Planning rights: what are they, and how to use them

References

• Agarwal, S. (ed.) (2022) Rights and the City: Problems, Progress and Practice, (Alberta, Can.: University of Alberta Press).
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (1992) Approaches to Planning: Introducing Current Planning Theories, Concepts and Issues, 2nd ed. (Montreaux: Gordon & Breach).
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2000) Rationality revisited: Planning paradigms in a post-postmodernist perspective, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(3), pp. 242–256. doi:10.1177/0739456X0001900303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2002a) Planning rights: Towards normative criteria for evaluating plans, International Planning Studies, 7(3), pp. 191–212. doi:10.1080/1356347022000001871
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2002b) The public interest in planning: From legitimation to substantive plan evaluation, Planning Theory, 1(3), pp. 226–249. doi:10.1177/147309520200100303
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (ed.) (2006) Evaluation in Planning: Evolution and Prospects, (Bassingstoke, Hants.: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2007a) Planning rights and their implications, Planning Theory, 6(2), pp. 112–126. doi:10.1177/1473095207077584
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2007b) Planning rights in theory and practice: The Case of Israel, International Planning Studies, 12(1), pp. 3–20. doi:10.1080/13563470701346501
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2013) Planning rights: a post-postmodernist approach to territorial justice, in: F. Dufaux & P. Philifert (Eds) Justice Spatiale et Politiques Territoriales, pp. 215–223 (Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest).
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2022) On planning, planning theories and practices: A critical reflection, Planning Theory, 21(2), pp. 181–211. doi:10.1177/14730952211066341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, W. C. (1997) General plan evaluation criteria: An approach to making better plans, Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(3), pp. 329–344. doi:10.1080/01944369708975926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bealey, F. (1988) Democracy in the Contemporary State. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
   Google Scholar
• Breton, A., & Breton, M. (1997) Democracy and empowerment, in: A. Breton (Ed) Understanding Democracy: Economic and Political Perspectives, pp. 176–195 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. (1993) Property As a Guarantor of Liberty. (Aldershot.: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Callies, D. L., Neuffer, N. C., & Caliboso, C. P. (1991) Ballot box zoning: Initiative, referendum and the law, Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law, 39, pp. 53–98.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2002) Utilitarianism’s bad breath: A reevaluation of the public interest justification for planning, Planning Theory, 1(2), pp. 165–189. doi:10.1177/147309520200100205
   Google Scholar
• Caves, R. W. (1992) Land Use Planning: The Ballot Box Revolution. (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, J. B., & Nadin, V. (1997) Town and Country Planning in Great Britain, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• DeSmith, S., & Brazier, R. (1996) Constitutional and Administrative Law, 6th ed. (London: Penguin).
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. (1978) Taking Rights Seriously. (London: Duckworth).
   Google Scholar
• Eagle, S. J. (2001) The birth of the property rights movement, Cato Policy Analysis, 404, (266/2001) (Washington, DC: The Cato Institute). Available at https://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-404es.html
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, H. (2000) Planning and public empowerment: Third party rights in development control, Planning Theory & Practice, 1(2), pp. 203–217. doi:10.1080/14649350020008387
   Google Scholar
• EMS. (2000) Ecological land use planning. Available at https://www.livinglakes.org/images/ecolup/pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fagence, M. (1977) Citizen Participation in Planning. (Oxford: Pergamon).
   Google Scholar
• Fairlie, S. (2000) Submission to the Government White Paper on Land Use (Edited) (3/8/2000) (Tinkers Bubble Trust). Available at https://www.monodesigno.com/bubble.html
   Google Scholar
• Friends of the Earth. (2004) Dr.Know: Know your planning rights in England, Change Your World, 48, (Aug/Sept. 2004), p. 22.
   Google Scholar
• Friends of the Irish Environment. (2003) Planning rights denied. Available at https://www.friendsoftheirishenvironment.net/carbon.html ( accessed 7 January 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Zamor, J.-C. (2001) Conundrums of urban planning in a global context: The case of the Frankfurt AirportPublic Organization Review, 1(4), pp. 415–435. doi:10.1023/A:1013735915234
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984)The Constitution of Society. (Cambridge: Polity).
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, K. (2002) Ruling protects rentals, city says: court acts to uphold right to limit developers, Toronto Star, Available at https://www.ontariotentats.ca//ts-02b22.phtml ( accessed 22 February 2002)
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, L. (2006) States take action to protect property rights. Planetizen 8/5/06 Available at https://www.planetizen.com.node/19705
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1988) The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M. (1990) State Failure: The Impotence of Politics in Industrial Society. (Cambridge: Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. M. (1994) Rights. (Basingstoke, Hamps: Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Kasaegae, H., Kaji, H., Velasquez, G. T., & Ishibashi, K. (2000) Web-based Gaming Simulations: UNCRD’s PANAGEA Regional Sustainable Development and Planning. UNU Discussion Paper Series June 2000 (Tokyo: United Nations University).
   Google Scholar
• Mastop, H. (1997) Performance in Dutch spatial planning: An introduction, Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 24(6), pp. 807–814. doi:10.1068/b240807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miers, T. (2006) “Planning powers to the people” text of speech by Tom Miers, executive director, policy institute Edinburgh, Scotland. Available at https://www.policyinstitute.info/ShowNewsOrEvent.php?RowNum-60
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., & Pattasini, D. (Eds.) (2005) Beyond Benefit-Cost Analysis: Accounting for Non-Market Values in Planning Evaluation, (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Nederveen, A. A. J. (2001) Social aspects and citizen participation in decision making of road and railway planning, Doctoral dissertation, Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University Delft. Abstract. Available at https://www.tbm.tudelft.nl/webstaff/jann/trail98.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia. (New York: Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• OED. (1971) The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, M. (2000) Planning and the Political Market: Public Choice and the Politics of Failure. (London: Athlone Press).
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L. (2014) Possessory politics and the conceit of procedure: Exposing the cost of rights under conditions of dispossession, Planning Theory, 13(4), pp. 387–406. doi:10.1177/1473095214524569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2017) Communicative planning, In: M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, & V. Watson (Eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, Ch.8 (New York: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Environment Link. (2003) Real planning rights for communities: planning white paper briefing. Available at https://www.scotlink.org/About_LINK/Planning_MSP_Briefing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Upton, W. (2006) Update: neighbors and the law, chapter 7 ( Planning Control) ¶ 7.08. Available at https://www.ealaw.co.uk/supplement/chapter_7_htm
   Google Scholar
• Verity, W., & Davies, A. (2003) Councils battle to maintain local role in planning rights, Sydney Morning Herald. Available at https://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/02/12 (accessed 13 February 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Voogd, H. (ed.) (2001) Recent Developments in Evaluation in Spatial, Infrastructure and Environmental Planning, (Groningen, NL: Geo Press).
   Google Scholar