Comparison of activity trackers in estimating canine behaviors

References

• Owens A, Vinkemeier D, Elsheikha H. A review of applications of artificial intelligence in veterinary medicine. Companion Anim. 2023;28:78–85. doi:10.12968/coan.2022.0028a
   Google Scholar
• Zanello G, Srinivasan CS, Nkegbe P. Piloting the use of accelerometry devices to capture energy expenditure in agricultural and rural livelihoods: protocols and findings from northern Ghana. Dev Eng. 2017;2:114–131. doi:10.1016/j.deveng.2017.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Nathan R, Spiegel O, Fortmann-Roe S, et al. Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures. J Exp Biol. 2012;215:986–996. doi:10.1242/jeb.058602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton AJ, Rosen DA, Trites AW. Season and time of day affect the ability of accelerometry and the doubly labeled water methods to measure energy expenditure in northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2014;452:125–136. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2013.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamansky A, van der Linden D, Hadar I, et al. Log my dog: perceived impact of dog activity tracking. Computer. 2019;52:35–43. doi:10.1109/MC.2018.2889637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Väätäjä H, Majaranta P, Isokoski P, et al. Happy dogs and happy owners: using dog activity monitoring technology in everyday life. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction [Internet]. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2018. doi:10.1145/3295598.3295607.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott KH. Measurement of flying and diving metabolic rate in wild animals: review and recommendations. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2016;202:63–77. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halsey LG, Shepard EL, Wilson RP. Assessing the development and application of the accelerometry technique for estimating energy expenditure. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2011;158:305–314. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell HA, Gao L, Bidder OR, et al. Creating a behavioural classification module for acceleration data: using a captive surrogate for difficult to observe species. J Exp Biol. 2013;216:4501–4506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapa JM, Maschat K, Iwersen M, et al. Accelerometer systems as tools for health and welfare assessment in cattle and pigs – a review. Behav Processes. 2020;181:104262. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown DC, Boston RC, Farrar JT. Use of an activity monitor to detect response to treatment in dogs with osteoarthritis. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010;237:66–70. doi:10.2460/javma.237.1.66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodin M, Bergh A, Gustås P, et al. Inertial sensor-based system for lameness detection in trotting dogs with induced lameness. Vet J. 2017;222:54–59. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm J, McBrearty A, Fontaine S, et al. Use of accelerometry to investigate physical activity in dogs receiving chemotherapy. J Small Anim Pract. 2016;57:600–609. doi:10.1111/jsap.12587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke N, Fraser D. Automated monitoring of resting in dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2016;174:99–102. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2015.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westgarth C, Ladha C. Evaluation of an open source method for calculating physical activity in dogs from harness and collar based sensors. BMC Vet Res. 2017;13:1–7. doi:10.1186/s12917-017-1228-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam P, Penpraze V, Young D, et al. Validity, practical utility and reliability of actigraph accelerometry for the measurement of habitual physical activity in dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2011;52:86–91. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5827.2010.01025.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison R, Penpraze V, Beber A, et al. Associations between obesity and physical activity in dogs: a preliminary investigation. J Small Anim Pract. 2013;54:570–574. doi:10.1111/jsap.12142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen BD, Lascelles BDX, Keene BW, et al. Evaluation of an accelerometer for at-home monitoring of spontaneous activity in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2007;68:468–475. doi:10.2460/ajvr.68.5.468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen AM, Evans RB, Duerr FM. Evaluation of accelerometer inter-device variability and collar placement in dogs. Vet Evid. 2016;1:1–9. doi:10.18849/ve.v1i2.40
   Google Scholar
• den Uijl I, Gómez Álvarez CB, Bartram D, et al. External validation of a collar-mounted triaxial accelerometer for second-by-second monitoring of eight behavioural states in dogs. Plos One. 2017;12:e0188481. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashari JM, Duncan CG, Duerr FM. Evaluation of a novel canine activity monitor for at-home physical activity analysis. BMC Vet Res. 2015;11:1–7. doi:10.1186/s12917-015-0457-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belda B, Enomoto M, Case B, et al. Initial evaluation of PetPace activity monitor. Vet J. 2018;237:63–68. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colpoys J, DeCock D. Evaluation of the FitBark activity monitor for measuring physical activity in dogs. Animals (Basel). 2021;11:781. doi:10.3390/ani11030781
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Venkatraman S, Long JD, Pister KSJ, et al. Wireless inertial sensors for monitoring animal behavior. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Lyon, France; 2007. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352303
   Google Scholar
• Brugarolas R, Loftin RT, Yang P, et al. Behavior recognition based on machine learning algorithms for a wireless canine machine interface. Silver Spring (MD): IEEE; 2013. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ladha C, Hammerla N, Hughes E, et al. Dog's life: wearable activity recognition for dogs. UbiComp '13: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 2013: 415–418. doi: 10.1145/2493432.2493519
   Google Scholar
• Griffies JD, Zutty J, Sarzen M, et al. Wearable sensor shown to specifically quantify pruritic behaviors in dogs. BMC Vet Res. 2018;14:124. doi:10.1186/s12917-018-1428-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladha C, Hoffman CL. A combined approach to predicting rest in dogs using accelerometers. Sensors. 2018;18:2649. doi:10.3390/s18082649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau M, Siebert S, Buerkert A, et al. Use of a tri-axial accelerometer for automated recording and classification of goats’ grazing behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2009;119:158–170. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2009.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerema ST, Van Velsen L, Schaake L, et al. Optimal sensor placement for measuring physical activity with a 3D accelerometer. Sensors. 2014;14:3188–3206. doi:10.3390/s140203188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown DC, Michel KE, Love M, et al. Evaluation of the effect of signalment and body conformation on activity monitoring in companion dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2010;71:322–325. doi:10.2460/ajvr.71.3.322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel KE, Brown DC. Association of signalment parameters with activity of pet dogs. J Nutr Sci. 2014;3:e28. doi:10.1017/jns.2014.49
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrison R, Penpraze V, Greening R, et al. Correlates of objectively measured physical activity in dogs. Vet J. 2014;199:263–267. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.11.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel KE, Brown DC. Determination and application of cut points for accelerometer-based activity counts of activities with differing intensity in pet dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2011;72:866–870. doi:10.2460/ajvr.72.7.866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones S, Dowling-Guyer S, Patronek GJ, et al. Use of accelerometers to measure stress levels in shelter dogs. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2014;17:18–28. doi:10.1080/10888705.2014.856241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knazovicky D, Tomas A, Motsinger-Reif A, et al. Initial evaluation of nighttime restlessness in a naturally occurring canine model of osteoarthritis pain. PeerJ. 2015;3:e772. doi:10.7717/peerj.772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison R, Sutton D, Ramsoy C, et al. Validity and practical utility of accelerometry for the measurement of in-hand physical activity in horses. BMC Vet Res. 2015;11:1–8. doi:10.1186/s12917-015-0550-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakas CT, Dalrymple-Alford JC, Anderson TJ, et al. Generalization of Youden index for multiple-class classification problems applied to the assessment of externally validated cognition in Parkinson disease screening. Stat Med. 2013;32:995–1003. doi:10.1002/sim.5592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith RD. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Prev Vet Med. 2000;45:23–41. doi:10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00115-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. New York: CRC press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada M, Tokuriki M. Spontaneous activities measured continuously by an accelerometer in beagle dogs housed in a cage. J Vet Med Sci. 2000;62:443–447. doi:10.1292/jvms.62.443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin KW, Olsen AM, Duncan CG, et al. The method of attachment influences accelerometer-based activity data in dogs. BMC Vet Res. 2016;13:1–6. doi:10.1186/s12917-017-0971-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar