The social model and consumers with disabilities research: contributions, criticisms, and call for new perspectives

References

• Altermark, N. (2017). The post-institutional era: Visions of history in research on intellectual disability. Disability & Society, 32(9), 1315–1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1322497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasiou, D., & Kauffman, J. M. (2013). The social model of disability: Dichotomy between impairment and disability. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38(4), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jht026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett-Hitchcock, K., & Xu, Y. (2015). Shopping and virtual communities for consumers with physical disabilities. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsel, Z., Crockett, D., & Scott, M. L. (2022). Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the journal of consumer research: A curation and research agenda. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 920–933. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askegaard, S., & Linnet, J. T. (2011). Towards an epistemology of consumer culture theory: Phenomenology and the context of context. Marketing Theory, 11(4), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111418796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S. M. (2006). Consumer normalcy: Understanding the value of shopping through narratives of consumers with visual impairments. Journal of Retailing, 82(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2005.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S. M., Holland, J., & Kaufman‐Scarborough, C. (2007). How consumers with disabilities perceive “welcome” in retail servicescapes: A critical incident study. Journal of Services Marketing, 21(3), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040710746525
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. M., & Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (2001). Marketing and public accommodation: A retrospective on title III of the Americans with disabilities Act. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20(2), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.20.2.297.17370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S. M., Stephens, D. L., & Hill, R. P. (2001). Marketplace experiences of consumers with visual impairments: Beyond the Americans with disabilities Act. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.20.2.215.17369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S. M., Stephens, D. L., & Hill, R. P. (2002). How can retailers enhance accessibility: Giving consumers with visual impairments a voice in the marketplace. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 9(4), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6989(01)00034-0
   Google Scholar
• Bamu, B. N., & Van Hove, G. (2017). Community perceptions of people with disabilities in the North West region of Cameroon: What is the impact on their access to services? Disability & Society, 32(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1265915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baril, A. (2017). Docteur, suis-je un anglophone enfermé dans un corps de francophone? Une analyse intersectionnelle de la « temporalité de trans-crip-tion » dans des sociétés capacitistes, cisnormatives et anglonormatives. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 6(2), 1644. https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v6i2.349
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. (2020). Understanding the social model of disability: Past, present and future. In N. Watson & S. Vehmas (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 14–31). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2010). Exploring disability. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beudaert, A. (2020). Towards an embodied understanding of consumers with disabilities: Insights from the field of disability studies. Consumption Markets & Culture, 23(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1534734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beudaert, A., Gorge, H., & Herbert, M. (2017). An exploration of servicescapes’ exclusion and coping strategies of consumers with “hidden” auditory disorders. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(4/5), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-06-2016-0247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beudaert, A., & Nau, J. P. (2021). The vulnerability of consumers with disabilities: The benefits of taking time into account. Recherche et Applications En Marketing (English Edition), 36(4), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051570721995625
   Google Scholar
• Beudaert, A., Özçağlar-Toulouse, N., & Türe, M. (2016). Becoming sensory disabled: Exploring self-transformation through rites of passage. Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigonnesse, C., Mahmood, A., Chaudhury, H., Mortenson, W. B., Miller, W. C., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2018). The role of neighborhood physical environment on mobility and social participation among people using mobility assistive technology. Disability & Society, 33(6), 866–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1453783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, Å., Iwarsson, S., & Ståhle, A. (2004). Older people’s use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 36(2), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970310017432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunosson, A., Brante, G., Sepp, H., & Mattsson Sydner, Y. (2014). To use a recipe–not a piece of cake. Students with mild intellectual disabilities’ use of recipes in home economics. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(4), 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callus, A.-M. (2017). Making disability conferences more actively inclusive. Disability & Society, 32(10), 1661–1665. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1356059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, C. (2015). Turning experience into theory: The affirmation model as a tool for critical praxis. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 17(3), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v17i3.802
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, B., & Andersson, A. P. (2021). Trans-create–co-design with persons with severe disabilities. In I. Verma (Ed.), Universal design 2021: From special to mainstream solutions (pp. 87–101). IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Celik, A. A., & Yakut, E. (2021). Consumers with vulnerabilities: In-store satisfaction of visually impaired and legally blind. Journal of Services Marketing, 35(6), 821–833. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-05-2020-0191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Disability and health overview. Retrieved April 27, 2023, from https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability.html
   Google Scholar
• Childers, T. L., & Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (2009). Expanding opportunities for online shoppers with disabilities. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 572–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. H., Fresneda, J. E., & Anderson, R. E. (2020). What retailers need to understand about website inaccessibility and disabled consumers: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 54(3), 854–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. H., Fresneda, J. E., & Anderson, R. E. (2023). How inaccessible retail websites affect blind and low vision consumers: Their perceptions and responses. Journal of Service Theory & Practice, 33(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-08-2021-0167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, L. J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Dee-Price, B.-J. M., Hallahan, L., Nelson Bryen, D., & Watson, J. M. (2021). Every voice counts: Exploring communication accessible research methods. Disability & Society, 36(2), 240–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1715924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, C., Alamanos, E., Papagiannidis, S., & Bourlakis, M. (2016). Does social exclusion influence multiple channel use? The interconnections with community, happiness, and well-being. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1061–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, S., & Palakshappa, N. (2022). Service inclusion: The role of disability identity in retail. Journal of Services Marketing, 36(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-06-2021-0217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, H., Hamilton, K., & Catterall, M. (2007). Researching vulnerability: What about the researcher? European Journal of Marketing, 41(7/8), 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710752375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubost, N. (2018). Disability and consumption: A state of the art. Recherche et Applications En Marketing (English Edition), 33(2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051570718764882
   Google Scholar
• Echeverri, P., & Salomonson, N. (2019). Consumer vulnerability during mobility service interactions: Causes, forms and coping. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(3–4), 364–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1568281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, K., Rosenbaum, M. S., Brosdahl, D., & Hughes, P., Jr. (2018). Designing retail spaces for inclusion. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, L. (2018). Making decisions together? Exploring the decision-making process in an inclusive research project. Disability & Society, 33(3), 454–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1392932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elms, J., & Tinson, J. (2012). Consumer vulnerability and the transformative potential of internet shopping: An exploratory case study. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(1112), 1354–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.691526
   Google Scholar
• Emery, S. D., & Iyer, S. (2022). Deaf migration through an intersectionality lens. Disability & Society, 37(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.1916890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskytė, I. (2019). When accessibility of public space excludes: Shopping experience of people with vision impairments. The Journal of Public Space, 4(4), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v4i4.1233
   Google Scholar
• Falchetti, C., Ponchio, M. C., & Botelho, N. L. P. (2016). Understanding the vulnerability of blind consumers: Adaptation in the marketplace, personal traits and coping strategies. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(3–4), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1119710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feely, M. (2016). Disability studies after the ontological turn: A return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism. Disability & Society, 31(7), 863–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1208603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felker Kaufman, C. (1995). Shop′ til you drop: Tales from a physically challenged shopper. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12(3), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769510090455
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, S. (2021). Corporeality and critical disability studies: Toward an informed epistemology of embodiment. Disability & Society, 36(4), 636–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1755237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J., & Pettinicchio, D. (2022). A model who looks like me: Communicating and consuming representations of disability. Journal of Consumer Culture, 22(3), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405211022074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., & Runswick Cole, K. (2014). Posthuman disability studies. Subjectivity, 7(4), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2014.15
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich, K., & Ramsey, R. (2012). Are consumers with disabilities receiving the services they need? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Gopaldas, A., & DeRoy, G. (2015). An intersectional approach to diversity research. Consumption Markets & Culture, 18(4), 333–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2015.1019872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granberg, A., Brante, G., Olsson, V., & Sydner, Y. M. (2017). Knowing how to use and understand recipes: What arithmetical understanding is needed when students with mild intellectual disabilities use recipes in practical cooking lessons in home economics? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(5), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haller, B. A. (2010). Representing disability in an ableist world: Essays on mass media. Advocado Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S., Wilton, R. D., & Newbold, K. B. (2017). ‘There is always this feeling of otherness’: Exploring the lived experiences of visually impaired immigrant women in Canada. Disability & Society, 32(8), 1121–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1343128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasler, F. (1993). Developments in the disabled people’s movement. In J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disabling barriers – Enabling environments (pp. 278–284). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, L. (2020). Psycho-emotional disability in the marketplace. European Journal of Marketing, 54(11), 2675–2695. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, L., & O’Leary, K. (2023). ‘Clap for “some” carers’: Problematizing heroism and ableist tenets of heroic discourse through the experiences of parent-carers. Marketing Theory, 23(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931221123991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B., & Paterson, K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disability & Society, 12(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599727209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Nam, S. J. (2021). Social media use and subjective well-being among middle-aged consumers in Korea: Mediation model of social capital moderated by disability. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 55(4), 1352–1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari, A., Dunnett, S., Hamilton, K., & Downey, H. (2013). Exploring researcher vulnerability: Contexts, complications, and conceptualisation. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(9–10), 1182–1200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.798677
   Google Scholar
• Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karababa, E., & Ger, G. (2011). Early modern ottoman coffeehouse culture and the formation of the consumer subject. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 737–760. https://doi.org/10.1086/656422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman‐Scarborough, C. (1998). Retailers’ perceptions of the Americans with disabilities Act: Suggestions for low‐cost, high‐impact accommodations for disabled shoppers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(2), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769810210296
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman‐Scarborough, C., & Baker, S. M. (2005). Do people with disabilities believe the ADA has served their consumer interests? Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (1999). Reasonable access for mobility-disabled persons is more than widening the door. Journal of Retailing, 75(4), 479–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)00020-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman-Scarborough, C., & Childers, T. L. (2009). Understanding markets as online public places: Insights from consumers with visual impairments. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.28.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, S., Brittain, I., & Kipnis, E. (2019). “Superdisabilities” vs “disabilities”? Theorizing the role of ableism in (mis) representational mythology of disability in the marketplace. Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(5–6), 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1562701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerk, H. M. D., & Ampousah, L. (2002). The physically disabled South African female consumer’s problems in purchasing clothing. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 26(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1470-6431.2002.00209.x
   Google Scholar
• Kolodinsky, J. (2001). Satisfaction of disabled rural elders and adults with the quality of community‐based long‐term care services. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 25(2), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2001.00192.x
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, V., & Belk, R. (2022). Human enhancement technologies and the future of consumer well-being. Journal of Services Marketing, 36(7), 885–894. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-09-2021-0363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton, S. (1998). Disability studies/not disability studies. Disability & Society, 13(4), 525–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599826588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, A., & Hogan, K. (2000). The use and abuse of models of disability. Disability & Society, 15(1), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590025829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, J. E., Adkins, N. R., Crosby, E., Farrell, J. R., & Mirabito, A. M. (2019). The marketplace, mental well-being, and me: Exploring self-efficacy, self-esteem, and self-compassion in consumer coping. Journal of Business Research, 100, 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafatlane, G. R., Fidzani, L. C., & Gobotswang, K. S. (2015). Wheelchair users as consumers: Accessibility of supermarkets in Gaborone, Botswana. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makris, A., & Kapetanaki, A. (2022). Practice-based social marketing to improve well-being for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Marketing Management, 38(11–12), 1178–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2091641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, P. M., & Pinto, M. B. (2008). Consumer vulnerability and credit card knowledge among developmentally disabled citizens. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 42(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2008.00115.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M., & Pavia, T. (2006). When the family system includes disability: Adaptation in the marketplace, roles and identity. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(9/10), 1009–1030. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725706778935637
   Google Scholar
• Matson-Barkat, S., Puncheva-Michelotti, P., Koetz, C., & Hennekam, S. (2022). Destigmatisation through social sharing of emotions and empowerment: The case of disabled athletes and consumers of disability sports. Journal of Business Research, 149, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, C., & Collins, B. (2012). The affirmative model of disability: A means to include disability orientation in occupational therapy? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(3), 156–158. https://doi.org/10.4276/030802212X13311219571909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. ([1945] 2013). Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Mogaji, E., Bosah, G., & Nguyen, N. P. (2023). Transport and mobility decisions of consumers with disabilities. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(2), 422–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monde, L. (2022). L’endométriose unanimement reconnue comme affection longue durée à l’Assemblée Nationale. Retrieved April 27, 2023, from https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2022/01/13/l-endometriose-reconnue-comme-affection-longue-duree-par-une-assemblee-unanime_6109329_3224.html
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (1991). Pride against prejudice: Transforming attitudes to disability. Women‘s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (2000) Untitled conference presentation. In Reclaiming the social model of disability Report (pp. 1–3). Greater London Action on Disability. Retreived August 31, 2022, from https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/GLAD-Social-Model-of-Disability-Conference-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Murray, S. (2020). Disability and the posthuman: Bodies, technology and cultural futures. Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nau, J. P., Derbaix, C., & Thevenot, G. (2016). Market offers and the construction of a stigmatised identity: Insights from the case of motor-disabled persons. Recherche et Applications En Marketing (English Edition), 31(4), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051570716658465
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, S., Andreu, L., & Cervera, A. (2014). Value co-creation among hotels and disabled customers: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 813–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (2004). The social model in action: If I had a hammer. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research (pp. 18–31). The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, C. (2008). Becoming en‐wheeled: The situated accomplishment of reembodiment as a wheelchair user after spinal cord injury. Disability & Society, 23(7), 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590802469420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, E. Y., & Nam, S. J. (2014). An analysis of the digital literacy of people with disabilities in Korea: Verification of a moderating effect of gender, education and age. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(4), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, K., & Hughes, B. (1999). Disability studies and phenomenology: The carnal politics of everyday life. Disability & Society, 14(5), 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599925966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavia, T. M., & Mason, M. J. (2012). Inclusion, exclusion and identity in the consumption of families living with childhood disability. Consumption Markets & Culture, 15(1), 87–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2011.637753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavia, T. M., & Mason, M. J. (2014). Vulnerability and physical, cognitive, and behavioral impairment: Model extensions and open questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(4), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146714527766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, Y. (2020). Understanding the body and disability in Chinese contexts. Disability & Society, 35(5), 738–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1649123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, M. (2017). ‘Angry, when things don’t go my own way’: What it means to be gay with learning disabilities. Disability & Society, 32(8), 1165–1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1352489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L. (2008). Modernizing times: UK hearing‐impaired consumers at the policy crossroads. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(2), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00651.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, K. (2003). E-space inclusion: A case for the Americans with disabilities Act in cyberspace. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22(2), 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.22.2.223.17638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider-Kamp, A., & Askegaard, S. (2022). Reassembling the elderly consumption ensemble: Retaining independence through smart assisted living technologies. Journal of Marketing Management, 38(17–18), 2011–2034. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2078862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. 2001. The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? In B. M. Altman & S. N. Barnartt (Eds.), Research in social science and disability: Exploring theories and expanding methodologies (Vol. 2, pp. 9–28). Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Siebers, T. (2013). Disability and the theory of complex embodiment—For identity politics in a new register. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (pp. 272–291). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Södergren, J., Hietanen, J., & Vallström, N. (2022). Tales from the crypt: A psychoanalytic approach to disability representation in advertising. Journal of Consumer Culture, 23(4), 747–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405221140543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Södergren, J., & Vallström, N. (2023). Disability in influencer marketing: A complex model of disability representation. Journal of Marketing Management, 39(11-12), 1012–1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, R. (2010). Implants and ethnocide: Learning from the cochlear implant controversy. Disability & Society, 25(4), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687591003755849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, D. L., & Bergman, K. (1995). The Americans with disabilities Act: A mandate for marketers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 14(1), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569501400116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiker, H.-J. (1999). A history of disability. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stum, M. S., Bauer, J. W., & Delaney, P. J. (1998). Disabled elders’ out‐of‐pocket home care expenses: Examining financial burden. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1998.tb00401.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, J., & French, S. (2000). Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability & Society, 15(4), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590050058189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E., Balandin, S., Wilson, E., & Murfitt, K. (2019). Customer service communication with customers with disability. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(1), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2017-2400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomes, A. E., & Harrison, B. (1991). The marketing of a community service. Journal of Marketing Management, 7(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1991.9964147
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, P., & De Ruysscher, C. (2020). From monologue to dialogue in mental health care research: Reflections on a collaborative research process. Disability & Society, 35(8), 1274–1289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1680345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.K. Equality and Human Rights Commission. (2017). Being disabled in Britain: A Journey less equal. Retrieved August 31, 2022, from https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/publication-download/being-disabled-britain-journey-less-equal
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, L. (2022). Reading a duty to provide accessible pre-contractual information for consumers with disabilities into EU Consumer protection law. Journal of Consumer Policy, 45(2), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-022-09513-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, N., & Vehmas, S. (Eds.). (2020). Routledge handbook of disability studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weygand, Z. (2009). Les aveugles dans la société française. Représentations et institutions du Moyen-Âge au XIXe siècle. Revue d’éthique et de théologie morale, 256, 65–85. https://doi.org/10.3917/retm.256.0065
   Google Scholar
• Winance, M. (2007). Being normally different? Changes to normalization processes: From alignment to work on the norm. Disability & Society, 22(6), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590701560261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winance, M. (2019). ‘Don’t touch/push me!’ from disruption to intimacy in relations with one’s wheelchair: An analysis of relational modalities between persons and objects. The Sociological Review, 67(2), 428–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119830916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2022), Disability and health. Fact sheet. Retrieved August 31, 2022, from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H., Tullio-Pow, S., & Akhtar, A. (2015). Retail design and the visually impaired: A needs assessment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 24, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar