Development of main concept and core lexicon checklists for the original and modern Cookie Theft stimuli

References

• Alyahya, R. S., Conroy, P., Halai, A. D., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2022). An efficient, accurate and clinically-applicable index of content word fluency in aphasia. Aphasiology, 36(8), 921–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2021.1923946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J. T., Boller, F., Lopez, O. L., Saxton, J., & McGonigle, K. L. (1994). The natural history of Alzheimer’s disease: Description of study cohort and accuracy of diagnosis. Archives of Neurology, 51(6), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1994.00540180063015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berube, S. K., Goldberg, E., Sheppard, S. M., Durfee, A. Z., Ubellacker, D., Walker, A., Stein, C. M., & Hillis, A. E. (2022). An analysis of right hemisphere stroke discourse in the modern cookie theft picture. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31(5S), 2301–2312. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00294
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berube, S., Nonnemacher, J., Demsky, C., Glenn, S., Saxena, S., Wright, A., Tippett, D. C., & Hillis, A. E. (2019). Stealing cookies in the twenty-first century: Measures of spoken narrative in healthy versus speakers with aphasia. American Journal of Speech Language-Pathology, 28(1S), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Body, R., & Parker, M. (2005). Topic repetitiveness after traumatic brain injury: An emergent, jointly managed behaviour. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19(5), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200400027189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2014). Test–retest stability of word retrieval in aphasic discourse. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 57(3), 966–978. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, L., Spencer, E., & Ferguson, A. (2017). Clinical use of linguistic discourse analysis for the assessment of language in aphasia. Aphasiology, 31(10), 1105–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1239013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criel, Y., Deleu, M., De Groote, E., Bockstael, A., Kong, A. P. H., & De Letter, M. (2021). The Dutch main concept analysis: Translation and establishment of normative data. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(4), 1750–1766. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croisile, B., Ska, B., Brabant, M. J., Duchene, A., Lepage, Y., Aimard, G., & Trillet, M. (1996). Comparative study of oral and written picture description in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Language, 53(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1996.0033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruice, M., Botting, N., Marshall, J., Boyle, M., Hersh, D., Pritchard, M., & Dipper, L. (2020). UK speech and language therapists’ views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 55(3), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupit, J., Rochon, E., Leonard, C., & Laird, L. (2010). Social validation as a measure of improvement after aphasia treatment: Its usefulness and influencing factors. Aphasiology, 24(11), 1486–1500. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687031003615235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, S. G. H., Kim, H., Richardson, J. D., & Wright, H. H. (2020). A compendium of core lexicon checklists. Seminars in Speech and Language, 41(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3400972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, S. G. H., & Richardson, J. D. (2019). A large-scale comparison of main concept production between persons with aphasia and persons without brain injury. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(1S), 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, S. G., & Richardson, J. D. (2015). Core-lexicon and main-concept production during picture-sequence description in adults without brain damage and adults with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(4), S923–S938. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, S. G., Stark, B. C., Fromm, D., Apple, K., MacWhinney, B., Rensch, A., & Rowedder, M. (2022). Validation of an automated procedure for calculating core lexicon from transcripts. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65(8), 2996–3003. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G., & Hoover, E. (2021). Measuring change at the discourse-level following conversation treatment: Examples from mild and severe aphasia. Topics in Language Disorders, 41(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., & Wright, H. H. (2011). Lexical diversity for adults with and without aphasia across discourse elicitation tasks. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1414–1430. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.603898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, D., Forbes, M., Holland, A., Dalton, S. G., Richardson, J., & MacWhinney, B. (2017). Discourse characteristics in aphasia beyond the Western Aphasia Battery cutoff. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(3), 762–768. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-16-0071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). BDAE- 3: Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination—Third edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Hux, K., & Frodsham, K. (2023). Speech and language characteristics of neurologically healthy adults when describing the modern cookie theft picture: Mixing the new with the old. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32(3), 1110–1130. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hux, K., Wallace, S. E., Evans, K., & Snell, J. (2008). Performing Cookie Theft picture content analyses to delineate cognitive-communication impairments. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 16(2), 83–99.
   Google Scholar
• Jacks, A., Haley, K., Bishop, G., & Harmon, T. (2019). Automated speech recognition in adult stroke survivors: Comparing human and computer transcriptions. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica, 71(5–6), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavé, G., & Levy, Y. (2003). Morphology in picture descriptions provided by persons with Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research, 46(2), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/027)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook. (4th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H.-Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, H., Berube, S., Hillis, A. E., & Castro, N. (2022). Core lexicon in aphasia: A longitudinal study. Aphasiology, 38(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2022.2121598
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, H., Kintz, S., Zelnosky, K., & Wright, H. H. (2019). Measuring word retrieval in narrative discourse: Core lexicon in aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 54(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, A. P. H. (2011). The main concept analysis in Cantonese aphasic oral discourse: External validation and monitoring chronic aphasia. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research, 54(1), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0240)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, A. P. H. (2021). Dialectally-sensitive norms of the Spanish version of main concept analysis (Span-MCA) for quantifying neurogenically impaired spoken discourse. Revista de Investigación en Logopedia, 11(2), e69932. https://doi.org/10.5209/rlog.69932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, A. P. H., Whiteside, J., & Bargmann, P. (2016). The main concept analysis: Validation and sensitivity in differentiating discourse produced by unimpaired English speakers from individuals with aphasia and dementia of Alzheimer type. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 41(3), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2015.1041551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, A. P. H., & Yeh, C. C. (2015). A Taiwanese Mandarin Main Concept Analysis (TM‐MCA) for quantification of aphasic oral discourse. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 50(5), 580–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaman, M. C., & Archer, B. (2023). Choosing discourse types that align with person-centered goals in aphasia rehabilitation: A clinical tutorial. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 8(2), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_PERSP-22-00160
   Google Scholar
• Le, D., Licata, K., & Mower Provost, E. (2018). Automatic quantitative analysis of spontaneous aphasic speech. Speech Communication, 100, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2018.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A. (2012). Characteristics of narrative discourse processing after damage to the right hemisphere. Seminars in Speech and Language, 33(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1301164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, K. D., Hermann, B., Mecollari, J., & Turkstra, L. S. (2018). Connected speech and language in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: A review of picture description tasks. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 40(9), 917–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2018.1446513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(2), 338–350. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3602.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1995). Presence, completeness, and accuracy of main concepts in the connected speech of non-brain-damaged adults and adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 38(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3801.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olness, G. S., & Ulatowska, H. K. (2011). Personal narratives in aphasia: Coherence in the context of use. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1393–1413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.599365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramkissoon, I., Dagenais, P. A., Evans, K. J., Camp, T. J., & Ferguson, N. N. (2013). Effects of ethnically diverse photographic stimuli on preference and discourse tasks in African American and Caucasian American adults. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 34(2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740111420707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. D., & Dalton, S. G. (2016). Main concepts for three different discourse tasks in a large non-clinical sample. Aphasiology, 30(1), 45–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1057891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. D., & Dalton, S. G. H. (2020). Main concepts for two picture description tasks: An addition to Richardson and Dalton, 2016. Aphasiology, 34(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1561417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. D., Dalton, S. G., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., Holland, A., & MacWhinney, B. (2018). The relationship between confrontation naming and story gist production in aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(1S), 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera, A., Hirst, J., & Edmonds, L. A. (2018). Evaluation of language predictors of main concept production in Spanish/English bilingual discourse using Nicholas and Brookshire stimuli. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-15-0186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers, D. L., & Love, R. J. (1980). Language performance on visual processing tasks in right hemisphere lesion cases. Brain and Language, 10(2), 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(80)90061-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, K. B., & Wertz, R. T. (1999). Comparison of impairment and disability measures for assessing severity of, and improvement in, aphasia. Aphasiology, 13(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399402235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghian, R., Schaffer, J. D., & Zahorian, S. A. (2021). Towards an automatic speech-based diagnostic test for Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers in Computer Science, 3, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2021.624594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slegers, A., Filiou, R. P., Montembeault, M., & Brambati, S. M. (2018). Connected speech features from picture description in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 65(2), 519–542. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, B. C. (2019). A comparison of three discourse elicitation methods in aphasia and age-matched adults: Implications for language assessment and outcome. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(3), 1067–1083. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, B. C., Dutta, M., Murray, L. L., Fromm, D., Bryant, L., Harmon, T. G., Ramage, A. E., & Roberts, A. C. (2021). Spoken discourse assessment and analysis in aphasia: An international survey of current practices. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(11), 4366–4389. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, I. G., Romero, M., & Álvarez, A. (2021). Improving aphasic speech recognition by using novel semi-supervised learning methods on AphasiaBank for English and Spanish. Applied Sciences, 11(19), 8872. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11198872
   Google Scholar
• West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications (pp. 56–75). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yazu, H., Kong, A. P. H., Yoshihata, H., & Okubo, K. (2022). Adaptation and validation of the main concept analysis of spoken discourse by native Japanese adults. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 36(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2021.1915385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar