Embodied interaction: a turn to better understand disabling marketplaces and consumer vulnerability

References

• Anastasiou, D., & Kauffman, J. M. (2013). The social model of disability: Dichotomy between impairment and disability. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 38(4), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jht026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., & Ostrom, A. L. (2015). Transformative service research: Advancing our knowledge about service and well-being. Journal of Service Research, 18(3), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670515591316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., Ostrom, A. L., Corus, C., Fisk, R. P., Gallan, A. S., Giraldo, M., Mende, M., Mulder, M., Rayburn, S. W., Rosenbaum, M. S., Shirahada, K., & Williams, J. D. (2013). Transformative service research: An agenda for the future. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1203–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnould, E. (1998). Ethical concerns in participant observation/ethnography. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), 72–74.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. M. (2006). Consumer normalcy: Understanding the value of shopping through narratives of consumers with visual impairments. Journal of Retailing, 82(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2005.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S. M., Gentry, J. W., & Rittenburg, T. (2005). Building understanding of the domain of consumer vulnerability. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(2), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146705280622
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. M., Holland, J., & Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (2007). How consumers with disabilities perceive “welcome” in retail servicescapes: A critical incident study. Journal of Services Marketing, 21(3), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040710746525
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. M., Stephens, D. L., & Hill, R.-P. (2001). How can retailers enhance accessibility-giving consumers with visual impairments a voice in the marketplace. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 9(4), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6989(01)00034-0
   Google Scholar
• Beudaert, A. (2020). Towards an embodied understanding of consumers with disabilities: Insights from the field of disability studies. Consumption Markets & Culture, 23(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1534734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1989). The possibility of naturalism. A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bitner, M. J., Ostrom, A. L., & Morgan, F. N. (2008). Service blueprinting: A practical technique for service innovation. California Management Review, 50(3), 66–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boden, D., & Zimmerman, D. (Eds.). (1991). Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, G., Kelemen, M., Moffat, S., & Parsons, E. (2017). Using performative knowledge production to explore marketplace exclusion. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 20(4), 486–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-09-2016-0085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. D., & Chen, S. (2016). Practice styles and service systems. Journal of Service Management, 27(5), 798–830. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-09-2015-0293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A., & Coupland, C. (2012). From hero to villain to hero: Making experience sensible through embodied narrative sensemaking. Human Relations, 65(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711424321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, K. (2005). Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12(5), 649–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405055940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. (2013). Multimodal interaction from a conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echeverri, P., & Salomonson, N. (2017a). Bi-directional and stratified demeanour in value forming service encounter interactions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 36, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echeverri, P., & Salomonson, N. (2017b). Embodied value co-creation: A turn-taking perspective on service encounter interactions. Journal of Creating Value, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964317693341
   Google Scholar
• Echeverri, P., & Salomonson, N. (2019). Consumer vulnerability during mobility service interactions: Causes, forms and coping. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(3–4), 364–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1568281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021a, December 4). European accessibility act. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1202
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021b, December 4). Persons with disabilities. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1137
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021c, December 4). Union of equality: Strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities 2021-2030. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=8376&furtherPubs=yes
   Google Scholar
• Feely, M. (2016). Disability studies after the ontological turn: A return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism. Disability & Society, 31(7), 863–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1208603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, J. M., Fotheringham, D., Subramony, M., Gustafsson, A., Ostrom, A. L., Lemon, K. N., Huang, M.-H., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2021). Service research priorities: Designing sustainable service ecosystems. Journal of Service Research, 24(4), 462–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705211031302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Ethnomethodology. Studies in ethnomethodology. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gimlin, D. (2006). The absent body project: Cosmetic surgery as a response to bodily dys-appearance. Sociology, 40(4), 699–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506065156
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. (2017). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2003). The body in action. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body, and identity (pp. 19–42). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403918543_2
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, R. S. (2002). The tasks of embodied love: Moral problems in caring for children with disabilities. Hypatia, 17(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb00950.x
   Google Scholar
• Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111408177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazel, S., Mortensen, K., & Rasmussen, G. (2014). Introduction: A body of resources – CA studies of social conduct. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, L. (2020). Psycho-emotional disability in the marketplace. European Journal of Marketing, 54(11), 2675–2695. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, L., Husemann, K. C., & Zeyen, A. (2021). The disabling marketplace call for special issue. Journal of Marketing Management. www.jmmnews.com/the-disabling-marketplace/
   Google Scholar
• Holt, D. B. (1995). How consumers consume: A typology of consumption practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1086/209431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B., & Paterson, K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disability & Society, 12(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599727209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E., & Palen, L. (1997). Constructing meaning from space, gesture, and speech. In L. B. Resnick, R. Saljo, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning (pp. 23–40). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie, R. (2016). Disability, embodiment and the meaning of the home. In V. Chouinard, E. Hall, & R. Wilton (Eds.), Towards enabling geographies: “Disabled” bodies and minds in society and space (pp. 23–44). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., & Spee, P. S. (2009). Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00250.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, R., & Davey, J. (2021). Guest editorial: Solving problems for service consumers experiencing vulnerabilities: A marketplace challenge. The Journal of Services Marketing, 35(6), 685–691. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-08-2021-542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observations: A methodology for human studies. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (1999). Reasonable access for mobility-disabled persons is more than widening the door. Journal of Retailing, 75(4), 479–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)00020-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (2001). Sharing the experience of mobility-disabled consumers: Building understanding through the use of ethnographic research methods. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 30(4), 430–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124101030004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman-Scarborough, C., & Baker, S. (2005). Do people with disabilities believe the ADA has served their consumer interests? The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (1997). Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusenbach. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/146613810343007
   Google Scholar
• Kuuru, T.-K., & Närvänen, E. (2019). Embodied interaction in customer experience: A phenomenological study of group fitness. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(13–14), 1241–1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1649295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuru, T.-K., & Närvänen, E. (2022). Talking bodies – an embodied approach to service employees’ work. Journal of Services Marketing, 36(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-02-2020-0060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Schlindwein, E., Jalan, R., & Heaphy, E. D. (2023). Organizational body work: Efforts to shape human bodies in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), 37–73. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layder, D. (2005). Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, D. (1990). The absent body. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. G., Ozanne, J. L., & Hill, R. P. (1999). Improving service encounters through resource sensitivity: The case of health care delivery in an Appalachian community. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 18(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569901800209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Linton, S. (1998). Disability studies/not disability studies. Disability & Society, 13(4), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599826588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loscher, G., Splitter, V., & Seidl, D. (2019). Theodore schatzki’s practice theory and its implications for organization studies. In S. Clegg & M. Pina e Cunha (Eds.), Management, organizations and contemporary social theory (pp. 115–134). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Cheung, L., & Ferrier, E. (2015a). Co-creating service experience practices. Journal of Service Management, 26(2), 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-08-2014-0204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Gustafsson, A., Jaakkola, E., Klaus, P., Radnor, Z. J., Perks, H., & Friman, M. (2015b). Fresh perspectives on customer experience. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(6/7), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2015-0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (Ed.). (2000). Language and gesture. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2004). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. (1991). Pride against prejudice: Transforming attitudes to disability. Women’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, S., Andreu, L., & Cervera, A. (2014). Value co-creation among hotels and disabled customers: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 813–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nettleton, S., & Watson, J. (1998). The body in everyday life: An introduction. In S. Nettleton & J. Watson (Eds.), The body in everyday life (pp. 1–24). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1391–1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D.(2011). Practice as the site of knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine. Organization Science, 22(3), 602–620. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (2003). Introduction: Toward a practice-based view of knowing and learning in organizations. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 3–31). M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, C. (2008). Becoming en‐wheeled: The situated accomplishment of re‐embodiment as a wheelchair user after spinal cord injury. Disability & Society, 23(7), 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590802469420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, K., & Hughes, B. (1999). Disability studies and phenomenology: The carnal politics of everyday life. Disability & Society, 14(5), 597–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599925966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavia, T. M., & Mason, M. J. (2012). Inclusion, exclusion and identity in the consumption of families living with childhood disability. Consumption Markets & Culture, 15(1), 87–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2011.637753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavia, T. M., & Mason, M. J. (2014). Vulnerability and physical, cognitive, and behavioral impairment model extensions and open questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146714527766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinder, R. (1995). Bringing back the body without the blame? The experience of Ill and disabled people at work. Sociology of Health & Illness, 17(5), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10932129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creating unique value with the customers. Strategy Leadership, 32(3), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570410699249
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Richards, D. (2004). Introduction. Culture and Organization, 10(2), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475955042000253396
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J., & Dall’alba, G. (2009). Returning to practice anew: A life-world perspective. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1349–1368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saren, M., Parsons, E., & Goulding, C. (2019). Dimensions of marketplace exclusion: Representations, resistances and responses. Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(5–6), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1562684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863–1873. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606071942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2012). Temporality and the causal approach to human activity. In J. Kiverstein & M. Wheeler (Eds.), Heidegger and cognitive science (pp. 343–364). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2017). Sayings, texts and discursive formations. In A. Hui, T. R. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations, practitioners (pp. 126–140). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2019). Social change in a material world. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., Jr., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2004). Social models of disability and other life strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410409512636
   Google Scholar
• Shilling, C. (2012). The body and social theory. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, L., Maclaran, P., & Brown, S. (2019). An embodied approach to consumer experiences: The hollister brandscape. European Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 806–828. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-09-2017-0558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505053090
   Google Scholar
• Ware, L. P. (2002). A moral conversation in disability: Risking the personal in educational contexts. Hypatia, 17(3), 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb00945.x
   Google Scholar
• Willems, T. (2018). Seeing and sensing the railways: A phenomenological view on practice-based learning. Management Learning, 49(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507617725188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. M. (1998). The use of mystery shopping in the measurement of service delivery. The Service Industries Journal, 18(3), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069800000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H., Tullio-Pow, S., & Akhtar, A. (2015). Retail design and the visually impaired: A needs assessment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 24(1), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzelsberger. (2005). (In)visibility: Accounts of embodiment of women with physical disabilities and differences. Disability & Society, 20(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590500086492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar