The assessment of executive functions: coming out of the office

References

• GOLDBERG, E.: The Executive Brain (New York: Oxford University Press), 2001.
   Google Scholar
• STUSS, D. T. and BENSON, F. D.: Neuropsychological studies of the frontal lobes. Psychological Bulletin, 95: 3–28, 1984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STUSS, D. T. and BENSON, F. D.: Control of cognition and memory. In: E. Perecman (editor), The Frontal Lobes Revisited (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.), pp. 141–154, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• MALLOY, P., BIHRLE, A., DUFFY, J. et al.: The orbito medial frontal syndrome. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 8: 185–201, 1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'EsPosno, M., POSTLE B. R., and RYPMA, B.: Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: evidence from event related fMRI studies. Experimental Brain Research, 133: 3–11, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, E. S. and STEWART, R. M.: Akinetic mutism from hypothalamic damage: successful treatment with dopamine agonists. Neurology, 31: 1435–1439, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TRANEL, D., ANDERSON, S. W. and BENTON, A. L.: Development of the concept of 'executive function' and its relationship to the frontal lobes. Handbook of Neuropsychology, 9: 125–148, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• BADDELEY, A. D.: Working Memory (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 1986.
   Google Scholar
• BADDELEY, A. D. and WILSON, B. A.: Frontal amnesia and the dysexecutive syndrome. Brain and Cognition, 7: 212–230, 1988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEZAK, M. D.: The problem of assessing executive functions. International Journal of Psychology, 17:281–297, 1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAMASIO, A.: Descartes' Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain (London: Papemiac), 1994.
   Google Scholar
• SHALLICE, T. and BURGESS, P. W.: Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114: 727–740, 1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESLINGER, P. J. and DAMASIO, A. R.: Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: Patient EVR. Neurology, 35: 1731–1741, 1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRIPE, L. I.: The ecological validity of executive function testing. In: R. Sbordone and C. Long (editors), Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing (New York: St Lucie Press), pp. 171–202, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wool), R. L.: Neuropsychological assessment in brain injury. In: M. G. Eisenburgh, and R. C. Greziak (editors), Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 1, pp. 47–92 (New York: Springer), 1987.
   Google Scholar
• &wool), R. W.: Psychological tests and clinical discriminations: beginning to address the base rate problem. Clinical Psychology Review, 13: 409–419, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• MATTHEY, S.: p 0.05-But is it clinically significant? Practical examples for clinicians. Behaviour Change, 15: 140–146, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• CRAWFORD, J.: Assessment of executive dysfunction. In: P. W. Halligan and N. Wade (editors), The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive Deficits (London: Oxford University Press), in press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• MEEHL, P. E. and ROSEN, A.: Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52: 194–216, 1955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOEHLE, K. A., FITZHUGH-BELL, K. B., ENGLEMAN, E. et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of the Halstead Category Test and a short fonn.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9: 37 (abstract), 1987.
   Google Scholar
• REITAN, R. M. and WOLFSON, D.: The Halstead Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation (Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press), 1993.
   Google Scholar
• GOUVIER, W. M. D.: Base rates and clinical decision making in neuropsychology. In: J. J. Sweet (editor), Forensic Neuropsychology: Fundamentals and Practice (Lisse: Sweets and Zeitlinger).
   Google Scholar
• STROOP, J. R.: Studies of interferences in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18: 643–662, 1935.
   Google Scholar
• WILDGRUBER, D., KISCHKA, U., GASSBENDER, K. etal.: The frontal lobe score: part II: evaluation of its clinical validity. Clinical Rehabilitation, 14: 272–278, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRANT, A. D. and BERG, E. A.: A behavioural analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card sorting. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38: 404–411, 1948.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HEINRICHS, R. W.: Variables associated with Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance. In neuro-psychiatric patients referred for assessment. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioural Neurology, 3: 107–112, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• MORICE, R.: Cognitive inflexibility and pre-frontal dysfunction in schizophrenia and mania. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157: 50–54, 1990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANDERSON, C. V., BIGLER, E. D. and BLATTER, D. D.: Frontal lobe lesions, diffuse damage, and neuropsychological functioning in traumatic brain-injured patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17: 900–908, 1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANDERSON, S. W., DAMASIO, H., JONES, R. D. et al.: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance as a measure of frontal lobe damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, 13: 909–922, 1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOUNTAIN, M. A. and SNO W. G.: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test as a measure of frontal pathology: a review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7: 108–118, 1993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHALLICE, P. and BURGESS, T.: Higher-order cognitive impairments, and frontal lobe lesions in man. In: H. S. Levin, H. M. Eisenberg and A. L. Benton (editors), Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 125–137, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• REITAN, R. M. and WOLFSON, D.: Category Test and Trail Making Test as measures of frontal lobe functions. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9: 50–56, 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AHOLA, K., Vwxxi, J. and SERVO, A.: Frontal tests do not detect frontal infarctions after ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Brain and Cognition, 31: 1–16, 1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BURGESS, P. W., ALDERMAN, N., EVANS, J. et al.: The ecological validity of tests of executive function. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4: 547–558, 1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NoRms, G. and TATE, R. L.: The Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS): ecological, concurrent and construct validity. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10: 33–45, 2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MILLER, E.: Verbal fluency as a function of a measure of verbal intelligence and in relation to different types of pathology. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23: 53–57, 1984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHALLICE, T. and EVANS, M. E.: The involvement of the frontal lobes in cognitive estimation. Cortex, 14: 294–303, 1978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TAYLO R. and O'CARRon, R.: Cognitive estimation in neurological disorders. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34: 223–228, 1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WILSON, B. A., ALDERMAN, N., BURGESS, P., EMSLIE, H., and EVANS, J.: Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (Bury, St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company Limited), 1996.
   Google Scholar
• BURGESS, P. W. and SHALLICE, T.: The Hayling and Brixton Tests (Bury, St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company Limited), 1997.
   Google Scholar
• WILSON, B. A., EVANS, J. J., EMSLIE, H. et al.: The development of an ecologically valid test for assessing patients with a dysexecutive syndrome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 8: 213–228, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SoHLBERG, M. M. and MATEER, C. A.: Cognitive Rehabilitation: An Integrative Neuropsychological Approach (New York: The Guilford Press), 2001.
   Google Scholar
• BURGESS, P. W. and SHALLICE, T.: The Hayling and Brixton Tests Manual (Bury, St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company Limited), 1997.
   Google Scholar
• BURGESS, P. W. and SHALLICE, T.: Bizarre responses, rule detection and frontal lobe lesions. Cortex, 32: 241–259, 1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANDRES, P. and VAN DER LINDEN, M.: Supervisory attentional system in patients with focal frontal lesions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23: 225–239, 2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BADDELEY, A. D., DELLA SALA, S., PAPAGNO, C. et al.: Dual task performance in dys-executive and non-dysexecutive patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychology, 11: 187–194, 1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STUSS, D. T.: Disturbances of self awareness after frontal system damage. In: G. P. Prigatano and D. L. Schacter (editors), Awareness of Deficit After Brain Injury. Clinical and Theoretical Issues, pp. 63–83 (Washington: Oxford University Press), 1991.
   Google Scholar
• GRACE, J. and MALLOY, P. F.: The Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (California: Psychological Assessment Resources), 2002.
   Google Scholar
• DYWAN, J. and SEGALOWITZ, S.: Self and family ratings of adaptive behaviour after traumatic brain injury: psychometric scores and frontally generated ERPs. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11: 79–95, 1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JACKSON, H. F., HOPEWELL, C. A., GLASS, C. et al.: The Katz Social Adjustment Scale: modification for use with victims of traumatic brain and spinal injury. Brain Injury, 6: 109–127, 1992.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FLEMING, J. M., STRONG, J. and ASHTON, R.: Self awarenessof deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury: how best to measure? Brain Injury, 10: 1–15, 1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHEVIGNARD, M., PILLON, B., PRADAT-DMHL, P. et al.: An ecological approach to planning dysfunction: script execution. Cortex, 36: 649–669, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• CAVELLO, M. M., KAY, T. and EZRACHIO, O.: Problems and changes after traumatic brain injury: differing perceptions within and between families. Brain Injury, 6: 327–335, 1992.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SoHLEERG, M. M., MATEER, C. A., PENIC/vIAN, L. et al.: Awareness intervention: who needs it? Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13: 62–78, 1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SBORDONE, R. J.: Ecological validity: some critical issues for the neuropsychologist. In: R. J. Sbordone and C. J. Long (editors), Ecological Validity of Neuopsychological Testing, pp. 15–42 (New York: St Lucie Press), 1996.
   Google Scholar
• HEATON, R. K. and PENDLETON, M. G.: Use of neuropsychologgical tests to predict adult patient's everyday functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49: 807–821, 1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DODRILL, C. B. and CLEMMONS, D.: Use of neuropsychological tests to identify high school students with epilepsy who later demonstrate in adequate performances in life. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52: 520–527, 1984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GUILMETTE, T. J., FAUST, D., HART, K. et al.: A national survey of psychologists who offer neuropsychological services. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 5: 373–392, 1990.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FAUST, D.: Forensic neuropsychology: the art of practising a science that does not yet exist. Neuropsychology Review, 2: 205–231, 1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WILLIAMS, J. M.: A practical model of everyday memory assessment. In: R. Sbordone and C. Long (editors), Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing, pp. 129–146 (Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St Lucie Press), 1996.
   Google Scholar
• BAJO, A. and NATHANIEL-JAMES, D.: The Hayling and Brixton Tests of Dysexecutive Syndrome. What do they measure in everyday life? Poster presentation at the 4th World Congress on Brain Injury, May, Turin, Italy, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• DELIS, D. C., KAPLAN, E. and KRAmER, J. H.: The Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation), 2001.
   Google Scholar
• SHALLICE, T.: Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 298: 199–209, 1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRANZEN, M. D. and SMITH-SEEMILLAR, L.: Behavioural neuropsychology. In: A. S. Bellack and M. Hersen (editors), Behavioral Assessment: A Practical Handbook, 4th edn, pp. 407–417 (Boston: Allyn and Bacon), 1998.
   Google Scholar
• POWELL, G. and Wool), R. L.: Assessing the nature, and extent of neurobehavioural disability. In: R. L. Wood and T. McMillan (editors), Neuro behavioural Disability and Social Handicap Following Traumatic Brain Injury, pp. 65–90 (Hove: Psychology Press), 2001.
   Google Scholar
• KNIGHT, C., ALDERMA N. and BURGESS, P.: Development of a simplified version of the multiple errands test for use in hospital settings. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12: 231–255, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCCUE, M. and AITICEN, S.: Ecological validity of assessment of problem solving and executive abilities. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 17 August, San Francisco, CA, 1998.
   Google Scholar