Effects of withholding answers coupled with physical manipulation on students’ learning of magnetism-related science content

References

• Akindehin, F. 1988. “Effect of an Instructional Package on Preservice Science Teachers’ Understanding of the Nature of Science and Acquisition of Science‐related Attitudes.” Science Education 72 (1): 73–82. doi:10.1002/sce.3730720107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfieri, L, P. J. Brooks, N. J. Aldrich, and H. R. Tenenbaum. 2011. “Does Discovery-based Instruction Enhance Learning?” Journal of Educational Psychology 103 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1037/a0021017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., D. R. Krathwohl, and B. S. Bloom. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., J. J. Matkins, and B. M. Gansneder. 2011. “Impacts of Contextual and Explicit Instruction on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Understandings of the Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (4): 414–436. doi:10.1002/tea.20402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., and J. Sweller. 1996. “Cognitive Load while Learning to Use a Computer Program.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 10 (2): 151–170. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199604)10:2<151::AID-ACP380>3.0.CO;2-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobern, W. W., D. Schuster, B. Adams, B. Applegate, B. Skjold, A. Undreiu, C. C. Loving, and J. D. Gobert. 2010. “Experimental Comparison of Inquiry and Direct Instruction in Science.” Research in Science & Technological Education 28 (1): 81–96. doi:10.1080/02635140903513599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. T. 2008. “The Effect of Direct Instruction versus Discovery Learning on the Understanding of Science Lessons by Second Grade Students.” https://opencommons.uconn.edu/nera_2008/30
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. R. Morrison. 2018. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, A., C. Dirks, M. Pat Wenderoth, and M. Sundberg. 2008. “Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom’s Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 7 (4): 368–381. doi:10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann, S., and G. Colvin. 2006. Rubric for Identifying Authentic Direct Instruction Programs. Eugene, OR: Engelmann Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M. 2006. “The Problem with Answers: An Exploration of Guided Scientific Inquiry Teaching.” Science Education 90 (3): 453–467. doi:10.1002/sce.20130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisinger, K. F. 2016. “21st Century Skills: What are They and How Do We Assess Them?” Applied Measurement in Education 29 (4): 245–249. doi:10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glogger-Frey, I., K. Gaus, and A. Renkl. 2017. “Learning from Direct Instruction: Best Prepared by Several Self-regulated or Guided Invention Activities?” Learning and Instruction 51 (1): 26–35. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., R. Golan Duncan, and C. A. Chinn. 2007. “Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark.” Educational Psychologist 42 (2): 99–107. doi:10.1080/00461520701263368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., and V. Lunetta. 2004. “The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty First Century.” Science Education 88 (1): 28–54. doi:10.1002/sce.10106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstermann, N., D. Grube, and S. Bögeholz. 2010. “Hands-on Activities and Their Influence on Students’ Interest.” Research in Science Education 40 (5): 743–757. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9142-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitt, W., D. Monetti, and J. Hummel. 2009. “Designing Direct Instruction. Prepublication Version of Chapter Published.” In Instructional Design Theories and Models: Volume III, Building a Common Knowledge Base, edited by C. Reigeluth and A. Carr-Chellman, 73–97. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, J. H., M. L. Venn, and P. L. Gunter. 2004. “Teacher-made Scripted Lessons.” In Evidence-based Educational Methods, 95–108. Elsevier Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kalthoff, B., H. Theyssen, and N. Schreiber. 2018. “Explicit Promotion of Experimental Skills. And What about the Content-related Skills?” International Journal of Science Education 40 (11): 1305–1326. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1477262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S. 2011. “Cognitive Load Theory: How Many Types of Load Does It Really Need?” Educational Psychology Review 23 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanokpermpoon, M. 2013. “Managing Working Memory in Language Instructions: An Overview of Cognitive Load Theory.” Thammasat Review 16 (2): 93–108. https://sc01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tureview/article/view/40755
   Google Scholar
• Kind, P. M., V. Kind, A. Hofstein, and J. Wilson. 2011. “Peer Argumentation in the School Science Laboratory - Exploring Effects of Task Features.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (18): 2527–2558. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.550952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark. 2006. “Why Minimal Guidance during Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-based, Experiential, and Inquiry-based Teaching.” Educational Psychologist 41 (2): 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissane, M., S. Kalyuga, P. Chandler, and J. Sweller. 2008. “The Consequences of Fading Instructional Guidance on Delayed Performance: The Case of Financial Services Training.” Educational Psychology 28 (7): 809–822. doi:10.1080/01443410802322069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittell, J. E. 1957. “An Experimental Study of the Effect of External Direction during Learning on Transfer and Retention of Principles.” Journal of Educational Psychology 48 (7): 391–405. doi:10.1037/h0046792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., and M. Nigam. 2004. “The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction: Effects of Direct Instruction and Discovery Learning.” Psychological Science 15 (10): 661–667. doi:10.1111/j.09567976.2004.00737.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., L. M. Triona, and C. Williams. 2007. “Hands on What? the Relative Effectiveness of Physical versus Virtual Materials in an Engineering Design Project by Middle School Children.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (1): 183–203. doi:10.1002/tea.20152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepsch, M., and T. Seufert. 2020. “Understanding Instructional Design Effects by Differentiated Measurement of Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load.” Instructional Science 48 (2): 45–77. doi:10.1007/s11251-020-09502-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2007. “Is Direct Instruction an Answer to the Right Question?” Educational Psychologist 42 (2): 109–113. doi:10.1080/00461520701263376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyun, S., S. Kalyuga, and J. Sweller. 2013. “The Effect of Worked Examples When Learning to Write Essays in English Literature.” The Journal of Experimental Education 81 (3): 385–408. doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.727884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazonder, A. W., and A. Egberink. 2013. “Children’s Acquisition and Use of the Control-of-variables Strategy: Effects of Explicit and Implicit Instructional Guidance.” Instructional Science 42 (2): 291–304. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9284-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likourezos, V., and S. Kalyuga. 2016. “Instruction-first and Problem-solving-first Approaches: Alternative Pathways to Learning Complex Tasks.” Instructional Science 45 (2): 195–219. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9399-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logar, A., and Savec V. Ferk. 2011. “Students’ Hands-on Experimental Work Vs Lecture Demonstration in Teaching Elementary School Chemistry.” Acta Chimica Slovenica 58 (4): 866–875. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24061141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loibi, K., and N. Rummel. 2013. “The Impact of Guidance during Problem-solving Prior to Instruction on Students’ Inventions and Learning Outcomes.” Instructional Science 42 (3): 305–326. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9282-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliaro, S. G., B. B. Lockee, and J. K. Burton. 2005. “Direct Instruction Revisited: A Key Model for Instructional Technology.” Journal of Educational Research Technology and Development 53 (4): 41–55. doi:10.1007/BF02504684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlen, B. J., and D. Klahr. 2013. “Sequential Effects of High and Low Instructional Guidance on Children’s Acquisition of Experimentation Skills: Is It All in the Timing?” Instructional Science 41 (3): 621–634. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9248-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. 2004. “Should There Be a Three-strikes Rule against Pure Discovery Learning? the Case for Guided Methods of Instruction.” American Psychologist 59 (1): 14–19. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., and R. Moreno. 1998. “A Split-attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory.” Journal of Educational Psychology 90 (2): 312–320. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlich, D. C., R. J. Harder, R. C. Callahan, M. S. Trevisan, and A. H. Brown. 2012. Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Effective Instruction. London: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Randler, C., and M. Hulde. 2007. “Hands-on versus Teacher-centered Experiments in Soil Ecology.” Research in Science & Technological Education 25 (3): 329–338. doi:10.1080/02635140701535091.
   Google Scholar
• Renken, M. D., and N. Nunez. 2010. “Evidence for Improved Conclusion Accuracy after Reading about Rather than Conducting a Belief-inconsistent Simple Physics Experiment.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 24 (6): 792–811. doi:10.1002/acp.1587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B. 2006. “Promoting Transfer: Effects of Self‐Explanation and Direct Instruction.” Child Development 77 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00852.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. 2012. Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from around the World. France: OECD Publishing. 2, rue Andre Pascal, F-75775 Paris Cedex 16.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M., D. Carnine, and R. Dixon. 1998. “Direct Instruction: Integrating Curriculum Design and Effective Teaching Practice.” Intervention in School and Clinic 33 (4): 227–233. doi:10.1177/105345129803300405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stull, A. T., and R. E. Mayer. 2007. “Learning by Doing versus Learning by Viewing: Three Experimental Comparisons of Learner-generated versus Author-provided Graphic Organizers.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (4): 808–820. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 1994. “Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design.” Learning and Instruction 4 (4): 295–312. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 2009. “What Human Cognitive Architecture Tells Us about Constructivism.” In Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure?, edited by S. Tobias and T. M. Duffy, 127–143. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 2010. “Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous and Germane Cognitive Load.” Educational Psychology Review 22 (2): 123–138. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., P. Ayres, and S. Kalyuga. 2011. Cognitive Load Theory. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., P. A. Kirschner, and R. E. Clark. 2007. “Why Minimally Guided Teaching Techniques Do Not Work: A Reply to Commentaries.” Educational Psychologist 42 (2): 115–121. doi:10.1080/00461520701263426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Merriënboer, J. J. G., and J. Sweller. 2005. “Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions.” Educational Psychology Review 17 (2): 147–177. doi:10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C., and E. Schmidt. 2004. Smart Tests: Teacher-made Tests that Help Students Learn. Ontario: Pembroke Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. 2018. “Withholding Answers during Hands-on Scientific Investigations? Comparing Effects on Developing Students’ Scientific Knowledge, Reasoning, and Application.” International Journal of Science Education 46 (4): 459–469. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1429692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. 2019. ““Hands-on” Plus “Inquiry”? Effects of Withholding Answers Coupled with Physical Manipulations on Students’ Learning of Energy-related Science Concepts.” Learning and Instruction 60 (3): 199–205. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. 2007. “The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills in Elementary and Middle School.” Developmental Review 27 (2): 172–223. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar