Measures of functional, real-world communication for aphasia: a critical review

References

• Barnes, S., & Bloch, S. (2018). Why is measuring communication difficult? A critical review of current speech pathology concepts and measures. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 1–18. doi:10.1080/02699206.2018.1498541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bavelas, J. B., & Chovil, N. (2000). Visible acts of meaning: An integrated message model of language in face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 163–194. doi:10.1177/0261927X00019002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Maxim, J., Best, W., & Cooper, F. (2011). Redesigning therapy for agrammatism: Initial findings from the ongoing evaluation of a conversation-based intervention study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 222–236. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Maxim, J., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 136–147. doi:10.1055/s-2007-970571
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beeke, S., Sirman, N., Beckley, F., Maxim, J., Edwards, S., Swinburn, K., & Best, W. (2013). Better conversations with aphasia: An e-learning resource. Retrieved from https://extend.ucl.ac.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Berlo, D. (1960). Process of communication. New York: International Thomson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Blomert, L., Kean, M. L., Koster, C., & Schokker, J. (1994). Amsterdam-Nijmegen everyday language test - construction, reliability and validity. Aphasiology, 8, 381–407. doi:10.1080/02687039408248666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomert, L., Koster, C., Mier, H. V., & Kean, M.-L. (1987). Verbal communication abilities of aphasic patients: The everyday language test. Aphasiology, 1, 463–474. doi:10.1080/02687038708248873
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, E. A., Anderson, A. H., & Newlands, A. (1994). The effects of visibility on dialogue and performance in a cooperative problem solving task. Language and Speech, 37, 1–20. doi:10.1177/002383099403700101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M. C., Godwin, J., Enderby, P., Kelly, H., & Campbell, P. (2016). speech and language therapy for aphasia after stroke: An updated systematic review and meta-analyses. Stroke, 47, E236–E237. doi:10.1161/Strokeaha.116.014439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 62–81. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, R., Farrow, V., Davies, C., & Lincoln, N. (1995). Reliability of the assessment of communicative effectiveness in severe aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 30, 1–16. doi:10.3109/13682829509031319
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, B., & Worrall, L. (2000). The assessment of activity limitation in functional communication: challenges and choices. In L. Worrall & C. Frattali (Eds.), Neurogenic communication disorders: A functional approach (pp. 19-34). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, B., Worrall, L., & Hickson, L. (2008). Exploring the interactional dimension of social communication: A collective case study of older people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 22, 235–257. doi:10.1080/02687030701268024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doedens, W., & Meteyard, L. (2018, July 31). The importance of situated language use for aphasia rehabilitation. doi:10.31234/osf.io/svwpf
   Google Scholar
• Elman, R. J., & Bernstein-Ellis, E. (1995). What is functional? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 115–117. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0404.115
   Google Scholar
• Enderby, P., John, A., & Petheram, B. (2006). Therapy outcome measures for rehabilitation professionals. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Frattali, C., Thompson, C. M., Holland, A. L., Wohl, C. B., & Ferketic, M. M. (1995). Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for Adults (ASHA-FACS). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Frattali, C. M. (1992). Functional assessment of communication: Merging public policy with clinical views. Aphasiology, 6, 63–83. doi:10.1080/02687039208248577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fucetola, R., & Connor, L. T. (2015). family ratings of communication largely reflect expressive language and conversation-level ability in people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24, S790. doi:10.1044/2015_ajslp-14-0135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glueckauf, R. L., Blonder, L. X., Ecklund-Johnson, E., Maher, L., Crosson, B., & Gonzalez-Rothi, L. (2003). Functional outcome questionnaire for aphasia: Overview and preliminary psychometric evaluation. NeuroRehabilitation, 18, 281–290. Retrieved from https://content.iospress.com/articles/neurorehabilitation/nre00202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233–260. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, C. H. (1993). Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 84–89. doi:10.1097/00002060-199304000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, A., Frattali, C., & Fromm, D. (1999). CADL-2: Communication activities of daily living. Austin, Texas: Pro-ed.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L. (1980). CADL: Communicative abilities in daily living: A test of functional communication for aphasic adults. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L. (1982). Observing functional communication of aphasic adults. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47, 50–56. doi:10.1044/jshd.4701.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2005). The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition, 96, 127–142. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hula, W., Doyle, P., Stone, C., Austermann Hula, S., Kellough, S., Wambaugh, J., … St Jacque, A. (2015). The Aphasia Communication Outcome Measure (ACOM): Dimensionality, item bank calibration, and initial validation. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 58, 906–919. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, B. (2012). Patient-reported outcome measures in aphasia. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 22, 160. doi:10.1044/nnsld22.4.160
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, W. H., Wertz, R. T., & Avent, J. R. (2002). Relationships among language impairment, functional communication, and pragmatic performance in aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 823–835. doi:10.1080/02687030244000086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, K. (1993). Functional outcome: Methodological considerations. Clinical Aphasiology, 21, 67–77. Retrieved from http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/1438/
   Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–227). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). Western Aphasia battery - revised. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ketterson, T. U., Glueckauf, R. L., Blonder, L. X., Gustafson, D. J., Donovan, N. J., Rodriquez, A. D., … Gonzalez-Rothi, L. J. (2008). Reliability and validity of the functional outcome questionnaire for aphasia (FOQ-A). Rehabilitation Psychology, 53, 215–223. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.53.2.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnik, A., Bastiaanse, R., & Hohle, B. (2016). Discourse production in aphasia: A current review of theoretical and methodological challenges. Aphasiology, 30, 765–800. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1113489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, S., Wilkinson, R., Bryan, K., Maxim, J., Edmundson, A., Bruce, C., & Moir, D. (2001). Supporting Partners of People with Aphasia in Relationships and Conversation (SPPARC). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 25–30. doi:10.3109/13682820109177853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas, J., Pickard, L., Bester, S., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., & Zoghaib, C. (1989). The communicative effectiveness index: Development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 113–124. doi:10.1044/jshd.5401.113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Long, A., Hesketh, A., & Bowen, A. (2009). Communication outcome after stroke: A new measure of the carer’s perspective. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23, 846–856. doi:10.1177/0269215509336055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, A., Hesketh, A., Paszek, G., Booth, M., & Bowen, A. (2008). Development of a reliable self-report outcome measure for pragmatic trials of communication therapy following stroke: The Communication Outcome after Stroke (COAST) scale. Clinical Rehabilitation, 22, 1083–1094. doi:10.1177/0269215508090091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manochiopinig, S., Sheard, C., & Reed, V. A. (1992). Pragmatic assessment in adult aphasia - a clinical review. Aphasiology, 6, 519–533. doi:10.1080/02687039208249489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, R. P., & Tylbor, H. (1983). On the necessity of collusion in conversation. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 3. doi:10.1515/text.1.1983.3.3.277
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Doyle, P. J., Fossett, T. R., Park, G. H., & Goda, A. J. (2001). Reliability and concurrent validity of the information unit scoring metric for the story retelling procedure. Aphasiology, 15, 991–1006. doi:10.1080/02687040143000348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 338–350. doi:10.1044/jshr.3602.338
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nykanen, A., Nyrkko, H., Nykanen, M., Brunou, R., & Rautakoski, P. (2013). Communication therapy for people with aphasia and their partners (APPUTE). Aphasiology, 27, 1159–1179. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.802284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger, M. L., & Thorne, J. C. (1999). Application of the correct information unit analysis to the naturally occurring conversation of a person with aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR, 42, 636–648. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4203.636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, J., & Chapey, R. (2008). Assessment of language disorders in adults (5th ed.). Baltimore, Maryland: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, L., Crisp, J., & Walshaw, D. (1999). Exploring conversation analysis as an assessment tool for aphasia: The issue of reliability. Aphasiology, 13, 259–281. doi:10.1080/026870399402091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–226. doi:10.1017/S0140525X04000056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porch, B. (2001). Treatment of aphasia subseqent to the porch index of communicative ability. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th ed., pp. 663–674). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Pound, C., Parr, S., Lindsay, J., & Woolf, C. (2000). Beyond aphasia, therapies for living with communication disability (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (2004). Review. Aphasiology, 18, 1075–1091. doi:10.1080/02687030444000534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, M., Hilari, K., Cocks, N., & Dipper, L. (2018). Psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia: Acceptability, reliability, and validity. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorder, 53, 1079–1093. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prutting, C. A., & Kirchner, D. M. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 105–119. doi:10.1044/jshd.5202.105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., & Berthier, M. L. (2008). Aphasia therapy on a neuroscience basis. Aphasiology, 22, 563–599. doi:10.1080/02687030701612213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C. (1994). Constructing social research: The unity and diversity of method. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsberger, G. (1994). Functional perspective for assessment and rehabilitation of persons with severe aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 15, 1–16. © 1994 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1064130
   Google Scholar
• Ramsberger, G., & Rende, B. (2002). Measuring transactional success in the conversation of people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 337–353. doi:10.1080/02687040143000636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautakoski, P. (2011). Training total communication. Aphasiology, 25, 344–365. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.530671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudd, T. (Ed.). (2016). National clinical guideline for stroke (5th ed.). London: Royal College of Physicians.
   Google Scholar
• Sarno, M. (1969). The functional communication profile. New York: New York University Medical Center, Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of `uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University Roundtable on language and linguistics. Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71-93). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schramm, W. (1954). How communication works. In W. Schramm (Ed.), The process and effects of mass communication (pp. 3–26). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., & Damico, J. S. (1997). Reformulating the definition of compensatory strategies in aphasia. Aphasiology, 11, 761–781. doi:10.1080/02687039708250455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., Savage, M. C., & Worrall, L. (2014). Conversation therapy for aphasia: A qualitative review of the literature. International Journal Of Language & Communication Disorders / Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists, 49, 511–526. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skipper, J. L. (2014). Echoes of the spoken past: How auditory cortex hears context during speech perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369, 1–19. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreen, O., & Risser, A. H. (2003). Assessment of aphasia. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner, D., Norman, G., & Cairney, J. (2015). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swinburn, K., Best, W., Beeke, S., Cruice, M., Smith, L., Pearce Willis, E., & McVicker, S. (2018). A concise patient reported outcome measure for people with aphasia: The aphasia impact questionnaire 21. Aphasiology. doi:10.1080/02687038.2018.1517406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinburn, K., & Byng, S. (2006). The communication disability profile. London: Connect Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Have, P. (ed.). (2007). Doing conversation analysis. A practical guide (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K. & Worrall, L. (2008). Approaches to aphasia treatment. In C.K. Thompson, L. Worrall & N. Martin (Ed.), Aphasia Rehabilitation. The Impairment and Its Consequences (pp. 3–24). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meulen, I., Sandt-Koenderman, W. M., Duivenvoorden, H. J., & Ribbers, G. M. (2010). Measuring verbal and non-verbal communication in aphasia: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Scenario Test. International Journal Of Language & Communication Disorders / Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists, 45, 424–435. doi:10.3109/13682820903111952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Perniss, P., & Vinson, D. (2014). Language as a multimodal phenomenon: Implications for language learning, processing and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369, 20130292. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., & Le Dorze, G. (2014). Measuring outcomes in aphasia research: A review of current practice and an agenda for standardisation. Aphasiology, 28, 1364–1384. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.930262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., & Le Dorze, G. (2017). Which treatment outcomes are most important to aphasia clinicians and managers? An international e-Delphi consensus study. Aphasiology, 31, 643–673. doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1186265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Le Dorze, G., Breitenstein, C., Hilari, K., … Webster, J. (2018). A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement. International Journal of Stroke. doi:10.1177/1747493018806200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Le Dorze, G., Cruice, M., Isaksen, J., … Gauvreau, C. A. (2016). Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? an international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39, 1364–1379. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1194899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., Whitworth, A., & Morris, J. (2015). Is it time to stop “fishing”? A review of generalisation following aphasia intervention. Aphasiology, 29, 1240–1264. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1027169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westley, B., & MacLean, M. (1957). A conceptual model for communications research. Journalism Quarterly, 34, 31–38. doi:10.1177/107769905703400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2015). Conversation and aphasia: Advances in analysis and intervention. Aphasiology, 29, 257–268. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.974138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirz, S. L., Skinner, & Dean. (1990). Revised edinburgh functional communication profile. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall, L. (2006). Professionalism and functional outcomes. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 320–327. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1980). An analysis of connected speech samples of aphasic and normal speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 27–36. doi:10.1044/jshd.4501.27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar