Social Media Influence on Emerging Adults’ Prosocial Behavior: A Systematic Review

References

• Abbas Naqvi, M. H., Jiang, Y., Miao, M., & Naqvi, M. H. (2020). The effect of social influence, trust, and entertainment value on social media use: Evidence from Pakistan. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1723825. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1723825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullahi, I. A., & Kumar, P. (2016). Gender differences in prosocial behaviour. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(4), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.25215/0304.017
   Google Scholar
• Afolabi, O. A. (2014). Psychosocial predictors of prosocial behaviour among a sample of Nigerian undergraduates. European Scientific Journal, 10(2), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2014.v10n2p
   Google Scholar
• Alhabash, S., McAlister, A. R., Lou, C., & Hagerstrom, A. (2015). From clicks to behaviors: The mediating effect of intentions to like, share, and comment on the relationship between message evaluations and offline behavioral intentions. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 15(2), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2015.1071677
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, F., Marquart, F., & Matthes, J. (2015). Effects of right-wing populist political advertising on implicit and explicit stereotypes. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 4, 27, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000139
   Google Scholar
• Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99(1), 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.1.544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan, S., Esteve, M., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2020). Talking the talk, but not walking the walk: A comparison of self‐reported and observed prosocial behaviour. Public Administration, 98(4), 995–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmas, M., & Halperin, E. (2022). I care about your plight, but only if I like your leader: The effect of national leaders’ perceived personality on empathy and pro-social behavior towards their citizenry. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(3), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220987989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221129
   Google Scholar
• Basil, D. Z., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. D. (2007). Guilt and giving: A process model of empathy and efficacy. Psychology & Marketing, 25(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315808048
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. Daniel, Polycarpou, Marina P., Harmon-Jones, Eddie, Imhoff, Heidi J., Mitchener, Erin C., Bednar, Lori L., Klein, Tricia R., Highberger, Lori,.(1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. (2016). Preventing charity website browsers from quitting the ’donate now’ page: A case study with recommendations. Social Business, 6(3), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1362/204440816X14811339560974
   Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., Steigen, A., Stea, T., Kleppang, A., Lien, L., & Leonhardt, M. (2023). Negative social media-related experiences and lower general self-efficacy are associated with depressive symptoms in adolescents. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1037375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A Cooperative Species. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691151250.003.0001
   Google Scholar
• Boxer, P., Tisak, M. S., & Goldstein, S. E. (2004). Is it bad to be good? An exploration of aggressive and prosocial behavior subtypes in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOYO.0000013421.02015.ef
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braddock, Kurt, Horgan, John, (2016). Towards a guide for constructing and disseminating counternarratives to reduce support for terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 5, 39, 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2015.1116277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2014). Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(2), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappellari, L., Ghinetti, P., & Turati, G. (2011). On time and money donations. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(6), 853–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.08.013
   Google Scholar
• Carlo, G., Knight, G. P., McGinley, M., Zamboanga, B. L. & Hernandez-Jarvis, L. (2010). The multidimensionality of prosocial behaviors and evidence of measurement equivalence in Mexican American and European American early adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2, 20, 334–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00637.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlo, G., Koller, S. H., Eisenberg, N., Da Silva, M. S., & Frohlich, C. B. (1996). A cross-national study on the relations among prosocial moral reasoning, gender role orientations, and prosocial behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlo, G. & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014033032440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou, W. B., Chen, S. W., & Liao, D. C. (2014). Does Facebook promote self-interest? Enactment of indiscriminate one-to-many communication on online social networking sites decreases prosocial behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 17(2), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C., Hsu, M., & Wang, E. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872–1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, E. Y., Hsu, D. Y., & Hernon, E. (2020). From slacktivism to activism: Improving the commitment power of e-pledges for prosocial causes. PloS One, 15(4) e0231314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, J. (2011). Sociology reference guide: Theories of social movements. Salem Press. https://www.biknotes.com/_files/ugd/b8b6dc_0d2f14d4f5b042e3bb2272da76673f00.pdf#page=30
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 58(6):1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cikara, M., Bruneau, E., van Bavel, J. J., & Saxe, R. (2014). Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinelli, Matteo, Quattrociocchi, Walter, Galeazzi, Alessandro, Valensise, Carlo Michele, Brugnoli, Emanuele, Schmidt, Ana Lucia, Zola, Paola, Zollo, Fabiana, Scala, Antonio, (2020). The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 16598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, S., Padilla‐Walker, L., Holmgren, H., Davis, E., Collier, K., Memmott‐Elison, M., … & Hawkins, A. (2018). A meta-analysis of prosocial media on prosocial behavior, aggression, and empathic concern: a multidimensional approach. Developmental Psychology, 54(2), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Howard, E. (2013). Emerging in a digital world: A decade review of media use, effects, and gratifications in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813479782
   Google Scholar
• Domingo, D. (2011). Managing audience participation: Practices, workflows and strategies. In J. B. Singer, A. Hermida, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, S. Paulussen, T. Quandt, Z. Reich, & M. Vujnovic (Eds.), Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers (pp. 76–95). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444340747.ch5
   Google Scholar
• Dorrough, A., Olsson, M., Froehlich, L., Glöckner, A., & Martiny, S. (2020). Does she compensate the victim while he punishes the perpetrator? no gender differences in anonymous economic games across 11 nations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34(2), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, John F, ten Vergert, Marleen, Stewart, Tracie L, Gaertner, Samuel L, Johnson, James D, Esses, Victoria M, Riek, Blake M, Pearson, Adam R, (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1537–1549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouvelis, M., & Grosskopf, B. (2016). The effects of induced emotions on pro-social behaviour. Journal of Public Economics, 134, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duclos, R. and Barasch, A. (2014). Prosocial behavior in intergroup relations: how donor self-construal and recipient group-membership shape generosity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1086/674976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duong, M., & Pensini, P. (2023). The role of connectedness in sustainable behaviour: A parallel mediation model examining the prosocial foundations of pro-environmental behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 209, 112216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhaus, E., & Sheaffer, Z. (2019). Factors affecting willingness to contribute goods and services on social media. The Social Science Journal, 56(3), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N. (1986). Altruistic Emotion, Cognition and Behavior. Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746135
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (6th ed., pp 64–718). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0311
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., Lennon, R., & Roth, K. (1983). Prosocial development: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 19(6), 846–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.19.6.846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertör-Akyazi, P., & Akçay, Ç. (2021). Moral intuitions predict pro-social behaviour in a climate commons game. Ecological Economics, 181, 106918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, J. A., Faber, N. S., & Crockett, M. (2015). Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findley-Van Nostrand, D., & Ojanen, T. (2018). Forms of prosocial behaviors are differentially linked to social goals and peer status in adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 179(6), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2018.1518894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, K. A., & Stephan, W. G. (2000). Improving intergroup relations: The effects of empathy on racial attitudes 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(8), 1720–1737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02464.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. (2013). From cyber bullying to cyber coping: The misuse of mobile technology and social media and their effects on people’s lives. Business and Economic Research, 3(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v3i2.4176
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, S. I. (2011). Types of social movements. In Sociology Reference Guide (pp. 26–36). Salem Press. https://www.biknotes.com/_files/ugd/b8b6dc_0d2f14d4f5b042e3bb2272da76673f00.pdf#page=30
   Google Scholar
• Foster, D., Linehan, C., Lawson, S., & Kirman, B. (2011). Power ballads: deploying aversive energy feedback in social media [Paper presentation]. CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems,, 2221–2226. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979944
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, R., Huang, Y., & Singh, P. V. (2020). AI and Algorithmic Bias: Source, Detection, Mitigation and Implications. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3681517
   Google Scholar
• Fu, W. W., & Sim, C. C. (2011). Aggregate bandwagon effects on online videos’ viewership: Value uncertainty, popularity cues, and heuristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(12), 2382–2395. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärtner, M., Andersson, D., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2022). Affect and prosocial behavior: The role of decision mode and individual processing style. Judgment and Decision Making, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500008998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 5, 132, 692–731. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendolla, G. H. (2000). On the impact of mood on behavior: An integrative theory and a review. Review of General Psychology, 4(4), 378–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.4.4.378
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet. Yale University Press. http://books.google.ie/books?id=-RteDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Gillespie,+T.+(2018).+Custodians+of+the+Internet.+Yale+University+Press.&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api
   Google Scholar
• González-Padilla, D. A., & Tortolero-Blanco, L. (2020). Social media influence in the COVID-19 Pandemic. International braz j urol: Official Journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology, suppl.1, 46, 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.s121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gottlieb, M., & Dyer, S. (2020). Information and disinformation: Social media in the COVID‐19 crisis.Academic emergency medicine: Official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 27(7), 640–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graupensperger, S. A., Jensen, C. J., & Evans, M. B. (2018). A meta-analytic review of studies using the Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale: Associations among intergroup moral behaviors. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 7(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, S., Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2016). Social media update 2016. Pew Research Centre. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Greitemeyer, T. (2009). Effects of songs with prosocial lyrics on prosocial thoughts, affect, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 186–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greitemeyer, T. (2011). Exposure to music with prosocial lyrics reduces aggression: First evidence and test of the underlying mechanism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2010). Preference for consistency and social influence: A review of current research findings. Social Influence, 5(3), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510903332378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Shachat, J., Walker, M. J., & Wei, L. (2021). Viral social media videos can raise pro-social behaviours when an epidemic arises. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 7(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-021-00104-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H D, S., P. Patil, P., Sambyal, S., & Nasir, M. (2023). The impact of social media on mental health. International Research Journal of Computer Science, 10(05), 182–184. https://doi.org/10.26562/irjcs.2023.v1005.14
   Google Scholar
• Halupka, M. (2014). Clicktivism: A systematic heuristic. Policy & Internet, 6(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI355
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2011). On behalf of the cochrane statistical methods group and the cochrane bias methods group (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604
   Google Scholar
• Hilbig, B. E., Glöckner, A., & Zettler, I. (2014). Personality and prosocial behavior: Linking basic traits and social value orientations., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107(3), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschberger, G., Ein-Dor, T., & Almakias, S. (2008). The self-protective altruist: Terror management and the ambivalent nature of prosocial behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(5), 666–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207313933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschberger, G., Florian, V., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Fear and compassion: A terror management analysis of emotional reactions to physical disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(3), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.50.3.246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (2004). Social desirability and self-reports: Testing models of socially desirable responding. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203259930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, Y., Xiong, D., Jiang, T., Song, L., & Wang, Q. (2019). Social media addiction: Its impact, mediation, and intervention. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 13(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2019-1-4
   Google Scholar
• Hsueh, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Malinen, S. (2015). “Leave your comment below”: Can biased online comments influence our own prejudicial attitudes and behaviors?Human Communication Research, 41(4), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C. W. (2014). Health slacktivism on social media: Predictors and effects. International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media, 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07632-4_34
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, S. (2013). Are emotive appeals effective in persuading people to give to charity? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/voluntary-sector-network/2013/sep/02/effective-emotive-appeals
   Google Scholar
• Hunsberger, B., & Jackson, L. M. (2005). Religion, meaning, and prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 807–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00433.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens, J. M., & Deković, M. (1997). Child rearing, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20(3), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502597385252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., Jiang, W., Cai, J., Su, Q., Zhou, Z., He, L., & Lai, K. (2019). Characterizing media content and effects of organ donation on a social media platform: content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(3), e13058. https://doi.org/10.2196/13058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., & LaBouff, J. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609357246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juanchich, M., Sirota, M., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2019). The polite wiggle‐room effect in charity donation decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, F., Oyewande, A., Abdalla, L., Ehsanullah, R., & Khan, S. (2020). Social media use and its connection to mental health: A systematic review. Cureus, 6, e8627, 12 https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C., & Yang, S. U. (2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Sharma, N., Hansen, D. L., & Alter, S. (2005). Impact of popularity indications on readers’ selective exposure to online news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(3), 296–313. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005). The “identified victim” effect: An identified group, or just a single individual? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(3), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1973). Moral development. McGraw-Hill Films.
   Google Scholar
• Kuem, J., Ray, S., Siponen, M., & Kim, S. S. (2017). What leads to prosocial behaviors on social networking services: A tripartite model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(1), 40–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2017.1296744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarven, Amanda, Strømland, Eirik, Wollbrant, Conny, Andersson, David, Johannesson, Magnus, Tinghög, Gustav, Västfjäll, Daniel, Myrseth, Kristian Ove R., (2020). The intuitive cooperation hypothesis revisited: A meta-analytic examination of effect size and between-study heterogeneity. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 6(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-020-00084-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labroo, A., Khan, U., & Su, S. (2022). Reconsidering prosocial behavior as intersocial: A literature review and a new perspective. Consumer Psychology Review, 6(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1088
   Google Scholar
• Lai, L. C. H. (2015). Who is more collectivistic? Hong Kong Chinese or Australian Chinese.Open Journal of Social Sciences, 03(09), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2015.39002
   Google Scholar
• Lane, D. S., & Dal Cin, S. (2018). Sharing beyond Slacktivism: the effect of socially observable prosocial media sharing on subsequent offline helping behavior. Information, Communication & Society, 21(11), 1523–1540. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1340496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, P. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J., Goldstein, A., Zagoory-Sharon, O., Weisman, O., Schneiderman, I., Eidelman-Rothman, M., & Feldman, R. (2016). Oxytocin selectively modulates brain response to stimuli probing social synchrony. Neuroimage, 124, 923–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W. Q., Li, L. M. W., & Li, M. (2019). Residential mobility reduces ingroup favouritism in prosocial behaviour. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, J., Z. Chen, & J. Lei. (2014). Inspire me to donate: The use of mixed emotions in public service announcements. NA-Advances in Consumer Research, 42, 578–579. http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/1017619/volumes/v42/NA-42
   Google Scholar
• Lim, H. S., Bouchacourt, L., & Brown‐Devlin, N. (2021). Nonprofit organization advertising on social media: The role of personality, advertising appeals, and bandwagon effects. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 20(4), 849–861. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. (2023). Social media usage statistics by age. Oberlo. https://sg.oberlo.com/statistics/social-media-usage-statistics-by-age
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H. J., & Chan, K. Y. (2015). Religious priming increases help if requestors dress poorly: Effects of dress, priming, and task difficulty on helping behaviors. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 7(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v7n2p164
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2021). Young people’s use of digital health technologies in the global north: Narrative review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(1), e18286. https://doi.org/10.2196/18286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysenstøen, C., Bøe, T., Hjetland, G. J., & Skogen, J. C. (2021). A review of the relationship between social media use and online prosocial behavior among adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 579347, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579347
   Google Scholar
• Macnair, L., & Frank, R. (2017). Voices against extremism: A case study of a community-based CVE counter-narrative campaign. Journal for Deradicalization, 10, 147–174. https://dc.arcabc.ca/islandora/object/dc%3A49584/datastream/PDF/view
   Google Scholar
• Madein, A., & Sholihin, M. (2015). The impact of social and environmental information on managers’ decisions: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. Asian Review of Accounting, 23(2), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-11-2013-0074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, K. A. A., & Ahmad, A. (2019). The effect of use of social media on prosocial behavior. Open Journal of Science and Technology. 2(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.31580/ojst.v2i1.909
   Google Scholar
• Martí-Vilar, M., Corell-García, L., & Merino-Soto, C. (2019). Systematic review of prosocial behavior measures. Revista de Psicología, 37(1), 349–377. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201901.012
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, L. A., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). Social media: A contextual framework to guide research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1653–1677. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, A. M. (1994). Helping behaviors in the natural environment: Dimensions and correlates of helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294201004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesurado, B., Resett, S., Tezón, M., & Vanney, C. E. (2021). Do Positive Emotions Make You More Prosocial? Direct and Indirect Effects of an Intervention Program on Prosociality in Colombian Adolescents During Social Isolation Due to COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 710037, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michikyan, Minas, Subrahmanyam, Kaveri, Regan, Pamela, Castillo, Linda G., Ham, Lindsay, Harkness, Audrey, Schwartz, Seth J., (2023). Social connectedness and negative emotion modulation: social media use for coping among college students during the covid-19 pandemic. Emerging Adulthood, 11(4), 1039–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968231176109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, Chanki, Travaglino, Giovanni A, Uskul, Ayse K,.(2018). Social value orientation and endorsement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism: an exploratory study comparing individuals from North America and South Korea. Frontiers in Psychology, 2262, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrick, J. G. (2017). Identification and emotions experienced after a celebrity cancer death shape information sharing and prosocial behavior. Journal of Health Communication, 22(6), 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1315622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naqvi, M. H., Guoyan, S., & Naqvi, M. H. A. (2021). Measuring the influence of web features in the online gamification environment: a multimediation approach. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3213981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naqvi, M., Li, S., Jiang, Y., & Naqvi, M. H. A. (2020). The rise of social networking sites: an empirical investigation applying demographic differences and the technology acceptance model. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(1), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-01-2019-0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Youth Council (NYC) Singapore (2012). Youth Scope: A Journal of Youth Research Studies in Singapore. https://www.youthpolicy.org/library/wp-content/uploads/library/Singapore_2012_Youth_Scope_Report_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neaman, A., Otto, S., & Vinokur, E. (2018). Toward an integrated approach to environmental and prosocial education. Sustainability, 10(3), 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neaman, Alexander, Díaz-Siefer, Pablo, Burnham, Elliot, Castro, Mónica, Zabel, Sarah, Dovletyarova, Elvira A., Navarro-Villarroel, Claudia, Otto, Siegmar,.(2021). Catholic religious identity, prosocial and pro-environmental behaviors, and connectedness to nature in Chile. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 30(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.30.1.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubaum, G., & Krämer, N. C. (2016). Monitoring the opinion of the crowd: Psychological mechanisms underlying public opinion perceptions on social media. Media Psychology, 20(3), 502–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1211539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2019). The rise of social media. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/rise-of-social-media
   Google Scholar
• Otto, S., Hildebrandt, J., Will, M., Henn, L., & Beer, K. (2021). Tying up loose ends. Integrating consumers’ psychology into a broad interdisciplinary perspective on a circular sustainable bioeconomy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 34(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-021-09851-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5, 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
   Google Scholar
• Padilla-Walker, L. M., Barry, C. M., Carroll, J. S., Madsen, S. D., & Nelson, L. J. (2008). Looking on the bright side: The role of identity status and gender on positive orientations during emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 31(4), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla-Walker, L. M., Van der Graaff, J., Workman, K., Carlo, G., Branje, S., Carrizales, A., Gerbino, M., Gülseven, Z., Hawk, S. T., Luengo Kanacri, P., Mesurado, B., Samper-García, P., Shen, Y. L., Taylor, L. K., Trach, J., van Zalk, M. H. W., & Žukauskienė, R. (2022). Emerging adults’ cultural values, prosocial behaviors, and mental health in 14 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 46(4), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254221084098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, Matthew J, McKenzie, Joanne E, Bossuyt, Patrick M, Boutron, Isabelle, Hoffmann, Tammy C, Mulrow, Cynthia D, Shamseer, Larissa, Tetzlaff, Jennifer M, Akl, Elie A, Brennan, Sue E, Chou, Roger, Glanville, Julie, Grimshaw, Jeremy M, Hróbjartsson, Asbjørn, Lalu, Manoj M, Li, Tianjing, Loder, Elizabeth W, Mayo-Wilson, Evan, McDonald, Steve, McGuinness, Luke A, Stewart, Lesley A, Moher, David, (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulin, M., Ferguson, R. J., Schattke, K., & Jost, N. (2014). Millennials, social media, prosocial emotions, and charitable causes: The paradox of gender differences. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 26(4), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2014.965069
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, P. L., & Amato, P. R. (1980). A taxonomy of helping: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(4), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, A. (2015). Social media usage 2005–2015. Pew Research Centre. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/10/08/social-networking-usage-2005-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1936). The Origin of intelligence in the child. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Piff, P., Dietze, P., Feinberg, M., Stancato, D., & Keltner, D. (2015). Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., … & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. ESRC Methods Programme Version, 1(1), b92. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=ed8b23836338f6fdea0cc55e161b0fc5805f9e27
   Google Scholar
• Powell, K. L., Roberts, G., & Nettle, D. (2012). Eye images increase charitable donations: Evidence from an opportunistic field experiment in a supermarket. Ethology, 118(11), 1096–1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. W. (2017). Theorizing Digital Divides. http://books.google.ie/books?id=4OE2DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Ragnedda,+M.,+%26+Muschert,+G.+W.+(Eds.).+(2017).+Theorizing+digital+divides.+Routledge.&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api
   Google Scholar
• Raihani, N. J., & McAuliffe, K. (2014). Dictator game giving: The importance of descriptive versus injunctive norms. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e113826-. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramus, C. A., & Killmer, A. B. (2007). Corporate greening through prosocial extrarole behaviours–a conceptual framework for employee motivation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(8), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.504
   Google Scholar
• Rand, D. G. (2016). Cooperation, fast and slow: Meta-analytic evidence for a theory of social heuristics and self-interested deliberation. Psychological Science, 27(9), 1192–1206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616654455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, E. E., Punyanunt-Carter, N., LaFreniere, J. R., Norman, M. S., & Kimball, T. G. (2020). The serially mediated relationship between emerging adults’ social media use and mental well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza, A., Usman, M., & Ali, M. (2022). Examining how and when Facebook intensive use shapes users’ online pro-social behaviors. Telematics and Informatics, 67, 101753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Klinger, M. R., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2007). Media priming: A meta-analysis. In Mass media effects research. Advances through meta-analysis. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, M., & Tamma, F. (2015). The science behind why people give money to charity. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/voluntary-sector-network/2015/mar/23/the-science-behind-why-people-give-money-to-charity
   Google Scholar
• Saroglou, V., Pichon, I., Trompette, L., Verschueren, M., & Dernelle, R. (2005). Prosocial behavior and religion: New evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(3), 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxton, G. D., & Wang, L. (2013). The social network effect: The determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 850–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013485159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalz, D. L., Colistra, C. M., & Evans, K. E. (2015). Social media sites as a means of coping with a threatened social identity. Leisure Sciences, 37(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2014.935835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. (2000). New environmental theories: Empathizing with nature: The effects of Perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. F., Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Prince, M. A., Nochajski, T. H., & Collins, R. L. (2017). Time spent online: Latent profile analyses of emerging adults’ social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singapore Children’s Society (2005). Protection of children in Singapore: An overview. Research and Advocacy Standing Committee. https://www.childrensociety.org.sg/resources/ck/files/child_protection.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sisco, M. R., & Weber, E. U. (2019). Examining charitable giving in real-world online donations. Nature Communications, 10(1), 3968. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11852-z
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, P., Vidgen, R., & Finnegan, P. (2021). Winning heads and hearts? How websites encourage prosocial behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(9), 933–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1736156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022299422219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. R., & McSweeney, A. (2007). Charitable giving: The effectiveness of a revised theory of planned behaviour model in predicting donating intentions and behaviour. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17(5), 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. (2023). Global social networks ranked by number of users. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, A. T. (2016). The role of digital and social media marketing in consumer behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 322–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sujata, M., Khor, K. S., Ramayah, T., & Teoh, A. P. (2019). The role of social media on recycling behaviour. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 20, 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The main model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.073
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Xu, Q. (2008). The bandwagon effect of collaborative filtering technology [Paper presentation]. CHI'08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3453–3458. https://doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358873
   Google Scholar
• Tan, M. & Singh, S. (2022). Drivers of prosocial behavior: Exploring the role of mindset and perceived cost. Current Research in Social Psychology, 31(3), 28–38. https://crisp.org.uiowa.edu/sites/crisp.org.uiowa.edu/files/2022-09/CRISP%20Tan%2031.3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thielmann, I., Böhm, R., Ott, M., & Hilbig, B. (2021). Economic games: An introduction and guide for research. Collabra: Psychology, 7(1), 19004. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.19004
   Google Scholar
• Thielmann, I., Spadaro, G., & Balliet, D. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 30–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, D., Lau, V., Hong, Y., Bligh, M., & Kakarika, M. (2021). Prosociality and hoarding amid the covid‐19 pandemic: a tale of four countries. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 32(3), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from tahrir square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usmani, S., Ali, S. F., Imtiaz, K., & Khan, H. G. (2019). The experimental study on the effectiveness of social media ad campaign: Like, comment, share. International Journal of Experiential Learning & Case Studies, 4(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.22555/ijelcs.v4i1.2452.g535
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Linden, S. (2015). Intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Nature Climate Change. 5(7), 612–613. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannucci, A., Flannery, K. M., & Ohannessian, C. M. (2017). Social media use and anxiety in emerging adults. Journal of affective disorders, 207, 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannucci, A., Ohannessian, C. M., & Gagnon, S. (2019). Use of multiple social media platforms concerning psychological functioning in emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood, 7(6), 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818782309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vescio, T. K., Sechrist, G. B., & Paolucci, M. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(4), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell, T. F., & Sundar, S. S. (2020). Bandwagon effects in social television: How audience metrics related to size and opinion affect the enjoyment of digital media. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 106270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K. C., Lai, C. M., Wang, T., & Wu, S. F. (2015). Bandwagon effect in Facebook discussion groups [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the ASE Big Data & Social Informatics 2015, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818869.2818914
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Tchernev, J. M., & Solloway, T. (2012). A dynamic longitudinal examination of social media use, needs, and gratifications among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1829–1839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M., Viehmann, C., Ziegele, M., & Schemer, C. (2020). Online hate does not stay online–how implicit and explicit attitudes mediate the effect of civil negativity and hate in user comments on prosocial behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 104. 106192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, H., & Quinn, C. (2017). Can Facebook aid sustainability? An investigation of empathy expression within the humans of New York blog. Sustainability, 9(6), 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiepking, P., & Bekkers, R. (2012). Who gives? A literature review of predictors of charitable giving. Part Two: Gender, family composition and income.Voluntary Sector Review, 3(2), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080512X649379
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, K., & Stephen, A. T. (2013). Are close friends the enemy? Online social networks, self-esteem, and self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1086/668794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P., & Aaker, J. (2002). Can mixed emotions peacefully coexist? Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 636–649. https://doi.org/10.1086/338206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S., Brückner, C., & Krämer, N. C. (2015). They came, they liked, they commented: Social influence on Facebook news channels. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(8), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, T., Konishi, C., & Kong, X. (2020). Parenting and prosocial behaviors: A meta‐analysis. Social Development, 30(2), 343–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, R. and Zhang, W. (2022). Analysis of influencing factors of online community knowledge-sharing from the perspective of the platform environment. Kybernetes, 52(12), 6107–6121. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2022-0528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Hanyi, Bègue, Laurent, Bushman, Brad J,.(2014). Washing the guilt away: effects of personal versus vicarious cleansing on guilty feelings and prosocial behavior. Frontiers In Human Neuroscience, 8(97), 97. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00097
   Google Scholar
• Xu, X., Zuo, X., Wang, X., & Han, S. (2009). Do you feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 29(26), 8525–8529. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2418-09.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanovitzky, I., & Stryker, J. (2001). Mass media, social norms, and health promotion efforts: A longitudinal study of media effects on youth binge drinking. Communication Research, 28(2), 208–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yushi, J., Naqvi, M. H. A., & Naqvi, M. H. (2018). Using social influence processes and psychological factors to measure pervasive adoption of social networking sites: Evidence from Pakistan. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(15), 3485–3499. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2017.1417834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf, S., Idris, K., Samah, A. A., Ibrahim, A., Ramli, N. S., Ibrahim, M. S., & Rahman, N. A. A. (2020). Keyboard warrior, online predator or cyber bully? The growing menace of child exposure to internet harm based on research evidence. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(2), 1291–1309. http://119.40.116.186/resources/files/Pertanika%20PAPERS/JSSH%20Vol.%2028%20(2)%20Jun.%202020/33%20JSSH-4325-2019.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, N. and Zhou, G. (2020). Social media use and mental health during the covid‐19 pandemic: moderator role of disaster stressor and mediator role of negative affect. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 12(4), 1019–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, C., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science (New York, N.Y.), 313(5792), 1451–1452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegele, M., & Jost, P. B. (2016). Not funny? The effects of factual versus sarcastic journalistic responses to uncivil user comments. Communication Research, 47(6), 891–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216671854
   Google Scholar
• Ziegele, M., & Quiring, O. (2017). The discussion value of online news: How news story characteristics affect the deliberative quality of user discussions in SNS Comment Sections [Paper presentation]. Paper Presented at the 67th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (Ica), San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegele, M., Naab, T. K., & Jost, P. (2019). Lonely together? Identifying the determinants of collective corrective action against uncivil comments. New Media & Society, 22(5), 731–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819870130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar