The challenge of achieving greater generalization in phonological treatment of Aphasia

References

• Albert, R., & Barbasi, A.-L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Review of Modern Physics, 74(1), 47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, H. S., Conture, E. G., & Ohde, R. N. (2005). Phonological neighborhood density in the picture naming of young children who stutter: Preliminary study. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 30(2), 125–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2005.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W. (1995). A reverse length effect in dysphasic naming: When elephant is easier than ant. Cortex, 31(4), 637–652. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80017-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W., Greenwood, A., Grassly, J., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., & Howard, D. (2013). Aphasia rehabilitation: Does generalisation from anomia therapy occur and is it predictable? A case series study. Cortex, 49(9), 2345–2357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bislick, L., McNeil, M., Spencer, K., Yorkston, K., & Kendall, D. (2017). The Nature of Error Consistency in Individuals With Acquired Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(2S), 611–630. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0080
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brookshire, E., Conway, T., Pompon, R., Oelke, M., & Kendall, D. (2014). Effects of intensive phonomotor treatment on reading in eight individuals with aphasia and phonological alexia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(2), S300–S311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., New, B., & Keuleers, E. (2012). Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 991–997. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0190-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2016). How many words do we know? Practical estimates of vocabulary size dependent on word definition, the degree of language input and the participant’s age. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, N., Pelczarski, K., & Vitevitch, M. (2017). Using network science measures to predict the lexical decision performance of adults who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(7), 1911–1918. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, N., & Siew, C. (2020). Contributions of modern network science to the cognitive sciences: Revisiting research spirals of representation and process. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 476(2238), 20190825. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0825
   Google Scholar
• Castro, N., & Stella, M. (2019). The multiplex structure of the mental lexicon influences picture naming in people with aphasia. Journal of Complex Networks, 7(6), 913–931. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnz012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K., & Vitevitch, M. (2009). The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35(6), 1934–1949. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K., & Vitevitch, M. (2010). Network structure influences speech production. Cognitive Science, 34(4), 685–697. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01100.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., & Loftus, E. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748108400805
   Google Scholar
• Coppens, P., & Patterson, J. (2018). Generalization in aphasiology: What are the best strategies. In P. Coppens & J. Patterson (Eds.), Aphasia rehabilitation: Clinical challenges (pp. 205–248). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695(5), 1–9 http://igraph.org
   Google Scholar
• De Deyne, S., Navarro, D., Perfors, A., Brysbaert, M., & Storms, G. (2019). The “Small World of Words” English word association norms for over 12,000 cue words. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 987–1006. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1115-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druks, J., & Masterson, J. (2000). An object and action naming battery. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer I Cancho, R., & Solé, R. V. (2001). The small world of human language. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268(1482), 2261–2265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. A., Wilshire, C. E., & Ponsford, J. L. (2009). Word discrimination therapy: A new technique for the treatment of a phonologically based word‐finding impairment. Aphasiology, 23(6), 676–693. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030801987382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, R., & Vitevitch, M. (2014). The influence of clustering coefficient on word-learning: How groups of similar sounding words facilitate acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, R., & Vitevitch, M. (2017). The influence of closeness centrality on lexical processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1683. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. (2002). Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: Spontaneous and structured contexts. Brain and Language, 82(2), 113–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00001-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, U., & Bailey, T. (2005). What makes words sound similar? Cognition, 97(3), 227–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks, C. T., Nicholas, M. L., & Zipse, L. (2013). Effects of phonological neighbourhood on the treatment of naming in aphasia. Aphasiology, 28(3), 338–358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.866209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, A. R., Kirk, K. I., Lachs, L., & Pisoni, D. B. (2003). Talker and lexical rffects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(2), 390–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/032)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, D., Del Toro, C., Nadeau, S., Johnson, J., Rosenbek, J., & Velozo, C. (2010). The development of a standardized assessment of phonology in aphasia [Paper presentation]. Clinical Aphasiology Conference. Isle of Palm, SC.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, D., Moldestad, M., Allen, W., Torrence, J., & Nadeau, S. (2019). Phonomotor versus semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in 58 persons with aphasia: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(12), 4464–4482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, D., & Nadeau, S. (2016). The phonomotor approach to treating phonological-based language deficits in people with aphasia. Topics in Language Disorders, 36(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, D., Oelke, M., Brookshire, C., & Nadeau, S. (2015). The influence of phonomotor treatment on word retrieval abilities in 26 individuals with chronic aphasia: An open trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 798–812. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, D., Rosenbek, J., Heilman, K., Conway, T., Kleinberg, K., Rothi, L., & Nadeau, S. (2008). Phoneme-based rehabilitation of anomia in aphasia. Brain and Language, 105(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2003). The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(4), 773–787. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/061)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambon Ralph, M., & Ehsan, S. (2006). Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence. Visual Cognition, 13(7–8), 928–948. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280544000110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, P., & Pisoni, D. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A., & Peperkamp, S. (2017). Assessing the distinctiveness of phonological features in word recognition: Prelexical and lexical influences. Journal of Phonetics, 62, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, S. (2012). The neural architecture of grammar. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau, S. (2015). Neuroplastic mechanisms of language recovery after stroke. In J. Tracy, B. Hampstead, & K. Sathian (Eds.), Cognitive plasticity in neurologic disorders (pp. 61–84). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau, S. (2019). Bilingual aphasia: Explanations in population encoding. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 49, 117–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, S. (2020). Neural population dynamics and cognitive function. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, S. E. (2001). Phonology: A review and proposals from a connectionist perspective. Brain and Language, 79(3), 511–579. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C. (1996). Relearning after damage in connectionist networks: Toward a theory of rehabilitation. Brain and Language, 52(1), 25–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1996.0004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Grewal, R. S., & Brecher, A. (1996). The Philadelphia naming test: Scoring and rationale. Clinical Aphasiology, 24, 121–133 http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/215/
   Google Scholar
• Siew, C. (2013). Community structure in the phonological network. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siew, C. (2017). The influence of 2-hop network density on spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(2), 496–502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1103-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silkes, J. P., Fergadiotis, G., Graue, K., & Kendall, D. L. (2020). Effects of phonomotor therapy and semantic feature analysis on discourse production. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1–14. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00111
   Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. (2004). Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H., Armbrüster, J., & Hogan, T. (2006). Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(6), 1175–1192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/085)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinburn, K., Porter, G., & Howard, D. (2004). Comprehensive aphasia test. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Vaden, K., Halpin, H., & Hickik, G. (2009). Irvine phonotactic online dictionary. [Data file} www.iphod.com
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. (2002a). Influence of onset density on spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 28(2), 270–278. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.2.270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. (2002b). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 735–747. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. (2008). What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 408–422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/030)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. (2019). Can network science connect mind, brain, and behavior? In M. Vitevitch (Ed..), Network Science in Cognitive Psychology (1st ed., pp . 184-197). Taylor & Francis Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M., & Castro, N. (2015). Using network science in the language sciences and clinic. International Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 17(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2014.987819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M., Chan, K., & Goldstein, R. (2014). Insights into failed lexical retrieval from network science. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 1–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M., Chan, K., & Roodenrys, S. (2012). Complex network structure influences processing in long-term and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M., Goldstein, R., & Johnson, E. (2016). Path-length and the misperception of speech: Insights from network science and psycholinguistics. In A. Mehler, A. Lucking, S. Banisch, O. Blanchard, & B. Job (Eds.), Towards a Theoretical Framework for Analyzing Complex Linguistic Networks (pp. 29–45). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M., Goldstein, R., Siew, C., & Castro, N. (2014). Using complex networks to understand the mental lexicon. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting, 1(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/yplm-2015-0007
   Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M., & Luce, P. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(3), 374–408. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M., & Luce, P. (2016). Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word perception and production. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2, 75–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-124832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M., & Sommers, M. (2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 31(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M., & Storkel, H. (2013). Examining the acquisition of phonological word forms with computational experiments. Language and Speech, 56(4), 493–527. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830912460513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J., Whitworth, A., & Morris, J. (2015). Is it time to stop “fishing”? A review of generalisation following aphasia intervention. Aphasiology, 29(11), 1240–1264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1027169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisenburn, B., & Mahoney, K. (2009). A meta-analysis of word-finding treatments for aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(11), 1338–1352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902732745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar