New equipment for measurement of the force of adhesion of mucoadhesive films

References

• Boddupalli BM, Mohammed ZNK, Nath RA, Banji D. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: an overview. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2010;1:381–387.10.4103/0110-5558.76436
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sriamornsak P, Wattanakorn N, Nunthanid J, Puttipipatkhachorn S. Mucoadhesion of pectin as evidence by wettability and chain interpenetration. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008;74:458–467.10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sönju T, Christensen TB, Kornstad L, Rölla G. Electron microscopy, carbohydrate analyses and biological activities of the proteins adsorbed in two hours to tooth surfaces in vivo. Caries Res. 1974;8:113–122.10.1159/000260099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja A, Khar RP, Ali J. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1997;23:489–515.10.3109/03639049709148498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu JM, Robinson JR, Leung SHS. Binding of acrylic polymers to mucin/epithelial surfaces: structure property relationships. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier. Syst. 1988;5:21–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JW, Park JH, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: the next generation. J. Pharm. Sci. 2000;89:850–866.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart JD, Mortazavi SA. An investigation of the pH within the hydrating gel layer of a poly(acylic acid) compact. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1995;47:1099.
   Google Scholar
• Chen JL, Cyr GN. Compositions producing adhesion trough hydration. In: Manly RS, editor. Adhesion in biological systems. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1970. p. 163–181.10.1016/B978-0-12-469050-9.50015-6
   Google Scholar
• Smart JD, Kellaway IW, Worthington HEC. An in vitro investigation of mucosa-adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1984;36:295–299.10.1111/jphp.1984.36.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding SE, Davis SS, Deacon MP, Fiebrig I. Biopolymer mucoadhesives. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 1999;16:41–86.10.1080/02648725.1999.10647971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart JD. Drug delivery using buccal adhesive systems. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 1993;11:253–270.10.1016/0169-409X(93)90012-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews GP, Laverty TP, Jones DS. Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms for controlled drug delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2009;71:505–518.10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.09.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi RB, Robinson JR. Oral cavity as a site for bioadhesive drug delivery. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 1994;13:43–74.10.1016/0169-409X(94)90026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forstner JF. Intestinal mucins in health and disease. Digestion. 1978;17:234–263.10.1159/000198115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylan B, Capan Y, Güven O, Kes S, Hincal A. Design and evaluation of sustained-release and buccal adhesive propranolol hydrochloride tablets. J. Controlled Release. 1996;38:11–20.10.1016/0168-3659(95)00094-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woertz C, Preis M, Breitkreutz J, Kleinebudde P. Assessment of test methods evaluating mucoadhesive polymers and dosage forms: an overview. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2013;85:843–853.10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.06.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovich-Pinhas M, Bianco-Peled H. Mucoadhesion: a review of characterization techniques. Expert Opin. Drug Delivery. 2010;7:259–271.10.1517/17425240903473134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobyn MJ, Johnson JR, Dettmar PW. Factors affecting in vitro gastric mucoadhesion I. Test conditions and instrumental parameters. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 1995;41:235–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DS, Woolfson AD, Brown AF. Textural, viscoelastic and mucoadhesive properties of pharmaceutical gels composed of cellulose polymers. Int. J. Pharm. 1997;151:223–233.10.1016/S0378-5173(97)04904-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DS, Woolfson AD, Brown AF, O’Neill MJ. Mucoadhesive, syringeable drug delivery systems for controlled application of metronidazole to the periodontal pocket: in vitro release kinetics, syringeability, mechanical and mucoadhesive properties. J. Controlled Release. 1997;49:71–79.10.1016/S0168-3659(97)00060-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerström H, Edsman K. Interpretation of mucoadhesive properties of polymer gel preparations using a tensile strength method. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2001;53:1589–1599.10.1211/0022357011778197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repka MA, Gutta K, Prodduturi S, Munjal M, Stodghill SP. Characterization of cellulosic hot-melt extruded films containing lidocaine. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2005;59:189–196.10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirawong N, Nunthanid J, Puttipipatkhachorn S, Sriamornsak P. Mucoadhesive properties of various pectins on gastrointestinal mucosa: an in vitro evaluation using texture analyzer. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2007;67:132–140.10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagesaether E, Hiorth M, Sande SA. Mucoadhesion and drug permeability of free mixed films of pectin and chitosan: an in vitro and ex vivo study. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2009;71:325–331.10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abruzzo A, Bigucci F, Cerchiara T, Cruciani F, Vitali B, Luppi B. Mucoadhesive chitosan/gelatin films for buccal delivery of propranolol hydrochloride. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012;87:581–588.10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogias IA, Williams AC, Khutoryanskiy VV. Chitosan-based mucoadhesive tablets for oral delivery of ibuprofen. Int. J. Pharm. 2012;436:602–610.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchěne D, Touchard F, Peppas NA. Pharmaceutical and medical aspects of bioadhesive systems for drug administration. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1988;14:283–318.10.3109/03639048809151972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Robinson JR. Physico-chemical properties of water insoluble polymers important to mucin/epithelial adhesion. J. Controlled Release. 1985;2:47–57.10.1016/0168-3659(85)90032-X
   Google Scholar
• Gurny R, Meyer JM, Peppas NA. Bioadhesive intraoral release systems: design, testing and analysis. Biomaterials. 1984;5:336–340.10.1016/0142-9612(84)90031-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponchel G, Touchard F, Wouessidjewe D, Duchene D, Peppas NA. Bioadhesive analysis of controlled-release systems. III. Bioadhesive and release behavior of metronidazole-containing poly(acrylic acid)–hydroxypropyl methylcellulose systems. Int. J. Pharm. 1987;38:65–70.10.1016/0378-5173(87)90098-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari F, Bertoni M, Rossi S, Bonferoni MC, Caramella C, Waring MJ, Aulton ME. Comparative rheomechanical and adhesive properties of two hydrocolloid dressings: dependence on the degree of hydration. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1996;22:1223–1230.10.3109/03639049609063241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhakar Y, Kuotsu K, Bandyopadhyay AK. Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery – a promising option for orally less efficient drugs. J. Controlled Release. 2006;114:15–40.10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho FC, Bruschi ML, Evangelista RC, Gremiao MPD. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010;46:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary J, Bromberg L, Magner E. Adhesion of polyether-modified poly(acrylic acid) to mucin. Langmuir. 2004;20:9755–9762.10.1021/la048993s
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi H, Thongborisute J, Matsui Y, Sugihara H, Yamamoto H, Kawashima Y. Novel mucoadhesion tests for polymers and polymer-coated particles to design optimal mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2005;57:1583–1594.10.1016/j.addr.2005.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thongborisute J, Takeuchi H. Evaluation of mucoadhesiveness of polymers by BIACORE method and mucin-particle method. Int. J. Pharm. 2008;354:204–209.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivarsson D, Wahlgren M. Comparison of in vitro methods of measuring mucoadhesion: ellipsometry, tensile strength and rheological measurements. Colloids Surf., B. 2012;92:353–359.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan EE, Gallo JM. A simple rheological method for the in vitro assessment of mucin-polymer bioadhesive bond strength. Pharm. Res. 1990;7:491–495.10.1023/A:1015812615635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmsten M, Ljusegren I, Carlstedt I. Ellipsometry studies of the mucoadhesion of cellulose derivatives. Colloids Surf., B. 1994;2:463–470.10.1016/0927-7765(94)80054-5
   Google Scholar
• Park K. A new approach to study mucoadhesion: colloidal gold staining. Int. J. Pharm. 1989;53:209–217.10.1016/0378-5173(89)90314-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikos AG, Peppas NA. Bioadhesive analysis of controlled-release systems. IV. An experimental method for testing the adhesion of microparticles with mucus. J. Controlled Release. 1990;12:31–37.10.1016/0168-3659(90)90180-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng CLC, Ho NFH. Mechanistic studies in the simultaneous flow and adsorption of polymer-coated latex particles on intestinal mucus I: methods and physical model development. J. Controlled Release. 1987;6:133–149.10.1016/0168-3659(87)90071-X
   Google Scholar
• Hasçiçek C, Gönül N, Erk N. Mucoadhesive microspheres containing gentamicin sulfate for nasal administration: preparation and in vitro characterization. Farmaco. 2003;58:11–16.10.1016/S0014-827X(02)00004-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen LS, Schubert L, Hansen J. Bioadhesive drug delivery systems. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 1998;6:231–239.10.1016/S0928-0987(97)10004-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repka MA, McGinity JW. Bioadhesive properties of hydroxypropylcellulose topical films produced by hot-melt extrusion. J. Controlled Release. 2001;70:341–351.10.1016/S0168-3659(00)00365-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura F, Ohta R, Machida Y, Nagai T. In vitro and in vivo nasal mucoadhesion of some water-soluble polymers. Int. J. Pharm. 1996;134:173–181.10.1016/0378-5173(95)04416-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen A. Dynamic force measurements in preformulation of solid dosage forms [ PhD thesis]. Szeged: University of Szeged; 2012.
   Google Scholar