107
Views
55
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Outcomes in traumatic brain injury: self report versus report of significant others

, &
Pages 575-582 | Published online: 03 Jul 2009

References

  • BROWN, D. S. O., NELL, V. and PHIL, D. L.: Recovery from diffuse traumatic brain injury in Johannesburg: a concurrent prospective study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73: 758–770, 1992.
  • COPE, D. N., COLE, J. R., HALL, K. M. et al.: Brain Injury: analysis of outcome in a post-acute rehabilitation system. Part 1: General analysis. Brain Injury, 5: 111–125, 1991.
  • FRASER, R., DIKMEN, S., MCLEAN, A. et al.: Employability in head injury survivors: first year post injury. Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin, 31: 276–288, 1988.
  • MACKENZIE, E. J., SHAPIRO, S., SMITH, R. T. et al.: Factors influencing return to work following hospitalization for traumatic injury. American Journal of Public Health, 77: 329–334, 1987.
  • RAO, N. and KILGORE, K. M.: Predicting return to work in traumatic brain injury using assessment scales. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73: 911–916, 1992.
  • MCLEAN, A., DIKMEN, S. S., TEMKIN, N. R. Psychosodal recovery after head injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74: 1041–1046, 1993.
  • TATE, R. L., LULHAM, J. M., BROE, G. A. et al.: Psychosocial outcome for the survivors of severe blunt head injury: the results from a consecutive series of 100 patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 52: 1128–1134, 1989.
  • THOMSEN, I. V.: Late psychosocial outcome in severe blunt head trauma. Brain Injury, 1: 131–143, 1987.
  • WILLER, B., ROSENTHAL, M., KREU'FZER, J. S. et al.: Assessment of community integration follow-ing rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury.Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8: 75–87, 1993.
  • KREUTZER, J. S. and WEHMAN, P.: Community Integration Following Traumatic Brain Injury (Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD), 1990.
  • KOZLOPE, R.: Networks of social support and the outcome from severe head injury.Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2: 14–23, 1987.
  • WILLER, B., LINN, R. and ALLEN, K.: Community integration and barriers to integration for individuals with brain injury. In: M. A. J. Finlayson and S. Garner (editors) Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Clinical Considerations (Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD), pp. 355–375, 1994.
  • MAGAZINER, J., SIMONSICK, E. M., KASHNER, T. M. et al.: Patient-proxy response comparability On measures of patient health and functional status. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 41: 1065–1074, 1988.
  • MCKINLAY, W. and BROOKS, D. N.: Methodological problems in assessing psychosodal recovery following severe head injury.Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6: 87–89, 1984.
  • BROWN, D. S. O. and NELL, V.: Recovery from diffuse traumatic brain injury in Johannesburg: a concurrent prospective study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73: 758–770, 1992.
  • BURTON, L. A. and VOLPE, B.: Social adjustment scale assessments in traumatic brain injury.Journal of Rehabilitation, October/November/December: 34–37, 1993.
  • CAVALLO, M. M., KAY, T. and EZRACHI, O.: Problems and changes after traumatic brain injury: differing perceptions within and between families. Brain Injury, 6: 327–335, 1992.
  • FORDYCE, D. J. and ROUECHE, J. R.: Changes in perspectives of disability among patients, staff and relatives during rehabilitation of brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 31: 217–229, 1986.
  • HAMILTON, E. B., GRANGER, C. V., SHERWIN, F. S. et al.: A uniform data system for medical rehabilitation. In: M. S. Furher (editor) Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. (Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD), pp. 137–150, 1987.
  • WILLER, B., ROSENTHAL, M., KREU'FZER, J. S. et al.: Assessment of community integration follow-ing rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury.Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8: 75–87, 1993.
  • Guide for the use of the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation, Version 3.0. Buffalo, NY (Research Foundation-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY), 1990.
  • LINACRE, J. M., HEINEMANN, A. W., WRIGHT, B. D.: The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75: 127–132, 1994.
  • HEINEMANN, A. W., LINACRE, J. M., WRIGHT, B. D., et al.: Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 566–573, 1993.
  • GRANGER, C. V., HAMILTON, B. B., LINACRE, J. M. et al.: Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72: 84–89, 1993.
  • HELMSTADTER, C. G.: Principles of Psychological Measurement (Appleton-Cantury-Crofts, New York), 1964.
  • NUNNALLY, J. C.: Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn (McGraw-Hill, New York), 1978.
  • WARE, J. E., Jr: SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and Interpretation Guide (Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA), 1993.
  • SHROUT, P. E. and FLEISS, J. L.: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychology Bulletin, 86: 420–428, 1979.
  • OTTENBACHER, K. J., MANN, W. C., GRANGER, C. V. et al.: Inter-rater agreement and stability of functional assessment in the community-based elderly. Archieves of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75: 1297–1301, 1994.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.