The collaborative construction of non‐serious episodes of interaction by non‐speaking children with cerebral palsy and their peers

References

• Atkinson J. M., Heritage J. Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984
   Google Scholar
• Basil C. Social interaction and learned helplessness in severely disabled children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1992; 8: 188–199
   Google Scholar
• Bloch S., Wilkinson R. AAC in context: a conversation analysis study of AAC use in acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2004; 20: 272–282
   Google Scholar
• Clarke M. T. Conversational interaction between children using communication aids and their peers. 2005, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University College, London
   Google Scholar
• Clarke M. T., Kirton A. Patterns of interaction between children with physical disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication and their peers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2003; 19: 135–151
   Google Scholar
• Clarke M. T., Wilkinson R. Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 1: Organising and understanding VOCA use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2007; 23: 336–348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke M. T., Wilkinson R. Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 2: Understanding initiated VOCA mediated turns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2008; 24: 3–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins S. Referring expressions in conversations between aided and natural speakers. Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives, S Tetzchner, M. H Jehsen. Whurr, London 1996; 89–100
   Google Scholar
• Connors C., Stalker K. Children's experiences of disability: pointers to a social model of childhood disability. Disability and Society 2007; 22: 19–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew P. ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 1997; 28: 69–101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn P. Laughter in interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin C. Conversational organisation: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York Academic Press, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin C. Conversations with an aphasic man. Research in Language and Social Interaction 1995; 28: 233–260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin C. Action and embodiment within a situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 2000; 32: 1489–1522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin M. H., Goodwin C. Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semotica 1986; 62: 51–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haakana M. Laughter in medical interaction: from quantification to analysis, and back. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2002; 6: 207–235
   Google Scholar
• Harris D. Communication interaction processes involving nonvocal physically handicapped children. Topics in Language Disorders 1982; 2: 21–37
   Google Scholar
• Heath C. Talk and recipiency: sequential organisation in speech and body movement. Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, J. M Atkinson, J Heritage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984; 247–265
   Google Scholar
• Heritage J. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge 1984
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J., Mathy‐Laikko P., Yoder D. E. Studying conversations of augmentative communication system users. The vocally impaired: Clinical practice and research, L. E Berstein. Grune and Stratton, Philadelphia 1988; 265–294
   Google Scholar
• Hjelmquist E., Sandberg A. D. Sounds of silence: interaction in aided language use. Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives, S Tetzchner, M. H Jehsen. Whurr, London 1996; 137–152
   Google Scholar
• Hutchby I. Children's talk and social competence. Children and Society 2005; 19: 66–73
   Google Scholar
• Hutchby I., Wooffitt R. Conversation analysis. Polity Press, Cambridge 1998
   Google Scholar
• James A., Prout A. Constructing and reconstructing childhood. Falmer Press, London 1997, 2nd ed
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson G. A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, G Psathas. Irvington, New York 1979; 79–96
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson G., Sacks H., Schegloff E. A. Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. Talk and social organisation, G Button, J. R. E Lee. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon 1987; 152–205
   Google Scholar
• Jolleff N., McConachie H., Winyard S., Jones S., Wisbeach A., Clayton C. Communication aids for children: procedures and problems. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1992; 34: 719–730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly B. ‘Chocolate … makes you autism’: impairment, disability and childhood identities. Disability and Society 2005; 20: 261–275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J. Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: state of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1988; 4: 66–82
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Collier B., Parnes P. Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part I—Discourse patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1985a; 1: 74–83
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Collier B., Parnes P. Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part II—Communicative function. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1985b; 2: 98–107
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Collier B., Parnes P. Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part III—Modes of communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1985c; 3: 125–133
   Google Scholar
• Linell P., Luckmann T. Asymmetries in dialogue: some conceptual preliminaries. Asymmetries in dialogue, I Markova, K Foppa. Rowman and Littlefield, Savage, MD 1991; 1–21
   Google Scholar
• McConachie H., Ciccognani A. ‘What's in the box?’: assessing physically disabled children's communication skills. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 1995; 11: 253–263
   Google Scholar
• Morris J. Pride against prejudice: Transformation attitudes towards disability. The Women's Press, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Pennington L., McConachie H. Mother‐child interaction revisited: communication with non‐speaking physically disabled children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 1999; 34: 391–416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz A. Extreme case formulations: a way of legitimising claims. Human Studies 1986; 9: 219–229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff E. A. The relevance of repair for syntax‐for‐conversation. Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax, T Givon. Academic Press, New York 1979; 261–288
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff E. A. On some gestures' relation to talk. Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, J. M Atkinson, J Heritage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984; 266–296
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff E. A. Body torque. Social Research 1998; 65: 335–596
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff E. A. Getting serious: Joke → serious ‘no’. Journal of Pragmatics 2001; 33: 1947–1955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff E. A. Sequence organization in interaction: a primer in conversation analysis, 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff E. A., Jefferson G., Sacks H. The preference for self correction in the organisation of repair in conversation. Language 1977; 53: 361–382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T. Disability, identify and difference. Exploring the Divide, C Barnes, G Mercer. The Disability Press, Leeds 1996; 94–113
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T., Watson N. The social model of disability: an outdated ideology?. Research in Social Science and Disability 2002; 2: 9–28
   Google Scholar
• Smith M. M. Speech by any other name: the role of communication aids in interaction. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 1994; 29: 225–240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas C. Feminism and disability: the theoretical and political significance of the personal and the experiential. Disability, politics and the struggle for change, L Barton. David Fulton, London 2001
   Google Scholar
• Udwin O., Yule W. Augmentative communication systems taught to cerebral‐palsied children—a longitudinal study: II Pragmatic features of sign and symbol use. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1991; 26: 137–148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Tetzchner S., Martinsen H. Words and strategies: conversations with young children who use aided language. Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives, S von Tetzchner, M. H Jensen. Whurr, London 1996; 65–88
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner S., Brekke K. M., Sjøthun B., Grindheim E. Constructing preschool communities of learners that afford alternative language development. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2005; 21: 82–100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar