Assessing functional communication: validation of the Italian versions of the Communication Outcome after Stroke (COAST) scales for speakers and caregivers

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1990). Report of the advisory panel to the ASHA’s functional communication measures project. Rockville, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Arcara, G., & Bambini, V. (2016). A test for the assessment of pragmatic abilities and cognitive substrates (APACS): Normative data and psychometric properties. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 70. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., & Ferguson, A. (2010). Language, meaning, context, and functional communication. Aphasiology, 24, 480–496. doi:10.1080/02687030902775157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambini, V. (2010). Neuropragmatics: A foreword. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 1–20. doi:10.1075/hop.16.neu2
   Google Scholar
• Bambini, V., & Bara, B. G. (2012). Neuropragmatics. In J.-O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–21). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bambini, V., Kratschmer, A., & Ricci, I. (2012). Correlati psicolinguistici delle gradazioni epistemiche. In V. Bambini, I. Ricci, P. M. Bertinetto; Collaboratori (Eds.), Linguaggio e cervello – Semantica /Language and the brain – Semantics Atti del XLII Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (Pisa, SNS, 2008) (Vol. 2, pp. I.A.5). Roma: Bulzoni.
   Google Scholar
• Blomert, L., Kean, M. L., Koster, C., & Schokker, J. (1994). Amsterdam—Nijmegen everyday language test: Construction, reliability and validity. Aphasiology, 8, 381–407. doi:10.1080/02687039408248666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco, F. M., Angeleri, R., Zuffranieri, M., Bara, B. G., & Sacco, K. (2012). Assessment battery for communication: Development of two equivalent forms. Journal of Communication Disorders, 45, 290–303. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, A., Hesketh, A., Patchick, E., Young, A., Davies, L., & Vail, A. … Tyrrell, P. (2012). Effectiveness of enhanced communication therapy in the first four months after stroke for aphasia and dysarthria: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 345, e4407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, K. L. (1995). The right hemisphere language battery (2nd ed.). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Cappa, S. F. (1994). Functional communication profile, versione italiana. Piccoli Quaderni Di Riabilitazione, 3, 49–51.
   Google Scholar
• Cappa, S. F., Ansaldo, A. I., & Durand, E. (2014). Rehabilitation for aphasia. In M. Selzer, S. Clarke, L. Cohen, G. Kwakkel, & R. Miller (Eds.), Textbook of neural repair and rehabilitation (pp. 437–446). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511995590.038
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
   Google Scholar
• Code, C. (2003). The quantity of life for people with chronic aphasia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13, 379–390. doi:10.1080/09602010244000255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruice, M., Worrall, L., Hickson, L., & Murison, R. (2005). Measuring quality of life: Comparing family members’ and friends’ ratings with those of their aphasic partners. Aphasiology, 19, 111–129. doi:10.1080/02687030444000651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Carvalho, I. A. M., & Mansur, L. L. (2008). Validation of ASHA FACS-functional assessment of communication skills for Alzheimer disease population. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 22, 375–381. doi:10.1097/WAD.0b013e31818809b2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong-Hagelstein, M., Kros, L., Lingsma, H. F., Dippel, D. W. J., Koudstaal, P. J., & Visch-Brink, E. G. (2012). Expert versus proxy rating of verbal communicative ability of people with aphasia after stroke. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 18, 1064–1070. doi:10.1017/S1355617712000811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. M., O’Flaherty, C. A., & Snow, P. C. (2000). Measuring perception of communicative ability: The development and evaluation of the La Trobe communication questionnaire. Aphasiology, 14, 251–268. doi:10.1080/026870300401469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie, T. L., Yorkston, K. M., Klasner, E. R., Dudgeon, B. J., Deitz, J. C., Baylor, C. R., … Amtmann, D. (2006). Measuring communicative participation: A review of self-report instruments in speech-language pathology. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 307–320. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2006/030)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frattali, C. M. (1998). Measuring outcomes in speech-language pathology. New York, NY: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Frattali, C. M., Thompson, C. M., Holland, A. L., Wohl, C. B., & Ferketic, M. M. (1995). ASHA functional assessment of communication skills for adults (FACS). ASHA (Vol. 37). Rockville, MD: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., & Brownell, H. H. (1986). Right hemisphere communication battery. Boston, MA: Psychology Service.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417–1432. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Swaab, T. Y. (1996). Lexical-semantic event-related potential effects in patients with left hemisphere lesions and aphasia, and patients with right hemisphere lesions without aphasia. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 119, 627–649. doi:10.1093/brain/119.2.627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesketh, A., Long, A. F., Bowen, A. & on behalf of the Actnow Research St. (2011). Agreement on outcome: Speaker, carer, and therapist perspectives on functional communication after stroke. Aphasiology, 25, 291–308. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.507818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari, K., Owen, S., & Farrelly, S. J. (2007). Proxy and self-report agreement on the stroke and aphasia quality of life scale-39. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 78, 1072–1075. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.111476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L., Frattali, C. M., & Fromm, D. (1980). Communicative abilities in daily living: A test of functional communication for aphasic adults. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L., Frattali, C. M., & Fromm, D. (1998). Communication abilities of daily living (CADL-2) (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, W. H., Wertz, R. T., & Avent, J. R. (2002). Relationships among language impairment, functional communication, and pragmatic performance in aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 823–835. doi:10.1080/02687030244000086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Dorze, G., & Brassard, C. (1995). A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends, based on the WHO model of chronic diseases. Aphasiology, 9, 239–255. doi:10.1080/02687039508248198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Dorze, G., & Signori, F.-H. (2010). Needs, barriers and facilitators experienced by spouses of people with aphasia. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(13), 1073–1087. doi: 10.3109/09638280903374121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnik, A., Bastiaanse, R., & Höhle, B. (2015). Discourse production in aphasia: A current review of theoretical and methodological challenges. Aphasiology, 7038, 1–36. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1113489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas, J., Pickard, L., Bester, S., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., & Zoghaib, C. (1989). The communicative effectiveness index: Development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 113–124. doi:10.1044/jshd.5401.113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Long, A. F., Hesketh, A., & Bowen, A. (2009). Communication outcome after stroke: A new measure of the carer’s perspective. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23, 846–856. doi:10.1177/0269215509336055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, A. F., Hesketh, A., Paszek, G., Booth, M., & Bowen, A. (2008). Development of a reliable self-report outcome measure for pragmatic trials of communication therapy following stroke: The communication outcome after stroke (COAST) scale. Clinical Rehabilitation, 22, 1083–1094. doi:10.1177/0269215508090091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzzatti, C., Willmes, K., & De Bleser, R. (1991). Aachener aphasia test (AAT) – Versione Italiana. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, K. C., McCullough, G. H., Ruark, J. L., & Rainey, J. (2006). Pragmatic performance and functional communication in adults with aphasia. The Journal of Speech and Language Pathology – Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 164–178. doi:10.1037/h0100193
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, J., Wright, V., & Rosenbaum, P. (2010). The ICF model of functioning and disability: Incorporating quality of life and human development. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 204–211. doi:10.3109/17518421003620525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGurk, R., Kneebone, I. I., & Pit ten Cate, I. M. (2011). “Sometimes we get it wrong but we keep on trying”: A cross-sectional study of coping with communication problems by informal carers of stroke survivors with aphasia. Aphasiology, 25(12), 1507–1522. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.599528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michallet, B., Tétreault, S., & Le Dorze, G. (2003). The consequences of severe aphasia on the spouses of aphasic people: A description of the adaptation process. Aphasiology, 17, 835–859. doi:10.1080/02687030344000238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muò, R., Cancialosi, P., Galimberti, L., Cacciola, B. C., Gilardone, M., & Schindler, A. (2015). Validation of the Italian version of the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association–Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for adults (I-ASHA-FACS). Aphasiology, 29, 1110–1130. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1010475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, D. R., Frattali, C. M., Holland, A. L., Thompson, C. K., Caperton, C. J., & Slater, S. C. (2004). Quality of communication life scale (ASHA QCL). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, C. (1985). The profile of communicative appropriateness: A clinical tool for the assessment of pragmatics. The South African Journal of Communication Disorders. 32, 18–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pizzamiglio, L., Laicardi, C., Appicciafuoco, A., Gentili, P., Judica, A., & Luglio, L. (1984). Capacità comunicative di pazienti afasici in situazioni di vita quotidiana: adattamento italiano. Archivio Di Psicologia Neurologia E Psichiatria, XLV, 187–210.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (2004). Review. Analysing the spontaneous speech of aphasic speakers. Aphasiology, 18, 1075–1091. doi:10.1080/02687030444000534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prutting, C. A., & Kirchner, D. M. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 105–119. doi:10.1044/jshd.5202.105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rautakoski, P., Korpijaakko-Huuhka, A.-M., & Klippi, A. (2008). People with severe and moderate aphasia and their partners as estimators of communicative skills: A client-centred evaluation. Aphasiology, 22, 1269–1293. doi:10.1080/02687030802374788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2014). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, M. C., Marangolo, P., & Lauriola, M. (2004). BLED SantaLucia. Batteria sul Linguaggio dell’Emisfero Destro SantaLucia. Firenze: Giunti O.S.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrmann, B. (2007). Verbal qualifiers for rating scales: Sociolinguistic considerations and psychometric data. Project report. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, K., & Wertz, R. (2003). Quality of life with and without aphasia. Aphasiology, 17, 355–364. doi:10.1080/02687030244000716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiter, M. B., Kolk, H. H. J., Rietveld, T. C. M., Dijkstra, N., & Lotgering, E. (2011). Towards a quantitative measure of verbal effectiveness and efficiency in the Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (ANELT). Aphasiology, 25(8), 961–975. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.569892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarno, M. T. (1965). A measurement of functional communication in aphasia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 46, 101–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarno, M. T. (1969). The functional communication profile: Manual of directions. New York, NY: Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University Medical Center.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., & Kagan, A. (2007). Application of the ICF in aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 244–253. doi:10.1055/s-2007-986521
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17, 268–274. doi:10.1111/jep.2011.17.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavano, A., Côté, H., Ferré, P., Ska, B., & Joanette, Y. (2013). Protocollo MEC – Protocollo Montréal per la valutazione delle abilità comunicative. Milan: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meulen, I., van de Sandt-Koenderman, W. M. E., Duivenvoorden, H. J., & Ribbers, G. M. (2010). Measuring verbal and non-verbal communication in aphasia: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the scenario test. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45, 424–435. doi:10.3109/13682820903111952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenborre, D., Visch-Brink, E., & Mariën, P. (2015). The development of modern approaches to aphasia. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 38, 189–194. doi:10.1097/MRR.0000000000000116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmes, K., Luzzatti, C., Mazzucchi, A., De Bleser, R., Colombo, C., & Bisiacchi, P. (1988). L’Aachener Aphasie test (AAT). III. Procedimento diagnostico per casi singoli. Archivio Di Psicologia, Neurologia E Psichiatria, 49, 510–545.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1946). Preamble to the constitution of the World Health Organization. New York, NY: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar