Critical Evaluation of Information as a New Threshold Concept for Navigating STEM Information

References

• Abelson, H., K. Ledeen, H. R. Lewis, Seltzer, Wendy. 2021. . Blown to bits: Your Life, Liberty, and Happiness After the Digital Explosion 2nd (London, UK: Pearson Education Inc 307) .
   Google Scholar
• ACRL Board of Directors. 2015. Association of college and research libraries framework for information literacy for higher education. Chicago: American Libraries Association.
   Google Scholar
• Adrian, H., C. McGrath, and N. Mattheos. 2017. Social media patient testimonials in implant dentistry: Information or misinformation? Clinical Oral Implants Research 28:7. doi:10.1111/clr.12883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Library Association/Association of College and Research Libraries/Science and Technology Section Task Force on Information Literacy for Science and Technology. n.d. “Information literacy standards for science and engineering/technology.”
   Google Scholar
• Association of College and Research Libraries. 2000 Information literacy competency standards for higher education. https://alair.ala.org/bitstream/handle/11213/7668/ACRL%20Information%20Literacy%20Competency%20Standards%20for%20Higher%20Education.pdf?sequence=1 . . .
   Google Scholar
• Azzam, A., D. Bresler, A. Leon, L. Maggio, E. Whitaker, J. Heilman, J. Orlowitz, V. Swisher, L. Rasberry, K. Otoide, et al. 2017. Why medical schools should embrace wikipedia. Academic Medicine 92 (2):194–200. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardzell, J., S. Bardzell, and M. A. Blythe. 2018. Critical Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. MIT Press 840 .
   Google Scholar
• Blakeslee, S. 2004. The CRAAP Test. LOEX Quarterly 31 (3):6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Borland, M., and K. Mercer 8 12 . 2020 Introducing critique to enhance traditional evaluation in design courses. Canadian Design Workshop December 7-9, 2020 Waterloo, ON . . In . Waterloo: Canadian Design Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Carolien van, S., and V. Donche. 2014. Profiling first-year students in STEM Programs Based on Autonomous Motivation and Academic Self-Concept and Relationship with Academic Achievement. PLoS ONE 9 (11):e112489. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, J. 2019. The critical role of information retrieval in STEM information literacy. Science & Technology Libraries 38 (1):83–97. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2018.1544534.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amour, D., M. Ferrada-Videla, L. San Martin Rodriguez, and M.-D. Beaulieu. 2005. The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care 19 (sup1):116–31. doi:10.1080/13561820500082529.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahlstrom, M. F. 2021. The narrative truth about scientific misinformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (15):e1914085117. doi:10.1073/pnas.1914085117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, E. D., C. Tenopir, and B.-C. Björk. 2020. Attitudes of North American academics toward open access scholarly journals. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 20 (1):73–100. doi:10.1353/pla.2020.0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denick, D., J. Bhatt, and B. Layton. 2010. “Citation analysis of engineering design reports for information literacy assessment.” In 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 15.278.1-15.278.17 June 20-23 Louisville, KY. ASEE Conferences. 10.18260/1-2–16508.
   Google Scholar
• Donna, K., and S. M. Ritchie. 2012 January. Learning science through real-world contexts. Second International Handbook of Science Education 69–79. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_6.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. A., C. Rohan, M. Fosmire, C. Smith, A. van Epps, and S. Purzer. 2015. “‘I Just Google It’: A Qualitative Study of Information Strategies in Problem Solving Used by Upper and Lower Level Engineering Students.” Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference Oct. 21-24 2015 El Paso, Texas (February). 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044298.
   Google Scholar
• Drabinski, E., A. Kumbier, and M. Accardi. 2010. Critical library instruction: Theories and methods. Duluth, MN: Library Juice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ezza, El-Sadig Y, A. Ageeb, R. O. Sirry, E. Mubarak et al. 2020. The significance of teaching academic writing as a discipline-specific skill Teaching Academic Writing as a Discipline-Specific Skill in Higher Education eds. Ezza, El-Sadig Y, and Touria, Drid (Hershey PA: IGI Global)1–22 . 10.4018/978-1-7998-2265-3.ch001
   Google Scholar
• Fosmire, M. 2014. Engineering research. Research within the disciplines : Foundations for reference and library instruction. ed. P. Keeran, and M. Levine-Clark, eBook. 46–49. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, C., G. Kerins, and R. Madden. 2004. Information Seeking and Students Studying for Professional Careers: The Cases of Engineering and Law Students in Ireland. Information Research 10 (1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon, D. 2003. Technology: Pushing the boundaries of scientific discovery. Nature Medicine 9 (1):97–97. doi:10.1038/nm0103-97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleick, J. 2011. The Information : A History, a Theory, a Flood. Toronto, Ontario: Random House of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, S. Y. 2017. Undergraduates’ assessment of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) Information Literacy Instruction. IFLA Journal 43 (2):171–86. doi:10.1177/0340035216684522.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, T. L., L. M. Daniels, R. H. Stupnisky, R. P. Perry, and S. Hladkyj. 2008. The effect of attributional retraining on mastery and performance motivation among first-year college students. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 30 (3):198–207. doi:10.1080/01973530802374972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, A. J., B. Fister, and M. MacMillan Knight Foundation, Harvard Graduate School of Education, School of Library and Information Science University of South Carolina . 2019. Information literacy in the age of algorithms-student experiences with news and information, and the need for change. . (Seattle WA: Project Information Literacy)
   Google Scholar
• Head, A. J. 2013. Learning the ropes: How freshmen conduct course research once they enter college. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2364080.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, J. M., and A. G. West. 2015. Wikipedia and medicine: Quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language. Journal of Medical Internet Research 17 (3):E62. doi:10.2196/JMIR.4069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F., and D. Kienhues. 2019. 2. Science understanding between scientific literacy and trust: Contributions from psychological and educational research. In Science communication eds. Leßmöllmann, Annette, Dascal, Marcelo, and Gloning, Thomas, 29–50. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783110255522-002.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B., I. Joshi, H. Lemonde, and J. Wareham. 2009. Junior physician’s use of web 2.0 for information seeking and medical education: A Qualitative study. International Journal of Medical Informatics 78 (10):645–55. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, H. 2016. Identifying 21st Century STEM Competencies Using Workplace Data. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25 (2):284–301. doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffryes, J., and M. Lafferty. 2012 . Gauging workplace readiness: Assessing the information needs of engineering co-op students. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship Spring 69 doi:10.5062/F4X34VDR.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. 2016. Indigenous knowledge within academia: Exploring the tensions that exist between indigenous, decolonizing, and nêhiyawak methodologies. Totem - the University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology 24 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Kate, M., and K. D. Weaver. 2021. Evaluative frameworks and scientific knowledge for undergraduate STEM students: An illustrative case study perspective. Science & Technology Libraries 40:1. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2020.1796891.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, N., S. Nesbit, and C. Oliver. 2012. A difficult journey: Transitioning from STEM to SoTL. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 6 (1). doi: 10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060118.
   Google Scholar
• Kirman, C. R., T. W. Simon, and S. M. Hays. 2019. Science peer review for the 21st century: assessing scientific consensus for decision-making while managing conflict of interests, reviewer and process bias. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 103 (April):73–85. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuglitsch, R. Z. 2015. Teaching for transfer: Reconciling the framework with disciplinary information literacy. Portal 15:3. doi:10.1353/pla.2015.0040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, G., K. Weaver, R. Figueiredo, K. Mercer, A. Jonahs, H. Love, B. Mehlenbacher, C. Neal, K. Zmetana, and R. Al-Hammoud. 2020. “Information-seeking behavior among first-year engineering students and the impacts of pedagogical intervention.” In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings. June 21-24 (ASEE Conferences) Online. 10.18260/1-2–34827.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., and J. S. Lederman. 2012 January. Nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry: Building instructional capacity through professional development. Second International Handbook of Science Education 335–59. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_24.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Yongjun 12 . 2020 Exploring reading motivation and engagement in discipline-specific classes. . . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/218702
   Google Scholar
• Lenker, M. 2017. Developmentalism: Learning as the basis for evaluating information. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 17 (4):721–37. doi:10.1353/pla.2017.0043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. 2020. Patients are also experts. The Lancet Haematology 7 (4):e280. doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30077-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytle, A., and J. Elizabeth Shin. 2020. Incremental beliefs, STEM efficacy and STEM interest among first-year undergraduate students. Journal of Science Education and Technology 29 (2):272–81. doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09813-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggio, L. A., J. M. Willinsky, J. A. Costello, N. A. Skinner, P. C. Martin, and J. E. Dawson. 2020. Integrating wikipedia editing into health professions education: A curricular inventory and review of the literature. Perspectives on Medical Education 9 (6):333–42. doi:10.1007/s40037-020-00620-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandalios, J. 2013. RADAR: An approach for helping students evaluate internet sources. Journal of Information Science 39 (4):470–78. doi:10.1177/0165551513478889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menczer, F., and T. Hills 12 . 2020. Information overload helps fake news spread, and social media knows it. Scientific American 323 (6 54–61).
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, K., K. Weaver, and A. Stables-Kennedy. 2019. “Understanding undergraduate engineering student information access and needs: Results from a scoping review.” In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings June 16-19 Tampa, FL. ASEE Conferences. 10.18260/1-2–33485.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., and R. Land. 2003. Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practising within the Disciplines. In Improving Student Learning-10 years on ed. Rust, C, 412–24. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., and R. Land. 2005. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education 49 (3):373–88. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. 2012. ‘Variation in student learning’ as a threshold concept. The Journal of Faculty Development 26:3.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. D. 2018. Diving deep: Reflective questions for identifying tacit disciplinary information literacy knowledge practices, dispositions, and values through the ACRL framework for information literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 44 (3):412–18. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2018.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, D., and J. Clare Laxton. 2012. Experts by experience; the views of service user educators providing feedback on medical students’ work based assessments. Nurse Education Today 32 (2):146–50. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.08.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, T. 2017. The death of expertise: The campaign against established knowledge and why it matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., and J. Owen Weatherall. 2019. The Misinformation Age: How False Beliefs Spread (New Haven & London: Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Orduna-Malea, E., A. Martín-Martín, and E. Delgado López-Cózar. 2017. Google Scholar Como Una Fuente de Evaluación Científica: Una Revisión Bibliográfica Sobre Errores de La Base de Datos. Revista Española de Documentación Científica 40 (4):185. doi:10.3989/redc.2017.4.1500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo, L. 2018. Instruction is contextual: An Examination of McNair Program Curricula for STEM scholars and recommendations based on the framework for information literacy in higher education. Science & Technology Libraries 37 (2):187–210. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2018.1456089.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, H. 2017. Information literacy in the sciences: Faculty perception of undergraduate student skill. College & Research Libraries 78 (7). doi: 10.5860/crl.78.7.964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. 2002. . In The logic of scientific discovery. London, UK: Routledge Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Pusz, M. D., and S. E. Brietzke. 2012. How good is google? The quality of otolaryngology information on the internet Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery . 147 (3):462–65. doi:10.1177/0194599812447733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapchak, M. 2021. Introducing critical librarianship to information professionals: Using critical pedagogy and critical information literacy in an LIS graduate course. Communications in Information Literacy 15:1. doi:10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, G., and J. Striley. 1996. Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33 (8):839–58. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199610)33:8<839::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, H., S. Syed, and S. Rezaie. 2020. The twitter pandemic: The critical role of twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Cjem 22 (4):418–21. doi:10.1017/cem.2020.361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scharf, D. 8 3 2014. “Instruction and assessment of information literacy among STEM majors.” In 2014 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference Princeton, NJ, 1–7. IEEE. 10.1109/ISECon.2014.6891048.
   Google Scholar
• Seroto, J. 2014 (March). Creating a space for the co-existence of multiple knowledge systems: Indigenous knowledge in academia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n4p429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharareh, T. V., and S. Mohammad Alavi. 2020. The role of discipline-related knowledge and test task objectivity in assessing reading for academic purposes. Language Assessment Quarterly 17 (1):1–17. doi:10.1080/15434303.2019.1666848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silbiger, N. J., and A. D. Stubler. 2019. Unprofessional Peer Reviews Disproportionately Harm Underrepresented Groups in STEM. PeerJ 7 (December):e8247. doi:10.7717/peerj.8247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songini, M. 2018. “LIBRARIANS often come up short in STEM degrees, says survey.” JOVE Blog. August 10. https://www.jove.com/blog/librarian-blog/librarians-career-advancement/stem-librarians-face-gap-with-audiences-survey-indicates/ Accessed 18 10 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Soom, Carolien van, and Vincent Donche. 2014. “Profiling First-Year Students in STEM Programs Based on Autonomous Motivation and Academic Self-Concept and Relationship with Academic Achievement.” PLoS ONE 9 (11): e112489 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112489. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, A. L., and J. Clement. 2012. The role of thought experiments in science and science learning. In Second International Handbook of Science Education eds. Fraser, Barry J., Tobin, Kenneth, and McRobbie, Campbell J, 157–75. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_13.
   Google Scholar
• Storksdieck, M. 2016. Critical information literacy as core skill for lifelong STEM learning in the 21st century: Reflections on the desirability and feasibility for widespread science media education. Cultural Studies of Science Education 11 (1):167–82. doi:10.1007/s11422-015-9714-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub-Cook, P. 2018. Source, Please? Digital Journalism 6 (10):1314–32. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1412801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susan, S., and K. A. Smith. 2013. Discipline‐based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 102 (4):468–71. doi:10.1002/jee.20030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, M., and A. Archer. 2004. The web and information literacy: Scaffolding the use of web sources in a project-based curriculum. British Journal of Educational Technology 35 (2):173–86. doi:10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00379.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, N., E. Kasuto, and F. McNaughton. 2012. Partnership between engineering libraries: Identifying information literacy skills for a successful transition from student to professional. Science & Technology Libraries 31 (1):124–32. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2012.648104.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. 2007. The lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Zoller, U., and T. Levy Nahum. 2012. From teaching to KNOW to learning to THINK in science education. In Second International Handbook of Science Education eds. Fraser, Barry J., Tobin, Kenneth, and McRobbie, Campbell J., 209–29. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_16.
   Google Scholar