. Encyclopedia of case study research: L-Z; index. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D.R. and Dainty, A.R.J., 2001. Intra-team boundaries as inhibitors of performance improvement in UK design and build projects: a call for change. Construction management and economics, 19, 559–562.
   Google Scholar
• Mossman, A., Ballard, G., and Pasquire, C., 2013. Lean project delivery: innovation in integrated design & delivery. In: J. Eynon, ed. The design manager’s handbook, Edition 1. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Special issue on integrated design & development systems.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, C.H. and Tatum, C.B., 1992. Strategies for technology push: Lessons from construction innovations. Journal of construction engineering and management, 118, 507–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, C.H. and Tatum, C.B., 1997. Leaders and champions for construction innovation. Construction management and economics, 15, 259–270.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P., Hampson, K., and Drogemuller, R., 2009. Technology, design and process innovation in the built environment. Abingdon: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ofori, G., 2000. Greening the construction supply chain in Singapore. European journal of purchasing & supply management, 6, 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Ogawa, R.T. and Malen, B., 1991. Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literatures: applying the exploratory case study method. Review of educational research, 61, 265–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osipova, E. and Eriksson, P.E., 2011. How procurement options influence risk management in construction projects. Construction management and economics, 29, 1149–1158.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., et al. 2010. Challenges for integrated design and delivery solutions. Architectural engineering and design management, 6, 232–240.
   Google Scholar
• Ozorhon, B., et al. 2010. Innovation in construction: a project life cycle approach. Salford, UK: Salford Centre for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q., 2015. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice, fourth ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, E., Forgues, D., and Staub-French, S., 2016. Collaboration through innovation: implications for expertise in the AEC sector. Construction management and economics, 34, 769–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E., 1991. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic management journal, 12, 95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichstein, T., Salter, A.J., and Gann, D.M., 2005. Last among equals: a comparison of innovation in construction, services and manufacturing in the UK. Construction management and economics, 23, 631–644.
   Google Scholar
• Rekola, M., Kojima, J., and Mäkeläinen, T., 2009. Pinpointing and classifying challenges in an integrated design process. In: Improving construction and use through integrated design solutions. Espoo, Finland: CIB.
   Google Scholar
• Rekola, M., Mäkeläinen, T., and Häkkinen, T., 2012. The role of design management in the sustainable building process. Architectural engineering and design management, 8, 78–89.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, E.S., 1993. Builders as sources of construction innovation. Journal of construction engineering and management, 119, 532–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, E.S., 1998. Models of construction innovation. Journal of construction engineering and management, 124, 226–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, E.S., 2000. Implementation of construction innovations. Building research & information, 28, 2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, E.S. and Cate, W.L., 2009. Critical actions by clients for effective development and implementation of construction innovations. Clients driving innovation, 15, 146.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, H. and Pryke, S., 2009. Collaborative relationships in construction: developing frameworks and networks, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sodagar, B. and Fieldson, R., 2008. Towards a low carbon construction practice. Construction information quarterly, 10, 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, J., 1995. Collaboration for competitive advantage: the changing world of alliances and partnerships. Long range planning, 28, 109–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taroun, A., 2014. Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk: Insights from a literature review. International journal of project management, 32, 101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatum, C.B., 1986. Potential mechanisms for construction innovation. Journal of construction engineering and management, 112, 178–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatum, C.B., 1989. Managing for increased design and construction innovation. Journal of management in engineering, 5, 385–399.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, D., Ryan, N., and Charles, M., 2008. Environmental sustainability as an innovation driver among small-and medium-sized construction companies. In: P . Brandon, K.B. Janet and K. Hampson, eds. Clients driving construction innovation: benefiting from innovation. Brisbane, Australia: Cooperative Research Centre for Construction Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Toole, T.M., Hallowell, M., and Chinowsky, P., 2013. A tool for enhancing innovation in construction organizations. Engineering project organization journal, 3, 32–50.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A.H., 1986. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management science, 32, 590–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Stamm, B., 2004. Collaboration with other firms and customers: innovation’s secret weapon. Strategy & leadership, 32, 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G., 1995. Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European journal of information systems, 4, 74–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2003. Case study research: design and methods (3rd ed., Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, A., 2004. Integrated design process guide. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar