Co‐constructed talk in the conversations of people with dysarthria and aphasia

References

• Barefoot S. M., Bochner J. H., Johnson B. A., Eigen B. A. V. Rating deaf speakers' comprehensibility: an exploratory investigation. American Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology 1993; 2: 31–35
   Google Scholar
• Bauer A., Kulke F. Language exercises for dinner. Aspects of aphasia management in family settings. Aphasiology 2004; 18: 1135–1160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke S., Maxim J., Wilkinson R. Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language 2007; 28: 136–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beeke S., Wilkinson R., Maxim J. Individual variation in agrammatism: a single case study of the influence of interaction. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2007; 42: 629–647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson D. F., Ardila A. Aphasia: A Clinical Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1996
   Google Scholar
• Bloch S. Co‐constructing meaning in dysarthria: word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. Applying Conversation Analysis, K Richards, P Seedhouse. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2005; 38–55
   Google Scholar
• Bloch S. Trouble sources and repair in acquired dysarthria and communication aid use: a conversation analysis study. 2006, Unpublished PhD doctoral dissertation, University of London, London
   Google Scholar
• Bloch S., Wilkinson R. The understandability of AAC: a conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2004; 20: 272–282
   Google Scholar
• Bloch S., Clarke M., Collins S. Conversation analysis and AAC: from principle to practice. Communication Matters 2001; 15: 29–32
   Google Scholar
• Bunton K. Fundamental frequency as a perceptual cue for vowel identification in speakers with Parkinson's disease. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 2006; 58: 323–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins S., Markova I. Complementarity in the construction of a problematic utterance in conversation. Mutualities in Dialogue, I Markova, C. F Graumann, K Foppa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995; 238–263
   Google Scholar
• Comrie P., Mackenzie C., McCall J. The influence of acquired dysarthria on conversational turn taking. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2001; 15: 383–398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley F. L., Aronson A. E., Brown J. R. Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1969a; 12: 246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darley F. L., Aronson A. E., Brown J. R. Clusters of deviant speech dimensions in the dysarthrias. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1969b; 12: 462
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duchan J., Maxwell M., Kovarsky D. Evaluating competence in the course of everyday life. Constructing (In)Competence, D Kovarsky, J Duchan, M Maxwell. LEA, Mahwah, New Jersey 1999; 3–26
   Google Scholar
• Duffy J. R. Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management. Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri 2005
   Google Scholar
• Enderby P. Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment. College Hill Press, San Diego, California 1983
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge 1967
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Footing. Forms of Talk, E Goffman. University of Philadelphia Press, Philadelphia 1981; 124–159
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass H., Kaplan E., Barresi B. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2001, 3rd edn
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin C. Co‐constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research in Language and Social Interaction 1995; 28: 233–260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin C. Introduction. Conversation and Brain Damage, C Goodwin. Oxford University Press, New York 2003a; 3–20
   Google Scholar
• Conversation and Brain Damage, C Goodwin. Oxford University Press, New York 2003b
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin C., Goodwin M., Olsher D. Producing sense with nonsense syllables—turn and sequence in conversations with a man with severe aphasia. The Language of Turn and Sequence, C. E Ford, B. A Fox, S. A Thompson. Oxford University Press, New York 2002; 56–80
   Google Scholar
• Heeschen C., Schegloff E. Agrammatism, adaptation theory, conversation analysis: on the role of so‐called telegraphic style in talk‐in‐interaction. Aphasiology 1999; 13: 365–405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeschen C., Schegloff E. Aphasic agrammatism as interactional artifact and achivement. Conversation and Brain Damage, C Goodwin. Oxford University Press, New York 2003; 231–282
   Google Scholar
• Heritage J. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge 1984
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D., Yoder D. Communication within natural conversational interaction: implications for severe communcatively impaired persons. Topics in Language Disorders 1982; 2: 1–19
   Google Scholar
• Hillel A., Miller R., Yorkston K., McDonald E., Norris E., Konikow N. Amyotrophc lateral sclerosis severity scale. Journal of Neuroepidemiology 1989; 8: 142–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad K. C. Estimating the intelligibility of speakers with dysarthria. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 2006; 58: 217–228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby I., Woofitt R. Conversation Analysis. Polity Press, Cambridge 1998
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson G. Transcript notation. Structures of Social Action, J. M Atkinson, J Heritage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984; ix–xvi
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson G. On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. Talk and Social Organisation, G Button, J. R. E Lee. Multilingual Matters, ClevedonEngland 1987; 86–100
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A. Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology 1998; 12: 816–830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay J., Lesser R., Coltheart M. Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia (PALPA). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove 1992
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery. Grune and Stratton, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Lerner G. H. On the syntax of sentences‐in‐progress. Language in Society 1991; 20: 441–458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner G. H. On the ‘semi‐permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. Interaction and grammar, E Ochs, E Schegloff, S Thompson. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996; 238–276
   Google Scholar
• Lerner G. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk‐in‐interaction: grammar as action in promoting a speaker to elaborate. Research on Language and Social Interaction 2004; 37: 151–184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesser R., Milroy L. Linguistics and Aphasia: Psycholinguistic and Pragmatic Aspects of Intervention. Longman, London 1993
   Google Scholar
• Light J. Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1989; 5: 137–144
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Gulens M. Rebuilding communicative competence and self‐determination with adults who have acquired neurogenic and neuromuscular disabilitites. Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Adults with Neurogenic and Neuromuscular Disabilities, Beukelman, Yorkston, Reichle. Paul H Brookes Publishing Co, Baltimore 2000; 137–179
   Google Scholar
• Lock S., Wilkinson R., Bryan K. SPPARC (Supporting Partners of People with Aphasia in Relationships and Conversation): A Resource pack. Speechmark, Bicester 2001
   Google Scholar
• Müller E., Soto G. Capturing the complexity of aided conversations: a conversation analysis perspective. Paper presented at Sixth Biennial Research Symposium of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 2000, Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger M., Damico J. Joint productions as a conversational strategy in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1998; 12: 459–480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins M. Pragmatic Impairment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007
   Google Scholar
• Sacks H. Lectures on Conversation. Blackwell, Oxford 1992
   Google Scholar
• Sacks H., Schegloff E., Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn‐taking for conversation. Language 1974; 50: 696–735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff E. Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 1968; 70: 1075–1095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff E., Jefferson G., Sacks H. The preference for self‐correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 1977; 53: 361–382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons‐Mackie N., Kingston D., Schultz M. ‘Speaking for another’: the management of participant frames in aphasia. American Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology 2004; 13: 114–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer K. A., Slocomb D. L. The neural basis of ataxic dysarthria. Cerebellum 2007; 6: 58–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck J. Gesture as communication 1: its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication Monographs 1993; 60: 275–299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weismer G. Philosophy of research in motor speech disorders [Jul]. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2006; 20: 315–349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth A., Perkins L., Lesser R. Conversation Analysis Profile for People with Aphasia (CAPPA). Whurr, London 1997
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson R. Special issue on conversation analysis. Aphasiology 1999; 13: 251–258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson R. Reflecting on talk in speech and language therapy: some contributions using conversation analysis. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2004; 39: 497–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston K., Strand E., Kennedy M. Comprehensibility of dysarthric speech: implications for assessment and treatment planning. American Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology 1996; 5: 55–66
   Google Scholar