What Information Are Researchers Looking for? Patterns of users’ Information Needs in CIDOC CRM

References

• CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (International Committee for Documentation, May 2023), https://www.cidoc-crm.org/Version/version-7.2.3.
   Google Scholar
• Robert S. Taylor, Question-Negotiation and Information Seeking in Libraries (Studies in the ManSystem Interface in Libraries, Report no. 3, July 1967).
   Google Scholar
• William J. Paisley and Edwin B. Parker, “Information Retrieval as a Receiver-Controlled Communication System,” in Proceedings of the Symposium on Education for Information Science (Washington, DC: Spartan Books, 1965), 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ian Ruthven and Diane Kelly, eds., Interactive Information Seeking, Behaviour and Retrieval (Facet Publishing, 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Brenda Dervin and Michael Nilan, “Information Needs and Uses,” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 21 (1986): 3–33.
   Google Scholar
• Brenda Dervin, “Information as a User Construct: The Relevance of Perceived Information Needs to Synthesis and Interpretation,” in Knowledge Structure and Use: Implications for Synthesis and Interpretation, ed. Spencer A. Ward and Linda J. Reed (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1983), 155–83;
   Google Scholar
  Brenda Dervin, “From the Mind’s Eye of the User: The Sense-Making Qualitative-Quantitative Methodology,” Qualitative Research in Information Management 9 (1992): 61–84.
   Google Scholar
• George Alexander Kelly, Clinical Psychology and Personality: The Selected Papers of George Kelly, ed. Brendan Arnold Maher (Wiley, 1969).
   Google Scholar
• Peter Ingwersen, “Search Procedures in the Library—Analysed from the Cognitive Point of View,” Journal of Documentation 38, no. 3 (1982): 165–91. doi:10.1108/eb026727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, Clinical Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Tom D. Wilson, “The Cognitive Approach to Information-Seeking Behaviour and Information Use,” Social Science Information Studies 4, no. 2-3 (1984): 197–204. doi:10.1016/0143-6236(84)90076-0
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas J. Belkin, “Anomalous States of Knowledge as a Basis for Information Retrieval,” Canadian Journal of Information Science 5, no. 1 (1980): 133–143.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas J. Belkin, Robert N. Oddy, and Helen M. Brooks, “ASK for Information Retrieval: Part I. Background and Theory,” Journal of Documentation 38, no. 2 (1982): 61–71. doi:10.1108/eb026722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pia Borlund, “The Cognitive Viewpoint: The Essence of Information Retrieval Interaction,” in The Janus Faced Scholar. A Festschrift in Honor of Peter Ingwersen (Royal School of Library and Information Science, 2010), 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Tefko Saracevic, “The Stratified Model of Information Retrieval Interaction: Extension and Application,” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science 34 (1997): 313–27.
   Google Scholar
• Brenda Dervin, “Sense‐Making Theory and Practice: An Overview of User Interests in Knowledge Seeking and Use,” Journal of Knowledge Management 2, no. 2 (1998): 36–46. doi:10.1108/13673279810249369
   Google Scholar
• Peter Ingwersen, “Cognitive Analysis and the Role of the Intermediary in Information Retrieval,” in Intelligent Information Systems (Horwood, 1986), 206–37.
   Google Scholar
• Peter Ingwersen and Kalervo Järvelin, The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context (Springer, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Tom D. Wilson, “Models in Information Behaviour Research,” Journal of Documentation 55, no. 3 (1999): 249–270. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elaine G. Toms, “Task-Based Information Searching and Retrieval,” in Interactive Information Seeking, Behaviour and Retrieval, ed. Ian Ruthven and Diane Kelly (Facet, 2011), 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas R. Gruber, “Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing?,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43, no. 5-6 (1995): 907–28. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pragya Agarwal, “Ontological Considerations in GIScience,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19, no. 5 (2005): 501–36. doi:10.1080/13658810500032321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo Obrst, “Ontologies for Semantically Interoperable Systems,” in Proceedings of the Twelfth,” International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Association for Computing Machinery, 2003), 366–9. doi:10.1145/956863.956932
   Google Scholar
• Maja Žumer and Patrick Le Bœuf, “Conceptual Models: Museums & Libraries: Towards an Object-Oriented Formulation of FRBR Aligned on the CIDOC CRM Ontology,” in New Tools and New Library Practices, 30th ELAG Seminar (Bucharest, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonisation. FRBR Object-Oriented Definition and Mapping from FRBRER, FRAD and FRSAD (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, September 2017), https://repository.ifla.org/handle/123456789/659.
   Google Scholar
• IFLA LRMoo Working Group with the CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. LRMoo (Formerly FRBRoo) Object-Oriented Definition and Mapping from IFLA LRM (Currently Under Review for Approval by International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, May 2023), https://www.cidoc-crm.org/frbroo/ModelVersion/lrmoo-formerly-frbroo-version-0.9.4
   Google Scholar
• Barbara M. Wildemuth, ed., Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, 2nd ed. (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Yvonna S. Lincoln and Egon G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry, vol. 75 (Sage, 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Linda Dale Bloomberg and Marie Volpe, Completing Your Qualitative Dissertation: A Road Map from Beginning to End (Sage Publications, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Juliet M. Corbin and Anselm Strauss, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd ed. (Sage Publications, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Karen Holtzblatt and Hugh Beyer, Contextual Design: Evolved (Morgan & Claypool, 2014); Hugh Beyer and Karen Holtzblatt, “Contextual Design,” Interactions 6, no. 1 (1999): 32–42; Mary Elizabeth Raven, and Alicia Flanders, “Using Contextual Inquiry to Learn about Your Audiences,” ACM SIGDOC Asterisk Journal of Computer Documentation 20, no. 1 (1996): 1–13. doi:10.1145/227614.227615
   Google Scholar
• Holtzblatt and Beyer, Contextual Design.
   Google Scholar
• Sharan B. Merriam and Elizabeth J. Tisdell, Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (John Wiley & Sons, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Steffen Hennicke, “What is the Real Question? An Empirical-Ontological Approach to the Interpretative Analysis of Archival Reference Questions” (PhD diss., Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Trond Aalberg, Audun Vennesland, and Maliheh Farrokhnia, “A Pattern-Based Framework for Best Practice Implementation of CRM/FRBRoo,” in New Trends in Databases and Information Systems: ADBIS 2015 Short Papers and Workshops, BigDap, DCSA, GID, MEBIS, OAIS, SW4CH, WISARD, Poitiers, France, September 8-11, 2015. Proceedings (New York City: Springer International Publishing, 2015), 438–47.
   Google Scholar
• Maliheh Farrokhnia, “Searching for Cultural Heritage Information: Ontology-Based Modeling of User Needs” (PhD diss., Oslo Metropolitan University, 2019).
   Google Scholar