How do persons with apraxia of speech deal with morphological stress in Spanish? A preliminary study

References

• Alcoba Rueda, S. (2013). Cambios de acento en español. Verba. Anuario Galego De Filoloxía, 40, 415–452.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, M. Á., Díez, E., & Fernandez, A. (2016). Subjective age-of-acquisition norms for 4,640 verbs in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1337–1342. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0675-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. W., Damasio, H., & Tranel, D. (1990). Neuropsychological impairments associated with lesions caused by tumor or stroke. Archives of Neurology, 47(4), 397–405.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atagi, E., & Bent, T. (2017). Nonnative accent discrimination with words and sentences. Phonetica, 74(3), 173–191. doi:10.1159/000452956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baqué, L. (2015). Velocidad de articulación y estructuración del espacio vocálico en función del acento en la afasia: Un estudio preliminar. Normas. Revista De Estudios Lingüísticos Hispánicos, 7, 297–308.
   Google Scholar
• Baqué, L. (2017). Lexical stress contrast marking in fluent and non-fluent aphasia in Spanish: The relationship between acoustic cues and compensatory strategies. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 31(7–9), 642–664. doi:10.1080/02699206.2017.1305449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baqué, L., Estrada, M., & Daoussi, S. (2016). Corpus Cognipros (español) para la evaluación de producciones acentuales en la afasia y lengua extranjera (Internal Report). Bellaterra,Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Baqué, L., Estrada, M., Nespoulous, J., Le Besnerais, M., Rosas, A., & Marczyk, A. (2006). Protocolo de exploración lingüística del proyecto Cognifon. Versión española (Internal Report). Bellaterra, Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using {lme4}. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, S. R., Pell, M. D., Leonard, C. L., & Gordon, J. K. (1997). The ability of right- and left-hemisphere damaged individuals to produce and interprete prosodic cues marking phrasal boundaries. Language and Speech, 40(4), 313–330. doi:10.1177/002383099704000401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, S. R., Pell, M. D., Leonard, C. L., & Gordon, J. K. (2001). Using prosody to resolve temporary syntactic ambiguities in speech production: Acoustic data on brain-damaged speakers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 15(6), 441–456. doi:10.1080/02699200110044813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49(3–4), 155–180. doi:10.1159/000261913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B. (1992). Disorders of phonological encoding. Cognition, 42, 261–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208. doi:10.1080/026432997381664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, L. (1992). Lexical stress effect and its interaction with frequency in word pronunciation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 987–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger, A. J. (1980). Integration and generalization of kappas for multiple raters. Psychological Bulletin, 88(2), 322–328. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danly, M., & Shapiro, B. (1982). Speech prosody in Broca ’ s Aphasia. Brain and Language, 16, 171–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davie, G. L., Hutcheson, K. A., Barringer, D. A., Weinberg, J. S., & Lewin, J. S. (2009). Aphasia in patients after brain tumour resection. Aphasiology, 23(9), 1196–1206. doi:10.1080/02687030802436900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delattre, P. (1969). An acoustic and articulatory study of vowel reduction in four languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 7(4), 295–326. doi:10.1515/iral.1969.7.4.295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(2), 124–142. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90070-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1246–1258. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0326-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. R. (2013). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management (3rd ed.). St Louis, MO: Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, L. A., & Marquardt, T. P. (2004). Syllable use in apraxia of speech: Preliminary findings. Aphasiology, 18(12), 1121–1134. doi:10.1080/02687030444000561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K. D. (1987). The neurological substrates for prosodic aspects of speech. Brain and Language, 30(2), 305–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382. doi:10.1037/h0031619
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. (2013). The measurement of interrater agreement. In J. L. Fleiss, B. Levin, & M. C. Paik (Eds.), Statistical methods for rates and proportions (pp. 598–626). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27(4), 765–768. doi:10.1121/1.1908022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galluzzi, C., Bureca, I., Guariglia, C., & Romani, C. (2015). Phonological simplifications, apraxia of speech and the interaction between phonological and phonetic processing. Neuropsychologia, 71, 64–83. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamer, M., Lemon, J., Fellows, I., & Singh, P. (2015). Package ‘ irr ’: Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=irr
   Google Scholar
• Gandour, J., & Dardarananda, R. (1984). Prosodic disturbance in aphasia: Vowel length in Thai. Brain and Language, 23, 206–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandour, J., Petty, S. H., & Dardarananda, R. (1988). Perception and production of tone in aphasia. Brain and Language, 35, 201–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandour, J., Petty, S. H., & Dardarananda, R. (1989). Dysprosody in Broca’s aphasia: A case study. Brain and Language, 37, 232–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, M. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, Vol 1. Speech and talk (pp. 177–220). London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, J.-P., & Schwab, S. (2014). EasyAlign Spanish: An (semi-)automatic segmentation tool under Praat. In Y. Congosto, M. L. Montero, & A. Salvador (Eds.), Fonética experimental, Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior e Investigación, Proc. V Congreso de Fonética Experimental 2011 (pp. 629–640). Madrid, Spain: Arco/Libros.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, K. (1939). The organism: A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man. Salt Lake City, UT: American Book Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. K., & Roettger, T. B. (2017). Acoustic correlates of word stress: A cross-linguistic survey. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(1), 1–21. doi:10.1515/lingvan-2017-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, K. L., Ohde, R. N., & Wertz, R. T. (2001). Vowel quality in aphasia and apraxia of speech: Phonetic transcription and formant analyses. Aphasiology, 15(12), 1107–1123. doi:10.1080/02687040143000519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, T. A., & Kleinhenz, U. (1999). Studies on the phonological word (Vol. 174). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. (1989). The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In P. Kiparsky & G. Youmans (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology. 1. Rythm and Meter (pp. 201–260). San Diego,New York, Berkeley, Boston, London, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, D. (2011). The analysis by synthesis of speech melody: From data to models. Journal of Speech Sciences, 1(1), 55–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hualde, J. I. (2005). The sounds of Spanish with audio CD. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, D. F., & Darley, F. L. (1970). Phonemic variability in Apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Researchnd Hearing Research, 13(3), 556–583. doi:10.1044/jshr.1303.556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, D. F., & LaPointe, L. L. (1976). Neurogenic disorders of output processing: Apraxia of speech. In H. Whitaker & H. A. Whitaker (Ed.), Studies in neurolinguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 161–169). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, P., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2002). A prosodic view of word form encoding for speech production. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 101, 112–156. doi:10.1182/blood-2002-01-0025
   Google Scholar
• Kent, R. D., & Rosenbek, J. C. (1982). Prosodic disturbance and neurologic lesion. Brain and Language, 15(2), 259–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, R. D., & Rosenbek, J. C. (1983). Acoustic patterns of apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 231–249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khasanova, A., Cole, J., & Hasegawa-Johnson, M. (2014). Detecting articulatory compensation in acoustic data through linear regression modeling. In H. Li, H. Meng, B. Ma, E. Cheng, & L. Xie (Ed.), Fifteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (p. 925–929). Singapore: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, H., & Heeschen, C. (1990). Adaptation symptoms and impairment symptoms in Broca’s aphasia. Aphasiology, 4(3), 221–231. doi:10.1080/02687039008249075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labos, E., Del Río, M., Zabala, K., & Nespoulous, J.-L. (2005). Protocolo Montreal-Toulouse-Buenos Aires de examen lingüístico de la afasia. Buenos-Aires, Argentina: Ediciones Lenguaje y Cognición.
   Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., Vacheresse, F., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2002). Selective impairment of lexical stress assignment in an Italian-speaking aphasic patient. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 601–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashley, K. S. (1929). Brain mechanisms and intelligence: A quantitative study of injuries to the brain. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenth, R., & Hervé, M. (2015). lsmeans: least-squares means. R package. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=lsmeans
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38, discussion 38–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary?. Cognition, 50, 239–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llisterri, J., Machuca, M. J., Ríos, A., & Schwab, S. (2014). El acento léxico en contexto: datos acústicos. In Y. Congosto, M. L. Montero, & A. Salvador (Eds.), Fonética experimental, Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior e Investigación, Proc. V Congreso de Fonética Experimental 2011 (pp. 357–376). Madrid, Spain: Arco/Libros.
   Google Scholar
• Llisterri, J., Machuca, M. J., de la Mota, C., Riera, M., & Ríos, A. (2005). La percepción del acento léxico en español. In C. Hernández Alonso (Ed.), Filología y Lingüística. Estudios ofrecidos a Antonio Quilis (pp. 271–297). Madrid: Centro Superior de Investigaciones Científicas - Universidad de Valladolid.
   Google Scholar
• Llisterri, J., Marín, R., de la Mota, C., & Ríos, A. (1995). Factors affecting F0 peak displacement in Spanish. In J. M. Pardo, J. M. Enriquez, J. Ortega, & J. Ferreiros (Eds.), EUROSPEECH ’95 fourth European conference on speech communication and technology (pp. 581–584). Madrid, Spain: ESCA.
   Google Scholar
• Luria, A. R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia: Its syndromes, psychology and treatment (Vol. 5). The Hague, The Netherlands/Paris, France: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, T. P., Duffy, G., & Cannito, M. P. (1995). Acoustic analysis of accurate word stress patterning in patients with apraxia of speech and Broca’s Aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 180–185. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0404.180
   Google Scholar
• McClean, M. D., & Tasko, S. M. (2003). Association of orofacial muscle activity and movement during changes in speech rate and intensity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1387–1400. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/108)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2009). Apraxia of speech: Definition, differentiation, and treatment. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (2nd ed., pp. 249–268). New York, Stuttgart: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (2007). Prosodic phonology: With a new foreword (Vol. 28). Berlin, Germany/New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1999). Effects of lexical stress on aphasic word production. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 13(4), 269–294. doi:10.1080/026992099299086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odell, K. H., McNeil, M. R., Rosenbek, J. C., & Hunter, L. (1991). Perceptual characteristics of vowel and prosody production in apraxic, aphasic, and dysarthric speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34(1), 67–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Odell, K. H., & Shriberg, L. D. (2001). Prosody-voice characteristics of children and adults with apraxia of speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 15(4), 275–307. doi:10.1080/02699200010021800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogar, J., Slama, H., Dronkers, N., Amici, S., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2005). Apraxia of speech: An overview. Neurocase : Case Studies in Neuropsychology, Neuropsychiatry, and Behavioural Neurology, 11(6), 427–432. doi:10.1080/13554790500263529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G. P., & Baum, S. R. (1994). Acoustic analysis of prosodic cues in left- and right-hemisphere-damaged patients. Aphasiology, 8(3), 257–283. doi:10.1080/02687039408248656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña-Casanova, J. (2005). Test Barcelona Revisado (TBR). Programa Integrado de exploración neuropsicológica. Barcelona, Spain: Elsevier España.
   Google Scholar
• Peperkamp, S. A., & Wiltshire, C. (1999). Prosodic words. Glot International, 4(4), 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., & Kello, C. T. (1999). The emergence of phonology from the interplay of speech comprehension and production: A distributed connectionist approach. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 381–416). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Quilis, A. (1981). Fonética acústica de la lengua española. Madrid, Spain: Gredos.
   Google Scholar
• Quilis, A., & Esgueva, M. (1983). Realización de los fonemas vocálicos españoles en posición fonética normal. Estudios De Fonética, 1, 137–252.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1998). Metrical structure in planning the production of spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 922–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, E. D., Shayya, L., & Rousseau, J. F. (2013). Prosodic stress: Acoustic, aphasic, aprosodic and neuroanatomic interactions. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26(5), 526–551. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O. (2003). Metrical stress in speech production: A time course study. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2003) (p. 451–454). Bellaterra.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O., Jansma, B. M., Peters, J., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2006). Monitoring metrical stress in polysyllabic words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(1–3), 112–140. doi:10.1080/01690960400001861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirmer, A., Alter, K., Kotz, S. A., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Lateralization of prosody during language production: A lesion study. Brain and Language, 76(1), 1–17. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. O. (1995). The prosodic structure of function words. Papers in Optimality Theory, 18, 439–469.
   Google Scholar
• Sevald, C. A., Dell, G. S., & Cole, J. S. (1995). Syllable structure in speech production: Are syllables chunks or schemas? Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 807–820. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A. P., Baum, S. R., & Dwivedi, V. D. (2006). Neural substrates of linguistic prosody: Evidence from syntactic disambiguation in the productions of brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 96(1), 78–89. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1983). Sublexical units and suprasegmental structure in speech production planning. In P. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech (pp. 109–136). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N. N., & Damico, J. S. (1997). Reformulating the definition of compensatory strategies in aphasia. Aphasiology, 11(8), 761–781. doi:10.1080/02687039708250455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemberger, J. P. (1984). Structural errors in normal and agrammatic speech. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1(4), 281–313. doi:10.1080/02643298408252855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemberger, J. P. (1990). Wordshape errors in language production. Cognition, 35(2), 123–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, E. A., & McNeil, M. R. (1996). Effects of length and linguistic complexity on temporal acoustic measures in apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39(5), 1018–1033.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torreira, F., Simonet, M., & Hualde, J. I. (2014). Quasi-neutralization of stress contrasts in Spanish. In N. Campbell, D. Gibbon, & D. Hirst (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international conference on speech prosody (pp. 197–201). Dublin, Ireland: ISCA.
   Google Scholar
• Vergis, M. K., Ballard, K. J., Duffy, J. R., McNeil, M. R., Scholl, D., & Layfield, C. (2014). An acoustic measure of lexical stress differentiates aphasia and aphasia plus apraxia of speech after stroke. Aphasiology, 28(5), 1–22. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.889275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. P., Joseph, L., & Goodman, J. (2009). The production of linguistic prosody in subjects with aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23(7), 529–549. doi:10.1080/02699200902946944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York, NY: Springer Verlag. Retrieved from http://ggplot2.org
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, W. (2002). Psycholinguistic and motor theories of apraxia of speech. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23(4), 231–243. doi:10.1055/s-2002-35798
   PubMedGoogle Scholar