The differential effects of direct and indirect speech on discourse comprehension in Dutch and English listeners with and without aphasia

References

• Abuom, T. O., Shah, E., & Bastiaanse, R. (2013). Sentence comprehension in Swahili-English bilingual agrammatic speakers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27, 355–370. doi:10.3109/02699206.2013.775346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R. (2011). The retrieval and inflection of verbs in the spontaneous speech of fluent aphasic speakers. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 163–172. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., Hugen, J., Kos, M., & van Zonneveld, R. (2002). Lexical, morphological, and syntactic aspects of verb production in agrammatic aphasics. Brain and Language, 80, 142–159. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & van Zonneveld, R. (2006). Comprehension of passives in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 96, 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bohan, J., Sanford, A. J., Cochrane, S., & Sanford, A. J. S. (2008). Direct and indirect speech modulates depth of processing. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP), Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Brookshire, R., & Nicholas, L. (1993). The discourse comprehension test. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders, A Division of the Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language, 66, 764–805. doi:10.2307/414729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulmas, F. (1986a). Direct and indirect speech (Trends in linguistics studies and monographs 31). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Coulmas, F. (1986b). Direct and indirect speech in Japanese. In C. Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech (pp. 161–178). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2012). Lexical and prosodic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution in aphasia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41, 387–408. doi:10.1007/s10936-011-9191-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eerland, A., Engelen, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2013). The influence of direct and indirect speech on mental representations. PLoS One, 8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferstl, E. C., Walther, K., Guthke, T., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Assessment of story comprehension deficits after brain damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 367–384. doi:10.1080/13803390490515784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221–233. doi:10.1037/h0057532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading. East Sussex: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Graetz, P., De Bleser, R., Willmes, K., & Heeschen, C. (1992). De Akense Afasie Test: Constructie van de Nederlandstalige versie van de AAT. Logopedie en Foniatrie, 63, 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Groenewold, R., Bastiaanse, R., & Huiskes, M. (2013). Direct speech constructions in aphasic Dutch narratives. Aphasiology, 27, 546–567. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.742484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewold, R., Bastiaanse, R., Nickels, L., & Huiskes, M. (2014). Perceived liveliness and speech comprehensibility in aphasia: The effects of direct speech in auditory narratives. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49, 486–497. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewold, R., Bastiaanse, R., Nickels, L., Wieling, M., & Huiskes, M. (2014). The effects of direct and indirect speech on discourse comprehension in Dutch listeners with and without aphasia. Aphasiology, 28, 862–884. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.902916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hincks, R. (2005). Measures and perceptions of liveliness in student oral presentation speech: A proposal for an automatic feedback mechanism. System, 33, 575–591. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, A. (2007). Coding strategies of indirect reported speech in typological perspective. University of Queensland Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Koster, J. (1975). Dutch as an SOV Language. Linguistic Analysis, 1, 111–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1972). Language in the city: Studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. (1986). Direct and indirect speech: A functional study. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech (pp. 29–45). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Macaulay, R. (1987). Polyphonic monologues: Quoted direct speech in oral narratives. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics, 1, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, P. (1990). Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language, 14, 325–363. doi:10.1075/sl.14.2.04may
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaglione, A. (1981). The theory of German word order from the renaissance to the present. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. (Ed.). (1995). Collins COBUILD English language dictionary. London: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (1974). The semantics of direct and indirect discourse. Papers in Linguistics, 7, 267–307. doi:10.1080/08351817409370375
   Google Scholar
• Yao, B., Belin, P., & Scheepers, C. (2011). Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3146–3152. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, B., Belin, P., & Scheepers, C. (2012). Brain “talks over” boring quotes: Top-down activation of voice-selective areas while listening to monotonous direct speech quotations. NeuroImage, 60, 1832–1842. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, B., & Scheepers, C. (2011). Contextual modulation of reading rate for direct versus indirect speech quotations. Cognition, 121, 447–453. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart, C. J. W. (2011). The syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar