The Lombard effect in children with cochlear implants: suprasegmental aspects

References

• Adamidou, C., Okalidou, A., Fourakis, M., Printza, A., & Kyriafinis, G. (2023). Does lexical stress pattern affect learning and producing new words in Greek for children with cochlear implants? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 66(8), 2535–2561. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-21-00283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvaniti, A. (2000). The phonetics of stress in Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 1(1), 9–39.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (1992–2022). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program].
   Google Scholar
• Bořil, H., & Pollák, P. (2005). Comparison of three Czech speech databases from the standpoint of Lombard effect appearance. In ASIDE 2005–Applied Spoken Language Interaction in Distributed Environments, Aalborg Denmark, 10–11 November 2005. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hynek-Boril/publication/235220819_Comparison_of_Three_Czech_Speech_Databases_from_the_Standpoint_of_Lombard_Effect_Appearance/links/0912f51085700a9804000000/Comparison-of-Three-Czech-Speech-Databases-from-the-Standpoint-of-Lombard-Effect-Appearance.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., Torretta, G. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (1996). Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication, 20(3–4), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00063-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumm, H., & Zollinger, S. A. (2011). The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research. Behaviour, 148(11–13), 1173–1198. https://doi.org/10.1163/000579511X605759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, T., Vanpoucke, F., & van Wieringen, A. (2017). Auditory environment across the life span of cochlear implant users: Insights from data logging. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(5), 1362–1377. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart, R., Johnson, C., & Goodman, J. (1975). Perceptual masking of speakers by combinations of talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58(S1), S35. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2002082
   Google Scholar
• Chute, P. M., & Nevins, M. E. (2003). Educational challenges for children with cochlear implants. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200301000-00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, A. C., Brasolotto, A. G., Bevilacqua, M. C., Moret, A. L. M., & Bahmad Júnior, F. (2016). Hearing performance and voice acoustics of cochlear implanted children. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 82(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, M., & Lu, Y. (2010). Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(4), 2059–2069. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3478775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourakis, M., Botinis, A., & Katsaiti, M. (1999). Acoustic characteristics of Greek vowels. Phonetica, 56(1–2), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000028439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier, M., & Henrich, N. (2014). Speaking in noise: How does the Lombard effect improve acoustic contrasts between speech and ambient noise? Computer Speech & Language, 28(2), 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazrati, O., & Loizou, P. C. (2012). The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners. International Journal of Audiology, 51(6), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2012.658972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongman, A., Fourakis, M., & Sereno, J. A. (1989). The acoustic vowel space of Modern Greek and German. Language and Speech, 32(3), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098903200303
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Junqua, J. C. (1993). The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 510–524. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.405631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junqua, J. C. (1996). The influence of acoustics on speech production: A noise-induced stress phenomenon known as the Lombard reflex. Speech Communication, 20(1–2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00041-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasisopa, B., Attina, V., & Burnham, D. (2014). The Lombard effect with Thai lexical tones: An acoustic analysis of articulatory modifications in noise. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Singapore, 14–18 September 2014 (pp. 1717–1721). https://web.archive.org/web/20240128173204id_/https://www.isca-archive.org/interspeech_2014/kasisopa14_interspeech.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kleczkowski, P., Żak, A., & Król-Nowak, A. (2017). Lombard effect in Polish speech and its comparison in English speech. Archives of Acoustics, 42(4), 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoa-2017-0060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, L. L., Okalidou, A., & Psillas, G. (2018, November). Velopharyngeal control for speech in children with cochlear implants: Nasalance data in Greek VCV disyllables. In Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics (Vol. 35). AIP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinakis, K., Hazrati, O., & Loizou, P. C. (2011). A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(5), 3221–3232. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3559683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kressner, A. A., Westermann, A., & Buchholz, J. M. (2018). The impact of reverberation on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant recipients. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(2), 1113–1122. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5051640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, H., & Tranel, B. (1971). The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 14(4), 677–709. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1404.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langereis, M. C., Bosman, A. J., van Olphen, A. F., & Smoorenburg, G. F. (1997). Changes in vowel quality in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology, 36(5), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099709071980
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Ali, H., Ziaei, A., Tobey, E. A., & Hansen, J. H. (2017). The Lombard effect observed in speech produced by cochlear implant users in noisy environments: A naturalistic study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(4), 2788–2799. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4979927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenden, J. M., & Flipsen, P., Jr. (2007). Prosody and voice characteristics of children with cochlear implants. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, NATO ASI Series (Vol. 55, pp. 403–439). Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, E. (1911). Le signe de l’élévation de la voix. Annales des Maladies de L’Oreille et du Larynx, 37, 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., & Cooke, M. (2008). Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(5), 3261–3275. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2990705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyxell, B., Wass, M., Sahlén, B., Samuelsson, C., ASKER‐Árnason, L. E. N. A., Ibertsson, T., Hällgren, M. (2009). Cognitive development, reading and prosodic skills in children with cochlear implants. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(5), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00754.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mixdorff, H., Pech, U., Davis, C., & Kim, J. (2007). Map task dialogs in noise–a paradigm for examining Lombard speech. In J. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, 6–10 August 2007 (pp. 1329–1332). Pirrot GmbH, Dudweiler. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/3716181/1533-libre.pdf?1390834821=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DMap_task_dialogs_in_noise_a_paradigm_for.pdf&Expires=1713900507&Signature=XdWCLT2NbmGPMuMqmtZy4CK-KZZzgVbHkLmH3s1sWtQJ9GfCw~Q6fPE65KHC0fA8Q-bkGZ39U94cf0kMdqlo0x2VEnWku2YskN3Y1tPaam5JsgC~KrrPMKNM4F16OfB5J1o1NCWZaskcezKQm8iJAmAKINUXpnjFZ0IVR1kMHj22kE6QYls7b2QNY0AtNZ9DCuz9Q6trubWaE0CHjg-pW38l0-y-xEOhk9bJtQjKLJN47baVLcnq3a7bb9FrPOjwmzYyB7iq9RP6biH7IMqCxmQB7RHWKRrP5EsiTZd7Ey-NJJwLxG9rCWAv0Q-6shOOL~CZBzY01cdDFb7qcvYZ3w__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, A. C., Wroblewski, M., Hajicek, J., & Rubinstein, A. (2012). Measuring speech recognition in children with cochlear implants in a virtual classroom. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(2), 532–540. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0058)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaidis, K., & Rispoli, R. (2005). The effect of noise on speech production: An acoustic study. Studies in Greek Linguistics, 25, 415–426.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halpin, R. (2010). The perception and production of stress and intonation by children with cochlear implants [ Ph.D. dissertation]. University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Okalidou, A., Peng, Z. E., Pantazidou, P., Fels, J., Nistikakis, M., & Kyriafinis, G. (2018). Effects of background noise in vowel productions of children with cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(3), 1893. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5068299
   Google Scholar
• Pausch, F., Doma, S., & Fels, J. (2022). Hybrid multi-harmonic model for the prediction of interaural time differences in individual behind-the-ear hearing-aid-related transfer functions. Acta Acustica, 6(34), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2022020
   Google Scholar
• Perkell, J. S., Denny, M., Lane, H., Guenther, F., Matthies, M. L., Tiede, M., Vick, J., Zandipour, M., & Burton, E. (2007). Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(1), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2384848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisoni, D., Bernacki, R., Nusbaum, H. C., & Yuchtman, M. (1985, April). Some acoustic-phonetic correlates of speech produced in noise. In ICASSP’85. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (Vol. 10, pp. 1581–1584). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Plasmans, A., Rushbrooke, E., Moran, M., Spence, C., Theuwis, L., Zarowski, A., Mauger, S. J. (2016). A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the nucleus® 6 system. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 83, 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revithiadou, A. (1998). Lexical marking and dominance in Modern Greek. In B. D. Joseph, G. C. Horrocks, & I. Philippaki-Warburton (Eds.), Themes in Greek Linguistics II (pp. 23–51). John Benjamins, Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Revithiadou, A. (1999). Headmost accent wins [ Ph.D. dissertation]. HIL/Leiden University, LOT.
   Google Scholar
• Tartter, V. C., Gomes, H., & Litwin, E. (1993). Some acoustic effects of listening to noise on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(4), 2437–2440. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uma Maheswari, S., Shahina, A., & Nayeemulla Khan, A. (2021). Understanding Lombard speech: A review of compensation techniques towards improving speech based recognition systems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(4), 2495–2523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09907-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Summers, W. V., Pisoni, D. B., Bernacki, R. H., Pedlow, R. I., & Stokes, M. A. (1988). Effects of noise on speech production: Acoustic and perceptual analyses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(3), 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar