Socio-scientific reasoning of science, social studies and primary teachers

References

• Arslan, H. Ö., and C. Çiğdemoğlu. 2020. “Sosyobilimsel Konuların Öğretiminde Öğretmen Rolleri ve Mentörlük [Teacher Roles and Mentoring in the Teaching of Socioscientific Issues].” In Kuramdan Uygulamaya Sosyobilimsel Konular [Socioscientific Issues from Theory to Practice], edited by M. Genc, 371–392. Ankara: Nobel.
   Google Scholar
• Avalos, B. 2011. “Teacher Professional Development in Teaching and Teacher Education Over Ten Years.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (1): 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bingle, W. H., and P. J. Gaskell. 1994. “Scientific Literacy for Decisionmaking and the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge.” Science Education 78 (2): 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgerding, L. A., and M. Dagistan. 2018. “Preservice Science Teachers’ Concerns and Approaches for Teaching Socioscientific and Controversial Issues.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 29 (4): 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1440860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalık, M., and F. O. Karataş. 2019. “Does a ‘Science, Technology and Social Change’ Course Improve Scientific Habits of Mind and Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues?” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 44 (6): 35–52. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n6.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebesoy, Ü. B., and M. Dönmez Şahin. 2013. “Investigating Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues in Terms of Gender and Class Level.” Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences 37 (37): 100–117.
   Google Scholar
• Çepni, Z. 2020. “Determining Prospective Social Studies Teachers’ Attitudes and Views Regarding Socioscientific Issues.” Unpublished thesis., Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University.
   Google Scholar
• Christenson, N. 2011. “Knowledge, Value and Personal Experience: Upper Secondary Students’ Resources of Supporting Reasons When Arguing Socioscientific Issues.” PhD diss., Karlstads Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• CoHE (Council of Higher Education). 2018a. “Primary Teaching Undergraduate Program.” Accessed May 2, 2022. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Yeni-Ogretmen-Yetistirme-Lisans-Programlari/Sinif_Ogretmenligi_Lisans_Programi09042019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CoHE (Council of Higher Education). 2018b. “Science Education Undergraduate Program.” Accessed May 2, 2022. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Yeni-Ogretmen-Yetistirme-Lisans-Programlari/Fen_Bilgisi_Ogretmenligi_Lisans_Programi.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CoHE (Council of Higher Education). 2018c. “Social Studies Teaching Undergraduate Program.” Accessed May 2, 2022. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Yeni-Ogretmen-Yetistirme-Lisans-Programlari/Sosyal_Bilgileri_Ogretmenligi_Lisans_Programi09042019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. W. 1998. “New Technology Effects Inventory: Forty Leading Ethical Issues.” Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (2): 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327728jmme1302_2.
   Google Scholar
• Darling Hammond, L., M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner. 2017. Effective Teacher Professional Development. California: Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, V., and G. Venville. 2022. “Testing a Methodology for the Development of Socioscientific Issues to Enhance Middle School Students’ Argumentation and Reasoning.” Research in Science & Technological Education 40 (4): 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1830267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., and A. Wildavsky. 1983. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., P. Newton, and J. Osborne. 2000. “Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms.” Science Education 84 (3): 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287:AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersoy, M. 2019. “Investigation of Primary Teachers’ Attitudes with Making Decision Processes on Socioscientific Issues: Rize Sample.” Unpublished thesis., Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University.
   Google Scholar
• Eş, H., and V. Varol. 2019. “The Informal Argumentation of Theology and Science Education Students About the Socio-Scientific Issue: Nuclear Power Plant.” Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education 15 (2): 437–454. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.533013.
   Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., M. P. Jiménez Aleixandre, and J. Osborne. 2012. “Should We Kill Gray Squirrels? A Study Investigating Students’ Reasons and Decision Making.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (3): 401–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.619211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B., and V. A. Thompson. 2004. “Informal Reasoning: Theory and Method.” Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale 58 (2): 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evren Yapıcıoğlu, A. 2020. “Covid 19 Pandemic as a Socioscientific Issue in Science Education and Suggestions for Sample Applications.” Milli Eğitim 49 (1): 1121–1141. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.787170.
   Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., and G. B. Moskowitz. 2000. “Perspective-Taking: Decreasing Stereotype Expression, Stereotype Accessibility, and In-Group Favoritism.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 (4): 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., J. P. Gall, and W. R. Borg. 2003. Educational Research. Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Genç, M., and T. Genç. 2017. “The Content Analysis of the Researches About Socio-Scientific Issues in Turkey.” E-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research 4 (2): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.291772.
   Google Scholar
• Genç, M., U. Orhan, E. Özel Özcan Baykurt, N. Ikinci, E. Gürbüz, and M. Türk. 2020. “Examining the Decisions and Informal Reasoning Patterns of Middle School Students on Organ and Tissue Donation.” Academia Journal of Educational Research 5 (2): 337–353.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierez, S. B. 2015. “Integrating Socio-Scientific Issues to Enhance the Bioethical Decision-Making Skills of High School Students.” International Education Studies 8 (1): 142–151. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n1p142.
   Google Scholar
• Irmak, M. 2021. “Developing Undergraduate Students’ Reasoning Competencies and Attitudes Related to Socioscientific Issues.” Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty 41 (3): 1801–1838.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., and L. Christensen. 2019. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, S., and D. L. Zeidler. 2016. “Using Our Heads and HARTSS: Developing Perspective-Taking Skills for Socioscientific Reasoning (Humanities, ARTs, and Social Sciences).” Journal of Science Teacher Education 27 (3): 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9458-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasap, S., and A. S. Usul. 2018. “Yaklaşık 1 Milyon Öğretmen Genç Nüfusu Geleceğe Hazırlıyor [Nearly 1 Million Teachers Prepare the Young Population for the Future].” Anadolu Agency. Accessed November 23, 2021. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/egitim/yaklasik-1-milyon-ogretmen-genc-nufusu-gelecege-hazirliyor/1319248.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, R. A., and F. W. English. 1979. Needs Assessment: Concept and Application. New Jersey: Educational Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Klaver, L. T., J. H. Walma van der Molen, P. H. Sins, and L. J. Guérin. 2023. “Students’ Engagement with Socioscientific Issues: Use of Sources of Knowledge and Attitudes.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 60 (5): 1125–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. 2001a. “Scientific Literacy for Citizenship: Tools for Dealing with the Science Dimension of Controversial Socioscientific Issues.” Science Education 85 (3): 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. 2001b. “’To Trust or Not to Trust, ‘Pupils’ Ways of Judging Information Encountered in a Socio-Scientific Issue.” International Journal of Science Education 23 (9): 877–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krejcie, R. V., and D. W. Morgan. 1970. “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 30 (3): 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 1991. The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurşun, N., F. Ercan Yalman, and A. Taşdere. 2019. “Lisansüstü Öğrencilerinin Sosyobilimsel Konuları Algılama Biçimlerinin İncelenmesi [Investigation of Postgraduate Students’ Perceptions of Socioscientific Issues].” In 1st International Science, Education, Art & Technology Symposium UBEST, 2–4 May, İzmir, Turkey
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., F. Abd‐El‐Khalick, R. L. Bell, and R. S. Schwartz. 2002. “Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (6): 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, J. S. C. 2022. “A Practice-Based Approach to Learning Nature of Science Through Socioscientific Issues.” Research in Science Education 52 (1): 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09942-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., and G. Roehrig. 2019. “Exploring Science Teachers’ Argumentation and Personal Epistemology About Global Climate Change.” Research in Science Education 49 (1): 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9617-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. 2010. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• MoNE (Ministry of National Education). 2018a. “Science Course (3–8th Grades) Curriculum.” Accessed November 2, 2021. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr//Programlar.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• MoNE (Ministry of National Education). 2018b. “Social Studies Course (4–8th Grades) Curriculum.” Accessed November 2, 2021. http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Programlar.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, M. H., and D. L. Zeidler. 2020. “Developing Socioscientific Perspective Taking.” International Journal of Science Education 42 (8): 1302–1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1756515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2001. “Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from PISA 2000.” OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, P. F. 2005. Developing the Curriculum. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, J. 2017. “Nihilism and the Problem of Future: Biodiversity Destruction as One of the Great Dangers of Technology?” Ethics in Progress 8 (1): 147–155. https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2017.1.9.
   Google Scholar
• Orhan, U., and M. Genç. 2023. “Socioscientific Reasoning Scale: Adaptation, Validity and Reliability Analysis.” Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences 14 (2): 969–989. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1276034.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. 2000. “Science for Citizenship.” In Good Practice in Science Teaching: What Research Has to Say, edited by J. Osborne and J. Dillon, 225–240. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özcan, R., H. Aktamış, and E. Hiğde. 2018. “Computational Thinking and İntegrative Education (STEAM) in Science Education.” Pamukkale University Journal of Education 43: 93–106. https://doi.org/10.9779/PUJE800.
   Google Scholar
• Özcan, C., and F. Kaptan. 2020. “Investigation of the Studies on Socioscientific Issues Between 2008-2017.” Journal of Muallim Rifat Faculty of Education 2 (1): 16–36.
   Google Scholar
• Patronis, T., D. Potari, and V. Spiliotopoulou. 1999. “Students’ Argumentation in Decision-making on a Socio-Scientific Issue: Implications for Teaching.” International Journal of Science Education 21 (7): 745–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolsky, A., T. Kini, and L. Darling Hammond. 2019. “Does Teaching Experience Increase Teacher Effectiveness? A Review of US Research.” Journal of Professional Capital & Community 4 (4): 286–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-12-2018-0032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M., and M. Grace. 2003. Science Education for Citizenship: Teaching Socio-Scientific Issues. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. J. 2022. “Trust, Science Education and Vaccines.” Science & Education 31 (5): 1263–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00339-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reviere, R., S. Berkowitz, C. C. Carter, and C. G. Ferguson. 1996. Needs Assessment: A Creative and Practical Guide for Social Scientists. Washington: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Romine, W. L., T. D. Sadler, J. M. Dauer, and A. Kinslow. 2020. “Measurement of Socio-Scientific Reasoning (SSR) and Exploration of SSR as a Progression of Competencies.” International Journal of Science Education 42 (18): 2981–3002. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1849853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romine, W. L., T. D. Sadler, and A. T. Kinslow. 2017. “Assessment of Scientific Literacy: Development and Validation of the Quantitative Assessment of Socio‐Scientific Reasoning (QuASSR).” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 54 (2): 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., S. A. Barab, and B. Scott. 2007. “What Do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry?” Research in Science Education 37 (4): 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., and D. L. Zeidler. 2005. “The Significance of Content Knowledge for Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: Applying Genetics Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues.” Science Education 89 (1): 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sağlam, H. İ. 2016. “A Mixed Method Study on Pre-Service Teachers’ Informal Reasoning for Nuclear Energy Usage.” Unpublished thesis., Aksaray University.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of Learning Organization. New York: Doupleday/Currence.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U., and L. C. Scharman. 1999. “Defining versus Describing the Nature of Science: A Pragmatic Analysis for Classroom Teachers and Science Educators.” Science Education 83 (4): 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199907)83:4<493:AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekin, N., and O. Aslan. 2019. “Investigation of Pre-Service Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues with Respect to Different Variables.” Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences 29 (1): 133–141. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.538660.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. 2000. “Using Current Controversies in the Classroom: Opportunities and Concerns.” Critical Studies in Education 41 (2): 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480009556366.
   Google Scholar
• Topçu, M. S., E. Z. Muğaloğlu, and D. Güven. 2014. “Socioscientific Issues in Science Education: The Case of Turkey.” Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 14 (6): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.6.2226.
   Google Scholar
• Topçu, M. S., Ö. Yılmaz Tüzün, and T. D. Sadler. 2011. “Turkish Preservice Science Teachers’ Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues and the Factors Influencing Their Informal Reasoning.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 22 (4): 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9221-0.
   Google Scholar
• Türköz, G., and N. Öztürk. 2020. “Examination of Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Decisions About Some Socioscientific Issues with a Multidimensional Point of View.” Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education 9 (1): 175–197. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.550533.
   Google Scholar
• Ural, E., F. Öztaş, and O. Ercan. 2020. “Exploring Pre-Service Primary School Teachers’ Informal Reasoning and Argumantation Levels on a Socio-Scientific Issue.” EKEV Academy Journal 82: 97–118. https://doi.org/10.17753/Ekev1439.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H. H., H. T. Chen, H. S. Lin, Y. N. Huang, and Z. R. Hong. 2017. “Longitudinal Study of a Cooperation-Driven, Socio-Scientific Issue Intervention on Promoting Students’ Critical Thinking and Self-Regulation in Learning Science.” International Journal of Science Education 39 (15): 2002–2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1357087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. C., and J. Millican. 2011. “Service-Learning and the Development of Empathy in US College Students.” Education & Training 53 (2/3): 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911111115735.
   Google Scholar
• Yeniceli, M., and G. Hasturk. 2021. “Investigation of Prospective Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Socioscientific Issues.” Anatolian Journal of Teacher 5 (1): 160–178. https://doi.org/10.35346/aod.926934.
   Google Scholar
• Yolaçtı Kızılkaya, K., and N. Öztürk. 2022. “Preservice Science Teachers’ Informal Reasoning Modes and Socioscientific Reasoning Competencies: Hydraulic Fracking and Land Management Scenarios.” Başkent University Journal of Education 9 (1): 64–86.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., K. A. Walker, W. A. Ackett, and M. L. Simmons. 2002. “Tangled Up in Views: Beliefs in the Nature of Science and Responses to Socioscientific Dilemmas.” Science Education 86 (3): 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar