Long-term electrophysiological changes in athletes with a history of multiple concussions

References

• Kelly J. Traumatic brain injury and concussion in sports. Journal of the American Medical Association 1999; 282: 989–991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control, Prevention. Sports-related recurrent brain injuries–United States. Journal of the American Medical Association 1997; 277: 1190–1191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrory P, Johnston K, Meeuwisse W, Aubry M, Cantu R, Dvorak J, Graf-Baumann T, Kelly J, Lovell M, Schamasch P. International Symposium on Concussion in Sport. Summary and agreement statement of the 2nd International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Prague 2004. Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine 2005; 15: 48–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskiewicz KM, McCrea M, Marshall SW, Cantu RC, Randolph C, Barr W, Onate JA, Kelly JP. Cumulative effects associated with recurrent concussion in collegiate football players: The NCAA concussion study. Journal of the American Medical Association 2003; 290: 2549–2555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemper ED. Two-year prospective study of relative risk of a second cerebral concussion. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 82: 653–659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins MW, Lovell MR, Iverson GL, Cantu RC, Maroon JC, Field M. Cumulative effects of concussions in high school athletes. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 1175–1181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson GL, Gaetz M, Lovell MR, Collins MW. Two-year prospective study of relative risk of a second cerebral concussion. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 82: 653–659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangal RB, Sangal JM. Closed head injury patients with mild cognitive complaints without neurological or psychiatric findings have abnormal visual P300 latencies. Biological Psychiatry 1996; 39: 305–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaetz M, Goodman D, Weinberg H. Electrophysiological evidence for the cumulative effects of concussion. Brain Injury 2000; 14: 1077–1088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis F, Johnston KM, Lavoie M, Lepore F, Lassonde M. Concussions in athletes produce brain dysfunction as revealed by event-related potentials. Neuroreport 2000; 11: 4087–4092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie ME, Dupuis F, Johnston KM, Leclerc S, Lassonde M. Visual P300 effects beyond symptoms in concussed college athletes. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2004; 26: 55–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter DD, Bassett MR, Jory SH, Barrett K. Changes in event-related potentials in a three-stimulus auditory oddball task after mild head injury. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 1464–1472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner RA, Vanderzant CW. Multimodality evoked potential testing in acute mild closed head injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1991; 72: 31–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Bierbrauer A, Weissenborn K. P300 after minor head injury (a follow-up examination). Acta Neurologica Belgica 1998; 98: 21–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford MR, Khalil M. Evoked potentials findings in mild traumatic brain injury 1: Middle latency component augmentation and cognitive component attenuation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1996; 11: 1–15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solbakk AK, Reinvang I, Nielsen C, Sundet K. ERP indicators of disturbed attention in mild closed head injury: A frontal lobe syndrome? Psychophysiology 1999; 36: 802–817
   Google Scholar
• Reinvang I, Nordby H, Nielsen C. Information processing deficits in head injury assessed with ERPs reflecting early and late processing stages. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38: 995–1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solbakk AK, Reinvang I, Nielsen CS. ERP indices of resource allocation difficulties in mild head injury. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology 2000; 22: 743–760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin N, Thériault M, Johnston KM, Leclerc S, Montplaisir J, Lassonde M. Neurophysiological anomalies in symptomatic and asymptomatic concussed athletes. Neurosurgery 2006; 58: 1151–1161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaetz M, Bernstein DM. The current status of eletrophysiologic procedures for the assessment of mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2001; 14: 386–405
   Google Scholar
• Coles MGH, Ruggs MD. Event-related potentials: An introduction. Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related potentials and cognition, MD Ruggs, MGH Coles. Oxford Psychology Series, New York 1995; 86–125
   Google Scholar
• Donchin E. A multivariate approach to the analysis of average evoked potentials. IEEE Transformation Biomedical Engineering 1966; 13: 131–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez Holguin S, Porjesz B, Chorlian DB, Polich J, Begleiter H. Visual P3a in male alcoholics and controls. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 1999; 23: 582–589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaki R, Katayama J. Severity of AD/HD symptoms and efficiency of attentional resource allocation. Neuroscience Letters 2006; 407: 86–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich J. P300 from a passive auditory paradigm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1989; 74: 312–320
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton TW. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1992; 9: 456–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich J. P300 clinical utility and control of variability. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1998; 15: 14–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donchin E, Coles M. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?. Behavior and Brain Science 1988; 11: 357–374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson R, Jr, Donchin E. On how P300 amplitude varies with the utility of the eliciting stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1978; 44: 424–437
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polich J. Bifurcated P300 peaks: P3a and P3b revisited. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1988; 5: 287–294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 1977; 14: 456–467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan-Johnson CC. Young psychophysiologist award address, 1980. P300 latency: A new metric of information processing. Psychophysiology 1981; 18: 207–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer AF, Strayer DL. Assessing the development of automatic processing: An application of dual-task and event-related brain potential methodologies. Biological Psychology 1988; 26: 231–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens C, Kramer A, Vanasse L, Donchin E. Performance of concurrent tasks: A psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. Science 1983; 221: 1080–1082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabiani M, Karis D, Donchin E. Effects of mnemonic strategy manipulation in a Von Restorff paradigm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1990; 75: 22–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson R, Jr. On the neural generators of the P300: evidence from temporal lobectomy patients. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Supplements 1995; 44: 110–129
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polich J. Clinical application of the P300 event-related brain potential. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 2004; 15: 133–161
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kutas M, McCarthy G, Donchin E. Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 1977; 197: 792–795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich J. Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1986; 63: 251–259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCarthy G, Donchin E. A metric for thought: A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science 1981; 211: 77–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfefferbaum A, Christensen C, Ford JM, Kopell BS. Apparent response incompatibility effects on P3 latency depend on the task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1986; 64: 424–437
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E. The relation of P300 latency to reaction time as a function of expectancy. Progress in Brain Research 1980; 54: 717–722
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ilan AB, Polich J. P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task. Clinical Neurophysiology 1999; 110: 367–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmerson RY, Dustman RE, Shearer DE, Turner CW. P3 latency and symbol digit performance correlations in aging. Experimental Aging Research 1989; 15: 151–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich J, Howard L, Starr A. P300 latency correlates with digit span. Psychophysiology 1983; 20: 665–669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich J. On the clinical application of P300. Biological Psychiatry 1992; 31: 647–649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinvang I. Cognitive event-related potentials in neuropsychological assessment. Neuropsychological Review 1999; 9: 231–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck SJ, Hillyard SA. Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994; 20: 1000–1014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck SJ, Hillyard SA. Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology 1994; 31: 291–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman GF, Luck SJ. Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003; 29: 121–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum J, Enns JT, Pratt J. Visual orienting in college athletes: Explorations of athlete type and gender. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2002; 73: 156–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe J. Differences in attentional set between athletes and nonathletes. The Journal of General Psychology 2004; 131: 426–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eimer M. The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1996; 99: 225–234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luck SJ, Girelli M, McDermott MT, Ford MA. Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: An ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention. Cognitive Psychology 1997; 33: 64–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Academy of Neurology Practice. Practice parameter: The management of concussion in sports (summary statement). Neurology 1997; 48: 581–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroon JC, Lovell MR, Norwig J, Podell K, Powell JW, Hartl R. Cerebral concussion in athletes: Evaluation and neuropsychological testing. Neurosurgery 2000; 47: 659–669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellman EJ, Lovell MR, Viano DC, Casson IR, Tucker AM. Concussion in professional football: Neuropsychological testing-part 6. Neurosurgery 2004; 55: 1290–1303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmen SS, Mclean A, Temkin N. Neuropsychological and psychosocial consequences of minor head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1986; 49: 1227–1232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimel RW, Giordani B, Barth JT, Boll TJ, Jane JA. Disability caused by minor head injury. Neurosurgery 1981; 9: 221–228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisson B, Jolicoeur P. Electrophysiological evidence of central interference on the control of visual-spatial attention. Psychonomics Bulletin Review, in-press
   Google Scholar
• Cooper R, Osselton JW, Shaw JC. EEG Technology. 3rd. Butterworths, London 1980
   Google Scholar
• Miller J, Patterson T, Ulrich R. Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology 1998; 35: 99–115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbourn AHS. Mechanisms of head injury. Lancet 1943; 2: 438–441
   Google Scholar
• Shutter MD, Tong KA, Lee A, Holshouser BA. Prognostic role of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in acute traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006; 21: 334–349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrea M, Kelly JP, Randolph C, Cisler R, Berger L. Immediate neurocognitive effects of concussion. Neurosurgery 2002; 50: 1032–1040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell MR, Iverson GL, Collins MW, McKeag D, Maroon JC. Does loss of consciousness predict neuropsychological decrements after concussion? Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine 1999; 9: 193–198
   Google Scholar
• McAllister TW, Sparling MB, Flashman LA, Guerin SJ, Mamourian AC, Saykin AJ. Differential working memory load effects after mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage 2001; 14: 1004–1012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantzen KJ, Anderson B, Steinberg FL, Kelso JA. A prospective functional MR imaging study of mild traumatic brain injury in college football players. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2004; 25: 738–745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein DM. Information processing difficulty long after self-reported concussion. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2002; 8: 673–682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisson B, Jolicoeur O. A psychological refractory period in access to visual short-term memory and the deployment of visual-spatial attention: Multitasking processing deficits revealed by event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 2007; 44: 323–333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell’Acqua R, Sessa P, Jolicoeur P, Robitaille N. Spatial attention freezes during the attentional blink. Psychophysiology 2006; 43: 394–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolicoeur P, Sessa P, Dell’Acqua R, Robitaille N. On the control of visual spatial attention: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychological Research 2006; 70: 414–424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolicoeur P, Sessa P, Dell’Acqua R, Robitaille N. Attentional control and capture in the attentional blink paradigm: Evidence from human electrophysiology. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2006; 18: 560–578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar