Effects of neurological damage on production of formulaic language

References

• Aijmer K. Conversational routines in English. Longman, London, New York 1996
   Google Scholar
• Bell R. A., Healey J. G. Idiomatic communication and interpersonal solidarity in friends' relational cultures. Human Communication Research 1992; 14: 47–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthier M. Transcortical aphasias. Psychology Press, East SussexUK 1999
   Google Scholar
• Blank S. C., Scott S. K., Murphy K., Warburton W., Wise R. Speech production: Wernicke, Broca and beyond. Brain 2002; 125: 1829–1838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanken G., Marini V. Where do lexical speech automatisms come from?. Journal of Neurolinguistics 1997; 10: 19–31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom R. L., Borod J. C., Obler L. K., Koff E. A preliminary characterization of lexical emotional expression in right and left brain‐damaged patients. International Journal of Neuroscience 1990; 55: 71–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bookheimer S. Y., Zeffiro T. A., Blaxton T. A., Gaillard P. W., Theodore W. H. Activation of language cortex with automatic speech tasks. Neurology 2000; 55: 1151–1157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borod J. C., Zgaljardic D., Tabert M., Koff E. Asymmetries of emotional perception and expression in normal adults. Handbook of neuropsychology, G Gainotti. Elsevier, Amsterdam 2001; 5: 181–205, 2nd ed
   Google Scholar
• Brownell H., Martino G. Deficts in inference and social cognition: the effects of right hemisphere brain damage on discourse. Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive science, M Beeman, C Chiarello. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahweh, NJ 1997; 309–328
   Google Scholar
• Narrative discourse in neurological impaired and normal aging adults, H. H Brownwell, Y Joanette. Singular Publishing Company, San Diego, CA 1993
   Google Scholar
• Bruess C. J., Pearson J. C. ‘Sweet pea’ and ‘pussy cat’: an examination of idiom use and marital satisfaction over the life cycle. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 1993; 10: 609–615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham H. W., Avakian‐Whitaker H., Whitaker H. A. Linguistic structures in stereotyped aphasic speech. Linguistics 1975; 154/155: 5–13
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth B. Hesitation and semantic planning in speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1974; 4: 75–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadalbert A., Landis T., Regard N., Graves R. E. Singing with and without words: Hemispheric asymmetries in motor control. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1994; 16: 664–670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheang H. S., Pell M. D. A study of humor and communicative intention following right hemisphere stroke. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2006; 20: 447–462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung K. K. H., Code C., Ball M. J. Lexical and non‐lexical speech automatisms in aphasic Cantonese speakers. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 2004; 2: 32–42
   Google Scholar
• Clark C. H., Fox Tree J. E. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 2006; 84: 73–111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code C. Speech automatisms and recurring utterances. The characteristics of aphasia, C Code. Taylor & Francis, London 1989; 155–177
   Google Scholar
• Critchley M. Aphasiology and other aspects of language. Edward Arnold, Ltd, London 1970
   Google Scholar
• Devitt M. Intuitions in linguistics. British Journal of Philosophical Science 2006; 57: 481–513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew P., Holt E. Complainable matters: the use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems 1988; 35: 398–417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espir L., Rose F. The basic neurology of speech. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford 1970
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore C. On fluency. Individual differences in language ability and language behavior, C. J Fillmore, D Kempler, W. S.‐Y Wang. Academic Press, London 1979; 85–102
   Google Scholar
• Folstein M. F., Folstein S. E., McHugh P. R. ‘Mini‐Mental State’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975; 12: 189–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox Tree J. E. Placing like in telling stories. Discourse Studies 2006; 8: 723–743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox Tree J. E., Schrock J. C. Discourse markers in spontaneous speech: oh what a difference an oh makes. Journal of Memory and Language 1999; 40: 280–295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gloning I., Gloning K., Hoff H. Aphasia—a clinical syndrome. Problems of dynamic neurology, L Halpern. Hebrew University Press, Jerusalem 1963; 63–70
   Google Scholar
• Goldman‐Eisler F. Psycholinguistics: experiments in spontaneous speech. Academic Press, London; New York 1968
   Google Scholar
• Graves R., Landis T. Hemispheric control of speech expression in aphasia. Archives of Neurology 1985; 42: 249–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graybiel A. M. The basal ganglia and chunking of action repertoires. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 1998; 70: 119–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holowka S., Pettito L. A. Left hemisphere cerebral specialization for babies while babbling. Science 2002; 297. 1515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughlings Jackson J. On the nature of the duality of the brain. Selected writings of John Hughlings Jackson, J Taylor. Hodder and Stoughton, London 1874; 2: 129–145
   Google Scholar
• Illes J., Metter E. J., Hanson W. R., Iritani S. Language production in Parkinson's disease: acoustic and linguistic considerations. Brain and Language 1988; 33: 146–160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jucker A. H. The discourse marker ‘well’: relevance theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics 1993; 19: 435–452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan E., Goodglass H., Weintraub S. The Boston Naming Test. Lea & Ferbinger, Philadelphia 1983
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan J. A., Brownell H. H., Jacobs J. R., Gardner H. The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks. Brain and Language 1990; 38: 122–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempler D. Kempler Syntax Comprehension Test. 1986, Copyright
   Google Scholar
• Kempler D., Van Lancker D. The Familiar and Novel Language Comprehension Test (FANL‐C). 1985, Copyright
   Google Scholar
• Kempler D., Van Lancker D., Marchman V., Bates E. Idiom comprehension in children and adults with unilateral brain damage. Developmental Neuropsychology 1999; 15: 327–349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. The Western Aphasia Battery. Grune & Stratton Inc, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger C. How to resist an idiom. Research on Language and Social Interaction 2000; 33: 121–154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiper K. Formulaic performance in conventionalized varieties of speech. Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use, N Schmitt. John Benjamin, Amsterdam 2004; 37–53
   Google Scholar
• LaPointe L. L., Horner J. Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia. C.C. Publications, Tegoid, OR 1979
   Google Scholar
• Larsen B., Skinhøj E., Lassen H. A. Variations in regional cortical blood flow in the right and left hemispheres during automatic speech. Brain 1978; 10: 193–200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum C. C., Ellis A. W. Is ‘nonpropositional’ speech preserved in aphasia?. Brain and Language 1994; 46: 368–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishkin M., Malamut B., Bachevalier J. Memories and habits: two neural systems. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, G Lynch, J. L McGaugh, N. M Weinberger. The Guilford Press, New York 1984; 65–67
   Google Scholar
• Myers P. Right hemisphere damage: Disorders of communication and cognition. Singular Press, San Diego 1998
   Google Scholar
• Nespoulous J.‐L., Code C., Virbel J., Lecours A. R. Hypotheses in the dissociation between ‘referential’ and ‘modalizing’ verbal behavior in aphasia. Applied Psycholinguistics 1998; 19: 311–331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawley A. Developments in the study of formulaic language since 1970: a personal view. Phraseology and culture in English, P Skandera. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin 2007; 3–34
   Google Scholar
• Pawley A., Syder F. H. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. Language and communication, J. C Richards, R Schmidt. Longman, London 1983; 191–225
   Google Scholar
• Petrovici J.‐N. Speech disturbances following stereotaxic surgery in ventrolateral thalamus. Neurosurgical Review 1980; 3: 189–195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pimental P., Kingsbury N. A. Mini inventory of right brain injury. Pro‐Ed, Austin, TX 1989
   Google Scholar
• Ryding E., Bradvik B., Ingvar D. H. Changes of regional cerebral blood flow measured simultaneously in the right and left hemisphere during automatic speech and humming. Brain 1987; 110: 1345–1358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaltenbrand G. The effects of stereotactic electrical stimulation in the depth of the brain. Brain 1965; 88: 835–840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffrin D. Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press, New York 1987
   Google Scholar
• Sidtis J. J. Some problems for representations of brain organization based on ‘activation’. Brain and Language 2007; 102: 130–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith A. Speech and other functions after left (dominant) hemispherectomy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1966; 29: 467–471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speedie L. J., Wertman E., T'air J., Heilman K. M. Disruption of automatic speech following a right basal ganglia lesion. Neurology 1993; 43: 1768–1774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen D. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989
   Google Scholar
• Tannen D., Öztek P. C. Health to our mouths: formulaic expressions in Turkish and Greek. Conversational routine, F Coulmas. Mouton, The Hague 1981; 37–54
   Google Scholar
• Van Lancker D. Language lateralization and grammars. Studies in syntax and semantics, J Kimball. Academic Press, New York 1973; II: 197–204
   Google Scholar
• Van Lancker D. Nonpropositional speech: neurolinguistic studies. Progress in the psychology of language, A. E Ellis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1988; III: 49–118
   Google Scholar
• Van Lancker D. Nonpropositional speech in aphasia. Linguistic disorders and pathologies, An international handbook, G Blanken, J Dittmann, J Grimm, J. C Marshall, C‐W Wallesch. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin 1993; 215–225
   Google Scholar
• Van Lancker D. Rags to riches: our increasing appreciation of cognitive and communicative abilities of the human right cerebral hemisphere. Brain and Language 1997; 57: 1–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker D., Cummings J. Expletives: neurolinguistic and neurobehavioral perspectives on swearing. Brain Research Reviews 1999; 31: 83–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker D., Klein K. K. Preserved recognition of familiar personal nouns in global aphasia. Brain & Language 1990; 39: 511–529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker D., Sidtis J. J. The identification of affective‐prosodic stimuli by left‐ and right‐hemisphere‐damaged subjects: all errors are not created equal. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1992; 35: 963–970
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Lancker D., Bogen J. E., Canter G. J. A case report of pathological rule‐governed syllable intrusion. Brain and Language 1983; 20: 12–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis D. When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: toward a dual‐process model of language. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2004; 39: 1–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis D. Has neuroimaging solved the problems of neurolinguistics?. Brain and Language 2006a; 98: 276–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis D. Where in the brain is nonliteral language?. Metaphor and Symbol 2006b; 21: 213–244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis D. Formulaic and novel language in a ‘dual process’ model of language competence: evidence from surveys, speech samples, and schemata. Formulaic Language: Volume 2. Acquisition, loss, psychological reality, functional applications, R. L Corrigan, E. A Moravcsik, H Ouali, K. M Wheatley. Benjamins Publishing Co, Amsterdam 2008; 151–176
   Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis D., Postman W. A. Formulaic expression in spontaneous speech of left‐ and right‐hemisphere‐damaged subjects. Aphasiology 2006; 20: 411–426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis D., Rallon G. Tracking the incidence of formulaic expressions in everyday speech: methods for classification and verification. Language and Communication 2004; 24: 207–240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis D., McIntosh R., Grafton R. PET activation studies comparing two speech tasks widely used in surgical mapping. Brain and Language 2003; 85: 245–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis D., Pachana N., Cummings J., Sidtis J. Dysprosodic speech following basal ganglia insult: toward a conceptual framework for the study of the cerebral representation of prosody. Brain and Language 2006; 97: 135–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. WAIS‐R: Manual: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX 1981
   Google Scholar
• Wray A. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002
   Google Scholar
• Wray A., Perkins M. The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model. Language and Communication 2000; 20: 1–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar