A single case experimental design study on improving social communication skills after traumatic brain injury using communication partner telehealth training

References

• Adolphs R. The neurobiology of social cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001;11:231–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S. Impairments in social cognition following severe traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2013;19(3):231–46. doi:10.1017/S1355617712001506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford JL, Downing MG, Olver J, Ponsford M, Acher R, Carty M, Spitz G. Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: outcome at two, five, and ten years post-injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(1):64–77. doi:10.1089/neu.2013.2997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson GK, Daher M, Hodgkinson A, Strettles B. Comparing the injury profile, service use, outcomes, and comorbidities of people with severe TBI across urban, regional, and remote populations in New South Wales: a multicentre study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31(2):E26–E38. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas AI, Menon DK, Adelson PD, Andelic N, Bell MJ, Belli A, Bragge P, Brazinova A, Büki A, Chesnut RM. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017; doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30371-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist T, Gehl C, Mandrekar J, Lepore S, Hanna S, Osten A, Beaulieu W. The effect of internet-based cognitive rehabilitation in persons with memory impairments after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2009;23(10):790–99. doi:10.1080/02699050903196688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenberg MR, Ruwe WD, Dawson K, McDonald NB, Houston B, Forducey PG. Comparison of functional outcomes and treatment cost between a computer-based cognitive rehabilitation teletherapy program and a face-to-face rehabilitation program. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2008;39(2):169–75. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.39.2.169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riegler LJ, Neils-Strunjas J, Boyce S, Wade SL, Scheifele PM. Cognitive intervention results in web-based videophone treatment adherence and improved cognitive scores. Med Sci Monit. 2013;19:269–75. doi:10.12659/MSM.883885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaousides T, Spielman L, Kajankova M, Guetta G, Gordon W, Dams-O’Connor K. Improving emotion regulation following web-based group intervention for individuals with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2017;32(5):354–65. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng EM, Polatajko HJ, Marziali E, Hunt A, Dawson DR. Telerehabilitation for addressing executive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013;27(5):548–64. doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.766927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolovec-Vranic J, Cullen N, Michalak A, Ouchterlony D, Bhalerao S, Masanic C, Cusimano MD. Evaluation of an online cognitive behavioural therapy program by patients with traumatic brain injury and depression. Brain Inj. 2010;24(5):762–72. doi:10.3109/02699051003709599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath N, Dowds MM, Goldstein R. Clinical supervision of a client with traumatic brain injury in a host home placement using video teleconferencing: a case study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008;23(6):388–93. doi:10.1097/01.HTR.0000341434.74875.c8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietdijk R, Togher L, Power E. Supporting family members of people with traumatic brain injury using telehealth: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44:913–21. doi:10.2340/16501977-1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damianakis T, Tough A, Marziali E, Dawson DR. Therapy online: a web-based video support group for family caregivers of survivors with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31(4):E12–E20. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin KA, Glang A, Beaver SV, Gau JM, Keen S. Web-based training in family advocacy. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013;28(5):341–48. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e31824e1d43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell JM, Fraser R, Brockway JA, Temkin N, Bell KR. A telehealth approach to caregiver self-management following traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31(3):180–90. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassel A, McDonald S, Kelly M, Togher L. Learning from the minds of others: a review of social cognition treatments and their relevance to traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2016;1–34. doi:10.1080/09602011.2016.1257435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Tate R, Power E, Ylviskaker M, Rietdijk R. TBI express: a social communication training manual for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their communication partners. Sydney: Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment (ASSBI); 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Tate R, Power E, Rietdijk R. Training communication partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury improves everyday conversations: a multicenter single blind clinical trial. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(7):637–45. doi:10.2340/16501977-1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Power E, Rietdijk R, McDonald S, Tate R. An exploration of participant experience of a communication training program for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(18):1562–74. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.656788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn N, Togher L, Power E, Heard R. Evaluating communication training for paid carers of people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2012;26(13–14):1702–15. doi:10.3109/02699052.2012.722258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Power E, McDonald S, Tate R, Rietdijk R. Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: reporting the protocol for a clinical trial. Brain Impair. 2009;10(2):188–204. doi:10.1375/brim.10.2.188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luxton DD, Pruitt LD, Osenbach JE. Best practices for remote psychological assessment via telehealth technologies. Prof Psychol: Res Pract. 2014;45(1):27–35. doi:10.1037/a0034547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker JK. Perspectives of speech-language pathologists on the use of telepractice in schools: quantitative survey results. Int J Telerehabil. 2012;4(2):61–72. doi:10.5195/ijt.2012.6100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL, Bond CM. Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomised controlled trials: development of a conceptual framework. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150205. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, Medical Research CG. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655. doi:10.1136/bmj.a1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, Wakim D, Godbee K, Togher L, McDonald S. Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and n-of-1 trials: the 15-item Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2013;23(5):619–38. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.824383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietdijk R, Power E, Brunner M, Togher L. Reliability of videoconferencing administration of a communication questionnaire to people with traumatic brain injury and their close others. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017;6:E38–E44. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J. Relation of executive functioning to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;53(2):365–82. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0205).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Inj. 1997;11(3):169–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Tate R, Rietdijk R, Power E. The effectiveness of social communication partner training for adults with severe chronic TBI and their families using a measure of perceived communication ability. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016;38(3):243–55. doi:10.3233/NRE-151316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldert C, Jensen LR, Blom Johansson M, Simmons-Mackie N. Complexity in measuring outcomes after communication partner training: alignment between goals of intervention and methods of evaluation. Aphasiology. 2018;32(10):1167–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM, Bracy CA, Snow PC. Measuring perceived communicative ability after traumatic brain injury: the reliability and validity of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007;22(1):31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbitt EM, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Cherney LR. Psychometric properties of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): phase 2. Aphasiology. 2011;25(6–7):727–35. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.537347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Babbitt EM, Semik P, Heinemann AW. Psychometric properties of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): phase 1. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):352–62. doi:10.1310/tsr1804-352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Steinbuchel N, Wilson L, Gibbons H, Hawthorne G, Hofer S, Schmidt S, Bullinger M, Maas A, Neugebauer E, Powell J, et al. Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI): scale development and metric properties. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(7):1167–85. doi:10.1089/neu.2009.1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne G, Kaye AH, Gruen R, Houseman D, Bauer I. Traumatic brain injury and quality of life: initial Australian validation of the QOLIBRI. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(2):197–202. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2010.06.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Dijkers M, Heinemann A, Bogner J, Bushnik T, Cicerone K, Corrigan J, Hart T, Malec J. Development of the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools – objective for use with individuals with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:542–51. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner JA, Whiteneck GG, MacDonald J, Juengst SB, Brown AW, Philippus AM, Marwitz JH, Lengenfelder J, Mellick D, Arenth P. Test–retest reliability of traumatic brain injury outcome measures: a traumatic brain injury model systems study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2017;32(5):E1–E16. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Winckel J, Black S, Duchan JF, Simmons-Mackie N, Square P. A set of observational measures for rating support and participation in conversation between adults with aphasia and their conversation partners. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11(1):67–83. doi:10.1310/CL3V-A94A-DE5C-CVBE.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Togher L, Power E, Tate R, McDonald S, Rietdijk R. Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: the adapted Kagan scales. Aphasiology. 2010;24(6–8):914–27. doi:10.1080/02687030903422478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond F, Godfrey HPD. Conversation with traumatically brain-injured individuals: a controlled study of behavioural changes and their impact. Brain Inj. 1997;11(5):319–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill J, Stiles WB, Barkham M, Hardy GE, Stone G, Agnew-Davies R, Unsworth G. Two short forms of the Agnew Relationship Measure: the ARM-5 and ARM-12. Psychother Res. 2012;22(3):241–55. doi:10.1080/10503307.2011.643253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill TR, Hitchcock J, Horner RH, Levin JR, Odom SL, Rindskopf DM, Shadish WR. Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial Spec Educ. 2013;34(1):26–38. doi:10.1177/0741932512452794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59(1):12–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Black SE, Duchan JF, Simmons-Mackie N, Square P. Training volunteers as conversational partners using “Supported Conversation with Adults with Aphasia” (SCA): a controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44:624–38. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/051).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano BE, Birks AH, Kloezeman K, Cha N, Morland LA, Tuerk PW. Therapeutic alliance in clinical videoconferencing: optimizing the communication context. In: Tuerk PW, Shore P, editors. Clinical videoconferencing in telehealth: program development and practice. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 221–51.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn ER, Watzlaf VJM. Privacy and internet-based telepractice. SIG 18 Perspectives on Telepractice. 2011;1(1):26–37. doi:10.1044/tele1.1.26.
   Google Scholar