Development and psychometric evaluation of the Birmingham Relationship Continuity Measure for acquired brain injury

References

• Anderson MI, Parmenter TR, Mok M. The relationship between neurobehavioural problems of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), family functioning and the psychological well-being of the spouse/caregiver: path model analysis. Brain Inj. 2002;16:743–57. doi:10.1080/02699050210128906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein-Lubow GP, Beevers CG, Bishop DS, Miller IW. Family functioning is associated with depressive symptoms in caregivers of acute stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(6):947–55. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall E, Terry D. Predicting emotional well-being following traumatic brain injury: a test of mediated and moderated models. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:947–54. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark MS, Smith DS. Psychological correlates of outcome following rehabilitation from stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:129–40. doi:10.1191/026921599673399613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer S, Glass TA. 2003. Family function and stroke recovery: a review. Rehabil Psychol. 48(4):255–65. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.48.4.255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander AM, Caroselli JS, High WM, Becker C, Neese L, Scheibel R. Relationship of family functioning to progress in a post-acute rehabilitation programme following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2002;16:649–57. doi:10.1080/02699050210128889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais CM, Boisvert JM. Psychological and marital adjustment in couples following a traumatic brain injury (TBI): a critical review. Brain Inj. 2005;19:1223–35. doi:10.1080/02699050500309387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burridge AC, Williams WH, Yates PJ, Harris A, Ward C. Spousal relationship satisfaction following acquired brain injury: the role of insight and socioemotional skill. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2007;17:95–105. doi:10.1080/09602010500505070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin EE, Kreutzer JS, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Lehan TJ. Marriage after brain injury: review, analysis, and research recommendations. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011;26:43–55. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182048f54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling J, Oddy M. Rearranged marriages: marital relationships after head injury. Brain Inj. 1999;13:785–96. doi:10.1080/026990599121179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RL, Yurdakul LK. Change in relationship status following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 1997;11:491–501. doi:10.1080/bij.11.7.491.501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill CJ, Sander AM, Robins N, Mazzei D, Struchen MA. Exploring experiences of intimacy from the viewpoint of individuals with traumatic brain injury and their partners. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011;26:56–68. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182048ee9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratz AL, Sander AM, Brickell TA, Lange RT, Carlozzi NE. Traumatic brain injury caregivers: a qualitative analysis of spouse and parent perspectives on quality of life. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017;27:16–37. doi:10.1080/09602011.2015.1051056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lond BJ, Williamson IR. “Stuck in a loop of fear”: a phenomenological exploration of carers’ experiences supporting a spouse with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:2907–15. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1363299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam A, McKay A, Sloan S, Ponsford J. The experience of challenging behaviours following severe TBI: a family perspective. Brain Inj. 2015;29:7–8. doi:10.3109/02699052.2015.1005134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson HS, Ryan A. The impact of stroke consequences on spousal relationships from the perspective of the person with stroke. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18:1803–11. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02694.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodley-Scott SEM, Riley GA. How partners experience personality change after traumatic brain injury – its impact on their emotions and their relationship. Brain Impair. 2015;16:205–20. doi:10.1017/BrImp.2015.22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin EE, Chappell B, Kreutzer JS. Relationships after TBI: a grounded research study. Brain Inj. 2014;28:398–413. doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.880514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond FM, Davis CS, Cook JR, Philbrick P, Hirsch MA. Relational dimension of irritability following traumatic brain injury: a qualitative analysis. Brain Inj. 2012;26:1287–96. doi:10.3109/02699052.2012.706352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res. 2004;2004(33):14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014.
   Google Scholar
• Villa D, Riley GA. Partners’ experiences of relationship continuity in acquired brain injury. Cogent Psychol. 2017;4:1380891. doi:10.1080/23311908.2017.1380891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesla C, Martinson I, Muwaswes M. Continuities and discontinuities in family members’ relationships with Alzheimer’s patients. Fam Relat. 1994;43:3–9. doi:10.2307/585135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan L. A couplehood typology for spouses of institutionalized persons with Alzheimer’s disease: perceptions of ‘We’-‘I’. Fam Relat. 2001;50:87–98. doi:10.1111/fare.2001.50.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg J, Eriksson H. ‘The hard thing is the changes’: the importance of continuity for older men caring for their wives. Qual Aging Older Adults. 2007;8:5–15. doi:10.1108/14717794200700008.
   Google Scholar
• Walters AH, Oyebode JR, Riley GA. The dynamics of continuity and discontinuity for women caring for a spouse with dementia. Dementia (London). 2010;9:169–89. doi:10.1177/1471301209354027.
   Google Scholar
• Riley GA, Fisher G, Hagger BF, Elliott A, Le Serve H, Oyebode JR. The Birmingham Relationship continuity measure: the development and evaluation of a measure of the perceived continuity of spousal relationships in dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25:263–74. doi:10.1017/S1041610212001743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan P. Close relationships. New York: Routledge; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Murray J, Livingston G. A qualitative study of adjustment to caring for an older spouse with psychiatric illness. Aging Soc. 1998;18:659–71. doi:10.1017/S0144686X98007120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis RDH. The impact of the marital relationship on the experience of caring for an elderly spouse with dementia. Aging Soc. 1998;18:209–31. doi:10.1017/S0144686X9700682X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poveda B, Osborne-Crowley K, Laidlaw K, Macleod F, Power K. Social cognition, behaviour and relationship continuity in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Brain Impair. 2017;18:175–87. doi:10.1017/BrImp.2016.35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley GA, Achiampong J, Hillberg T, Oyebode JR. Relationship continuity and person-centred care in how spouses make sense of challenging care needs. Aging Ment Health. 2020;24:242–49. doi:10.1080/13607863.2018.1531380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley GA, Evans L, Oyebode JR. Relationship continuity and emotional well-being in spouses of people with dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2018;22:299–305. doi:10.1080/13607863.2016.1248896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley GA, Balloo S. Maternal narratives about their child’s identity following acquired brain injury. Cogent Psychol. 2016;3:1154308. doi:10.1080/23311908.2016.1154308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline P. A psychometrics primer. London (UK): Free Association Books; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hankins M. Questionnaire discrimination: (re)-introducing coefficient delta. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:19. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Warner TT, Thompson AJ. What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology? J Neurol. 2012;259:2681–94. doi:10.1007/s00415-012-6570-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwit SJ, Meuser TM. Development and initial validation of an inventory to assess grief in caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s disease. Gerontologist. 2002;42:751–65. doi:10.1093/geront/42.6.751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield HL, Murphy B, Herrman HE, Bloch S, Singh B. Family caregiving: measurement of emotional well-being and various aspects of the caregiving role. Psychol Med. 1997;27:647–57. doi:10.1017/S0033291797004820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrick SS, Dicke A, Hendrick C. The relationship assessment scale. J Soc Pers Relat. 1998;15:137–42. doi:10.1177/0265407598151009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam. 1976;38:15–28. doi:10.2307/350547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson N, Barion A, Rademaker A, Rehkemper G, Weintraub S. The activities of daily living questionnaire: a validation study in patients with dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004;18:223–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello AB, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005;10:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, MacCallum RC. Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: factor recovery with small samples. Behav Genet. 2002;32:153–61. doi:10.1023/A:1015210025234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley GA, Keeble HS, Yasmin N, Hagger BF. Relationship continuity and person-centred care: an exploratory mixed-methods investigation of spousal partners’ responses to the challenging care needs of those with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019; Early online. doi:10.1080/09602011.2019.1566078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar