Multicriteria-decision support for master plan scheduling: urban regeneration of an industrial area in Northern Italy

References

• Abu-Samra, S., Ahmed, M., and Amador, L., 2020. Asset management framework for integrated municipal infrastructure. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 26 (4), 04020039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida-Dias, J., Figueira, J.R., and Roy, B., 2012. A multiple criteria sorting method where each category is characterized by several reference actions: the electre Tri-nC method. European Journal of Operational Research, 217 (3), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiden, B.K., Price, A.D.F., and Dainty, A.R.J., 2006. The extent of team integration within construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24 (1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Ballarini, A., Copiello, S., and Donati, E., 2022. Explicit and implicit weighting schemes in multi‐criteria decision support systems: the case of the national innovative housing quality program in Italy. In: O. Gervasi, B. Murgante, S. Misra, A.M.A.C. Rocha, C. Garau, eds. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2022 Workshops. ICCSA 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13378. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10562-3_43
   Google Scholar
• Bana e Costa, C.A., and Vansnick, J.-C., 1995. General overview of the Macbeth approach. In: P. M. Pardalos, Y. Siskos, C. Zopounidis, eds. Advances in Multicriteria Analysis. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol 5. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2383-0_6
   Google Scholar
• Barbati, M., Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Panaro, S. 2018. A multiple criteria methodology for priority based portfolio selection. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 88, 101595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101595
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, A. D., 2017. DecSpace: A multi-criteria decision analysis framework.
   Google Scholar
• Becchio, C., et al., 2017. A MCDA-based approach for evaluating alternative requalification strategies for a net-zero energy district (NZED). In: C. Zopounidis & M. Doumpos eds. Multiple criteria decision making. Cham: Springer, 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39292-9_10
   Google Scholar
• Benayoun, R., Roy, B., and Sussmann, B., 1996. ELECTRE: Une méthode pour guider le choix en présence de points de vue multiples. In Note de travail n° 49 de la Direction Scientifique de la SEMA. Montrouge: SEMA.
   Google Scholar
• Berta, M., Bottero, M., and Ferretti, V., 2018. A mixed methods approach for the integration of urban design and economic evaluation: Industrial heritage and urban regeneration in China. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45 (2), 208–232.
   Google Scholar
• Borsino immobiliare. (2020). Quotazioni Stime Valutazioni Immobiliari Torino. https://www.borsinoimmobiliare.it/quotazioni-immobiliari/Piemonte/Torino-Provincia/Torino
   Google Scholar
• Boscacci, F., et al., 2017. Collective benefits of an urban transformation: restoring the Navigli in Milan. Cities, 71, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosone, M., and Ciampa, F., 2021. Human-centred indicators (HCI) to regenerate vulnerable cultural heritage and landscape towards a circular city: from the Bronx (NY) to Ercolano (IT). Sustainability, 13 (10), 5505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosone, M., et al., 2021. Indicators for ex‐post evaluation of cultural heritage adaptivreuse impacts in the perspective of the circular economy. Sustainability, 13 (9), 4759. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., et al., 2022. Regeneration of Rogoredo railway: a combined approach using multi-criteria and financial analysis. Valori e Valutazioni, 31, 89–102. https://dx.doi.org/10.48264/VVSIEV-20223107
   Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., Dell’Anna, F., and Morgese, V., 2020. Assessing investment projects under risk and uncertainty using discounted cash-flow analysis and Monte Carlo simulation. Geoingegneria Ambientale e Mineraria, 161 (3), 5–15. https://dx.doi.org/10.19199/2020.3.1121-9041.05
   Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., Lami, I. M., and Lombardi, P., 2008. Analytic network process. La valutazione di scenari di trasformazione urbana e territoriale. Florence: Alinea.
   Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., et al., 2021. Decision making in urban development: the application of a hybrid evaluation method for a critical area in the city of Turin (Italy). Sustainable Cities and Society, 72, 103028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., et al., 2020. Experimenting community impact evaluation (CIE) for assessing urban regeneration programmes: the case study of the area 22@ Barcelona. Cities, 99, 102464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., and Datola, G., 2020. Addressing social sustainability in urban regeneration processes. An application of the social multi-criteria evaluation. Sustainability. 12 (18), 7579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., and Dell’Anna, F., 2022. The role of Quality Management Services (QMSs) in aligning the construction sector to the European Taxonomy: the experience of the QUEST project. In: F. Calabrò, L. Della Spina, M. J. Piñeira Mantiñán, eds. New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 482. Cham: Springer, 1732–1741. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06825-6_167
   Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., Ferretti, V., and Mondini, G., 2015. How to support strategic decisions in territorial transformation processes. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems, 6 (4), 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., et al., 2019. Hybrid evaluation approaches for urban regeneration processes of landfills and industrial sites: the case of the Kwun Tong area in Hong Kong. Land Use Policy, 82, 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, J., and Vincke, P., 1985. A preference ranking organization method: the PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Management Science, 31 (6), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budner, W.W., and Pawlicka, K., 2020. Znaczenie procesów przekształceń i rewitalizacji miasta dla wzrostu atrakcyjności rynku nieruchomości. Studium przypadku HafenCity. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, Sectio B – Geographia, Geologia, Mineralogia et Petrographia, 75, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Capolongo, S., et al., 2019. How to assess urban regeneration proposals by considering conflicting values. Sustainability, 11 (14), 3877. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo, P., Ferrari, S., and Zagarella, F., 2020. Urban renovation: An opportunity for economic development, environmental improvement and social redemption. In: S. Della Torre, S. Cattaneo, C. Lenzi, and A. Zanelli, eds. Regeneration of the Built Environment from a Circular Economy Perspective. Research for Development. Cham: Springer, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33256-3_13
   Google Scholar
• Cerreta, M., and Daldanise, G., 2017. Community branding (Co-bra): A collaborative decision making process for urban regeneration. In: O. Gervasi et al. eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Cham: Springer, 730–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_52
   Google Scholar
• Cerreta, M., et al., 2020. Operationalizing the circular city model for Naples’ city-port: a hybrid development strategy. Sustainability, 12 (7), 2927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerreta, M., Elefante, A., and La Rocca, L., 2020. A creative living lab for the adaptive reuse of the morticelli church: the SSMOLL project. Sustainability, 12 (24), 10561. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerreta, M., and La Rocca, L., 2021. Urban regeneration processes and social impact: a literature review to explore the role of evaluation. In: O. Gervasi, et al. eds. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021. ICCSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12954. Cham: Springer, 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_13
   Google Scholar
• Cerreta, M., et al., 2021. A multidimensional evaluation for regenerative strategies: Towards a circular city-port model implementation. In: C. Bevilacqua, F. Calabrò, L. Della Spina, eds. New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 178. Cham: Springer, 1067–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_100
   Google Scholar
• Chae, J.S., et al., 2021. Urban public service analysis by GIS-MCDA for sustainable redevelopment: A case study of a megacity in Korea. Sustainability, 13 (3), 1472. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciesiółka, P., and Burov, A., 2021. Paths of the urban regeneration process in Central and Eastern Europe after EU enlargement - Poland and Bulgaria as comparative case studies. Spatium, 46, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT2146001C
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M., 2017. A systematic review of urban sustainability assessment literature. Sustainability, 9 (11), 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conforto, E.C., and Amaral, D.C., 2010. Evaluating an agile method for planning and controlling innovative projects. Project Management Journal, 41 (2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., and Boyko, C., 2010. How to design a city in five easy steps: exploring VivaCity2020’s process and tools for urban design decision making? Journal of Urbanism, 3(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2010.526366
   Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, M., 2014. Towards place-based regional and local development strategies in Central and Eastern Europe? EU cohesion policy and strategic planning capacity at the sub-national level. Local Economy, 29 (4–5), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094214535715
   Google Scholar
• Dansoh, A., Frimpong, S., and Oppong, G.D., 2020. Exploring the dimensions of traditional authority influencing stakeholder management at the pre-construction stage of infrastructure projects. Construction Management and Economics, 38 (2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1589647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Toro, P., et al., 2020. Real estate market dynamics in the city of naples: an integration of a multi-criteria decision analysis and geographical information system. Sustainability, 12 (3):1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deakin, M., and Allwinkle, S., 2008. A community-based approach to sustainable urban regeneration: The LUDA project. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 3 (5), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630730903090354
   Google Scholar
• Dell’Anna, F., 2023. An ELECTRE TRI B-based decision framework to support the energy project manager in dealing with retrofit processes at district scale. Sustainability, 15 (2), 1250. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell’Anna, F., and Dell’Ovo, M., 2022. A stakeholder-based approach managing conflictual values in urban design processes. The case of an open prison in Barcelona. Land Use Policy, 114, 105934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell’Anna, F., et al., 2023. Supporting sustainability projects at neighbourhood scale: Green visions for the San Salvario district in Turin guided by a combined assessment framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 384, 135460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell’Ovo, M., Oppio, A., and Capolongo, S., 2020. Structuring the decision problem. A spatial multi-methodological approach. In SpringerBriefs in applied sciences and technology. Cham: Springer, 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50173-0_2
   Google Scholar
• Della Spina, L., 2019. Multidimensional assessment for “culture-led” and “community-driven” urban regeneration as driver for trigger economic vitality in urban historic centers. Sustainability, 11 (24), 7237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Spina, L., 2020. Adaptive sustainable reuse for cultural heritage: A multiple criteria decision aiding approach supporting urban development processes. Sustainability, 12 (4), 1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doumpos, M., and Figueira, J.R., 2019. A multicriteria outranking approach for modeling corporate credit ratings: An application of the Electre Tri-nC method. Omega, 82, 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid, M.S., Elbeltagi, E.E., and El-Adaway, I.H., 2018. Simultaneous multi-criteria optimization for scheduling linear infrastructure projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 21 (1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1505027
   Google Scholar
• Eneqvist, E., and Karvonen, A., 2021. Experimental governance and urban planning futures: five strategic functions for municipalities in local innovation. Urban Planning, 6 (1), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enia, M., and Martella, F., 2019. Reducing architecture: Doing almost nothing as a city-making strategy in 21st century architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8 (2), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission 1999. Urban pilot projects: Phase II, 1997-99: Project descriptions. Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy. Brussels: EU Publications.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities – Final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on “Nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities.”
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, E., et al., 2017. ELECTRE TRI-nB: A new multiple criteria ordinal classification method. European Journal of Operational Research, 263 (1), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, V., 2012. Verso la valutazione integrata di scenari strategici in ambito spaziale. I modelli MC-SDSS. Turin: CELID.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti, V., and Grosso, R., 2019. Designing successful urban regeneration strategies through a behavioral decision aiding approach. Cities, 95, 102386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, V., 2016. From stakeholders analysis to cognitive mapping and Multi-Attribute Value Theory: An integrated approach for policy support. European Journal of Operational Research, 253 (2), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.02.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira, J., and Roy, B., 2002. Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. European Journal of Operational Research, 139 (2), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00370-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, Y. D. d S., Prim, M.A., and Dandolini, G.A., 2022. Urban regeneration in the light of social innovation: A systematic integrative literature review. Land Use Policy, 113, 105873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, G., Kreinin, H., and Stagl, S., 2020. The future of circular environmental impact indicators for cultural heritage buildings in Europe. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32 (1), 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00411-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, B., and Tait, M., 2002. Constructing an image: The urban village concept in the UK. Planning Theory, 1 (3), 250–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309520200100304
   Google Scholar
• Gade, A.N., et al., 2021. Value-based decision making in the pre-design stage of sustainable building renovation projects–exploring two methods for weighting criteria. International Journal of Construction Management, 21 (6), 648–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1578913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, M., d’Avignon, G., and Aouni, B., 2012. Resource-constrained project scheduling through the goal programming model: integration of the manager’s preferences. International Transactions in Operational Research, 19 (4), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2012.00842.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelbard, R., Pliskin, N., and Spiegler, I., 2002. Integrating system analysis and project management tools. International Journal of Project Management, 20 (6), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00044-8
   Google Scholar
• Genio Civile, 2014. Prezzi tipologie Edilizie. Rome: DEI.
   Google Scholar
• Girard, L.F., and Nocca, F., 2019. Moving towards the circular economy/city model: Which tools for operationalizing this model? Sustainability, 11 (22), 6253. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuffrè, O., et al., 2021. Life-cycle costing decision-making methodology and urban intersection design: modelling and analysis for a circular city. In: E. Macioszek, G. Sierpiński, eds. Research Methods in Modern Urban Transportation Systems and Networks. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 207. Cham: Springer, 59–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71708-7_5
   Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., and Jepsen, M.B., 2016. ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., and Ibert, O., 2011. Project ecologies: A contextual view on temporary organizations. In The Oxford handbook of project management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–199.
   Google Scholar
• Gravagnuolo, A., Angrisano, M., and Girard, L.F., 2019. Circular economy strategies in eight historic port cities: Criteria and indicators towards a circular city assessment framework. Sustainability, 11 (13), 3512. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, P., and de Werra, D., 2002. Connectivity, Transitivity and Chromaticity: The Pioneering Work of Bernard Roy in Graph Theory. In: D. Bouyssou, E. Jacquet-Lagrèze, P. Perny, R. Słowiński, D. Vanderpooten, P. Vincke, eds. Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 44. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0843-4_2
   Google Scholar
• Harbottle, M.J., Al-Tabbaa, A., and Evans, C.W., 2008. Sustainability of land remediation. Part I: Overall analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Geotechnical Engineering, 161 (2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2008.161.2.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heravi, G., and Gerami Seresht, N., 2018. A multi criteria decision making model for prioritizing the non-critical activities in construction projects. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22 (10), 3753–3763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1275-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado, S.D.G., 2015. The implementation of the URBAN community initiative: a transformative driver towards collaborative urban regeneration? Answers from Spain. European Journal of American Studies, 10 (3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.11354.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C.-L., Lai, Y.-J., and Liu, T.-Y., 1993. A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Computers & Operations Research, 20 (8), 889–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaempf-Dern, A., & Höing, A. (2019). Effective decision-making for municipal real estates. 26th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference. https://dx.doi.org/10.15396/eres2019_341
   Google Scholar
• Kain, J.H., and Söderberg, H., 2008. Management of complex knowledge in planning for sustainable development: The use of multi-criteria decision aids. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28 (1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klumbyte, E., Bliudzius, R., and Fokaides, P., 2020. Development and application of municipal residential buildings facilities management model. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klumbytė, E., et al., 2021. An MCDM model for sustainable decision-making in municipal residential buildings facilities management. Sustainability 13 (5), 2820. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkinos, K., Karayannis, V., and Moustakas, K., 2020. Circular bio-economy via energy transition supported by Fuzzy Cognitive Map modeling towards sustainable low-carbon environment. Science of the Total Environment, 721, 137754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magdi, S.A., 2021. An interdisciplinary assessment model for supporting decision making in urban regeneration plans: A case study of the Maspero Triangle, Cairo City, Egypt. Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 14 (4), 377–399.
   Google Scholar
• Manganelli, B., Tataranna, S., and Pontrandolfi, P., 2020. A model to support the decision-making in urban regeneration. Land Use Policy, 99, 104865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti, I., and Riganti, P., 2021. Valuing urban regeneration projects: The case of the Navigli, Milan. City, Culture and Society, 26, 100415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2021.100415
   Google Scholar
• Mazzuto, G., Bevilacqua, M., and Ciarapica, F.E., 2017. A heuristic scheduling algorithm based on fuzzy logic and critical chain project management. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 9 (4), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2017.088244
   Google Scholar
• Mota, C. M. d M., de Almeida, A.T., and Alencar, L.H., 2009. A multiple criteria decision model for assigning priorities to activities in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 27 (2), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R., and Zielniewicz, P., 1999. ELECTRE TRI 2.0 a methodological guide and user’s manual. In Document du LAMSADE (Vol. 111). Paris, France: Université Paris-Dauphine.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, M., and Nadler, C., 2018. Promoting investment in sustainable urban development with JESSICA: Outcomes of a new EU policy initiative. Urban Studies, 55 (9), 1839–1858. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017702815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahiduzzaman, K.M., Aldosary, A.S., and Rahman, M.T., 2015. Flood induced vulnerability in strategic plan making process of Riyadh city. Habitat International, 49, 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nail, S. N., and Fée, D., 2018. Vers une renaissance anglaise ? Dix ans de politique travailliste de la ville - The Role of the Historic Environment in Facilitating an Urban Renaissance - Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. Paris: OpenEdition Books.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, G., et al., 2020. Supporting public decision process in buildings energy retrofitting operations: The application of a Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding model to a case study in Southern Italy. Sustainable Cities and Society, 60, 102214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasser, N., 2003. Planning for urban heritage places: reconciling conservation, tourism, and sustainable development. Journal of Planning Literature, 17 (4), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412203017004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesticò, A., Elia, C., and Naddeo, V., 2020. Sustainability of urban regeneration projects: Novel selection model based on analytic network process and zero-one goal programming. Land Use Policy, 99, 104831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesticò, A., et al., 2022. Multi-criteria methods for the optimal localization of urban green areas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 374, 133690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauna, T., et al., 2021. Challenges for implementing collaborative practices in industrial engineering projects. Project Leadership and Society, 2, 100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100029
   Google Scholar
• Pazzini, M., et al., 2022. Multi-criteria analysis and decision-making approach for the urban regeneration: the application to the Rimini Canal Port (Italy). Sustainability, 15 (1), 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintossi, N., Ikiz Kaya, D., and Pereira Roders, A., 2021. Assessing cultural heritage adaptive reuse practices: multi-scale challenges and solutions in Rijeka. Sustainability, 13 (7), 3603. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontrandolfo, P., 2000. Project duration in stochastic networks by the PERT-path technique. International Journal of Project Management, 18 (3), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00015-0
   Google Scholar
• Riabacke, M., et al., 2009. A prescriptive approach for eliciting imprecise weight statements in an MCDA Process. In: F. Rossi, A. Tsoukias, eds. Algorithmic Decision Theory. ADT 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5783. Berlin: Springer, 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04428-1_15
   Google Scholar
• Ribera, F., et al., 2020. A multicriteria approach to identify the Highest and Best Use for historical buildings. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 41, 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Rigillo, M., and Cervelli, E., 2014. Mapping urban vulnerability: the case study of Gran Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. Advanced Engineering Forum, 11, 142–148. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.11.142
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B., 1973. How outranking relation helps multiple criteria decision making. In J. Cochrane and Zeleny M. (Ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making (pp. 179–201). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B., 1993. Aide multicritére à la décision: méthodes et cas. Paris: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Ruá, M.J., et al., 2021. A model to prioritise sustainable urban regeneration in vulnerable areas using SWOT and CAME methodologies. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36 (4), 1603–1627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09813-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruá, M.J., et al., 2019. A simplified model to assess vulnerable areas for urban regeneration. Sustainable Cities and Society, 46, 101440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, J., and Yepes, V., 2018. Urban vulnerability assessment: Advances from the strategic planning outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production, 179, 544–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, O.P., Terlizzi, M.A., and de Moraes, H. R. d O. C., 2017. Cost and time project management success factors for information systems development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35 (8), 1608–1626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoyo-Castelazo, E., and Azapagic, A., 2014. Sustainability assessment of energy systems: Integrating environmental, economic and social aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 80, 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarnataro, M., Barbati, M., and Greco, S., 2020. A portfolio approach for the selection and the timing of urban planning projects. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 75, 100908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100908
   Google Scholar
• Sassanelli, C., et al., 2019. Circular economy performance assessment methods: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., and Thornhill, A., 2012. Research methods for business students. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Suppa, A.R., Cavana, G., and Binda, T., 2022. Supporting the EU Mission “100 Climate-Neutral Cities by 2030": A Review of Tools to Support Decision-Making for the Built Environment at District or City Scale. In: O. Gervasi, B. Murgante, S. Misra, A.M.A.C. Rocha, C. Garau, eds. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2022 Workshops. ICCSA 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13380. Cham: Springer, 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10542-5_11
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira Dias, F., et al., 2023. Sustainable development with environmental, social and governance: Strategies for urban sustainability. Sustainable Development, 31 (1), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thekdi, S.A., and Joshi, N.N., 2016. Prioritization of capacity investment projects with stakeholder divergence criteria for coordinated infrastructure development. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 22 (2), 04015019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, C.S., Karrbom Gustavsson, T., and Karvonen, A., 2021. Grand challenges facing our cities: where construction management research meets the urban field. Construction Management and Economics, 39 (10), 874–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1972400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, D.H., 2020. Optimizing time–cost in generalized construction projects using multiple-objective social group optimization and multi-criteria decision-making methods. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27 (9), 2287–2313. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2019-0412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trentanovi, G., et al., 2021. Integrating spontaneous urban woodlands into the green infrastructure: Unexploited opportunities for urban regeneration. Land Use Policy, 102, 105221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. In A New Era in Global Health, New York. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Universitè Laval. (2023). MCDA-ULaval: a software tool for multicriteria decision aiding. https://mcda.fsa.ulaval.ca/
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer, J., et al., 2020. Multi-criteria decision analysis and quality of design decisions in infrastructure tenders: a contractor’s perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 38 (2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1577559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzberg, J., et al., 2021. Do we need a new sustainability assessment method for the circular economy? A critical literature review. Frontiers in Sustainability, 1, 620047. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2020.620047
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., et al., 2021. Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Land Use Policy, 107, 105479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E.K., et al., 2021. An integrated assessment of the municipal buildings’ use including sustainability criteria. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, 102708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, H.W., Shen, G.Q., and Wang, H., 2014. A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal. Habitat International, 41, 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, T., and Zhou, Y., 2015. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of urban regeneration decision-making based on entropy weight method: Case study of Yuzhong Peninsula, China. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 29 (6), 2661–2668. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-151969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar