Use of data obtained in the field and its contribution to the process of construction of the geological change model by preservice elementary teachers

References

• Aflalo, E., R. Montin, and A. Raviv. 2020. “Learning Outdoors or with a Computer: The Contribution of the Learning Setting to Learning and to Environmental Perceptions”. Research in Science & Technological Education 38 (2): 208–226. doi:10.1080/02635143.2019.1603141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ageitos, N., B. Puig, and L. Colucci-Gray. 2019. “Examining Reasoning Practices and Epistemic Actions to Explore Students’ Understanding of Genetics and Evolution.” Science & Education 28 (9–10): 1209–1233. doi:10.1007/s11191-019-00086-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almquist, H., G. Stanley, L. Blank, M. Hendrix, M. Rosenblatt, S. Hanfling, and J. Crews. 2011. “An Integrated Field-based Approach to Building Teachers’ Geoscience Skills.” Journal of Geoscience Education 59 (1): 31–40. doi:10.5408/1.3543926.
   Google Scholar
• Balliet, R. N., E. M. Riggs, and A. V. Maltese. 2015. “Students’ Problem Solving Approaches for Developing Geologic Models in the Field.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (8): 1109–1131. doi:10.1002/tea.21236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrendt, M., and T. Franklin. 2014. “A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education.” International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 9 (3): 235–245. doi:10.12973/ijese.2014.213a.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco-Anaya, P., R. Justi, and J. Díaz de Bustamante. 2017. “Challenges and Opportunities in Analysing Students Modelling.” International Journal of Science Education 39 (3): 377–402. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1286408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böttcher, F., and A. Meisert. 2011. “Argumentation in Science Education: A Model-based Framework.” Science & Education 20 (2): 103–140. doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9304-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., A. Collins, and P. Duguid. 1989. “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning.” Educational Researcher 18 (1): 32–42. doi:10.3102/0013189X018001032.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. 2014. “NGSS and the Next Generation of Science Teachers.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 25: 211–221. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9381-4.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, S. J., L. P. Tugurian, and M. M. Thomson. 2013. “Elementary Science Indoors and Out: Teachers, Time, and Testing.” Research in Science Education 43: 2059–2083. doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9347-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crippen, K. J. 2012. “Argument as Professional Development: Impacting Teacher Knowledge and Beliefs about Science.” Journal of ScienceTeacher Education 23 (8): 847–866.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., G. A. Fore, G. M. Filippelli, and J. L. Hess. 2020. “A Systematic Review of the Literature on Situated Learning in the Geosciences: Beyond the Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education 42 (5): 722–743. doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1727060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., P. Newton, and J. Osborne. 2000. “Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms.” Science Education 84: 287–312. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. G., C. A. Chinn, and S. Barzilai. 2018. “Grasp of Evidence: Problematizing and Expanding the Next Generation Science Standards’ Conceptualization of Evidence.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (7): 907–937. doi:10.1002/tea.21468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. 2008. “Science Education in Three-part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic and Social Learning Goals.” Review of Research in Education 32 (1): 268–291. doi:10.3102/0091732X07309371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, E., and A. Gilburn. 2012. “The Field Course Effect: Gains in Cognitive Learning in Undergraduate Biology Students following a Field Course.” Journal of Biological Education 46 (1): 29–35. doi:10.1080/00219266.2011.568063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger, A. 2019. “The Field as Touchstone.” Journal of Geoscience Education 67 (2): 97–99. doi:10.1080/10899995.2019.1596461.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. 1986. “Qualitative Methods in Research on Teaching.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by Merlin C. Wittrock, 119–161. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fedesco, H., D. Cavin, and R. Henares. 2020. “Field-based Learning in Higher Education.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 20 (1): 65–84. doi:10.14434/josotl.v20i1.24877.
   Google Scholar
• Frodeman, R. 1995. “Geological Reasoning: Geology as an Interpretative and Historical Science.” Geological Society American Bulletin 107 (8): 960–968. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1995)107<0960:GRGAAI>2.3.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., C. J. Boulter, and R. Elmer. 2000. “Positioning Models in Science Education and in Design and Technology Education.” In Developing Models in Science Education, edited by J. K. Gilbert and C. J. Boulter, 3–17. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., and R. Justi. 2016. Modelling-based Teaching in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., and B. Crujeiras. 2017. “Epistemic Practices and Scientific Practices in Science Education.” In Science Education, edited by K.S. Taber and B. Akpan, 69–80. Rotterdam: Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Justi, R. S., and J. K. Gilbert. 2002. “Modelling, Teachers’ Views on the Nature of Modelling, and Implications for the Education of Modellers.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (4): 369–387. doi:10.1080/09500690110110142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., and A. Takao. 2002. “Epistemic Levels in Argument: An Analysis of University Oceanography Students’ Use of Evidence in Writing.” Science Education 86 (3): 314–342. doi:10.1002/sce.10024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, C. 2008. “Geoscience Education: An Overview.” Studies in Science Education 44 (2): 187–222. doi:10.1080/03057260802264289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortz, K., D. Cardace, and B. Savage. 2020. “Affective Factors during Field Research that Influence Intention to Persist in the Geosciences.” Journal of Geoscience Education 68 (2): 133–151. doi:10.1080/10899995.2019.1652463.
   Google Scholar
• Koslowski, B., J. Marasia, M. Chelenza, and R. Dublin. 2008. “Information Becomes Evidence When an Explanation Can Incorporate It into a Causal Framework.” Cognitive Development 23 (4): 472–487. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie Alon, N., and T. Tal. 2017. “Field Trips to Natural Environments: How Outdoor Educators Use the Physical Environment.” International Journal of Science Education, Part B 7 (3): 237–252. doi:10.1080/21548455.2016.1250291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., M. González-Howard, R. Katsh-Singer, and S. Loper. 2016. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Argumentation: Using Classroom Contexts to Assess High-quality PCK Rather than Pseudoargumentation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (2): 261–290. doi:10.1002/tea.21252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonça, P. C. C., and R. Justi. 2013. “The Relationships between Modelling and Argumentation from the Perspective of the Model of Modelling Diagram.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (14): 2407–2434. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.811615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogk, D. W., and C. Goodwin. 2012. “Learning in the Field: Synthesis of Research on Thinking and Learning in the Geosciences.” Geological Society of America Special Papers 486: 131–163. doi:10.1130/2012.2486(24.
   Google Scholar
• Monteira, S. F., and M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre. 2016. “The Practice of Using Evidence in Kindergarten: The Role of Purposeful Observation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (8): 1232–1258. doi:10.1002/tea.21259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, G., M. D. Toland, R. Levy, G. Kunz, D. Harwood, D. Green, and K. Kitts. 2012. “The Impact of an Inquiry-based Geoscience Field Course on Pre-service Teachers.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 23: 503–529. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9283-2.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/b25efab8-en.
   Google Scholar
• Orion, N., and A. Hofstein. 1991. “The Measurement of Students’ Attitudes Towards Scientific Field Trips.” Science Education 75 (5): 513–523. doi:10.1002/sce.3730750503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orion, N., and A. Hofstein. 1994. “Factors that Influence Learning during a Scientific Field Trip in a Natural Environment.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31 (10): 1097–1119. doi:10.1002/tea.3660311005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. 2014. “Teaching Scientific Practices: Meeting the Challenge of Change.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 25: 177–196. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1.
   Google Scholar
• Passmore, C., and J. Svoboda. 2011. “Exploring Opportunities for Argumentation in Modelling Classrooms.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (10): 1535–1554. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.577842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petcovic, H., and A. Stokes. 2014. “Geoscientists’ Perceptions of the Value of Undergraduate Field Education.” GSA Today: A Publication of the Geological Society of America 24 (7): 4–10. doi:10.1130/GSATG196A.1.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., and W. A. Sandoval. 2012. “Improvements to Elementary Children´s Epistemic Understanding from Sustained Argumentation.” Science Education 96 (3): 488–526. doi:10.1002/sce.21006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., and S. R. Fowler. 2006. “A Threshold Model of Content Knowledge Transfer for Socioscientific Argumentation.” Science Education 90: 986–1004. doi:10.1002/sce.20165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., and M. R. Blanchard. 2012. “Science Teachers and Scientific Argumentation: Trends in View and Practice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (9): 112–1148. doi:10.1002/tea.21037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., and K. A. Millwood. 2005. “The Quality of Students´ Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations.” Cognition and Instruction 23 (1): 23–55. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauble, L.et al 2018. ”In the eye of the beholder: Domain-general and domain-specific reasoning in science.” In Scientific reasoning and argumentation: The roles of domain-specific and domain-general knowledge, edited by F. Fischer, C. Chinn, K. Engelman, and J. Osborne, 11–33. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schiappa, T., and L. Smith. 2019. “Field Experiences in Geosciences: A Case Study from A Multidisciplinary Geology and Geography Course.” Journal of Geoscience Education 67 (2): 100–113. doi:10.1080/10899995.2018.1527618.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., B. J. Reiser, E. A. Davis, L. Kenyon, A. Achér, D. Fortus, and J. Krajcik. 2009. “Developing a Learning Progression for Scientific Modeling: Making Scientific Modeling Accessible and Meaningful for Learners.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (6): 632–654. doi:10.1002/tea.20311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G., M. Boyd, and D. Colquhoun. 2013. “Changing Spaces, Changing Relationships: The Positive Impact.” Australian Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 17 (1): 47–53. doi:10.1007/BF03400955.
   Google Scholar
• Tal, T., and O. Morag. 2009. “Reflective Practice as a Means for Preparing to Teach Outdoors in an Ecological Garden.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 20 (3): 245–262. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9131-1.
   Google Scholar
• Uskola, A., and N. Seijas. 2019. “Visual expression of the geological change model during a hydrogeology teaching sequence which includes fieldwork.” Poster Presented at the 13th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), Bologna, August 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Vo, T., C. Forbes, L. Zangori, and C. V. Schwarz. 2019. “Longitudinal Investigation of Primary Inservice Teachers’ Modelling the Hydrological Phenomena.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (18): 2788–2807. doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1698786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. 2003. “Inquiry Projects in Science Teacher Education: What Can Investigative Experiences Reveal about Teacher Thinking and Eventual Classroom Practice?” Science Education 87 (1): 112–143. doi:10.1002/sce.10044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamorano, P. O., J. R. Del Pozo, and M. J. A. Tomás. 1978. “Mapa geológico de la hoja nº 111 (Orduña).” In Mapa geológico de España E: 1:50.000. Segunda Serie (MAGNA) http://info.igme.es/cartografiadigital/geologica/Magna50Hoja.aspx?Id=111&language=es Accesed 10 September 2021, edited by IGME.
   Google Scholar
• Zembal-Saul, C. 2009. “Learning to Teach Elementary School Science as Argument.” Science Education 93: 687–719. doi:10.1002/sce.20325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar