Realist evaluation of a pilot intervention implementing interprofessional and interinstitutional processes for transitional care

References

• Amelung, V., Stein, V., Suter, E., Goodwin, N., Nolte, E., and Balicer, R. (Eds.). (2021). Handbook integrated care (2nd ed.). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69262-9
   Google Scholar
• Auschra, C. (2018). Barriers to the integration of care in inter-organisational settings: A literature review. Int J Integr Care, 18(1), 5 doi:https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson, R., & Bihari Axelsson, S. (2006). Integration and collaboration in public health—A conceptual framework. Int. J. Health Plan. Manag., 21(1), 75–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berchtold, P., Reich, O., Schimmann, F., & Zanoni, U. (2017). Modèles de rémunération liée à la performance à l’horizon 2025 [Pay-for-performance models towards 2025] Matière à réflexion No 3). Neuaegeri, Switzerland: Forum Managed Care Retrieved 10 06 2017. www.fmc.ch
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, F., Goodman, C., Russell, B., Wilson, P., Manthorpe, J., Rait, G., & Durand, M.-A. (2018, 18). Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: A realist synthesis. BMC Geriatrics, 18(1), 165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0853-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman, K. L., Dardess, P., Maurer, M., Sofaer, S., Adams, K., Bechtel, C., & Sweeney, J. (2013). Patient and family engagement: A framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Affairs (Millwood), 32(2), 223–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, E. A., & Berenson, R. A. (2004). Lost in transition: Challenges and opportunities for improving the quality of transitional care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 141(7), 533–536. doi:https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, E. A., Roman, S. P., Hall, K. A., & Min, S. (2015). Enhancing the care transitions intervention protocol to better address the needs of family caregivers. J Healthc Qual, 37(1), 2–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JHQ.0000460118.60567.fe
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collerette, P., Schneider, R., & Lauzier, M. (2013). Le pilotage du changement [Change management] (2nd ed., 293 p. ISBN 978-2-7605-2533-7). Quebec, Canada: University of Quebec Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coventry, P. A., Small, N., Panagioti, M., Adeyemi, I., & Bee, P. (2015). Living with complexity; marshalling resources: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of lived experience of mental and physical multimorbidity. BMC Family Practice, 16(171), 12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0345-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., San Martin, R. L., & Beaulieu, M. D. (2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. J Interprof Care, 19(Suppl 1), 116–131 doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820500082529.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalkin, S. M., Greenhalgh, J., Jones, D., Cunningham, B., & Lhussier, M. (2015). What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implement Sci, 10(1), 49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0237-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pietro, C., Camenzind, P., Sturny, I., Crivelli, L., Edwards-Garavoglia, S., Spranger, A., Wittenbecher, F., and Wilm, Q., 2015). Health system review: Switzerland Health Systems in Transition No 4, Vol. 17). Copenhagen, Denmark: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Retrieved 25 02 2017. www.euro.who.int
   Google Scholar
• Dyrstad, D. N., Testad, I., Aase, K., & Storm, M. (2015). A review of the literature on patient participation in transitions of the elderly. Cognition, Technology & Work, 17(1), 15–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0300-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggli, Y., Schaller, P., & Baudoin, F. (2015). Évaluation d’une structure gériatrique entre l’ambulatoire et l’hospitalier [Evaluation of a geriatric structure between outpatient and inpatient settings]. Santé publique, 1(HS), 167–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.150.0167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emmel, N., Greenhalgh, J., Manzano, A., Monaghan, M., and Dalkin, S. (Eds.). (2018). Doing realist research (1st ed., 251 p. ISBN 978-1-4739-7789-1). Los Angeles, USA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, B., McAuliffe, E., Power, J., & Vallières, F. (2019). Data analysis and synthesis within a realist evaluation: Toward more transparent methodological approaches. Int J Qual Methods, 18, 11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919859754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graffigna, G., & Barello, S. (2018). Spotlight on the Patient Health Engagement model (PHE model): A psychosocial theory to understand people’s meaningful engagement in their own health care. Patient Prefer. Adherence, 12, 1261–1271. doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S145646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Kyriakidou, O., & Peacock, R. (2004). How to spread good ideas : A systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation). London, UK: National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO) Retrieved 08 06 2018. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
   Google Scholar
• Gurtner, S., & Wettstein, M. (2019). Interprofessionelle Zusammenarbeit im Gesundheitswesen - Anreize und Hindernisse in der Berufsausübung [Interprofessional collaboration in the health sector: Facilitators and obstacles in professional practices]). Bern, Switzerland: Federal office of public health Retrieved 17 10 2019. www.bag.admin.ch
   Google Scholar
• imad. (2020). Institution genevoise de maintien à domicile (imad) [Geneva institution for homecare and assistance] [Internet]. Retrieved from www.imad-ge.ch
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, N., Amann, F., Meier, N., Inderbitzi, L., Haering, B., Eicher, M., and Stanic, J, 2019). Berufsausübung: Potenziale für Interprofessionalität [Professional practice: Potentials for interprofessionality] (90 p. Retrieved 18 10 2019). Bern, Switzerland: Federal office of public health (FOPH). www.bag.admin.ch
   Google Scholar
• Karam, M., Brault, I., Van Durme, T., & Macq, J. (2018). Comparing interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in healthcare: A systematic review of the qualitative research. Int J Nurs Stud, 79, 70–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karazivan, P., Dumez, V., Flora, L., Pomey, M.-P., Del Grande, C., Ghadiri, D. P., & Lebel, P. (2015). The Patient-as-Partner approach in health care: A conceptual framework for a necessary transition. Academic Medicine, 90(4), 437–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kripalani, S., LeFevre, F., Phillips, C. O., Williams, M. V., Basaviah, P., & Baker, D. W. (2007). Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: Implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA, 297(8), 831–841. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.8.831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalani, M., Fernandes, J., Fradgley, R., Ogunsola, C., & Marshall, M. (2019). Transforming community nursing services in the UK; lessons from a participatory evaluation of the implementation of a new community nursing model in East London based on the principles of the Dutch Buurtzorg model. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 945. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4804-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malengreaux, S., Doumont, D., & Aujoulat, I. (2020,). L’approche réaliste pour évaluer les interventions de promotion de la santé: éclairages théoriques [The realistic approach to evaluating health promotion interventions: Theoretical insights]). Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Service universitaire de promotion de la santé de l’Université catholique de Louvain Retrieved 14 06 2020. https://promosante.org
   Google Scholar
• Manzano, A. (2016). The craft of interviewing in realist evaluation. Evaluation, 22(3), 342–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389016638615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, C. R., Johnson, M., & Finch, T. (2016). Implementation, context and complexity. Implementation Science, 11(1), 141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0506-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merten, H., Van Galen, L. S., & Wagner, C. (2017, 9). Safe handover. BMJ, 359, j4328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mickan, S. M., & Rodger, S. A. (2005). Effective health care teams: A model of six characteristics developed from shared perceptions. J Interprof Care, 19(4), 358–370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820500165142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monsen, K. A., & De Blok, J. (2013). Buurtzorg Nederland: A nurse-led model of care has revolutionized home care in the Netherlands. AJN, 113(8), 55–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000432966.26257.97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nutt, M., & Hungerford, C. (2010, August). Nurse care coordinators: Definitions and scope of practice. Contemporary Nurse, 36(1–2), 71–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.2010.36.1-2.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation 235 p. ISBN 9780761950080). London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Philibert, I., & Barach, P. (2012). The European HANDOVER Project: A multi-nation program to improve transitions at the primary care—inpatient interface. BMJ Quality & Safety, 21(Suppl 1), i1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001598
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poitras, M.-E., Hudon, C., Godbout, I., Bujold, M., Pluye, P., Vaillancourt, V. T., Debarges, B., Poirier, A., Prevost, K., Spence, C., and Legare, F., 2019). Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13325.
   Google Scholar
• Punton, M., Vogel, I., & Loyd, R. (2016). Reflections from a realist evaluation in progress: Scaling ladders and stitching theory (Centre for Development Impact Practice Paper Nr 18). UK: UK Department for International Development Retrieved 03 03 2020. www.ids.ac.uk/cdi
   Google Scholar
• Redding, D., Gentry, T., Shand, J., and Stuart, L. (2014). I’m still me: A narrative for coordinated support for older people). UK: National Voices, Age UK & UCL Partners Retrieved 16 01 2017. www.nationalvoices.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Sav, A., King, M. A., Whitty, J. A., Kendall, E., McMillan, S. S., Kelly, F., & Wheeler, A. J. (2015, June). Burden of treatment for chronic illness: A concept analysis and review of the literature. Health Expectations, 18(3), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, C., Atzeni, G., & Berchtold, P. (2020). Interprofessionelle Zusammenarbeit in der Gesundheitsversorgung: Erfolgskritische Dimensionen und Fördermassnahmen [Interprofessional cooperation in health care: Critical dimensions and support measures]. Swiss Academies Communications, 15(2), 136 Retrieved 18 02 2020 www.samw.ch.
   Google Scholar
• Schusselé Filliettaz, S., Moiroux, S., Marchand, G., Gilles, I., & Peytremann-Bridevaux, I. (2021, March). Transitional shared decision-making processes for patients with complex needs: A feasibility study. J Eval Clin Pract., 1–9 org/10.1111/jep.13561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnott, C., Georgiadis, A., Park, J., & Dixon-Woods, M. (2020). Impacts of operational failures on primary care physicians’ work: A critical interpretive synthesis of the literature. Ann Fam Med, 18(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Reedt Dortland, A. K. B., Peters, L. L., Boenink, A. D., Smit, J. H., Slaets, J. P. J., Hoogendoorn, A. W., … Ferrari, S. (2017). Assessment of biopsychosocial complexity and health care needs: Measurement properties of the INTERMED self-assessment version. Psychosomatic Medicine, 79(4), 485–492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, G., Westhorp, G., Greenhalgh, J., Manzano, A., Jagosh, J., & Greenhalgh, T. (2017). Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: The RAMESES II project. Health Serv Res, 5(28), 1–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr05280
   Google Scholar