What happens when they think they are right? Error awareness analysis of sentence comprehension deficits in aphasia

References

• Abuom, T. O., Shah, E., & Bastiaanse, R. (2013). Sentence comprehension in Swahili-English bilingual agrammatic speakers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 27, 355–370. doi:10.3109/02699206.2013.775346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC, 19, 716–723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arantzeta, M. (2017). Sentence comprehension in monolingual and bilingual aphasia: Evidence from behavioral and eye-tracking methods. Groningen, NL: Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics (GRODIL). ISBN: 978-90-367-9635-4.
   Google Scholar
• Arantzeta, M., Bastiaanse, R., Burchert, F., Wieling, M., Martínez-Zabaleta, M., & Laka, I. (2017). Eye-tracking the effect of word order in sentence comprehension in aphasia: Evidence from Basque, a free word order ergative language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience., 32, 1320–1343. doi:10.1080/23273798.2017.1344715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & Edwards, S. (2004). Word order and finiteness in Dutch and English Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 89, 91–107. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00306-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Wilkinson, R., & Maxim, J. (2009). Prosody as a compensatory strategy in the conversations of people with agrammatism. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23, 133–155. doi:10.1080/02699200802602985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bever, T. G. (1970). The influence of speech performance on linguistic structure. In G. B. Flores d’Arcais & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), Advances in psycholinguistics. 4–30. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co. ISBN: 072046031X.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, J. (2004). Linking eye movements to sentence comprehension in reading and listening. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and beyond. 51–76. Hove, US: Psychology Press. ISBN: 1-84169-400-2.
   Google Scholar
• Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2013). Neurotypology: Modeling crosslinguistic similarities and differences in the neurocognition of language comprehension. In M. Sanz, I. Laka, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Language down the garden path. The cognitive and biological basis for linguistic structures. 241–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0-19-967713-9.
   Google Scholar
• Burchert, F., De Bleser, R., & Sonntag, K. (2003). Does morphology make the difference? Agrammatic sentence comprehension in German. Brain and Language, 87, 323–342. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00132-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchert, F., Hanne, S., & Vasishth, S. (2013). Sentence comprehension disorders in aphasia: The concept of chance performance revisited. Aphasiology, 27, 112–125. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.730603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., & Hildebrandt, N. (1988). Disorders of syntactic comprehension. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. ISBN: 0-262-03132-9.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., Waters, G., DeDe, G., Michaud, J., & Reddy, A. (2007). A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: Behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspect. Brain and Language, 101, 103–150. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572–582. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, A., Maher, L. M., & Heilman, K. M. (1995). Spatial characteristics of thematic role representation. Neuropsychologia, 33, 643–648. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(94)00134-B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheesman, J., & Merikle, P. M. (1984). Priming with and without awareness. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 387–395. doi:10.3758/BF03202793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheesman, J., & Merikle, P. M. (1986). Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 40, 343. doi:10.1037/h0080103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa Lectures. Foris: Dordrecht. ISBN: 9070176289.
   Google Scholar
• Collins English Dictionary (2012). Retrieved 2016, July 27th, from: http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/guess
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye spoken fixation by the meaning language. Cognitive Psychology, 107, 84–107. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44, 837–845. doi:10.2307/2531595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. W., Choy, J. J., & Thompson, C. K. (2007). Real-time comprehension of wh- movement in aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking while listening. Brain and Language, 100, 1–22. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. W., & Thompson, C. K. (2009). Automatic processing of wh- and NP-movement in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 563–583. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M., Kwan, L., & Goode, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1322–1338. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.5.1322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diggle, P., Heagerty, P., Liang, K., & Zeger, S. (2002). Analysis of longitudinal data (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0-19-852484-7.
   Google Scholar
• Drai, D., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2006a). A new empirical angle on the variability debate: Quantitative neurosyntactic analyses of a large data set from Broca’s Aphasia. Brain and Language, 96, 117–128. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drai, D., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2006b). The variability debate: More statistics, more linguistics. Brain and Language, 96, 157–170. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryer, M. S. (2005). Order of subject, object, and verb. In M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures. 330–333. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 0-19-925591-1.
   Google Scholar
• Dryer, M. S. (2007). Word order. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Clause structure, language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 1, 61–131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0-521-58156-1.
   Google Scholar
• Duman, T. Y., Altinok, N., Özgirgin, N., & Bastiaanse, R. (2011). Sentence comprehension in Turkish Broca’s aphasia: An integration problem. Aphasiology, 25, 908–926. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.550629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Sedivy, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1995). Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 409–436. doi:10.1007/BF02143160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The good enough approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistic Compass, 1, 71–83. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00007.x
   Google Scholar
• Garraffa, M., & Grillo, N. (2008). Canonicity effects as grammatical phenomena. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 177–197. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, H., & Barresi, B. (2005). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. (3rd ed.). (J. E. García-Albea, Spanish adaptation). Madrid:Médica Panamericana. ISBN: 84-7903-785-7.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1986). Language deficits and the theory of syntax. Brain and Language, 27, 135–159. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(86)90009-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 50, 27–51. doi:10.1006/brln.1995.1039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The trace deletion hypothesis and the tree-pruning hypothesis: Still valid characterizations of Broca’s aphasia. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1–21. discussion 55-64. 10.1017/S0140525X00002399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y., Piñango, M., Zurif, E., & Drai, D. (1999). The critical role of group studies in neuropsychology: Comprehension regularities in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language., 67, 134–147. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanne, S., Sekerina, I. A., Vasishth, S., Burchert, F., & De Bleser, R. (2011). Chance in agrammatic sentence comprehension: What does it really mean? Evidence from eye movements of German agrammatic aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 25, 221–244. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.489256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jap, B. A., Martínez-Ferreiro, S., & Bastiaanse, R. (2016). The effect of syntactic frequency on sentence comprehension in standard Indonesian Broca’s aphasia. Aphasiology, 11, 1325–1340. doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1148902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncós-Rabadán, O., Pereiro, A. X., & Souto, M. (2009). Manifestaciones de la afasia en gallego. Datos preliminares de pacientes bilingües gallego-castellano. Revista De Logopedia, Foniatría Y Audiología, 29, 21–29. doi:10.1016/S0214-4603(09)70140-8
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. R. T., & Chiou, H. H. (2008). What explains metacomprehension in adults with aphasia? Jackson, WY: Clinical Aphasiology Conference. http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00001937/01/viewpaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2010). Anosognosia in Aphasia. In G. P. Prigatano (Ed.), The study of anosognosia. 113–122. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0-19-537909-9.
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H. J. (1993). A time-based approach to agrammatic production. Brain and Language, 50, 282–303. doi:10.1006/brln.1995.1049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 149–171. doi:10.1006/ccog.2000.0433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, E. J., & Imber, L. G. (1979). When practice makes imperfect: Debilitating effects of overlearning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2014–2024. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://childes.talkbank.org/clan/
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, R. C., Rappaport, B. Z., & Garcia-Bunuel, L. (1985). Self-monitoring behavior in a case of auditory agnosia with aphasia. Brain and Language, 24, 297–313. doi:10.1016/0093-934x(85)90137-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, R., Joanette, Y., & Monchi, O. (2015). The implications of age-related neurofunctional compensatory mechanisms in executive function and language processing including the new Temporal Hypothesis for Compensation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 221. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matin, E., Shao, K. C., & Boff, K. R. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 372–380. doi:10.3758/BF03206780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. M., Mack, J. E., & Thompson, C. K. (2012). Tracking passive sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25, 31–43. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, R. K., Olivers, C. N. L., & Huettig, F. (2013). Spoken language and the decision to move the eyes: To what extent are language-mediated eye movements automatic? In V. S. C. Pammi & N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Progress in brain research: Decision making - Neural and behavioural approaches (pp. 135–149). New York: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62604-2.00008-3.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorder: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 671–717. doi:10.1080/02643299408251989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, E., & Price, M. C. (2015). Measuring consciousness with confidence ratings. In M. Overgaard (Ed.), Behavioral methods in consciousness research. 159–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0-19-968889-0.
   Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger, M., & Damico, J. S. (1998). Spontaneous verbal repetition: A social strategy in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 12, 971–988. doi:10.1080/02687039808249464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overgaard, M. (2015). Behavioral methods in consciousness research. Oxford University Press: Oxford. ISBN: 978-0-19-968889-0.
   Google Scholar
• Overgaard, M., Timmermans, B., Sandberg, K., & Cleeremans, A. (2010). Optimizing subjective measures of consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 682–684. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña-Ayala, A., & Cárdenas, L. (2015). A conceptual model of metacognitive activity. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Metacognition: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 39–72). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. ISBN: 978-3-319-11061-5.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rubens, A. B., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Anosognosia of linguistic deficits in patients with neurological deficits. In G. P. Prigatano & D. L. Schacter (Eds.), Awareness of deficit after brain injury: Clinical and theoretical issues. 40–52. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 0-195-05941-7.
   Google Scholar
• Scheepers, C., & Crocker, M. (2004). Constituent order priming from reading to listening: A visual-world study. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton Jr. (Eds), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP and beyond. 167–399. Hove, US: Psychology Press. ISBN: 1-84169-400-2.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W. (2009). Automaticity and consciousness. In W. P. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consciousness (pp. 83–92). Elsevier:Amsterdam. ISBN: 978-0-123-73864-6
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, R., Cazzoli, D., Eggenberger, N., Preisig, B., Nef, T., Nyffeler, T., … Müri, R. (2015). Cue recognition and integration – Eyetracking evidence of processing differences in sentence comprehension in aphasia. PloS ONE, 10, e0142853. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 10, 249–262. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(80)90055-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth, A. K., Dienes, Z., Cleeremans, A., Overgaard, M., & Pessoa, L. (2008). Measuring consciousness: Relating behavioral and neurophysiological approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 314–321. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Heuristic made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 207–222. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information precessing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuren, J. E., Hammond, C. S., Maher, L. M., Rothi, L. J., & Heilman, K. M. (1995). Attention and anosognosia: The case of a jargon aphasic patient with unawareness of language deficit. Neurology, 45, 376–378. doi:10.1212/WNL.45.2.376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N. N., & Damico, J. S. (1997). Reformulating the definition of compensatory strategies in aphasia. Aphasiology, 11, 761–781. doi:10.1080/02687039708250455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss, D. T. (1991). Disturbance of self-awareness after frontal system damage. In G. P. Prigatono & D. L. Schacter (Eds.), Awareness of deficits after brain injury. 64–83. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 0-195-05941-7.
   Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007). Eye movements and spoken language processing. In R. P. G. Van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain. 443–469. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier. ISBN: 0-080-44980-8.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., Meltzer-Asscher, A., Cho, S., Lee, J., Wieneke, C., Weintraub, S., & Mesulam, M. M. (2013). Syntactic and morphosyntactic processing in stroke-induced and primary progressive aphasia. Behavioural Neurology, 26, 35–54. doi:10.1155/2013/749412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Scharp, V. L., & Marchall, R. (2006). Communicative value of self cues in aphasia: A re-evaluation. Aphasiology, 20, 684–704. doi:10.1080/02687030500334076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, D. J., & Bever, T. G. (2001). Sentence comprehension: The integration of rules and habits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN: 978-0-262-70080-1.
   Google Scholar
• van Herten, M., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2006). When heuristics clash with parsing routines: ERP evidence for conflict monitoring in sentence perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1181–1197. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2000). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer. ISBN: 978-1-4419-0299-3.
   Google Scholar
• Vuilleumier, P. (2004). Anosognosia: The neurology of beliefs and uncertainties. Cortex, 40, 9–17. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70918-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. A. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS-III). The Psychological Corporation: San Antonio. ISBN: 0-158-98104-9.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A., Cockburn, J., & Halligan, P. W. (1987). Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT). England: Thames Valley Test Company. ISBN: 978-0-749-12997-2.
   Google Scholar