A transcription-less quantitative analysis of aphasic discourse elicited with an adapted version of the Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (ANELT)

References

• Aan de Stegge, S. W. M. (2015). Aanpassing van ANTAT-scenarios. Een onderzoek naar de mogelijkheid tot aanpassing van scenario’s uit de ANTAT ter verbetering van actualiteit, inleefbaarheid en verbale eenduidigheid [An adapted version of the ANELT: Imaginability, representativeness and clearity of instuction] [ Bachelor’s thesis, Radboud University]. Radboud University Thesis Respository. https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/868
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, L., Brady, M., Mackenzie, C., & Norrie, J. (2007). Transcription‐less analysis of aphasic discourse: A clinician’s dream or a possibility? Aphasiology, 21(3–4), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600911310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., & Bloch, S. (2019). Why is measuring communication difficult? A critical review of current speech pathology concepts and measures. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 33(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2018.1498541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., Hurkmans, J., & Links, P. (2006). The training of verb production in Broca’s aphasia: A multiple‐baseline across‐behaviours study. Aphasiology, 20(2–4), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500474922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomert, L., Kean, M. L., Koster, C., & Schokker, J. (1994). Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test - Construction, Reliability and Validity. Aphasiology, 8(4), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039408248666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomert, L., Koster, C., & Kean, M. L. (1995). Amsterdam-Nijmegen Test voor Alledaagse Taalvaardigheid: Handleiding [Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test: Manual]. Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.
   Google Scholar
• Croteau, C., McMahon-Morin, P., Le Dorze, G., & Baril, G. (2020). Impact of aphasia on communication in couples. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 55(4), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassek, S. (2016). Eerste stappen richting validatieonderzoek en betrouwbaarheidsonderzoek van de ANTAT-CU4 [Validity and reliability of ANELT-CU version 4: Preliminary results]. [ Master’s thesis, Radboud University]. Radboud University Thesis Repository. https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/2424
   Google Scholar
• De Renzi, E., & Faglioni, P. (1978). Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the Token Test. Cortex, 14(1), 41–49.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(78)80006-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dipper, L., Marshall, J., Boyle, M., Hersh, D., Botting, N., & Cruice, M. (2021). Creating a Theoretical Framework to Underpin Discourse Assessment and Intervention in Aphasia. Brain Sciences, 11(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doedens, W. J., & Meteyard, L. (2022). What is Functional Communication? A Theoretical Framework for Real-World Communication Applied to Aphasia Rehabilitation. Neuropsychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-021-09531-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4 ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Filipinski, F. (2014). Het scoringsmodel ANTATcu voor de kwantitatieve meting van de functionele communicatievaardigheid bij afasie: Laveren tussen een model met standaardreacties en het behoud van de variatie in spontaan taalgebruik [Using ANELT-CU to quanitify functional communication in persons with aphasia: Navigating between standardisation and variability in semi-spontaneous speech] [ Unpublished master’s thesis]. Radboud University.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D., Forbes, M., Holland, A., Dalton, S. G., Richardson, J., & MacWhinney, B. (2017). Discourse Characteristics in Aphasia Beyond the Western Aphasia Battery Cutoff. American journal of speech-language pathology, 26(3), 762–768. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-16-0071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giessen, M. M. (2015). Aanpassing van scenario’s van de Amsterdam-Nijmegen Test voor Alledaagse Taalvaardigheden: Een verbetering van de scenario’s met als doel een duidelijkere rolverdeling en verbeterde actualiteit en inleefbaarheid. [Adapted ANELT scenarios: Imaginabilty, representativeness and clearity of instruction. [ Bachelor’s thesis, Radboud University]. Radboud University Thesis Repository. https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/638
   Google Scholar
• Glosser, G., & Deser, T. (1990). Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language, 40(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90117-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graetz, P., de Bleser, R., & Willmes, K. (1992). De Akense Afasietest [ The Aachen Aphasia Test]. Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. H. (2019). Discourse Analysis: A resource book for students. Routledge English Language Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, A. P. H. (2016). Analysis of Neurogenic Disordered Discourse Production: From Theory to Practice. Routlegde. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315639376
   Google Scholar
• Konietschke, F., & Pauly, M. (2012). A studentized permutation test for the nonparametric Behrens-Fisher problem in paired data. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 6, 1358–1372. https://doi.org/10.1214/12-EJS714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linnik, A., Bastiaanse, R., & Höhle, B. (2015). Discourse production in aphasia: a current review of theoretical and methodological challenges. Aphasiology, 30(7), 765–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1113489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (1985). Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In J. D. Benson & W. S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse (Vol. 1). Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Otters, M. C. (2019). ANTAT-CU Real Time: Een gekwantificeerde beoordeling van de verbaal-mondelinge effectiviteit en efficiëntie middels de ANTAT [ANELT-CU: A quantitative scoring systemen for verbal effectiveness and efficiency] [ Master’s thesis, Radboud University]. Radboud University Thesis Repository. https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/8962
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. D., & Dalton, S. G. (2015). Main concepts for three different discourse tasks in a large non-clinical sample. Aphasiology, 30(1), 45–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1057891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietveld, T., & van Hout, R. (2017). The paired t test and beyond: Recommendations for testing the central tendencies of two paired samples in research on speech, language and hearing pathology. Journal of Communication Disorders, 69, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiter, M. B., Kolk, H. H. J., & Rietveld, T. C. M. (2010). Speaking in ellipses: The effect of a compensatory style of speech on functional communication in chronic agrammatism. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(3), 423–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010903399287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiter, M. B., Kolk, H. H. J., Rietveld, T. C. M., Dijkstra, N., & Lotgering, E. (2011). Towards a quantitative measure of verbal effectiveness and efficiency in the Amsterdam-Nijmegen everyday language test (ANELT). Aphasiology, 25(8), 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.569892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiter, M. B., Lotgering, E., & Rietveld, A. C. (2016). Adapted ANELT scenarios for ANELT-CU scoring method. [ Unpublished test stimuli].
   Google Scholar
• Ruiter, M. B., Piai, V., & Roelofs, A. (in preparation). Semi-independent Interactive Multimodal Production Training of ELLipses (SimpTell): A pilot-study into the effect of a therapeutic app on verbal functional communication in Broca’s aphasia.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, R., Bruehl, S., Halai, A. D., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2020). The verbal, non-verbal and structural bases of functional communication abilities in aphasia. Brain communications, 2(2), fcaa118. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.”. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (2015). Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199685219.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• van der Meulen, I., van de Sandt-Koenderman, W. M. E., Duivenvoorden, H. J., & Ribbers, G. M. (2010). Measuring verbal and non-verbal communication in aphasia: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Scenario Test. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45(4), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820903111952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhage, F. (1964). Intelligentie en leeftijd: Onderzoek bij Nederlanders van twaalf tot zevenenzeventig jaar [Intelligence and age: A study with Dutch people from age 12 to 77]. Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Visch-Brink, E., Vandenborre, D., de Smet, H. J., & Mariën, P. (2014). CAT-NL: Dutch version of the Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H. (2011). Discourse in aphasia: An introduction to current research and future directions. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1283–1285. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.613452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwartjens, J. H. M. (2017). ANTAT-CU4: Een onderzoek naar de betrouwbaarheid van de ANTAT-CU4 bij gezonde sprekers [The reliability of ANELT-CU version 4 in neurologically unimpaired speakers] [ Master’s thesis, Radboud University]. Radboud University Thesis Repository. https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/4942
   Google Scholar
• Zwartjens, J. H. M. (2017). ANTAT-CU4: Een onderzoek naar de betrouwbaarheid van de ANTAT-CU4 bij gezonde sprekers [The reliability of ANELT-CU version 4 in neurologically unimpaired speakers] [Master’s thesis, Radboud University]. Radboud University Thesis Repository. https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/4942
   Google Scholar