The trends and hotspots of research on non-pharmacological interventions for labor pain management: a bibliometric analysis

References

• Leinweber J, Fontein‐Kuipers Y, Karlsdottir SI, et al. Developing a woman‐centered, inclusive definition of positive childbirth experiences: a discussion paper. Birth. 2023;50(2):1–17. doi:10.1111/birt.12666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyable AA, Bayable SD, Ashebir YG. Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic labor pain management techniques in a resource-limited setting: a systematic review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;74:103312. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnham T. Reviewing pain management options for patients in active labor. Nursing. 2020;50(6):24–30. doi:10.1097/01.NURSE.0000662352.97953.cd
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zuarez-Easton S, Erez O, Zafran N, et al. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological options for pain relief during labor: an expert review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S1246–S1259. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu Y, Lu H, Huang J, et al. Efficacy and safety of non‐pharmacological interventions for labour pain management: a systematic review and bayesian network meta‐analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2021;30(23-24):3398–3414. doi:10.1111/jocn.15865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen WR, Friedman EA. The latent phase of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S1017–S1024. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.029
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Šanjug J, Kuna K, Goldštajn MŠ, et al. Relationship between COMT gene polymorphism, anxiety, and pain perception during labour. J Clin Med. 2023;12(19):6298. doi:10.3390/jcm12196298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughey AB, Tilden E. Nonpharmacologic approaches to management of labour pain. UpToDate Waltham, MA: upToDate 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gülümser C, Yassa M, Group W, et al. Clinical management of uterine contraction abnormalities; an evidence‐based intrapartum care algorithm. BJOG. 2022; doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. WHO recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: world Health Organization; 2018
   Google Scholar
• Wray S, Arrowsmith S, Sharp A. Pharmacological ınterventions in labor and delivery. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023;63(1):471–489. doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-051921-122822
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith CA, Collins CT, Cyna AM, et al. Complementary and alternative therapies for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2006(4):CD003521. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003521.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Practice CoO. ACOG committee opinion no. 766: approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e164–e173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nori W, Kassim MAK, Helmi ZR, et al. Non-pharmacological pain management in labor: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(23):7203. doi:10.3390/jcm12237203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012; doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakala M, Rantala A, Pölkki T. Women’s perceptions of counselling on pain assessment and management during labour in Finland: a cross-sectional survey. Midwifery. 2022;114:103471. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2022.103471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantala A, Hakala M, Pölkki T. Women’s perceptions of the pain assessment and non-pharmacological pain relief methods used during labor: a cross-sectional survey. Eur J Midwifery. 2022;6:21. doi:10.18332/ejm/146136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodrigues VA, Abreu YR, Santos CA, et al. Nonpharmacological labor pain management methods and risk of cesarean birth: a retrospective cohort study. Birth. 2022;49(3):464–473. doi:10.1111/birt.12617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C-Y, Gau M-L, Huang C-J, et al. Effects of non-pharmacological coping strategies for reducing labor pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(1):e0261493. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson G, Feeley C, Moran VH, et al. Women’s experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):71. doi:10.1186/s12978-019-0735-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kokol P, Vošner HB. Discrepancies among scopus, web of science, and PubMed coverage of funding information in medical journal articles. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(1):81–86. doi:10.5195/jmla.2018.181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokol P, Završnik J, Vošner HB. Bibliographic-based identification of hot future research topics: an opportunity for hospital librarianship. Journal of Hospital Librarianship. 2018;18(4):315–322. doi:10.1080/15323269.2018.1509193
   Google Scholar
• Kokol P, Kokol M, Zagoranski S. Machine learning on small size samples: a synthetic knowledge synthesis. Sci Prog. 2022;105(1):368504211029777. doi:10.1177/00368504211029777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogilović S, Černe M. The intellectual structure and outlooks for individual creativity research: a bibliometric analysis for the period 1950–2016. In: Roni Reiter-Palmon VLK, James C. Kaufman Hrsg, editors. Individual creativity in the workplace. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018: 153–188.
   Google Scholar
• Kokol P, Blažun Vošner H, Završnik J. Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis. Health Info Libr J. 2021;38(2):125–138. doi:10.1111/hir.12295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of İnformetrics. 2017;11(4):959–975. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heersmink R, van den Hoven J, van Eck NJ, et al. Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics. Ethics Inf Technol. 2011;13(3):241–249. doi:10.1007/s10676-011-9273-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie H, Niu N, Ming Z, et al. Evolving landscape of research on cancer-related cognitive impairment: a bibliometric analysis. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023;10(5):100217. doi:10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zhang Z, He X, et al. Mapping publication status and exploring hotspots in a research field: rheumatoid arthritis with depression. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76(11):3003–3013. doi:10.1111/jan.14504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez AD, de la Cruz Del Río Rama M, García JÁ. Bibliometric analysis of publications on wine tourism in the databases scopus and WoS. European Research on Management and Business Economics. 2017;23(1):8–15. doi:10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck N, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [Anonym]. Journal citation reports. In: clarivate Analytics; 2022
   Google Scholar
• Batista-Canino RM, Santana-Hernández L, Medina-Brito P. A scientometric analysis on entrepreneurial intention literature: delving deeper into local citation. Heliyon. 2023;9(2):e13046. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Rahwan I. Coauthorship network in transportation research. Transportation Research Part A: policy and Practice. 2017;100:135–151. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokol P, Železnik D, Završnik J, et al. Nursing research literature production in terms of the scope of country and health determinants: a bibliometric study. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019;51(5):590–598. doi:10.1111/jnu.12500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister JT, Lennertz L, Atencio Mojica Z. Mapping a discipline: a guide to using VOSviewer for bibliometric and visual analysis. Science & Technology Libraries. 2022;41(3):319–348. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2021.1991547
   Google Scholar
• You S. Perspective and future of evidence-based medicine. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2016;1(4):e000032–164.
   Google Scholar
• Aleixandre-Benavent R, Simon C, Fauser BC. Trends in clinical reproductive medicine research: 10 years of growth. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(1):131–137. e135. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahyuningsih IR, Putri NA, Sariayu MD, et al. The management of delıvery paın: a bıblıometrıc analysıs. Placentum J Ilmiah Kes Apl. 2023;11(2):185–193. doi:10.20961/placentum.v11i2.77264
   Google Scholar
• Hong SJ, Yoon DY, Cho YK, et al. Characteristics and quality of radiologic randomized controlled trials: a bibliometric analysis between 1995 and 2014. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(5):917–923. doi:10.2214/AJR.15.15640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieland LS, Manheimer E, Sampson M, et al. Bibliometric and content analysis of the cochrane complementary medicine field specialized register of controlled trials. Syst Rev. 2013;2(1):51. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-2-51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• [Anonym]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. In. Cochrane Library
   Google Scholar
• Klomp T, De Jonge A, Hutton EK, et al. Perceptions of labour pain management of Dutch primary care midwives: a focus group study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):6. doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0795-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nursanti R. The role of midwives in overcoming labor pain. In First International Conference on Health, Social Sciences and Technology (ICOHSST 2020): Atlantis Press; 2021: 27–31 doi:10.2991/assehr.k.210415.007
   Google Scholar
• Watson R, Tomietto M, Mikkonen K. Increasing the use of experimental methods in nursing and midwifery education research. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023;70:103674. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris C, Hare N, McCabe L, et al. A novel research competency framework for clinical research nurses and midwives. Nurse Res. 2023;31. doi:10.7748/nr.2023.e1900
   Google Scholar
• Li T, Zeng Y, Fan X, et al. A bibliometric analysis of research articles on midwifery based on the web of science. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023;16:677–692. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S398218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdi N, Salehi A, Vojoud M, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in pregnant women: a cross-sectional survey in the South of Iran. J Integr Med. 2019;17(6):392–395. doi:10.1016/j.joim.2019.09.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moeini R, Mozaffarpur SA, Mojahedi M, et al. The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use in the general population of babol, North of Iran, 2018. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021;21(1):113. doi:10.1186/s12906-021-03281-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mehrolhassani MH, Setayesh M, Yazdi-Feyzabadi V, et al. Identification of drivers and affecting factors in the future of persian medicine: the cross-impact analysis method. European Journal of Integrative Medicine. 2024;65:102316. doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2023.102316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnood-Rod A, Khoshkbejari MAP, Pourzargar P, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use among Iranian patients attending urban outpatient general practices. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;30:58–63. doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Chen X, Gao X, et al. Worldwide research productivity in the field of psychiatry. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2017;11(1):20. doi:10.1186/s13033-017-0127-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao X, Ye R, Zhao L, et al. Worldwide research productivity in the field of endocrinology and metabolism—a bibliometric analysis. Endokrynol Pol. 2015;66(5):434–442. doi:10.5603/EP.2015.0054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catsaros S, Wendland J. Hypnosis-based interventions during pregnancy and childbirth and their impact on women’s childbirth experience: a systematic review. Midwifery. 2020;84:102666. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2020.102666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landolt AS, Milling LS. The efficacy of hypnosis as an intervention for labor and delivery pain: a comprehensive methodological review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31(6):1022–1031. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan E, Heale R, Horrigan J, et al. Hydrotherapy as a nursing ıntervention for labour pain: a literature review. DRHJ. 2017;1:121–132. doi:10.28984/drhj.v1i0.10
   Google Scholar
• Schlaeger JM, Gabzdyl EM, Bussell JL, et al. Acupuncture and acupressure in labor. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017;62(1):12–28. doi:10.1111/jmwh.12545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagat V, Menon S. The efficacy of using hypnosis to reduce anxiety and pain in obstetrics and gynecology patients. Rese J Pharm and Technol. 2020;13(1):347–352. doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00070.0
   Google Scholar
• Wong MS, Spiegel BM, Gregory KD. Virtual reality reduces pain in laboring women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol. 2020;38(S 01):e167–e172. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1708851
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hajesmaeel-Gohari S, Sarpourian F, Shafiei E. Virtual reality applications to assist pregnant women: a scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):249. doi:10.1186/s12884-021-03725-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT, et al. Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018(3). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009514.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Candy B, Armstrong M, Flemming K, et al. The effectiveness of aromatherapy, massage and reflexology in people with palliative care needs: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2020;34(2):179–194. doi:10.1177/0269216319884198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo S, Li L, Wang C, et al. Effect of mind map assisting midwife-led labor on pain management and childbirth outcome. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2020;13:2790–2797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(1):305–310. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Xiang X-Y, Chin KHR, et al. Acupressure for labor pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acupunct Med. 2021;39(4):243–252. doi:10.1177/0964528420946044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raana HN, Fan X-N. The effect of acupressure on pain reduction during first stage of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Compl Ther Clin Pract. 2020;39:101126. doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CA, Collins CT, Levett KM, et al. Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009232.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuvarakan K, Zimmermann H, Mikkelsen MK, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as a pain-relieving approach in labor pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neuromodulation. 2020;23(6):732–746. doi:10.1111/ner.13221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams J, Frawley J, Steel A, et al. Use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological labour pain management techniques and their relationship to maternal and infant birth outcomes: examination of a nationally representative sample of 1835 pregnant women. Midwifery. 2015;31(4):458–463. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2014.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar