Teacher and student engagement when using learning materials based on the context of cutting-edge chemistry research

References

• Apotheker, J. 2019. “The Irresistible Use of Contexts in Chemistry Education.” Israel Journal of Chemistry 59 (6–7): 608–617. doi:10.1002/ijch.201800081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D., and D. Cohen. 1996. “Reform by the Book: What Is - or Might Be - the Role of Curriculum Materials in Teacher Learning and Instructional Reform?” Educational Researcher 25 (9): 6–8, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., and F. Lubben. 2006. “Context‐based Chemistry: The Salters Approach.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 999–1015. doi:10.1080/09500690600702496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., F. Lubben, and S. Hogarth. 2007. “Bringing Science to Life: A Synthesis of the Research Evidence on the Effects of Context‐based and STS Approaches to Science Teaching.” Science Education 91 (3): 347–370. doi:10.1002/sce.20186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, C. J., and E. A. Davis. 2012. “Developing Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Pedagogical Design Capacity for Reform‐based Curriculum Design.” Curriculum Inquiry 42 (3): 386–413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00599.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. W. 2011. “The Teacher–tool Relationship: Theorizing the Design and Use of Curriculum Materials.” In Mathematics Teachers at Work, edited by J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, and G. W. Lloyd, 37–56, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. W., and D. Edelson. 2003. Teaching as Design: Can We Better Understand the Ways Teachers Use Materials so We Can Better Design Materials to Support Their Changes in Practice? Evanston, IL: Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, W. G., J. S. Holman, G. M. Pilling, and D. J. Waddington. 1995. “Salters Advanced Chemistry: A Revolution in Pre-college Chemistry.” Journal of Chemical Education 72 (3): 3) 227. doi:10.1021/ed072p227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., J. A. Taylor, A. Gardner, P. Van Scotter, J. C. Powell, A. Westbrook, and N. Landes. 2006. The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
   Google Scholar
• Çam, A., and Ö. Geban. 2011. “Effectiveness of Case-Based Learning Instruction on Epistemological Beliefs and Attitudes toward Chemistry.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 20 (1): 26–32. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9231-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çigdemoglu, C., and Ö. Geban. 2015. “Context-based Lessons with 5E Model to Promote Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Reactions and Energy Concepts”. Journal of Baltic Science Education 14 (4): 435. doi:10.33225/jbse/15.14.435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., and J. S. Krajcik. 2005. “Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning.” Educational Researcher 34 (3): 3–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X034003003.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., A. S. Palincsar, P. S. Smith, A. M. Arias, and S. M. Kademian. 2017. “Educative Curriculum Materials: Uptake, Impact, and Implications for Research and Design.” Educational Researcher 46 (6): 293–304. doi:10.3102/0013189X17727502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., M. Segers, and M. M. Buehl. 1999. “The Relation between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies: The Case of Research on Prior Knowledge.” Review of Educational Research 69 (2): 145–186. doi:10.3102/00346543069002145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W., and G. A. Ponder. 1977. “The Practicality Ethic in Teacher Decision-making.” Interchange 8 (3): 1–12. doi:10.1007/BF01189290.
   Google Scholar
• Eymur, G., and Ö. Geban. 2017. “The Collaboration of Cooperative Learning and Conceptual Change: Enhancing the Students’ Understanding of Chemical Bonding Concepts.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15 (5): 853–871. doi:10.1007/s10763-016-9716-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. 2006. “On the Nature of ‘Context’ in Chemical Education.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 957–976. doi:10.1080/09500690600702470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., A. M. W. Bulte, and A. Pilot. 2011. “Concept Development and Transfer in Context‐Based Science Education.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (6): 817–837. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.493185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M. 2003. “Structuring Cooperative Group Work in Classrooms.” International Journal of Educational Research 39 (1–2): 35–49. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00072-7.
   Google Scholar
• Höffler, T. N., and D. Leutner. 2007. “Instructional Animation versus Static Pictures: A Meta-analysis.” Learning and Instruction 17 (6): 722–738. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, F., H. Westbroek, W. Doyle, and J. H. van Driel. 2013. “How to Make Innovations Practical.” Teachers College Record 115 (7): 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., and J. Elen. 2011. “Why Do Learning Goals (Not) Work: A Reexamination of the Hypothesized Effectiveness of Learning Goals Based on Students’ Behaviour and Cognitive Processes.” Educational Technology Research and Development 59 (4): 553–573. doi:10.1007/s11423-011-9200-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D. 2012. “New Perspectives on Context-based Chemistry Education: Using a Dialectical Sociocultural Approach to View Teaching and Learning.” Studies in Science Education 48 (1): 51–87. doi:10.1080/03057267.2012.655037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D., A. Bellocchi, and S. M. Ritchie. 2008. “Making Connections: Learning and Teaching Chemistry in Context”. Research in Science Education 38 (3): 365–384. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9070-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurup, P. M., R. Levinson, and X. Li. 2021. “Informed-decision regarding Global Warming and Climate Change among High School Students in the United Kingdom.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 21 (1): 166–185. doi:10.1007/s42330-020-00123-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Movilli, J., A. Rozzi, R. Ricciardi, R. Corradini, and J. Huskens. 2018. “Control of Probe Density at DNA Biosensor Surfaces Using Poly(l-lysine) with Appended Reactive Groups.” Bioconjugate Chemistry 29 (12): 4110–4118. doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nentwig, P. M., R. Demuth, I. Parchmann, B. Ralle, and C. Gräsel. 2007. “Chemie Im Kontext: Situating Learning in Relevant Contexts while Systematically Developing Basic Chemical Concepts.” Journal of Chemical Education 84 (9): 1439. doi:10.1021/ed084p1439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riel, M. 2000. “Education in the 21st Century: Just-in-Time Learning or Learning Communities.” In Fourth annual conference of the emirates center for strategic studies and research, 137–160. Abu Dhabi: Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Roblin, N. P., C. Schunn, and S. McKenney. 2018. “What are Critical Features of Science Curriculum Materials that Impact Student and Teacher Outcomes?” Science Education 102 (2): 260–282. doi:10.1002/sce.21328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. E. 2012. “Context-Based Learning.” In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, edited by N. M. Seel, 799–802. Boston, MA: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1872.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. M., and J. Krajcik. 2002. “Supporting Science Teacher Learning: The Role of Educative Curriculum Materials.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 13 (3): 221–245. doi:10.1023/A:1016569117024.
   Google Scholar
• Sesen, B. A., and L. Tarhan. 2013. “Inquiry-based Laboratory Activities in Electrochemistry: High School Students’ Achievements and Attitudes.” Research in Science Education 43 (1): 413–435. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9275-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2001. “The Mismatch between Assumed Prior Knowledge and the Learner’s Conceptions: A Typology of Learning Impediments.” Educational Studies 27 (2): 159–171. doi:10.1080/03055690120050392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ültay, E., and N. Ültay. 2012. “Designing, Implementing and Evaluating a Context-based Instructional Materials on Buoyancy Force.” Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies 4: 201–205.
   Google Scholar
• Ummels, M. H. J., M. J. A. Kamp, H. de Kroon, and K. T. Boersma. 2015. “Promoting Conceptual Coherence Within Context-Based Biology Education.” Science Education 99 (5): 958–985. doi:10.1002/sce.21179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vorst, H., and H. Aydogmus. 2021. “One Context Fits All?–Analysing Students’ Context Choice and Their Reasons for Choosing a Context-based Task in Chemistry Education”. International Journal of Science Education 43 (8): 1250–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos, M. A. J., R. Taconis, W. M. G. Jochems, and A. Pilot. 2011. “Classroom Implementation of Context‐based Chemistry Education by Teachers: The Relation between Experiences of Teachers and the Design of Materials.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (10): 1407–1432. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.511659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar