Auditory-perceptual evaluation with visual analogue scale: feasibility and preliminary evidence of ultrasound visual feedback treatment of Finnish [r]

References

• Adler-Bock, M., Bernhardt, B. M., Gick, B., & Bacsfalvi, P. (2007). The use of ultrasound in remediation of North American English /r/ in 2 adolescents. American Journal of Speech - Language Pathology, 16(2), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2007/017)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulanko, R. (2005). Puheen havaitseminen peruskäsitteitä [Basic concepts of speech perception]. In A. Iivonen (Ed.), Puheen salaisuudet: Fonetiikan uusia suuntia (pp. e–book). Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B, and Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, B., Gick, B., Bacsfalvi, P., & Adler‐Bock, M. (2005). Ultrasound in speech therapy with adolescents and adults. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19(6–7), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200500114028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2019). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.1.24) [Computer programme]. http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, S. E., Hamilton, S. M., & Rivera-Campos, A. (2016). Acquiring rhoticity across languages: An ultrasound study of differentiating tongue movements. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(3–5), 174–201. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2015.1127999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, V. A. (2021). An introduction to linear mixed effects modeling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 251524592096035. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920960351
   Google Scholar
• Cleland, J., Scobbie, J. M., Roxburgh, Z., Heyde, C., & Wrench, A. (2019). Enabling new articulatory gestures in children with persistent speech sound disorders using ultrasound visual biofeedback. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 62(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland, J., Scobbie, J. M., & Wrench, A. A. (2015). Using ultrasound visual biofeedback to treat persistent primary speech sound disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29(8–10), 575–597. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2015.1016188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland, J., Wrench, A., Lloyd, S., & Sugden, E. (2018). ULTRAX2020: Ultrasound technology for optimising the treatment of speech disorders: Clinicians’ resource manual. Strathprints - The University of Strathclyde Institutional Repository. https://doi.org/10.15129/63372
   Google Scholar
• De Renzi, E., & Faglioni, P. (1978). Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the token test. Cortex, 14(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(78)80006-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSimoni, F. (1978). The token test for children. Manual. Teaching Resources Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Harel, D., Hitchcock, E., Szeredi, D., Ortiz, J., & McAllister, T. (2017). Finding the experts in the crowd: Validity and reliability of crowdsourced measures of children’s gradient speech contrasts. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 31(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2016.1174306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, E. R., Harel, D., & Byun, T. M. (2015). Social, emotional, and academic impact of residual speech errors in school-age children: A survey study. Seminars in Speech and Language, 36(4), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1562911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julien, H. M., & Munson, B. (2012). Modifying speech to children based on their perceived phonetic accuracy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(6), 1836–1849. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0131)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston naming test. Boston University.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. B., Byun, T. M., Davidson, L., & Grigos, M. I. (2013). A multidimensional investigation of children’s /r/ productions: Perceptual, ultrasound, and acoustic measures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(3), 540–553. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0137)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, H. B., Grigos, M. I., McAllister Byun, T., & Davidson, L. (2012). The relationship between inexperienced listeners’ perceptions and acoustic correlates of children’s /r/ productions. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 26(7), 628–645. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2012.682695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunnari, S., Savinainen-Makkonen, T., & Saaristo-Helin, K. (2012). Fonologiatesti [The phonology test]. Niilo Mäki Instituutti.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, M., Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P., Hänninen, R., & Niemi, J. (1997). Bostonin nimentätestin suomenkielinen versio [Finnish version of Boston naming test]. PS-kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A., Potts, S., & Bressmann, T. (2020). Speech-language therapy students’ auditory-perceptual judgements of simulated concurrent hypernasality and articulation disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 34(5), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2019.1655666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macken, M. A., & Barton, D. (1980). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: A study of voice onset time in word-initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language, 7(1), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900007029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister Byun, T., Buchwald, A., & Mizoguchi, A. (2016). Covert contrast in velar fronting: An acoustic and ultrasound study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(3–5), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2015.1056884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister Byun, T., Halpin, P., & Szeredi, D. (2015). Online crowdsourcing for efficient rating of speech: A validation study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 53, 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister Byun, T., Harel, D., Halpin, P. F., & Szeredi, D. (2016). Deriving gradient measures of child speech from crowdsourced ratings. Journal of Communication Disorders, 64, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. K., & Munson, B. (2021). Clinical experience and categorical perception of children’s speech. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 56(2), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B., & Carlson, K. U. (2016). An exploration of methods for rating children’s productions of sibilant fricatives. Speech, Language and Hearing, 19(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2015.1116154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B., Edwards, J., Schellinger, S., Beckman, M. E., & Meyer, M. K. (2010). Deconstructing phonetic transcription: Covert contrast, perceptual bias, and an extraterrestrial view of vox humana. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24(4–5), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699200903532524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B., Johnson, J. M., & Edwards, J. (2012). The role of clinical experience in the perception of phonetic detail in children’s speech: A comparison between speech-language pathologists and clinically untrained listeners. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2011/11-0009)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, B., Schellinger, S. K., & Edwards, J. (2017). Bias in the perception of phonetic detail in children’s speech: A comparison of categorical and continuous rating scales. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 31(1), 56–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2016.1233292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namasivayam, A. K., Coleman, D., O’Dwyer, A., & Van Lieshout, P. (2020). Speech sound disorders in children: An articulatory phonology perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2998. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. L., Leece, M. C., & Maas, E. (2017). Motor-based treatment with and without ultrasound feedback for residual speech sound errors. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recasens, D., & Pallarès, M. D. (1999). A study of/J/ and /r/ in the light of the “DAC” coarticulation model. Journal of Phonetics, 27(2), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. (2020). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA. Retrieved from http://www.rstudio.com/
   Google Scholar
• Sajavaara, K., & Dufva, H. (2001). Finnish-English phonetics and phonology. International Journal of English Studies, 1(1), 241–256. https://revistas.um.es/ijes/article/view/47781
   Google Scholar
• Savinainen-Makkonen, T., & Kunnari, S. (2012). Äännevirheet ja niiden kuntoutus. In S. Kunnari & T. Savinainen-Makkonen (Eds.), Pienten sanat. Lasten äänteellinen kehitys (pp. 173–187). PS-kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• Schellinger, S. K., Munson, B., & Edwards, J. (2017). Gradient perception of children’s productions of /s/ and /θ/: A Comparative study of rating methods. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 31(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2016.1205665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., Fourakis, M., Hall, S. D., Karlsson, H. B., Lohmeier, H. L., McSweeny, J. L., Potter, N. L., Scheer-Cohen, A. R., Strand, E. A., Tilkens, C. M., & Wilson, D. L. (2010). Perceptual and acoustic reliability estimates for the speech disorders classification system (SDCS). Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24(10), 825–846. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2010.503007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbergsson, S., Salvi, G., & House, D. (2015). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of category goodness of /t/ and /k/ in typical and misarticulated children’s speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(6), 3422–3435. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4921033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, E., Lloyd, S., Lam, J., & Cleland, J. (2019). Systematic review of ultrasound visual biofeedback in intervention for speech sound disorders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 54(5), 705–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Riper, C. (1978). Speech correction. Principles and methods. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Van Riper, C., & Irwin, J. (1958). Voice and articulation. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, V., Martin, D., Borton, T., & Youngblood, H. C. (2003). The effect of clinical experience on cue trading for the /r-w/ contrast. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(2), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2003/068)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wren, Y., Miller, L. L., Peters, T. J., Emond, A., & Roulstone, S. (2016). Prevalence and predictors of persistent speech sound disorder at eight years old: Findings from a population cohort study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(4), 647–673. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar