655
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Women’s experiences after abnormal Pap smear results: a qualitative study

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 22-29 | Received 22 Feb 2019, Accepted 13 Aug 2019, Published online: 27 Aug 2019

References

  • Issah F, Maree JE, Mwinituo PP. Expressions of cervical cancer related signs and symptoms. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011;15:67–72.
  • American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2017 (Internet). America [cited 2017 Nov 11]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2017/cancer-facts-and-figures-2017.pdf.
  • Haberal A. Innovations in the etiology and epidemiology of gynecologic cancers. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obstetrics - Special Topics. 2015;8:1–7.
  • ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer. Human Papillomavirus and Related Cancers, Fact Sheet 2017 (Turkey). Turkey [cited 2017 Nov 11]. Available from: http://www.hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/TUR_FS.pdf.
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. Cervical Cancer [Internet]. Turkey [cited 2017 Nov 11]. Available from: http://kanser.gov.tr/kanser/kanser-turleri/56-serviks-kanseri.html.
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. Cervical Cancer. Non-Communicable Diseases-Programs and Cancer Department [Internet]. Turkey [cited 2017 Nov 17]. Available from: http://kanser.gov.tr/Dosya/Bilgi-Dokumanlari/raporlar/birim.pdf.
  • Janssen LT, Schijf C. What do women think about abnormal smear test results? A qualitative interview study. J Psychosomatic Obstetrics Gynecol. 2005;26:141–145.
  • Lerman C, Miller SM, Scarborough R, et al. Adverse psychologic consequences of positive cytologic cervical screening. Am J Obstetrics Gynecol. 1991;165:658–662.
  • Gray NM, Sharp L, Cotton SC, et al. Psychological effects of a low-grade abnormal cervical smear test result: anxiety and associated factors. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1253–1262.
  • Monsonego J, Cortes J, Silva DP, et al. Psychological impact, support and information needs for women with an abnormal Pap smear: comparative results of a questionnaire in three European countries. BMC Women's Health. 2011;11:2–7.
  • Vishnu Renjith V, Pai MS, Castalino F, et al. Engel’s model as a conceptual framework in nursing research. Holistic Nurs Pract. 2016;30:96–101.
  • Cabaniss DL, Diana E, Moga D, et al. Rethinking the biopsychosocial formulation. The Lancet. 2015;2:579–581.
  • Pilgrim D. The biopsychosocial model in health research: its strengths and limitations for critical realists. J Crit Realism. 2015;14:164–180.
  • Maissi E, Marteau TM, Hankins M, et al. Psychological impact of human Papillomavirus testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear test results: cross sectional questionnaire study. BMJ. 2004. 328:1293–1299.
  • McCaffery K, Waller J, Forrest S, et al. Testing positive for human Papillomavirus in routine cervical screening: examination of psychosocial impact. BJOG: An Internal J Obstetrics Gynecol. 2004;111:1437–1443.
  • Greiner PA. Health defined: objectives for promotion and prevention. In: Edelman CL, Kudzma EC, Mandle CL, editors. Health promotion, 8th ed. Canada: Elsevier; 2014. p. 1–72.
  • World Health Organization [Internet]. [cited 2017 Nov 17]. Available from: http://www.who.int/about/en/.
  • Gursoy A, Yigitbas C, Yilmaz F, et al. The effects of peer education on university students’ knowledge of breast self-examination and health beliefs. J Breast Health. 2009;5:135–140.
  • Narter M. Social representations of health and illness. Studs Psychol. 2004;24:57–77.
  • Diefenbach MA. Illness representations. Health behavior constructs: theory, measurement and research, cancer control and population sciences [Internet]. US: National Cancer Institute [cited 2017 Nov 11]. Available from: http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/constructs.
  • Leventhal H, Nerenz DR, Steele DJ. Illness representations and coping with health threats. In: Baum A, Taylor SE, Singer JE, editors. Handbook of psychology and health, Volume IV: social psychological aspects of health. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1984.
  • Akyuz A, Guvenc G, Yavan T, et al. Evaluation of the Pap smear test status of women and of the factors affecting this status. Gulhane Med J. 2006;48:25–29.
  • Kalyoncu C, Isıklı B, Ozalp S, et al. Test results knowledge, attitudes and behaviors about Pap smear of whom apply to Osmangazi University obstetrics and gynecology clinic. J Health Soc. 2003;13:60–66.
  • Karaca M, Palancı Y, Aksu SR. How common is Pap smear test known and performed? J Clin Obstetrics Gynecol. 2008;18:22–28.
  • Tascı S. Cultural factors affecting health and disease In: Sevig U, Tanriverdi G, editors. Intercultural Nurs. Istanbul: Istanbul Medical; 2012.
  • Camperson C. Women’s emotional experiences with gynecological oncology [Doctor of Philosophy]. The University of Texas at Arlington; 2009.
  • Lauver DR, Connolly-Nelson K, Vang P. Stressors and coping strategies among female cancer survivors after treatments. Cancer Nurs. 2007;30:101–111.
  • Evcili F, Bekar M. Psychosocial dimension of gynecological cancer diagnosis and nursing approaches. Turk J Gynecologic Oncol. 2013;1:21–28.
  • Wenzel LB, Donnelly JP, Fowler JM, et al. Resilience, reflections, and residual stress in ovarian cancer survivorship: a gynecologic oncology group study. Psycho-Oncology. 2002;11:142–153.
  • Markovic M, Kesic V, Topic L, et al. Barriers to cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study with women in Serbia. Social Sci Med. 2005;61:2528–2535.
  • Smit M, French L, Barry CH. Periodic abstinence from Pap (PAP) smear study: women’s perceptions of pap smear screening. Ann Family Med. 2003;1:203–208.
  • Rask M, Swahnberg K, Lindell G, et al. Women’s experiences of abnormal Pap smear results- a qualitative study. Sexual Reprod Health Care. 2017;12:3–8.
  • Arabacı Z, Ozsoy S. The pap-smear test experience of women in Turkey: a qualitative study. Asia Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:5687–5690.
  • Wong LP, Wong YL, Low WY, et al. Knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer and screening among Malaysian women who have never had a pap smear: a qualitative study. Singapore Med J. 2009;50:49–53.
  • McMullin MJ, De Alba I, Chavez LR, et al. Influence of beliefs about cervical cancer etiology on pap smear use among Latina immigrants. Ethnicity and Health. 2005;10:3–18.
  • Sarıkoc G, Demiralp M. Psychosocial response to illness. In: Oz F, Demiralp M, editors. Psychosocial nursing for general patient care. Ankara: Academician Medical Bookstore; 2014.
  • MarváN ML, Ehrenzweig Y, Catillo-LóPez RL. Knowledge about cervical cancer prevention and psychosocial barriers to screening among Mexican women. J Psychosomatic Obstetrics Gynecol. 2013;34:163–169.
  • Juraskova I, Butow P, Sharpe L, et al. What does it mean?’ Uncertainty, trust and communication following treatment for pre-cancerous cervical abnormalities. Psycho-Oncology. 2007;16:525–533.
  • Karasz A, McKee MD, Roybal K. Women’s experiences of abnormal cervical cytology: illness representations, care processes, and outcomes. Ann Family Med. 2003;1:196–202.
  • Mortensen GL, Adeler AL. Qualitative study of women’s anxiety and information needs after a diagnosis of cervical dysplasia. J Public Health. 2010;18:473–482.
  • Bosgraaf RP, de Jager WCC, Servaes P, et al. Qualitative insights into the psychological stress before and during colposcopy: a focus group study. J Psychosomatic Obstetrics Gynecol. 2013;34:150–156.
  • Fleurence RL, Dixon JM, Milanova TF, et al. Review of the economic and quality-of-life burden of cervical human Papillomavirus disease. Am J Obstetrics Gynecol. 2007;196:206–212.
  • Duran ET. Examination with the health belief model of women’s attitudes to cervical cancer and early diagnosis in Turkey: a qualitative study. Asia Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12:1179–1184.
  • Johnson C, Mues K, Mayne S, et al. Cervical cancer screening among immigrants and ethnic minorities: a systematic review using the health belief model. J Lower Genital Tract Dis. 2008;12:232–241.
  • White1 HL, Mulambia C, Sinkala M, et al. Motivations and experiences of women who accessed “see and treat” cervical cancer prevention services in Zambia. J Psychosomatic Obstetrics Gynecol. 2012;33:91–98.
  • Kroenke CH, Kubzansky LD, Schernhammer ES, et al. Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1105–1111.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.