Snoezelen: A controlled multi-sensory stimulation therapy for children recovering from severe brain injury

References

• Brain Injury Association of America, http://www.biasusa.orgaccessed January 2005
   Google Scholar
• Mazzola CA, Adelson PD. Critical care management of head trauma in children. Critical Care Medicine 2002; 30: S393–S401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luerssen TG, Klauber MR, Marshall LF. Outcome from head injury related to patient's age. Journal of Neurosurgery 1988; 68: 409–416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegman WE. Annual summary of vital statistics. Pediatrics 1981; 75: 835–843
   Google Scholar
• Rivara FP. Childhood injuries. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1984; 26: 81–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayr JM, Eder C, Khayati S. Cause and consequences of pedestrian injuries in children. European Journal of Pediatrics 2003; 162: 184–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicle. Traffic Crash Facts 2002. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicle, Tallahassee, FL 2002; 19
   Google Scholar
• Dennis M. Developmental plasticity in children: The role of biological risk, development, time and reserve. Journal of Communication Disorders 2000; 33: 321–332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz B, Ritz A, Kiesow S. Influence of age-related factors on long-term after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in children: A review of recent literature and some preliminary findings. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 1999; 14: 135–141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor HG, Alden J. Age-related differences in outcomes following childhood brain insults: an introduction and overview. JINS 1997; 3: 555–567
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teuber HL, Rudel RC. Behavior after cerebral lesions in children and adults. Developmental. Medicine and Child Neurology 1967; 4: 3–15
   Google Scholar
• McDermott KL, Raghupathi R, Fernandez SC, et al. Delayed administration of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) attenuates cognitive dysfunction following parasagittal fluid percussion brain injury in rats. Journal of Neurotrauma 1997; 14: 191–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields RD. Myelination: An overlooked mechanism of synaptic plasticity?. Neuroscientist 2005; 11: 528–531
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McIntosh T, Juhler M, Weiloch T. Novel pharmacological strategies in the treatment of experimental brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma 1998; 15: 731–769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger S. Recovery from brain damage: Research and theory. Plenum Press, New York 1978
   Google Scholar
• Finger S, Stein DG. Brain damage and recovery: Research and clinical perspectives. Academic Press, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Giza CC, Griesbach GS, Hovda DA. Experience dependent behavioral plasticity is disturbed following traumatic injury to the immature brain. Behavior and Brain Research 2005; 157: 11–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell BJ. Slow-to-recover brain-injured patients: Rationale for treatment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 1017–1022
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kater KM. Response of head-injured patients to sensory stimulation. Western Journal of Nursing Research 1989; 11: 20–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerber CS. Understanding and managing coma stimulation, are we doing everything we can?. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly 2005; 28: 94–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malkmus D, Booth BJ, Kodimer C. Rehabilitation of the head-injured adult: Comprehensive Cognitive Management. Professional Staff Association of Ranch Los Amigos Hospital, Downey, CA 1980
   Google Scholar
• Tolle P, Reimer MA. Do we need stimulation programs as a part of nursing care for patients in ‘persistent vegetative state’?. A conceptual analysis. Axon 2003; 25: 20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hulsegge J, Verheul A. Snoezelen: Another world. ROMPA International Ltd, Chesterfield 1987
   Google Scholar
• Thompson S, Martin S. Making sense of multisensory rooms for people with learning disabilities. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1994; 57: 341–344
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, et al. An overview of research on increasing indices of happiness of people with severe/profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation 2005; 27: 83–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotan M, Shapiro M. Management of young children with Rett disorder in the controlled multi-sensory (Snoezelen) environment. Brain Development 2005; 27: 88–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan H, Clopton M, Kaplan M, et al. Snoezelen multi-sensory environments: Task engagement and generalization. Research in Developmental Disability. August, 222005, [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Schofield P, Davis B. Sensory stimulation (snoezelen) versus relaxation: A potential strategy for management chronic pain. Disability & Rehabilitation 2000; 22: 675–682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland CG, Clark C. Sensory deprivation and aberrant behavior among idiots. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 1966; 71: 213–225
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haggar L, Hutchinson R. Snoezelen: An approach to the provision of a leisure resource for people with profound and multiple handicaps. BIMU Publications 1991; 37: 69–82
   Google Scholar
• Long A, Haig L. How do clients benefits from snoezelen? An exploratory study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1992; 55: 103–106
   Google Scholar
• Kwok HWM, To YF, Sung HF. The application of a multisensory Snoezelen room for people with learning disabilities. Hong Kong Medical Journal 2003; 9: 122–126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Bunsen A. A study in the implication of the Snoezelen resources at Limington House School. Sensations and Disability: Sensory environments for leisure, Snoezelen, Education, and Therapy. ROMPA, Chesterfield 1994; 138–162
   Google Scholar
• Hogg J, Cavet J, Lambe L, et al. The use of ‘Snoezelen’ as multisensory stimulation with people with intellectual disabilities: A review of the research. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2001; 22: 353–372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro M, Parush S, Green M, et al. The efficacy of the Snoezelen in the management of children with mental retardation who exhibit maladaptive behaviors. The British Journal of Developmental Disabilities 1997; 43: 140–155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagny M. L’impact de la technique du ‘snoezelen’ sur les comportements indiquant l’apaisement chez des adultes autistes (Impact of snoezelen technique on the calming behaviours of autistic adults). Revue Francophone de la Déficience Intellectuelle 2000; 11: 105–115
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon J, Hong W, Chia S. An explorative study of the function of a multisensory environment. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 1998; 5: 619–623
   Google Scholar
• Cuvo AJ, May ME, Post TM. Effects of living room, Snoezelen room and outdoor activites on stereotypical behavior and engagement by adults with profound mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2001; 22: 183–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton S, Douglas G, Briggs J, et al. An empirical evaluation of an interactive multi-sensory environment for children with disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 1998; 23: 267–278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay WR, Pitcaithly D, Greelen N, et al. A comparison of the effects of four therapy procedures on concentration and responsiveness in people with profound learning disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 1997; 41: 201–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W, Jr. The injury severity score: A method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. Journal of Trauma 1974; 14: 187–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale O, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon R, Smith M. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Physical Therapy 1987; 67: 206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD. Development of a scale for assessment of agitation following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1989; 11: 261–277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Lincare JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD. Performance profiles of the functional independent measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1993; 72: 84–89
   Google Scholar
• Johnston MV. Clinical disorders of brain plasticity. Brain Development 2004; 26: 73–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston MV, Nishimura A, Harum K, Pekkar J, et al. Sculpting the developing brain. Advances in Pediatrics 2001; 48: 1–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnston MV, Alemi L, Harum KH. Learning, memory and transcription factors. Pediatric Research 2003; 53: 369–374
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayres AJ. Sensory Integration and the child. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CA 1979
   Google Scholar
• Ayres AJ, Tickle L. Hyper-responsivity to touch and vestibular stimulation as a predictor or responsivitiy to sensory integrative procedure by autistic children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1980; 34: 375–381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messbauer L. Snoezelen: State of the art theory and practice. Snoezelen Training Course, New York 2004
   Google Scholar