Upper secondary school students’ gendered interests in electronics and electrical engineering

References

• ASEE (American Society of Engineering Education). n.d. ASEE Statement on Diversity and Inclusiveness (Washington, DC: American Society of Engineering Education).
   Google Scholar
• Berge, Maria, Eva Silfver, and Anna Danielsson. 2019. “In Search of the New Engineer: Gender, Age, and Social Class in Information about Engineering Education.” European Journal of Engineering Education 44 (5): 650–665. doi:10.1080/03043797.2018.1523133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, Stephen J., Wendy M. Williams, and Susan M. Barnett. 2009. “Women’s Underrepresentation in Science: Sociocultural and Biological Considerations.” Psychological Bulletin 135 (2): 218–261. doi:10.1037/a0014412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Du, Xiang-Yun. 2011. “Gendered Practices of Constructing an Engineering Identity in a Problem-Based Learning Environment.” European Journal of Engineering Education 31 (1): 35–42. doi:10.1080/03043790500430185.
   Google Scholar
• Engström, Susanne. 2016. “Differences and Similarities between Female Students and Male Students that Succeed within Higher Technical Education: Profiles Emerge through the Use of Cluster Analysis.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 28 (1): 239–261. doi:10.1007/s10798-016-9374-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey, Elizabeth. 2007. “Cultures within Cultures: Welcoming or Unwelcoming for Women?” In Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Honolulu, HI, June 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, Elizabeth, and Lesley Parker. 2010. “Mapping the Cultural Landscape in Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 99 (1): 5–22. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01038.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, Allison, and Geoff Potvin. 2017. “Pushing and Pulling Sara: A Case Study of the Contrasting Influences of High School and University Experiences on Engineering Agency, Identity, and Participation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54 (4): 439–462. doi:10.1002/tea.21372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, Allison, Geoff Potvin, Zahra Hazari, and Robynne Lock. 2016. “Identity, Critical Agency, and Engineering: An Affective Model for Predicting Engineering as a Career Choice.” Journal of Engineering Education 105 (2): 312–340. doi:10.1002/jee.20118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, Allison, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip M. Sadler. 2016. “Disciplinary Differences in Out-of-School High School Science Experiences and Influence on Students’ Engineering Choices.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research 6 (2): 1–14. doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1131.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Jiesi, Jacquelynne Sue Eccles, Florencia M. Sortheix, and Katariina Salmela-Aro. 2018. “Gendered Pathways toward STEM Careers: The Incremental Roles of Work Value Profiles above Academic Task Values.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1111. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazzan, O., D. Levy, and A. Tal. 2005. “Electricity in the Palms of Her Hands-the Perception of Electrical Engineering by Outstanding Female High School Pupils.” IEEE Transactions on Education 48 (3): 402–412. doi:10.1109/TE.2005.849728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, Kathryn, Jennifer Gore, Max Smith, and Adam Lloyd. 2018. “An Integrated Analysis of School Students’ Aspirations for STEM Careers: Which Student and School Factors are Most Predictive?” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (4): 655–675. doi:10.1007/s10763-016-9793-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavonen, Jari, Janjis Gedrovics, Reijo Byman, Veijo Meisalo, Kalle Juuti, and Anna Uitto. 2008. “Students’ Motivational Orientations and Career Choice in Science and Technology: A Comparative Investigation in Finland and Latvia.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 7 (2): 86–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, Susan M., Richard A. Layton, and Matthew W. Ohland. 2015. “Multi-Institution Study of Student Demographics and Outcomes in Electrical and Computer Engineering in the USA.” IEEE Transactions on Education 58 (3): 141–150. doi:10.1109/TE.2014.2344622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MINEDU (The Ministry of Education and Culture) and EDUFI (Finnish National Agency for Education). n.d. “Vipunen - Education Statistics Finland.” Accessed 14 October 2021. https://vipunen.fi/en-gb/
   Google Scholar
• Moote, Julie, Louise Archer, Jenifer DeWitt, and Emily MacLeod. 2020. “Comparing Students’ Engineering and Science Aspirations from Age 10 to 16: Investigating the Role of Gender, Ethnicity, Cultural Capital, and Attitudinal Factors.” Journal of Engineering Education 109 (1): 34–51. doi:10.1002/jee.20302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motivaction & YoungWorks. 2010. Bèta Mentality 2011–2016: Attracting Young People to Science and Technology. Den Haag: Platform Bèta Techniek.
   Google Scholar
• Naukkarinen, Johanna, and Hanna Niemela. 2020. “Understanding better young people’s views on technology in Finland.” In Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Virtual Conference, June 22-26.
   Google Scholar
• Potvin, Geoff, Catherine McGough, Lisa Benson, Hank J. Boone, Jacqueline Doyle, Allison Godwin, Adam Kirn, et al. 2018. “Gendered Interests in Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering: Intersections with Career Outcome Expectations.” IEEE Transactions on Education 61 (4): 298–304. doi:10.1109/te.2018.2859825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raabe, Isabel J., Zsófia Boda, and Christoph Stadtfeld. 2019. “The Social Pipeline: How Friend Influence and Peer Exposure Widen the STEM Gender Gap.” Sociology of Education 92 (2): 105–123. doi:10.1177/0038040718824095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagebiel, F., and S. Vazquez-Cupeiro. 2010. “Stereotypes and Identity. Meta-Analysis of Gender and Science Research – Topic Report.” European Union Project RTD-PP-L4-2007-1.
   Google Scholar
• SEFI (European Society for Engineering Education). 2018. “SEFI Position Paper on Diversity, Equality and Inclusiveness in Engineering Education.” Preprint.
   Google Scholar
• Shoffner, Marie F., Debbie Newsome, Casey A Barrio Minton, and Carrie A Wachter Morris. 2014. “A Qualitative Exploration of the STEM Career-related Outcome Expectations of Young Adolescents.” Journal of Career Development 42 (2): 102–116. doi:10.1177/0894845314544033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, Gijsbert, and David C. Geary. 2018. “The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education.” Psychological Science 29 (4): 581–593. doi:10.1177/0956797617741719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Rong, and James Rounds. 2015. “All STEM Fields are Not Created Equal: People and Things Interests Explain Gender Disparities across STEM Fields.” Frontiers in Psychology 6 (Article 189): 1–20. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00189Al.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan, Li, Joyce B. Main, and Rajeev Darolia. 2021. “Using Random Forest Analysis to Identify Student Demographic and High School-level Factors that Predict College Engineering Major Choice.” Journal of Engineering Education 110 (3): 572–593. doi:10.1002/jee.20393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teknikföretagen. 2017. “Att Få Ännu Fler Att Välja Teknik. En Guide Till Ungas Intresse För Teknikutbildningar.”
   Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). n.d. “The World’s Women 2020, Education.” Accessed 14 October 2021. https://worlds-women-2020-data-undesa.hub.arcgis.com/pages/education
   Google Scholar
• Virtanen, Sonja, Eija Räikkönen, and Pasi Ikonen. 2014. “Gender-based Motivational Differences in Technology Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 25 (2): 197–211. doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9278-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazilitas, D., S. Saharso, G. C. de Vries, and J. S. Svensson. 2016. “The Postmodern Perfectionist, the Pragmatic Hedonist and the Materialist Maximalist: Understanding High School Students’ Profile Choices Towards or Away from Mathematics, Science and Technology (MST) Fields in the Netherlands.” Gender and Education 29 (7): 831–849. doi:10.1080/09540253.2016.1166185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar