Technology and its role in rehabilitation for people with cognitive-communication disability following a traumatic brain injury (TBI)

References

• Carroll C, Cassidy J, Cancelliere C, Côté P, Hincapié C, Kristman V, Holm L, Borg J, Nygren-de Boussard C, Hartvigsen J. Systematic review of the prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury in adults: cognitive, psychiatric, and mortality outcomes: results of the international collaboration on mild traumatic brain injury prognosis. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2014;95(Suppl. 3):S152–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Draper K, Ponsford J. Cognitive functioning ten years following traumatic brain injury and rehabilitation. Neuropsychology. 2008;22(5):618–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd J, Wilson M, Tenovuo O, Saarijärvi S. Outcomes from mild and moderate traumatic brain injuries among children and adolescents: A systematic review of studies from 2008–2013. Brain Inj. 2015;29(5):539–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Wiseman-Hakes C, Douglas J, Stergiou-Kita M, Ponsford J, Teasell R, Bayley M, Turkstra L. INCOG Recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, Part IV: cognitive communication. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2014;29(4):353–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• College of Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists of Ontario (CASLPO). Preferred practice guideline for cognitive-communication disorders. Ontario, Canada: College of Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists of Ontario (CASLPO); 2015 02/08/2015.
   Google Scholar
• Maas A, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(8):728–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald S, Wiseman-Hakes C. Knowledge translation in ABI rehabilitation: A model for consolidating and applying the evidence for cognitive-communication interventions. Brain Inj. 2010;24(3):486–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Togher L, Code C. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. East Sussex: Psychology Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ciccia A, Threats T. Role of contextual factors in the rehabilitation of adolescent survivors of traumatic brain injury: emerging concepts identified through modified narrative review. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015;50(4):436–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Congress. Assistive technology act. In: Congress US, editor. (Public Law 108–364). Retrieved from: http://resnaprojects.org/nattap/library/laws/pl108-364.pdf2004.
   Google Scholar
• Speech Pathology Australia. 2012 augmentative and alternative communication clinical guideline. Speech Pathology Australia. Available from http://www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au/library/Clinical_Guidelines/24072012%20FINAL%20Augmentative%20and%20Alternative%20Communication%20Cl.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Communications and Media Authority. 2013 communications report 2012–13. Commonwealth of Australia. Available from http://www.acma.gov.au/~/media/mediacomms/Report/pdf/Like%20post%20share%20Young%20Australians%20experience%20of%20social%20media%20Quantitative%20research%20report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Davies G, Riley F. 2012 14/1/16. Glossary of ICT terminology. In information and communications technology for language teachers (ICT4LT). Slough, Thames Valley University. Accessed 14/1/16. Available from: http://www.ict4lt.org/en/en_glossary.htm#GlossI.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. 2016 14/1/16. Information and communications technology. Accessed 14/1/16. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_and_communications_technology.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner M, Hemsley B, Palmer S, Dann S, Togher L. Review of the literature on the use of social media by people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Disab Rehab. 2015;37(17):1511–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newby G, Coetzer R. The use of emails and texts in psychological therapy after acquired brain injury. In: Newby G, Coetzer R, Daisley A, Weatherhead S, editors. Practical neuropsychological rehabilitation in acquired brain injury: a guide for working clinicians. London: Karnac Books; 2013. p. 255–70.
   Google Scholar
• Menon D, Schwab K, Wright D, Maas A. Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2010;91(11):1637–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson Reuters. EndNote (Version X7.2.1). New York: Thompson Reuters; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed OH. The development of a Facebook concussion management intervention for young persons with a sports concussion [Thesis]. Otago: University of Otago; 2013. Available from: University of Otago http://hdl.handle.net/10523/4357.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed OH, Sullivan S, Schneiders AG, Mccrory P. iSupport: do social networking sites have a role to play in concussion awareness? Disab Rehab. 2010;32(22):1877–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed OH, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG, Moon S, McCrory P. Exploring the opinions and perspectives of general practitioners towards the use of social networking sites for concussion management. J Prim Health Care. 2013;5(1):36–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell K, Brockway J, Hart T, Whyte J, Sherer M, Fraser R, Temkin N, Dikmen S. Scheduled telephone intervention for traumatic brain injury: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2011;92(10):1552–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell K, Hoffman J, Doctor J, Powell J, Esselman P, Bombardier C, Fraser R, Dikmen S. Development of a telephone follow-up program for individuals following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2004;19(6):502–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell K, Temkin N, Esselman P, Doctor J, Bombardier C, Fraser R, Hoffman J, Powell J, Dikmen S. The effect of a scheduled telephone intervention on outcome after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2005;86(5):851–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman D, Fager S, Ball L, Dietz A. AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review. Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23(3):230–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg J, Lantz A, Gulliksen J. Accessibility to electronic communication for people with cognitive disabilities: a systematic search and review of empirical evidence. Univ Access Inform Soc. 2015;14(4):547–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan D, Georgeadis A, Baron C, Barker L. The effect of videoconference-based telerehabilitation on story retelling performance by brain-injured subjects and its implications for remote speech-language therapy. Telemed J e-Health. 2004;10(2):147–54.
   Google Scholar
• Brown J, Thiessen A, Beukelman D, Hux K. Noun representation in AAC grid displays: visual attention patterns of people with traumatic brain injury. Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31(1):15–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown R, Pain K, Berwald C, Hirschi P, Delehanty R, Miller H. Distance education and caregiver support groups: comparison of traditional and telephone groups. J Head Trauma Rehab. 1999;14(3):257–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke R. Word retrieval strategies by individuals with traumatic brain injury. Lincoln: University of Nebraska; 2002. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI3055263.
   Google Scholar
• Burke R, Beukelman D, Hux K. Accuracy, efficiency and preferences of survivors of traumatic brain injury when using three organization strategies to retrieve words. Brain Inj. 2004;18(5):497–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke R, Wassink K, Martin T, Seikel A. Message retrieval for survivors of traumatic brain injury. Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24(1):56–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell L, Balandin S, Togher L. Augmentative and alternative communication use by people with traumatic brain injury: a review. Adv Speech Lang Pathol. 2002;4(2):89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Carey J, Wade S, Wolfe C. Lessons learned: the effect of prior technology use on Web-based interventions. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(2):188–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charters E, Gillett L, Simpson G. Efficacy of electronic portable assistive devices for people with acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehab. 2015;25(1):82–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu Y, Brown P, Harniss M, Kautz H, Johnson K. Cognitive support technologies for people with TBI: current usage and challenges experienced. Disab Rehab Assist Technol. 2014;9(4):279–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cicerone K, Langenbahn D, Braden C, Malec J, Kalmar K, Fraas M, Felicetti T, Laatsch L, Harley J, Bergquist T, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2011;92(4):519–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman J, Frymark T, Franceschini N, Theodoros D. Assessment and treatment of cognition and communication skills in adults with acquired brain injury via telepractice: a systematic review. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(2):295–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culley C, Evans J. SMS text messaging as a means of increasing recall of therapy goals in brain injury rehabilitation: a single-blind within-subjects trial. Neuropsychol Rehab. 2010;20(1):103–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Joode E, van Heugten C, Verhey F, van Boxtel M. Efficacy and usability of assistive technology for patients with cognitive deficits: a systematic review. Clin Rehab. 2010;24(8):701–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca R, Calabrò RS, Gervasi G, De Salvo S, Bonanno L, Corallo F, De Cola MC, Bramanti P. Is computer-assisted training effective in improving rehabilitative outcomes after brain injury? A case-control hospital-based study. Disab Health J. 2014;7(3):356–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doesborgh S, van de Sandt‐Koenderman M, Dippel D, van Harskamp F, Koudstaal P, Visch‐Brink E. Cues on request: The efficacy of Multicue, a computer program for wordfinding therapy. Aphasiology. 2004;18(3):213–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan J, Worrall L, Oxenham D. An Internet training intervention for people with traumatic brain injury: barriers and outcomes. Brain Inj. 2005;19(8):555–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlhardt L, Sohlberg M, Glang A, Albin R. TEACH-M: a pilot study evaluating an instructional sequence for persons with impaired memory and executive functions. Brain Inj. 2005;19:569–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fager S, Burnfield J. Patients’ experiences with technology during inpatient rehabilitation: opportunities to support independence and therapeutic engagement. Disab Rehab Assist Technol. 2014;9(2):121–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fager S, Hux K, Beukelman D, Karantounis R. Augmentative and Alternative communication use and acceptance by adults with traumatic brain injury. Augment Altern Commun. 2006;22(1):37–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson S, Friedland D, Woodberry E. Smartphone technology: gentle reminders of everyday tasks for those with prospective memory difficulties post-brain injury. Brain Inj. 2015;29(5):583–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraas M, Balz MA. Expressive electronic journal writing: freedom of communication for survivors of acquired brain injury. J Psycholingu Res. 2008;37(2):115–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilkey S, Carey J, Wade S. Families in crisis: considerations for the use of web-based treatment models in family therapy. Families in society. J Contemp Soc Serv. 2009;90(1):37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross E. Logging on, bouncing back: an experimental investigation of online communication following social exclusion. Dev Psychol. 2009;45(6):1787–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauber R, Jones M. Telerehabilitation support for families at home caring for individuals in prolonged states of reduced consciousness. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2002;17(6):535–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hux K, Burke R, Elliot J, Ross M, Hrnicek T. Communication interaction differences between natural speakers and AAC users with traumatic brain injury. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2001;9(1):71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan J, Barnhart K. Development of yes/no systems in individuals with severe traumatic brain injuries. Augment Altern Commun. 1993;9(3):184–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kilov A, Togher L, Power E, Turkstra L. Can teenagers with traumatic brain injury use Internet chatrooms? A systematic review of the literature and the Internet. Brain Inj. 2010;24(10):1135–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Stierwalt J, LaPointe L. Email intervention following traumatic brain injury: two case reports. Int J Telerehab. 2010;2(2):19–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirsch N, Shenton M, Spirl E, Simpson R, LoPresti E, Schreckenghost D. An assistive-technology intervention for verbose speech after traumatic brain injury: a single case study. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2004;19(5):366–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurowski B, Wade S, Kirkwood M, Brown T, Stancin T, Taylor H. Online problem-solving therapy for executive dysfunction after child traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics. 2013;132(1):e158–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, O’Reilly M, Singh N, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Colonna F, Navarro J, Lanzilotti C, Belardinelli M, Bosco A, et al. Evaluation of technology-assisted learning setups for undertaking assessment and providing intervention to persons with a diagnosis of vegetative state. Dev Neurorehab. 2009;12(6):411–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, O’Reilly M, Singh N, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Colonna F, Navarro J, Lanzilotti C, Megna G. Post-coma persons with minimal consciousness and motor disabilities learn to use assistive communication technology to seek environmental stimulation. J Dev Phys Disab. 2010;22(2):119–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, O’Reilly M, Singh N, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Colonna F, Navarro J, Oliva D, Megna G, Bosco A. Technology-based intervention options for post-coma persons with minimally conscious state and pervasive motor disabilities. Dev Neurorehab. 2009;12(1):24–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, O’Reilly M, Singh N, D’Amico F, Ricci I, Buonocunto F. Microswitch-cluster technology to enhance adaptive engagement and head upright by a post-coma man with multiple disabilities. Dev Neurorehab. 2011;14(1):60–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, Saponaro F, Singh N, O’Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Oliva D. A microswitch to enable a woman with acquired brain injury and profound multiple disabilities to access environmental stimulation with lip movements. Percept Motor Skills. 2010;110(2):488–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, Singh N, O’Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Belardinelli M, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Navarro J, Lanzilotti C, De Tommaso M, et al. Promoting adaptive behavior in persons with acquired brain injury, extensive motor and communication disabilities, and consciousness disorders. Res Dev Disab. 2012;33(6):1964–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, Singh N, O’Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Colonna F, Navarro J, Lanzilotti C, Bosco A, et al. A technology-assisted learning setup as assessment supplement for three persons with a diagnosis of post-coma vegetative state and pervasive motor impairment. Res Dev Disab. 2009;30(5):1034–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, Singh N, O’Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Tommaso M, Megna G, Bosco A, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Chiapparino C. A learning assessment procedure to re-evaluate three persons with a diagnosis of post-coma vegetative state and pervasive motor impairment. Brain Inj. 2009;23(2):154–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, Singh N, O’Reilly M, Signorino M, Alberti G, Scigliuzzo F, Oliva D. Adapting a computer-assisted program to help a post-coma man with extensive multiple disabilities choose stimulus events. Dev Neurorehab. 2010;13(6):433–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, Singh N, O’Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Colonna F, Navarro J, Megna G, Chiapparino C, et al. Two persons with severe post-coma motor impairment and minimally conscious state use assistive technology to access stimulus events and social contact. Disab Rehab Assist Technol. 2009;4(5):367–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancioni G, Singh N, O’Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Colonna F, Navarro J, Oliva D, Signorino M, et al. Microswitch- and VOCA-assisted programs for two post-coma persons with minimally conscious state and pervasive motor disabilities. Res Dev Disab. 2009;30(6):1459–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, Singh N, O’Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Navarro J, Addante L, D’Agostino I. Persons with acquired brain injury and multiple disabilities access stimulation independently through microswitch-based technology. Percept Motor Skills. 2010;111(2):485–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, Singh N, O’Reilly M, Sigafoos J, Ricci I, Buonocunto F, Sacco V. Access to environmental stimuli via eyelid responses for persons with acquired brain injury and multiple disabilities: a new microswitch arrangement. Percept Motor Skills. 2012;114(2):353–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Sullivan S, Schneiders A, Ahmed O, Balasundaram A, Williams D, Meeuwisse W, McCrory P. Smartphone and tablet apps for concussion road warriors (team clinicians): a systematic review for practical users. Brit J Sports Med. 2015;49(8):499–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Alonso J, Chadha N, Pulido J. Does generalization occur following computer-based cognitive retraining?—an exploratory study. Occup Ther Health Care. 2015;29(3):283–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man D, Soong W, Tam S, Hui-Chan C. A randomized clinical trial study on the effectiveness of a tele-analogy-based problem-solving programme for people with acquired brain injury (ABI). NeuroRehabilitation. 2005;21(3):205–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson H, Carpenter C. Using different methods to communicate: how adults with severe acquired communication difficulties make decisions about the communication methods they use and how they experience them. Disab Rehab. 2015;37(17):1522–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provvidenza C, Engebretsen L, Tator C, Kissick J, McCrory P, Sills A, Johnston KM. From consensus to action: knowledge transfer, education and influencing policy on sports concussion. Brit J Sports Med. 2013;47(5):332–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riegler L, Neils-Strunjas J, Boyce S, Wade S, Scheifele P. Cognitive intervention results in web-based videophone treatment adherence and improved cognitive scores. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2013;19:269.
   Google Scholar
• Rietdijk R, Togher L, Brunner M, Power E. A pilot study of the use of telehealth for social communication skills training for people with traumatic brain injury and their usual communication partners. INS/ASSBI 5th Pacific Rim Conference 2015. Sydney NSW, Australia2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rietdijk R, Togher L, Power E. Supporting family members of people with traumatic brain injury using telehealth: a systematic review. J Rehab Med. 2012;44(11):913–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotondi A, Sinkule J, Spring M. An interactive web‐based intervention for persons with TBI and their families: use and evaluation by female significant others. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2005;20(2):173–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell A, McAllister S. Use of AAC by individuals with acquired neurologic communication disabilities: results of an Australian survey. Augment Altern Commun. 1995;11(3):138–46.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar A, Warden D, Schwab K, Spector J, Braverman S, Walter J, Cole R, Rosner M, Martin E, Ecklund J. Cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial. JAMA 2000;283(23):3075–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander A, Clark A, Atchison T, Rueda M. A web‐based videoconferencing approach to training caregivers in rural areas to compensate for problems related to traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2009;24(4):248–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenberg R, Ruwe W, Dawson K, McDonald N, Houston B, Forducey P. Comparison of functional outcomes and treatment cost between a computer-based cognitive rehabilitation teletherapy program and a face-to-face rehabilitation program. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2008;39(2):169–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg M, Ehlhardt L, Fickas S, Sutcliffe A. A pilot study exploring electronic (or e-mail) mail in users with acquired cognitive-linguistic impairments. Brain Inj. 2003;17(7):609–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg M, Fickas S, Ehlhardt L, Todis B. The longitudinal effects of accessible email for individuals with severe cognitive impairments. Aphasiology. 2005;19(7):651–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suffoletto B, Wagner A, Arenth P, Calabria J, Kingsley E, Kristan J, Callaway C. Mobile phone text messaging to assess symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury and provide self-care support: a pilot study. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2013;28(4):302–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG, Cheang CW, Kitto E, Lee H, Redhead J, Ward S, Ahmed OH, McCrory PR. ‘What’s happening?’ A content analysis of concussion-related traffic on Twitter. Brit J Sports Med. 2012;46(4):258–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam S, Man W, Hui-Chan C, Lau A, Yip B, Cheung W. Evaluating the efficacy of tele-cognitive rehabilitation for functional performance in three case studies. Occup Ther Int. 2003;10(1):20–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas-Stonell N, Johnson P, Schuller R, Jutai J. Evaluation of a computer-based program for remediation of cognitive-communication skills. J Head Trauma Rehab. 1994;9(4):25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton KE, Carmody DP. Efficacy of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: interventions of QEEG-guided biofeedback, computers, strategies, and medications. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2008;33(2):101–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todis B, Sohlberg M, Hood D, Fickas S. Making electronic mail accessible: perspectives of people with acquired cognitive impairments, caregivers and professionals. Brain Inj. 2005;19(6):389–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaousides T, D’Antonio E, Varbanova V, Spielman L. Delivering group treatment via videoconference to individuals with traumatic brain injury: a feasibility study. Neuropsychol Rehab. 2014;24(5):784–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaousides T, Matsuzawa Y, Lebowitz M. Familiarity and prevalence of Facebook use for social networking among individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2011;25(12):1155–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccaro M, Hart T, Whyte J, Buchhofer R. Internet use and interest among individuals with traumatic brain injury: a consumer survey. Disab Rehab Assist Technol. 2007;2(2):85–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Heugten C, Gregorio GW, Wade D. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: a systematic review of content of treatment. Neuropsychol Rehab. 2012;22(5):653–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg G, Borthwick B, Bennett B, Rumney P. Online support to facilitate the reintegration of students with brain injury: Trials and errors. NeuroRehabilitation. 2003;18(2):113–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade S, Carey J, Wolfe C. The efficacy of an online cognitive-behavioral family intervention in improving child behavior and social competence following pediatric brain injury. Rehab Psychol. 2006;51(3):179–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade S, Carey J, Wolfe C. An online family intervention to reduce parental distress following pediatric brain injury. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74(3):445–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade S, Kurowski B, Kirkwood M, Zhang N, Cassedy A, Brown T, Nielsen B, Stancin T, Taylor H. Online problem-solving therapy after traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2015;135(2):e487–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade S, Oberjohn K, Burkhardt A, Greenberg I. Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a web‐based parenting skills program for young children with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2009;24(4):239–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade S, Oberjohn K, Conaway K, Osinska P, Bangert L. Live coaching of parenting skills using the internet: Implications for clinical practice. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2011;42(6):487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade S, Taylor H, Stancin T, Kirkwood M, Brown T. Web-based family problem solving therapy for teens with traumatic brain injury (TBI). 2011. Ann Behav Med. Springer 233 Spring St, New York, NY 10013 USA 2011;41:S147.
   Google Scholar
• Wade S, Walz N, Carey J, McMullen K, Cass J, Mark E, Yeates K. Effect on behavior problems of teen online problem-solving for adolescent traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics. 2011;128(4):e947–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade S, Walz N, Carey J, McMullen K, Cass J, Mark E, Yeates K. A randomized trial of teen online problem solving: efficacy in improving caregiver outcomes after brain injury. Health Psychol. 2012;31(6):767–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade S, Walz N, Carey J, Williams K. Preliminary efficacy of a Web-based family problem-solving treatment program for adolescents with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2008;23(6):369–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade S, Walz N, Carey J, Williams K. Brief report: description of feasibility and satisfaction findings from an innovative online family problem-solving intervention for adolescents following traumatic brain injury. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34(5):517–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade S, Walz N, Carey J, Williams K, Cass J, Herren L, Mark E, Yeates K. A randomized trial of teen online problem solving for improving executive function deficits following pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2010;25(6):409–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade S, Wolfe C, Brown T, Pestian J. Can a web-based family problem-solving intervention work for children with traumatic brain injury? Rehab Psychol. 2005;50(4):337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade S, Wolfe C, Brown T, Pestian J. Putting the pieces together: preliminary efficacy of a web-based family intervention for children with traumatic brain injury. J Pediatr Psychol. 2005;30(5):437–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade S, Wolfe C, Pestian J. A web-based family problem-solving intervention for families of children with traumatic brain injury. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004;36(2):261–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallace S, Hux K, Beukelman D. Navigation of a dynamic screen aac interface by survivors of severe traumatic brain injury. Augment Altern Commun 2010;26(4):242–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warden D, Salazar A, Martin E, Schwab K, Coyle M, Walter J, DVHIP Study Group. A home program of rehabilitation for moderately severe traumatic brain injury patients. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2000;15(5):1092–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams D, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG, Ahmed OH, Lee H, Balasundaram AP, McCrory PR. Big hits on the small screen: an evaluation of concussion-related videos on YouTube. Brit J Sports Med. 2014;48(2):107–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods D, Catroppa C, Matthews J, Giallo R, Barnett P, Anderson V. Pediatric traumatic and nontraumatic brain injury: how clinical neuropsychology can help in the rehabilitation process. 2011. Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting International Neuropsychological Society; Feb 2–5; Boston, MA. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011;17(Supplement S1):s162.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft. Excel (Version 15.0.4779.1002). Redmond: Microsoft; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• NHMRC. 2009 NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia. Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/guidelines/developers/nhmrc_levels_grades_evidence_120423.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rispoli M, Machalicek W, Lang R. Assistive technology for people with acquired brain injury. In: Lancioni GE, Singh NN, editors. Assistive technologies for people with diverse abilities, autism and child psychopathology series. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 21–52.
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. 2015 14/1/16. Assistive technology. Accessed 14/1/16. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assistive_technology.
   Google Scholar
• Laffont I, Dumas C, Pozzi D, Ruquet M, Tissier A, Lofaso F, Dizien O. Home trials of a speech synthesizer in severe dysarthria: Patterns of use, satisfaction and utility of word prediction. J Rehab Med. 2007;39(5):399–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda E, Richards B, Yao C, Leach L. Long-term maintenance of smartphone and PDA use in individuals with moderate to severe memory impairment. Neuropsychol Rehab. 2014;25(3):353–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fager S, Karantounis R. AAC assessment and intervention in TBI. In: Hux K, editor. Assisting survivors of traumatic brain injury. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-ed; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Welch-West P, Ferri C, Aubut J, Togher L, Teasell R. 2013 Module 7. Cognitive-communication treatments post acquired brain injury. In evidence-based review of moderate to severe acquired brain injury. ABIEBR. Available from: http://www.abiebr.com/module/7-communication-deficits-following-acquired-brain-injury-intervention-treatments.
   Google Scholar
• Egan J, Worrall L, Oxenham D. Accessible internet training package helps people with aphasia cross the digital divide. Aphasiology. 2004;18:265–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atherton H, Sawmynaden P, Sheikh A, Majeed A, Car J. Email for clinical communication between patients/caregivers and healthcare professionals. Cochr Datab Syst Rev. 2012 2012;Issue 11(Art. No.: CD007978).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, Vodopivec-Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R. Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses. Cochr Datab Syst Rev. 2012 2012;Issue 12(Art. No.: CD007459).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN CRPD. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, GA 61st sess, 76th plenary mtg, Agenda item 67(b), UN Doc A/RES/61/106 (30 March 2007, adopted 13 December 2006); 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO). 2009 web accessibility national transition strategy. Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO). Accessed 2014. Available from http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/wcag-2-implementation/introduction.html#about.
   Google Scholar
• Hollier S. 2015 Cognitive disability digital accessibility guide: a practical resource for organisational support. Media Access Australia. Available from http://www.mediaaccess.org.au/research-policy/guides/cognitive-guide.
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Collaborative brain injury intervention: positive everyday routine. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2001 International classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization. Accessed 2014. Available from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionaries. 2015 15/05/2015. Oxford Dictionaries Definition: app. Oxford University Press. Accessed 15/05/2015. Available from: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/app.
   Google Scholar
• Buhi E, Trudnak T, Martinasek M, Oberne A, Fuhrmann H, McDermott R. Mobile phone-based behavioural interventions for health: a systematic review. Health Educ J. 2013;72(5):564–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards P, Patel V, Haines A. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Pérez B, de la Torre-Díez I, López-Coronado M. Mobile health applications for the most prevalent conditions by the world health organization: review and analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(6):e120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed O, Pulman A. Concussion information on the move: the role of mobile technology in concussion management. J Commun Inform. 2013;9(2).
   Google Scholar
• Bedell G, Wade S, LaFavre M, Fleisher A, King J, Turkstra L, Haarbauer-Krupa J, Johnson J. Social Participation and navigation (SPAN) for teens with TBI: phase 1 development of an app-based coaching intervention. 2015. American occupational therapy association annual conference; April, 2015; Nashville, TN 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley B, Dann S, Palmer S, Allan M, Balandin S. ‘We definitely need an audience’: experiences of Twitter, Twitter networks and tweet content in adults with severe communication disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Disab Rehab. 2015;37(17):1531–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley B, Palmer S, Balandin S. Tweet reach: a research protocol for using Twitter to increase information exchange in people with communication disabilities. Dev Neurorehab. 2014;17(2):84–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed OH, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG, Anderson L, Paton C, McCrory PR. Ethical considerations in using facebook for health care support: a case study using concussion management. PM R. 2013;5(4):328–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doyle M, Fager S. Traumatic brain injury and AAC: supporting communication through recovery. ASHA Lead. 2011;16(2).
   Google Scholar
• Sutton M. Apps for brain injury rehabilitation. ASHA Lead. 2012;17(8):21.
   Google Scholar
• Wong D, Sinclair K, Seabrook E, McKay A, Ponsford J. Smartphones as assistive technology following traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study of what helps and what hinders. Disab Rehab. 2016;Published online: 17 Oct 2016:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kötteritzsch A, Gerling K. Future directions for ICT in aphasia therapy for older adults: enhancing current practices through interdisciplinary perspectives. Stem Spraak Taalpathol. 2015;20:135–50.
   Google Scholar
• Drigas A, Petrova A. ICTs in speech and language therapy. Int J Eng Pedagogy. 2014;4(1):49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Menger F, Morris J, Salis C. Aphasia in an Internet age: wider perspectives on digital inclusion. Aphasiology. 2015:1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles-Bykbaev V, López-Nores M, García-Duque J, Pazos-Arias J, Arévalo-Lucero D, Ingavélez-Guerra P. A proposal of an ecosystem based on intelligent ICT tools to support the diagnosis and intervention of patients with communication disorders. Ingenius. 2015;14:44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Maas A, Murray G, Roozenbeek B, Lingsma H, Butcher I, McHugh G, Weir J, Lu J, Steyerberg E. Advancing care for traumatic brain injury: findings from the IMPACT studies and perspectives on future research. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(12):1200–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas A, Steyerberg E, Marmarou A, McHugh G, Lingsma H, Butcher I, Lu J, Weir J, Roozenbeek B, Murray G. IMPACT recommendations for improving the design and analysis of clinical trials in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7(1):127–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim P, Power E, Togher L. Describing conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and communication partners following communication partner training: using exchange structure analysis. Brain Inj. 2013;27(6):717–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate R, Aird V, Taylor C. Using single-case methodology to treat social-pragmatic communication disorders. In: McDonald S, Togher L, Code C, editors. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. Second ed. East Sussex: Psychology Press; 2014. p. 361–88.
   Google Scholar
• Tate R, Perdices M, McDonald S, Togher L, Rosenkoetter U. The design, conduct and report of single-case research: resources to improve the quality of the neurorehabilitation literature. Neuropsychol Rehab. 2014;24(3–4):315–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken M, Doyle M. Language representation for the augmentative and alternative communication of adults with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehab. 1992;7(3):59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace T, Bradshaw A. Technologies and strategies for people with communication problems following brain injury or stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;28(3):199–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ageing Disability and Home Care (ADHC). 2014 Service delivery approaches appraisal: augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) appraisal for speech pathologists who support people with a disability. Clinical innovation and governance, ageing, disability and home care (ADHC), family and community service, version 1. Available from http://www.adhc.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/file/0011/302402/Augmentative_and_Alternative_Communication_Practice_Guide.pdf.
   Google Scholar