Impact of visual and auditory deprivation on speech perception and production in adults

References

• Amadeo, M. B., Campus, C., & Gori, M. (2019). Impact of years of blindness on neural circuits underlying auditory spatial representation. Neuroimage, 1(191), 140–149. doi:10.1016/j
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2012). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen & S4 (R Package Version, 1.0-5).
   Google Scholar
• Bavelier, D., Dye, M. W., & Hauser, P. C. (2006). Do deaf individuals see better? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 512–518. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bavelier, D., Tommann, A., Hutton, C., Mitchell, T., Corina, D., Liu, G., & Neville, H. (2000). Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 93. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-17-j0001.2000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9–10), 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, R. G., & Dobkins, K. R. (2002). Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers. Brain Cognition, 49(1), 170–181. doi:10.1006/brcg.2001.1498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard, M. E. G., Normand, M. T. L., & Cohen, H. (2007). Production of consonants by prelinguistically deaf children with cochlear implants. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21(11/12), 875–884. doi:10.1080/02699200701653634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlingham, D. (1961). Some notes on the development of the blind. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 16, 121–145. doi:10.1080/00797308.1961.11823202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collignon, O., Voss, P., Lassonde, M., & Lepore, F. (2009). Cross-modal plasticity for the spatial processing of sounds in visually deprived subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 192, 343–358. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1553-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Craig, H. K., Raudenbush, S. W., Heavner, K., & Zwolan, T. A. (2006). The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: Is there an added value for early implantation? Ear and Hearing, 27(6), 628–644. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000240640.59205.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, K. M., Tiede, M. K., & Whalen, D. H. (2016). Methods for quantifying tongue shape and complexity using ultrasound imaging. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 30(3–5), 328–344. doi:10.3109/02699206.2015.1099164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delvaux, V., Huet, K., Puccaluga, M., & Harmegnies, B. (2018). The perception of anticipatory labial coarticulation by blind listeners in noise: A comparison with sighted listeners in audio-only, visual-only and audiovisual conditions. Journal of Phonetics, 67, 65–77. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2018.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, S., Hertrich, I., & Ackermann, H. (2013). Ultra-fast speech comprehension in blind subjects engages primary visual cortex, fusiform gyrus, and pulvinar - a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study. BMC Neuroscience, 14, 74. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-14-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, M. W., & Bavelier, D. (2010). Attentional enhancements and deficits in deaf populations: An integrative review. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 28(2), 181–192. doi:10.3233/RNN-2010-0501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstner, W. (1983). Abnormalities in the verbal communication of visually impaired children. In A. E. Mills Croom Helm (Ed.), Language acquisition in the blind child (pp. 18–41). London, England.
   Google Scholar
• Focker, J., Best, A., Holig, C., & Roder, B. (2012). The superiority in voice processing of the blind arises from neural plasticity at sensory processing stages. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 2056–2067. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 361377. doi:10.3758/BF03193857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnham, C., O’Driscoll, M., Ramsden, R., & Saeed, S. (2002). Speech understanding in noise with a Med-El COMBI 40+ cochlear implant using reduced channel sets. Ear and Hearing, 23(6), 540–552. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000042224.42442.A5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gick, B., & Stolar, S. (2013). An index for quantifying tongue curvature. Canadian Acoustics, 41, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Gougoux, F., Lepore, F., Lassonde, M., Voss, P., Zatorre, R. J., & Belin, P. (2004). Neuropsychology: Pitch discrimination in the early blind. Nature, 430(6997), 309. doi:10.1038/430309a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gougoux, F., Zatorre, R. J., Lassonde, M., Voss, P., & Lepore, F. (2005). A functional neuroimaging study of sound localization: Visual cortex activity predicts performance in early-blind individuals. PLoS Biology, 3(2), e27. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, M. G., Waltzman, S. B., Tajudeen, B., & Svirsky, M. A. (2010). Speech production intelligibility of early implanted pediatric cochlear implant users. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 74(8), 855–859. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimler, B., Weisz, N., & Collignon, O. (2014). Revisiting the adaptive and maladaptive effects of crossmodal plasticity. Neuroscience, 283, 44–63. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heming, J. E., & Brown, L. N. (2005). Sensory temporal processing in adults with early hearing loss. Brain and Cognition, 59, 173–182. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2005.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, F., Sock, R., Vaxelaire, B., Fauth, C., Bouarourou, F., Béchet, M., Barkat-Defradas M. (2011). A preliminary study on speech perception and production by blind people. International Seminar on Speech Production 2011, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. L., & Abbas, P. J. (2006). The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1527–1537. doi:10.1121/1.2163273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson, J. M., Tencer, H. L., Lany, J., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2000). The relation between gesture and speech in congenitally blind and sighted language-learners. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24(2), 105–130. doi:10.1023/A:1006605912965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, H., Denny, M., Guenther, F. H., Matthies, M. L., Ménard, L., Perkell, J. S., … Zandipour, M. (2005). Effects of bite blocks and hearing status on vowel production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(3), 1636–1646. doi:10.1121/1.2001527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, H., Matthies, M., Perkell, J., Vick, J., & Zandipour, M. (2001). The effects of changes in hearing status in cochlear implant users on the acoustic vowel space and CV coarticulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(3), 552–563. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/043)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, H., & Webster, J. W. (1991). Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 859–866. doi:10.1121/1.1894647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansing, C. R., & McConkie, G. W. (1999). Attention to facial regions in segmental and prosodic visual speech perception tasks. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(3), 526–539. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4203.526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejska, M. R. (2004). Voice field measurements—a new method of examination: The influence of hearing on the human voice. Journal of Voice, 18(2), 209–215. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2003.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessard, N., Pare, M., Lepore, F., & Lassonde, M. (1998). Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects. Nature, 395, 278–280. doi:10.1038/26228¸
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewald, J. (2002). Vertical sound localization in blind humans. Neuropsychologia, 40(12), 1868–1872. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00071-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. M. (1975). Infant speech: A study of the beginnings of language. New York, NY: Arno.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., Kambhamettu, C., & Stone, M. (2005). Automatic contour tracking in ultrasound images. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19(6–7), 545–554. doi:10.1080/02699200500113616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loke, W. H., & Song, S. (1991). Central and peripheral visual processing in hearing and nonhearing individuals. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 437–440. doi:10.3758/BF03333964
   Google Scholar
• McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746–748. doi:10.1038/264746a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménar, D. L., Polak, M., Denny, M., Burton, E., Lane, H., Matthies, M. L., … Vick, J. (2007). Interactions of speaking condition and auditory feedback on vowel production in postlingually deaf adults with cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(6), 3790–3801. doi:10.1121/1.2710963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard, L., Aubin, J., Thibeault, M., & Richard, G. (2012). Measuring tongue shapes and positions with ultrasound imaging: A validation experiment using an articulatory model. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 64(2), 64–72. doi:10.1159/000331997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard, L., Cathiard, M. A., Troille, E., & Giroux, M. (2015). Effects of congenital visual deprivation on the auditory perception of anticipatory labial coarticulation. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 67(2), 83–89. doi:10.1159/000434719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard, L., Cote, D., & Trudeau-Fisette, P. (2016). Maintaining distinctiveness at increased speaking rates: A comparison between congenitally blind and sighted speakers. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 68(5), 232–238. doi:10.1159/000470905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard, L., Dupont, S., Baum, S. R., & Aubin, J. (2009). Production and perception of French vowels by congenitally blind adults and sighted adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3), 1406–1414. doi:10.1121/1.3158930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard, L., Leclerc, A., & Tiede, M. (2014). Articulatory and acoustic correlates of contrastive focus in congenitally blind adults and sighted adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(3), 793–804. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-12-0395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard, L., Schwartz, J. L., Boe, L. J., Kandel, S., & Vallee, N. (2002). Auditory normalization of French vowels synthesized by an articulatory model simulating growth from birth to adulthood. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(4), 1892–1905. doi:10.1121/1.2710963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard, L., Toupin, C., Baum, S. R., Drouin, S., Aubin, J., & Tiede, M. (2013). Acoustic and articulatory analysis of French vowels produced by congenitally blind adults and sighted adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(4), 2975–2987. doi:10.1121/1.4818740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard, L., Trudeau-Fisette, P., Cote, D., & Turgeon, C. (2016). Speaking clearly for the blind: Acoustic and articulatory correlates of speaking conditions in sighted and congenitally blind speakers. PloS One, 11(9), e0160088. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merabet, L. B., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010). Neural reorganization following sensory loss: The opportunity of change. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(1), 44–52. doi:10.1038/nrn2758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, A. E. (1983). Language acquisition in the blind child. London, England: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, A. E. (1987). The development of phonology in the blind child. In B. Dodd & R. Campbell (Eds.), Hearing by eye: The psychology of lip-reading (pp. 145–163). London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Muchnik, C., Efrati, M., Nemeth, E., Malin, M., & Hildesheimer, M. (1991). Central auditory skills in blind and sighted subjects. Scandinavian Audiology, 20(1), 19–23. doi:10.3109/01050399109070785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neville, H. J., & Lawsom, D. (1987). Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: An event-related potential and behavioural study. II. Congenitally deaf adults. Brain Research, 405, 284–294. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(87)90297-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, W., & Starlinger, I. (1981). Do the blind hear better? Investigations on auditory processing in congenital or early acquired blindness. II. Central functions. Audiology, 20(6), 510–515. doi:10.3109/00206098109072719
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osberger, M. J., Fisher, L., & Kalberer, A. (2000). Speech perception results in adults implanted with the CLARION multi-strategy cochlear implant. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 57, 421–424. doi:10.1159/000059195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pérez-Pereira, M., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (1999). Language development and social interaction in blind children. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkell, J. S., Guenther, F. H., Lane, H., Matthies, M. L., Stockmann, E., Tiede, M., & Zandipour, M. (2004). The distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4 Pt 1), 2338–2344. doi:10.1121/1.1787524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, N. R., Pisoni, D. B., & Miyamoto, R. T. (2010). Cochlear implants and spoken language processing abilities: Review and assessment of the literature. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 28(2), 237–250. doi:10.3233/RNN-2010-0535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röder, B., Teder-Sälejärvi, W., Sterr, A., Rösler, F., Hillyard, S. A., & Neville, H. J. (1999). Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans. Nature, 400, 162–166. doi:10.1038/22106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronnberg, J. (1995). Perceptual compensation in the deaf and blind: Myth or reality? In R. A. Dixon & L. Backman (Eds.), Compensating for psychological deficits and declines: Managing losses and promoting gains (pp. 251–274). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ruff, S., Bocklet, T., Noth, E., Muller, J., Hoster, E., & Schuster, M. (2017). Speech production quality of cochlear implant users with respect to duration and onset of hearing loss. ORL, 79(5), 282–294. doi:10.1159/000479819
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J. L., Abry, C., Boë, L. J., & Cathiard, M. (2002). Phonology in a theory of perception-for-action-control. In J. Durand & B. Laks (Eds.), Phonology: From phonetics to cognition (pp. 255–280). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J. L., Boë, L. J., & Abry, C. (2007). Linking the Dispersion-Focalization Theory (DFT) and the Maximum Utilization of the Available Distinctive Features (MUAF) principle in a Perception-for-Action-Control Theory (PACT). In M. J. Solé, P. Beddor, & M. Ohala (Eds.), Experimental approaches to phonology (pp. 104–124). England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J. L., Basirat, A., Ménard, L., & Sato, M. (2012). The Perception for Action Control Theory (PACT): A perceptuo-motor theory of speech perception. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25, 336–354. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serry, T. A., & Blamey, P. J. (1999). A 4-year investigation into phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(1), 141–154. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4201.141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212–215. doi:10.1121/1.1907309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield, Q. (1979). Use of visual information for phonetic perception. Phonetica, 36(4–5), 314–331. doi:10.1159/000259969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield, Q. (1992). Lipreading and audio-visual speech perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 335(1273), 71–78. doi:10.1098/rstb.1992.0009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau-Fisette, P., Turgeon, C., & Côté, D. (2013). Vowel production in sighted adults and blind adults: A study of speech adaptation strategies in high-intensity background noise. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics. doi:10.1121/1.4799432
   Google Scholar
• Turgeon, C., Champoux, F., Lepore, F., & Ellemberg, D. (2012). Reduced visual discrimination in cochlear implant users. Neuroreport, 23(6), 385–389. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283525af4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turgeon, C., Premont, A., Trudeau-Fisette, P., & Ménard, L. (2015). Exploring consequences of short- and long-term deafness on speech production: A lip-tube perturbation study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29(5), 378–400. doi:10.3109/02699206.2015.1007527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turgeon, C., Trudeau-Fisette, P., Fitzpatrick, E., & Ménard, L. (2017). Vowel intelligibility in children with cochlear implants: An acoustic and articulatory study. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 101, 87–96. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.07.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubrig, M. T., Goffi-Gomez, M. V. S., Weber, R., Menezes, M. H. M., Nemr, N. K., Tsuji, D. H., & Tsuji, R. K. (2011). Voice analysis of postlingually deaf adults pre-and postcochlear implantation. Journal of Voice, 25(6), 692–699. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vick, J. C., Lane, H., Perkell, J. S., Matthies, M. L., Gould, J., & Zandipour, M. (2001). Covariation of cochlear implant users’ perception and production of vowel contrasts and their identification by listeners with normal hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(6), 1257–1267. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/098)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, P., Lassonde, M., Gougoux, F., Fortin, M., Guillemot, J. P., & Lepore, F. (2004). Early- and late-onset blind individuals show supra-normal auditory abilities in far-space. Current Biology, 14(19), 1734–1738. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, P., Tabry, V., & Zatorre, R. J. (2015). Trade-off in the sound localization abilities of early blind individuals between the horizontal and vertical planes. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 6051–6056. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4544-14.2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, D. H. (1977). Blindness and early childhood development. New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, D. H., Iskarous, K., Tiede, M. K., Ostry, D. J., Lehnert-Lehouillier, H., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., & Hailey, D. S. (2005). The Haskins optically corrected ultrasound system (HOCUS). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(3), 543–553. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/037)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. B., Rhone, A. E., Chatterjee, M., & Idsardi, W. J. (2013). The use of auditory and visual context in speech perception by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(4), 824. eCollection 2013. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00824
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, L., Hickson, L., & Dodd, B. (2009). Review of visual speech perception by hearing and hearing-impaired people: Clinical implications. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(3), 253–270. doi:10.1080/13682820802090281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeszut, S. (1998). A survey of speech sound production in children with visual impairment (Ph. D. thesis). Cleveland State University, USA.
   Google Scholar