Disability and well-being: towards a Capability Approach for marketplace access

References

• Alwitt, L. F. (1995). Marketing and the poor. American Behavioral Scientist, 38(4), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764295038004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. L., Humphries, K., McDermott, S., Marks, B., Sisirak, J., & Larson, S. (2013). The state of the science of health and wellness for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 51(5), 385–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arac, J. (2013). Prologue. In P. A. Hall & M. Lamont (Eds.), Social resilience in the neoliberal era (pp. xvi–xvii). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, J. (2015). Marketing’s diversity problem. Retrieved August 7, 2022, from https://www.marketingweek.com/an-utter-disgrace-marketings-diversity-problem/
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. M. (2006). Consumer normalcy: Understanding the value of shopping through narratives of consumers with visual impairments. Journal of Retailing, 81(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2005.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S. M., Gentry, J. W., & Rittenburg, T. L. (2005). Building understanding of the domain of consumer vulnerability. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(2), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146705280622
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. M., Holland, J., & Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (2007). How consumers with disabilities perceive “welcome” in retail servicescapes: A critical incident study. Journal of Services Marketing, 21(3), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040710746525
   Google Scholar
• Banister, E. N., Hogg, M. K., Budds, K., & Dixon, M. (2015). Becoming respectable: Low income young mothers, consumption and the pursuit of value. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(16), 652–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1117517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2005). Work, consumerism and the new poor. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2007). Society enables and disables. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 81(1), 58–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410500530068
   Google Scholar
• Begon, J. (2015). What are adaptive preferences? Exclusion and disability in the capability approach. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellanca, N., Biggeri, M., & Marchetta, F. (2011). An extension of the capability approach: Towards a theory of dis-capability. Alter, 5(3), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2011.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. M., Baker, S. M., Cross, S., James, J. P., Bartholomew, G., Ekpo, A. E., Henderson, G. R., Hutton, M., Khare, A., Roy, A., Stovall, T., & Taylor, C. R. (2016). Omission and commission as marketplace trauma. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 35(2), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.15.149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, R. (1987). The practical domain of marketing: The notion of a ‘free’ enterprise market economy as a guise for institutionalized marketing power. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 46(4), 415–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1987.tb01989.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, K. (1996). A healing homiletic: Preaching and disability. Abingdon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bockman, J. (2013). Neoliberalism. Journal of Indexing and Metrics, 12(3), 14–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504213499873
   Google Scholar
• Bøhler, K. K., KrastevaKrasteva, V., O’Reilly, J., Solstad Vedeler, J., Stoilova, R., & Tolgensbakk, I. (2019). Four narratives of overcoming early job insecurity in Europe: A capability approach. In B. Hvinden, J. O’Reilly, M. A. Schoyen, & C. Hyggen (Eds.), Negotiating early job insecurity (pp. 46–66). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, D. (2014). An advertising aesthetic: Real beauty and visual impairment. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 32(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619613512619
   Google Scholar
• Botti, S., & Iyengar, S. (2006). The dark side of choice: When choice impairs social welfare. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 25(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.25.1.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., Meyer, N. K., Joshi, G. S., & Schleppenbach, D. (2013). Accessing algebra via mathspeak: Understanding the potential and pitfalls for students with visual impairments. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341302800105
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, D., Murphy, R., McCallion, P., & McCarron, M. (2018). “What's going to happen when we're gone?” family caregiving capacity for older people with an intellectual disability in Ireland. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31(2), 226–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, W. V., & Henderson, G. (2011). Psychosocial aspects of disability. Charles C.
   Google Scholar
• Buhalis, D., & Darcy, S. (2011). Accessible tourism: Concepts and issues. Channel View Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Burckley, E., Tincani, M., & Fisher, A. G. (2014). An iPad™-based picture and video activity schedule increases community shopping skills of a young adult with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. Development Neurorehabilitation, 18(2), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2014.945045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R., & Bowlby, S. (1997). Bodies and spaces: An exploration of disabled people's experiences of public space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15(4), 411–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, G. (2018). As shopping moves online, don’t leave disabled people behind. Citizens Advice. Retrieved August 9, 2022, from https://wearecitizensadvice.org.uk/as-shopping-moves-online-dont-leave-disabled-people-behind-b23b2b508057
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, L. (2010). Who's the expert? Rethinking authority in the face of intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 58–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDC. (2018). Disability and health inclusion strategies. Retrieved August 9, 2022, from https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-strategies.html
   Google Scholar
• Cherrier, H., & Murray, J. B. (2004). The sociology of consumption: The hidden facet of marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(5–6), 509–525.
   Google Scholar
• Chouinard, V. (2010). Women with disabilities' experiences of government employment assistance in Canada. Disability & Rehabilitation, 32(2), 148–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creamer, D. B. (2009). Disability and Christian theology: Embodied limits and constructive possibilities. OUP USA.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. (2013). Introduction: Disability, normality and power. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (4th ed., pp. 1–14). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Degener, T. (2017). A new human rights model of disability. In The United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: A commentary (pp. 41–59). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, N. (2018). Home delivery services serve up improved accessibility to food and more. AmeriDisability: America’s disability community. Home delivery services serve up improved accessibility to food and more – the latest National disability news (ameridisability.com). Retrieved August 26, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Devlieger, P., Brown, S. E., Miranda-Galarza, B., & Strickfaden, M. (2016). Introducing disability mundus: History, critical theory, and plurality through the lens of disability culture. In Rethinking disability: World perspectives in culture and society (pp. 13–21).
   Google Scholar
• Dholakia, N., & Roy Dholakia, R. (1985). Choice and choicelessness in the paradigm of Marketing. In N. Dholakia & J. Arndt (Eds.), Changing the course of marketing: Alternative paradigms for widening marketing theory (pp. 173–185). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, S., Smith, C., & Touchet, A. (2018). The disability perception gap: Policy report. Scope, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Dunnett, S., Hamilton, K., & Piacentini, M. (2018). Consumer vulnerability: Conditions, contexts and characteristics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duyan, V. (2007). The community effects of disabled sports. Nato Security Through Science Series E Human and Societal Dynamics, 31, 70.
   Google Scholar
• Echeverri, P., & Salomonson, N. (2019). Consumer vulnerability during mobility service interactions: Causes, forms and coping. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(3/4), 364–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1568281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egilson, S. T., & Traustadottir, R. (2009). Assistance to pupils with physical disabilities in regular schools: Promoting inclusion or creating dependency? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24(1), 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Elms, J., & Tinson, J. (2012). Consumer vulnerability and the transformative potential of internet shopping: An exploratory case study. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(11/12), 1354–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.691526
   Google Scholar
• Eskyte, I. (2019). Disabled people’s vulnerability in the European single market: The case of consumer information. Journal of Consumer Policy, 42(4), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-019-09422-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchetti, C., Canniatti Ponchio, M., & Lucia Poli Botelho, N. (2015). Understanding the vulnerability of blind consumers: Adaptation into the marketplace, personal traits and coping strategies. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(3–4), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1119710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, M. (1982). The body in consumer culture. Theory, Culture and Society, 1(2), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327648200100203
   Google Scholar
• Firat, F. (1988). A Critical historical perspective on needs: The macro or micro rationale? In S. Shapiro & A. F. Walle (Eds.), AMA Winter Educators’ Conference Marketing: A Return to the Broader Dimensions (pp. 289–295). American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Firat, A. F., & Venkatesh, A. (1995). Liberatory postmodernism and the reenchantment of consumption. The Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 239–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, P., & Oswick, C. (2014). Educating consent? A conversation with Noam Chomsky on the university and business school education. Organization, 21(4), 568–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folbre, N. (2015). Valuing non-market work. United Nations Development Programme Human Development Report Office.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, J. (2017). Becky, Barbie’s friend who uses a wheelchair, was discontinued. PRI. https://www.pri.org/stories/2017-04-09/becky-barbies-wheelchair-bound-friend-was-discontinued-heres-why#targetText=With%20her%20shiny%20pink%20wheelchair,and%20representation%20to%20wheelchair%20users, accessed
   Google Scholar
• Gaines, D. (2004). Geographical perspectives on disability: A socio-spatial analysis of the mentally disabled population in Russia. Middle States Geographer, 37(1), 80–89.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996). The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A postcapitalist politics. University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, B. (2021, December 21). Fashion is moving into the metaverse – Here’s what to expect. Rolling stone. Fashion is moving into the metaverse – Here’s what to expect – Rolling Stone, accessed on the 26th August 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, N. (2011). Globalization and free trade. Infobase Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2016). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2017). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2015). Big society? Disabled people with the label of learning disabilities and the queer (Y) ing of civil society. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2014.941924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). ‘Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (2013). Making and gifting belonging: Creative arts and people with learning disabilities. Environment and Planning A, 45(2), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E., & Wilton, R. (2015). Thinking differently about ‘work’ and social inclusion for disabled people. In C. Grover & L. Piggott (Eds.), Disabled people, work and welfare: Is employment really the answer? (pp. 219–238). Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, B., & Ralph, S. (2006). Are disability images in advertising becoming bold and daring? An analysis of prominent themes in US and UK campaigns. Disability Studies Quarterly, 26(3), 716. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v26i3.716
   Google Scholar
• Hammett, E. (2019). What brands are doing to be more inclusive for people with disabilities. Retrieved August 9, 2022, from https://www.marketingweek.com/how-brands-are-being-more-inclusive-for-people-with-disabilities/
   Google Scholar
• Harnacke, C. (2013). Disability and capability: Exploring the usefulness of Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach for the UN disability rights convention. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 41(4), 768–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiss, S. (2011). Locating the bodies of women and disability in definitions of beauty: An analysis of dove’s campaign for real beauty. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v31i1.1367
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, L. (2020). Psycho-emotional disability in the marketplace. European Journal of Marketing, 54(11), 2675–2695. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, R. P., & Sharma, E. (2020). Consumer vulnerability. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(3), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., Tullio-Pow, S., & Akhtar, A. (2015). Retail design and the visually impaired: A needs assessment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 24(1), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment philosophical fragments. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, E. (2019). Risky’ representation: The portrayal of women with mobility impairment in twenty-first-century advertising. Disability & Society, 34(5), 704–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1576505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, F. S. (1986). The marketing concept: What it is and what it is not. Journal of Marketing, 50(April), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298605000207
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B., & Paterson, K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disability and Society, 12(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599727209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDA. (2018). Best Companies Award for employees with disability open until 3 December 2018. Retrieved August 9, 2022, from http://www.internationaldisabilityalliance.org/Best-Companies-Award-2018
   Google Scholar
• Imrie, R. (2012). Universalism, universal design and equitable access to the built environment. Disability & Rehabilitation, 34(10), 873–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. (2018). World Health Organisation. https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Jocz, K. E., & Quelch, J. A. (2008). An exploration of marketing’s impacts on society: A perspective linked to democracy. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 27(2), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.27.2.202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, S., Gulliksen, J., & Gustavsson, C. (2021). Disability digital divide: The use of the internet, smartphones, computers and tablets among people with disabilities in Sweden. Universal Access in the Information Society, 20(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00714-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. K. (2008). Disability and the labour market: A review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Studies, 35(5), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443580810903554
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B., & Tadajewski, M. (2016). The Routledge companion to marketing history. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karababa, E., & Kjeldgaard, D. (2013). Value in marketing: Toward sociocultural perspectives. Marketing Theory, 14(1), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593113500385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasser, S. L., & Lytle, R. K. (2013). Inclusive physical activity. Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman–Scarborough, C. (1999). Reasonable access for mobility-disabled persons is more than widening the door. Journal of Retailing, 75(4), 479–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)00020-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, S., Brittain, I., & Kipnis, E. (2019). Superdisabilities” vs “disabilities”? Theorising the role of ableism in (mis)representational mythology of disability in the marketplace. Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(5/6), 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1562701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., Sydney, J., & Levy, S. (1971). Demarketing, yes, demarketing. Harvard Business Review, 79(November/December), 74–80.
   Google Scholar
• Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, K., & Traustadóttir, R. (2004). Gender and disability research in the Nordic countries. Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Leopardi, G. (1827/1834). Dialogo della Natura e di un Islandese.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, J. M. (2017). Developing a model of disability that focuses on the actions of disabled people. Disability & Society, 32(5), 735–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loebner, J. (2019). Agencies need to better connect disability with diversity and inclusion efforts. Adweek. Retrieved August 9, 2022, from https://www.adweek.com/agencies/agencies-need-to-better-connect-disability-with-diversity-and-inclusion-efforts/
   Google Scholar
• Macasta, B. M. (2019). “Why marketing cannot afford to exclude disability. National Business and Disability Centre. Retrieved August 7, 2019, from https://www.viscardicenter.org/cannot-afford/.
   Google Scholar
• Maes, B., Broekman, T. G., Došen, A., & Nauts, J. (2003). Caregiving burden of families looking after persons with intellectual disability and behavioural or psychiatric problems. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47(6), 447–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee, K. (2016). The invisibles: Why are portrayals of disability so rare in advertising? Retrieved August 9, 2022, from https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/invisibles-why-portrayals-disability-so-rare-advertising/1407945
   Google Scholar
• Martiny, K. M. (2015). How to develop a phenomenological model of disability. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 18(4), 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-015-9625-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M., & Pavia, T. (2010). When the family system includes disability: Adaptation in the marketplace, roles and identity. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(9–10), 1009–1030. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725706778935637
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Z. (2018, October 24). Starbucks’ first US ‘signing store’ lets deaf customers order using sign language. USA Today. Retrieved August 9, 2022, from https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/restaurants/2018/10/23/starbucks-sign-language-store-now-open-washington-d-c/1737022002/
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2001). The poverty of morality. Journal of Consumer Culture, 1(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/146954050100100210
   Google Scholar
• Mirabito, A. M., Cele, O., & Elizabeth, C. (2016). The stigma turbine: A theoretical framework for conceptualizing and contextualizing marketplace stigma. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 35(2), 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.15.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, S. (2006). The capability approach and disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16(4), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073060160040501
   Google Scholar
• National Business and Disability Council. (2015). Annual report. Retrieved August 9, 2022, from https://www.viscardicenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/2016_NBDC_Annual_Report_2015_03.01.16.compressed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, S., Andreu, L., & Cervera, A. (2014). Value co-creation among hotels and disabled customers: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 813–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann, S. (2005). Persons with disabilities. In M. Burke, J. Chauvin, & J. Miranti (Eds.), Religious and spiritual issues in counseling: Applications across diverse populations (pp. 105–134). Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Olkin, R. (1999). The personal, professional and political when clients have disabilities. Women & Therapy, 22(2), 87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, J. (2015). Exploring the critiques of the social model of disability: The transformative possibility of Arendt's notion of power. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(3), 385–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardeck, J. A., Murphy, J. W., & Meinert, R. (2012). Postmodernism, religion, and the future of social work. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pavia, T. M., & Mason, M. J. (2012). Inclusion, exclusion and identity in the consumption of families living with childhood disability. Consumption Markets & Culture, 15(1), 87–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2011.637753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulton, S. (2018). Revealed: KFC’s chicken dancing to the slaughterhouse tops Britain’s top 10 most complained about adverts of 2017 - with MoneySuperMarket’s men in high heels and even Macmillan Cancer support making the list. Daily Mail. Retrieved September 9, 2019, from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5337743/KFCs-dancing-chicken-complained-TV-advert.html.
   Google Scholar
• Purtell, R. (2013). Music and the social model of disability. In Music and the social model: An occupational therapist’s approach to music with people labelled as having learning disabilities (pp. 26–32).
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, D. (2002). Negotiating psycho-emotional dimensions of disability and their influence on identity constructions. Disability and Society, 17(5), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590220148487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmerman, A. (2013). Social inclusion of people with disabilities: National and international perspectives.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2016a). Capabilitarianism. Journal of Human Development & Capabilities, 17(3), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1145631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. (2016b). The capability approach. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 ed.). Retrieved July 2, 2019, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/capability-approach/
   Google Scholar
• Roderick, L. (2017). How mars is expanding Maltesers’ diversity agenda to all its brands. Retrieved August 9, 2022, from https://www.marketingweek.com/mars-expand-maltesers-diversity/
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, F. (2019). Crippled – Austerity and the demonization of disabled People. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sabanoglua, T. (2022). Luxury brands metaverse readiness 2022, metaverse ready luxury brands worldwide 2022. Statista. Retrieved August 26, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Scaraboto, D., & Fischer, E. (2013). Frustrated fatshionistas: An institutional theory perspective on consumer quests for greater choice in mainstream markets. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1234–1257. https://doi.org/10.1086/668298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale, J. (2006). Disability, technology and e-learning: Challenging conceptions. ALT-J, 14(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2002). Why health equity? Health Economics, 11(8), 659–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (2002). The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? Journal of Research in Social Science and Disability, 2, 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3547(01)80018-X
   Google Scholar
• Śniadek, J., & Zajadacz, A. (2014). Tourism and recreation development and the quality of life of residents: On the example of the city of Leszno. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Ekonomiczne Problemy Turystyki, 1, 341–365.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, S. L., & Mitchell, D. T. (2005). Cultural locations of disability. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. (2016). The capability approach. Retrieved August 9, 2022, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/capability-approach/
   Google Scholar
• Swain, J., & French, S. (2000). Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability & Society, 15(4), 569–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadajewski, M., & Brownlie, D. (2008). Critical marketing: A limit attitude. In Critical marketing: Issues in contemporary marketing (pp. 1–28). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Toombs, S. K. (1995). The lived experience of disability. Human Studies, 18(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trani, J. F., Bakhshi, P., Bellanca, N., Biggeri, M., & Marchetta, F. (2011). Disabilities through the capability approach lens: Implications for public policies. Alter, 5(3), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2011.04.001
   Google Scholar
• UPIAS. (1976). Fundamental principles of disability. https://disabledpeoplesarchive.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2021/01/001-FundamentalPrinciplesOfDisability-UPIAS-DA-22Nov1975.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Visconti, L. M. (2016). A conversational approach to consumer vulnerability: Performativity, representations, and storytelling. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(3–4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1122660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldschmidt, A., Berressem, H., & Ingwersen, M. (2017). Culture-theory-disability: Encounters between disability Studies and cultural Studies. University of Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2011). https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/sensory-functions-disability-and-rehabilitation/world-report-on-disability
   Google Scholar
• Woods, H., & Thomas, D. (2003). Working with people with learning disabilities: Theory and practice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. J., Verissimo, D., Kathleen Pilford, E. C. M. P., Ventre, K., Cousins, J., Jefferson, R., Koldeway, H., Llewellyn, F., & McKinley, E. (2011). Competitive outreach in the 21st century: Why we need conservation marketing. Ocean and Coastal Management, 115(October), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, V., Li, X., Kim, H., & Kim, Y. H. (2015). Social shopping website quality attributes increasing consumer participation, positive eWOM, and co-shopping: The reciprocating role of participation. Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 24, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, S. (2015). Neoliberalism and disability: The possibilities and limitations of a Foucauldian critique. Foucault Studies, 19, 84–107. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i19.4826
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. (2019, February 19). River island features children with disabilities in new campaign celebrating diversity. The Independent. Retrieved August 9, 2022, from https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/fashion/river-island-campaign-children-disabilities-diversity-labels-are-for-clothes-a8218016.html
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H., Tullio-Pow, S., & Akhtar, A. (2015). Retail design and the visually impaired: A needs assessment. Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 24, 121–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajadacz, A. (2015). Evolution of models of disability as a basis for further policy changes in accessible tourism. Journal of Tourism Futures, 1(3), 189–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar