Factors Perceived by Rehabilitation Professionals to Influence the Provision of Assistive Technology to Children: A Systematic Review

References

• Bailey, R. L., Parette, H. P., Stoner, J. B., Angell, M. E., & Carroll, K. (2006). Family members’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 37(January), 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Bernd, T., Van Der Pijl, D., & De Witte, L. P. (2009). Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 16(3), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120802449362
   Google Scholar
• Chmiliar, L. (2007). Perspectives on assistive technology : What teachers, health professionals, and speech and language pathologists have to say. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 35(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2008). Cook & Hussey's assistive technologies (3rd ed.). St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Copley, J., & Ziviani, J. (2004). Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11(4), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.213
   Google Scholar
• Daly, J., Willis, K., Small, R., Green, J., Welch, N., Kealy, M., & Hughes, E. (2007). A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.014
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence : a review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Dugan, L. M., Campbell, P. H., & Wilcox, M. J. (2006). Making Decisions About Assistive Technology With Infants and Toddlers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214060260010301
   Google Scholar
• Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Hamby, D. W. (2007). Meta-analysis of family-centered helpgiving practices research. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13(4), 370–378.
   Google Scholar
• Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., Hamby, D. W., & Simkus, A. (2013). Systematic review of studies promoting the use of assistive technology devices by young children with disabilities (Vol. 5). Asheville. Retrieved from http://www.practicalevaluation.org/reports/CPE_Report_Vol5No1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Friederich, A., Bernd, T., & De Witte, L. (2010). Methods for the selection of assistive technology in neurological rehabilitation practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 17(4), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038120903377082
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, S., Skelton, H., & Rosenbaum, P. (2008). Assistive devices for children with functional impairments: Impact on child and caregiver function. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 50(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.02021.x
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., & Cameron, M. (2009). Australian speech-language pathologists’ perceptions and experiences of augmentative and alternative communication in early childhood intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25(4), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434610903322151
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (2004). United States congress. Retrieved from http://www.parentcenterhub.org/wp-content/uploads/repo_items/PL108-446.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Judge, S. (2002). Family-centered assistive technology assessment and intervention practices for early intervention. Infants & Young Children, 15(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001163-200207000-00009
   Google Scholar
• Judge, S. L., & Parette, H. P. (1998). Family-centered assistive technology decision making. The Transdiciplinary Journal, 8(2), 185–205.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Lawm, M., King, S., Rosenbaum, P., Kertoy, M. K., & Young, N. L. (2009). A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of children with disabilities. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 23(1), 63–90. Retrieved from http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/J006v23n01_05
   Google Scholar
• King, M., Shields, N., Imms, C., Black, M., & Ardern, C. (2013). Participation of children with intellectual disability compared with typically developing children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(5), 1854–1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.02.029
   Google Scholar
• Kling, A., Campbell, P. H., & Wilcox, J. (2010). Young children with physical disabilities. caregiver perspectives about assistive technology. Infants and Young Children, 23(3), 169–183.
   Google Scholar
• Lahm, E. A., & Sizemore, L. (2002). Factors that influence technology decision making. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(1), 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and ElaborationPRISMA: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), W–65. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S. (2010). Perceptions of health care workers prescribing augmentative and alternative communication devices to children. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 5(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483101003718195
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Smith, W. (1997). Evidence-based practice and occupational therapy. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(11), 474–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269706001103
   Google Scholar
• Long, T. M., & Perry, D. F. (2008). Pediatric physical therapists’ perceptions of their training in assistive technology. Physical Therapy, 88(5), 629–639. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060356
   Google Scholar
• Long, T. M., Woolverton, M., Perry, D. F., & Thomas, M. J. (2007). Training needs of pediatric occupational therapists in assistive technology. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(3), 345–354.
   Google Scholar
• Mihaylov, S. I., Jarvis, S. N., Colver, A. F., & Beresford, B. (2004). Identification and description of environmental factors that influence participation of children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 46(5), 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2004.tb00489.x10.1111/j.1469-8749.2004.tb00489.x
   Google Scholar
• Pace, R., Pluye, P., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J., & Seller, R. (2012). Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., & Brotherson, M. J. (2004). Family-centered and culturally responsive assistive technology decision making. Infants & Young Children, 17(4), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001163-200410000-00008
   Google Scholar
• Parette, P., & Scherer, M. (2004). Assistive Technology Use and Stigma. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/23880164
   Google Scholar
• Parette, P., Vanbiervliet, A., & Hourcade, J. (2000). Family-centered decision-making in assistive technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: Mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440
   Google Scholar
• Pluye, P., Robert, E., Cargo, M., & Bartlett, G. (2011). Proposal: A mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. (pp. 1–8). Montréal: McGill University, (Part I), Retrieved from http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/84371689/MMAT 2011 criteria and tutorial 2011-06-29updated2014.08.21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Virgo, R., Olsson, C., Connell, T., & Lane, A. E. (2011). Activity participation of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities and typically-developing peers. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 14(3), 145. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2011.568994
   Google Scholar
• Reed, B. G., & Kanny, E. M. (1993). The use of computers in school system practice by occupational therapists. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 13(4), 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, M. (1998). Matching person and technology. New York: Institute for Matching Person and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, M., Jutai, J., Fuhrer, M., Demers, L., & Deruyter, F. (2007). A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2(1), 1–8. Retrieved from http://0-informahealthcare.com.innopac.up.ac.za/doi/abs/10.1080/17483100600845414
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Koul, R. K. (2015). Speech output technologies in interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a scoping review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Early Onli(January), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1063689
   Google Scholar
• Schoonover, J., Argabrite Grove, R. E., & Smith, Y. (2013). Influencing participation through assistive technology. In J. Case-Smith & J. C. O'Brien (Eds.), Occupational therapy for children (Sixth Ed, pp. 583–619). Mosby Elsevier Maryland Heights, Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, M. J., Guimond, A., Campbell, P. H., & Weintraub Moore, H. (2006). Provider perspectives on the use of assistive technology for infants and toddlers with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214060260010401
   Google Scholar