Digital Reading Comprehension: Multimodal and Monomodal Inputs under Debate

References

• Alisaari, J., Turunen, T., Kajamies, A., Korpela, M., & Hurme, T.-R. (2018). Reading comprehension in digital and printed texts. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 18(Running Issue), 1–18. doi:10.17239/L1ESLL-2018.18.01.15
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Alonso, M. J., de-la-Peña, C., Ortega, Z., & Scott, R. (2021). Boys specific text-comprehension enhancement with dual-visual-auditory text presentation among 12–14 years-old students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 574685. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.574685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annisette, L., & Lafreniere, K. (2017). Social media, texting, and personality: A test of the shallowing hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 154–158. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barahani, B., & Ghafournia, N. (2015). The impact of multimodal texts on reading achievement: A study of Iranian secondary school learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(4), 161–170. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.4p.161
   Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S., Calixte, R. M., & Havewala, M. (2017). The persistence of print among university students: An exploratory study. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 590–604. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.11.00
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callow, J., & Zammit, K. (2012). ‘Where lies your text?’: Engaging high school students from low socio-economic backgrounds in reading multimodal texts. English in Australia, 47(2), 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, A. C. S., & Millet, S. (2015). The effect of extensive listening on developing L2 listening fluency: Some hard evidence. ELT Journal, 68(1), 31–40. doi:10.1093/elt/cct052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvin, B. A. (2003). Visual or media literacy? Journal of Visual Literacy, 23(2), 119–128. doi:10.1080/23796529.2003.11674596
   Google Scholar
• Chun, D., & Plass, J. (1996). Facilitating reading comprehension with multimedia. System, 24(4), 503–519. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00038-3
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton-Lisell, V. (2021). Stop multitasking and just read: Meta-analyses of multitasking’s effects on reading performance and reading time. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(4), 787–816. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortiana, P. (2017). Multimodalità e scrittura tradizionale a confronto: un intervento nella scuola secundaria [Multimodality and traditional writing: experimentation in a high school]. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 68–77. doi:10.17471/2499-4324/915
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S. R., Friesner, D., & Khayum, M. F. (2014). Do reading skills courses help underprepared readers achieve academic success in college? Journal of College Reading and Learning, 33(2), 170–196. doi:10.1080/10790195.2003.10850147
   Google Scholar
• Cuetos, F., Arribas, D., & Ramos, J. L. (2016). PROLEC-SE-R. Batería para la evaluación de los procesos lectores en secundaria y bachillerato - Revisada. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Del Pino-Yépez, G., Saltos-Rodríguez, L., & Moreira-Aguayo, P. (2019). Estrategias didácticas para el afianzamiento de la comprensión lectora en estudiantes universitarios. Revista científica Dominio de las Ciencias, 5, 171–187. doi:10.23857/dc.v5i1.1038
   Google Scholar
• De-la-Peña, C., & Luque-Rojas, M. J. (2021). Levels of reading comprehension in higher education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 712901. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eksi, G., & Yakisik, B. Y. (2015). An investigation of prospective English language teachers’ multimodal literacy. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 464–471. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.533
   Google Scholar
• European Union Gazette. (2018). Council recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01).
   Google Scholar
• Flewitt, R. (2008). Multimodal literacies. In J. Marsh & E. Hallet (Eds.), Desirable literacies: Approaches to language and literacy in the early years (pp. 122–366). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, D., Zhang, S., Wright, K. L., & McTigue, E. M. (2020). Do you get the picture? A meta-analysis of the effect of graphics on reading comprehension. AERA Open, 6(1), 233285842090169. doi:10.1177/2332858420901696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahnel, C. (2017). Demands and cognitive processes in reading digital text (Doctoral dissertation). Goethe University Frankfurt am Main.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Vaughn, S., Barnes, M., Stewart, A., Austin, C., & Roberts, G. (2020). The effects of inference instruction on the reading comprehension of English learners with reading comprehension difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 41(5), 259–270. doi:10.1177/0741932518824983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics para Windows. Arkmon: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Irdamurni, I., Nurhastuti, N., Amini, R., & Taufan, J. (2020). Implementation of speech to-text application for deaf students on inclusive education course. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Multidisciplinary and its Applications (vol. 3, pp. 1–5). Medan, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Januarty, R., & Nima, H. N. A. (2018). Energizing students’ reading comprehension through multimodal texts. International Journal of Language Education, 2(2), 14–22. doi:10.26858/ijole.v2i2.4347
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Pérez, E., Gutierrez, R., & Díez, A. (2017). Diversidad lectora. La influencia de las TIC en la forma de leer: tipología de textos digitales [Reading diversity. The influence of ICT when Reading: Typology of digital texts]. In M. El Honrani, I. Ávalos, & D. E. Báez, Respuestas e intervenciones educativa en una sociedad diversa [Answers and educational interventions in a diverse society] (pp. 171–179). Granda: Editorial Comares.
   Google Scholar
• Kazazoglu, S. (2020). Is printed-text the best choice? A mixed-method case study on reading comprehension. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(1), 458–473. doi:10.17263/jlls.712879
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, A., Schwabe, A., Boomgarden, H., Brandl, L., Stocker, G., Lauer, G., … Krause-Wolters, M. (2022). Who gets lost? How digital academic reading impacts equal opportunity in higher education. New Media & Society, 26(2), 1034–1055. doi:10.1177/14614448211072306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y. C., Yang, S.-W., & Kuo, H.-H. (2010). Learning bridge: A reading comprehension platform with rich media. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(2), 934–936.
   Google Scholar
• Kwok, R. K. W., Cuetos, F., Avdyli, R., & Ellis, A. W. (2017). Reading and lexicalization in opaque and transparent orthographies: Word naming and word learning in English and Spanish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(10), 2105–2129. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1223705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lah, Y., & Hashim, N. (2014). The acquisition of comprehension skills among high and low achievers of year 4–6 students in primary school. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 667–672. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.765
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. (2013). Visual images interpretive strategies in multimodal texts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(6), 1259–1263. doi:10.4304/jltr.4.6.1259-1263
   Google Scholar
• López-Martín, E., & Ardura-Martínez, D. (2023). The effect size in scientific publication. Educación XX1, 26(1), 9–17. doi:10.5944/educxx1.36276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciejewski, M. L. (2018). Quasi-experimental design. Biostatistics & Epidemiology, 4(1), 38–47. doi:10.1080/24709360.2018.1477468
   Google Scholar
• Márquez, H., Díaz, C., Muñoz, R., & Fuentes, R. (2016). Evaluación de los niveles de comprensión lectora en estudiantes universitarios pertenecientes a las carreras de Kinesiología y Nutrición y Dietética de la Universidad Andrés Bello, Concepción. Revista de Educación en Ciencias de la Salud, 13, 154–160.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 43–71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meneses, A., Escobar, J. P., & Véliz, S. (2018). The effects of multimodal texts on science reading comprehension in Chilean fifth-graders: Text scaffolding and comprehension skills. International Journal of Science Education, 40(18), 2226–2244. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1527472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, J. L., & Carrión-Mieles, J. E. (2020). Reading comprehension in the development of interpretive ability. Polo Del Conocimiento, 6(12), 484–497. doi:10.23857/pc.v6i12.3379
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I., & Martin, M. O. (2019). PIRLS 2021. Assessment frameworks. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. S., Niehues, J., Cho, E., Ha, T.-L., Kilgour, K., & Muller, M. (2020). Low latency ASR for simultaneous speech translation. arXiv prepint:2003.09891,1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (OCDE). (2021). OECD skills outlook 2021: Learning for life. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives. Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, version 4.3.0 [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., & Tallal, P. (2016). Does modality matter? the effects of reading, listening, and dual modality on comprehension. SAGE Open, 6(3), 215824401666955. doi:10.1177/2158244016669550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M., Pechenkina, E., Aeschliman, C., & Chase, A. (2017). Print versus digital texts: Understanding the experimental research and challenging the dichotomies. Research in Learning Technology, 25(0), 1–12. doi:10.25304/rlt.v25.1976
   Google Scholar
• Schwabe, A., Brandl, L., Boomgaarden, H., & Stocker, G. (2021). Experiencing literature on the e-reader: The effects of reading narrative texts on screen. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(2), 319–338. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. (2010). Reading multimodal texts: Pesceptual, structural and ideological perspectives. Children’s Literature in Education, 41(2), 85–104. doi:10.1007/s10583-010-9100-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Z., Tang, T., & Yin, L. (2020). Construction of cognitive maps to improve reading performance by text signaling: Reading text on paper compared to on screen. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 571957. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, J. (2003). A hypertext approach to foreign language reading: Student attitudes and perceptions. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Series S, 17, 91–110. doi:10.1075/aralss.17.07son
   Google Scholar
• Støle, H., Mangen, A., Frønes, T. S., & Thomson, J. (2018). Digitization of reading assessment. In M. Barzillai, J. Thompson, S. Schroeder, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Learning to read in a digital world (pp. 205–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sulfa, S., Ernawati, E., & Fatmawati, F. (2023). Investigating literal and inferential comprehension achievement of grade six students. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 39, 127–133. doi:10.47577/tssj.v39i1.8057
   Google Scholar
• Van-Den-Broek, P., Mouw, J. M., & Kraal, A. (2016). Individual differences in reading comprehension. In En P. Afflerbach (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading: Reader, text and context (pp.138–150). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vera, F. (2015). Impacto de la multimodalidad en la comprensión lectora de textos narrativos en inglés como lengua extranjera (L2) en estudiantes universitarios [Impact of multimodality on the university students’ reading comprehension of ESL narrative texts]. Contextos Educativos, 18, 25–41. doi:10.18172/con.2608
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. (2006). Reading visual and multimodal texts: How is ‘reading’ different? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 29, 24–37.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. (2010). Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice? The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(3), 211–239. doi:10.1007/BF03651836
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. C., Muijselaar, M. M. L., Boonstra, A. M., & de Bree, E. H. (2018). The relationship between reading and listening comprehension: Shared and modality-specific components. Reading and Writing, 32(7), 1747–1767. doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9924-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. G., Moxley, J. H., Tighe, E. L., & Wagner, R. K. (2018). Does use of text-to-speech and related read-aloud tools improve reading comprehension for students with reading disabilities? A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(1), 73–84. doi:10.1177/0022219416688170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, T., & Chen, A. (2018). Combining e-books with mind mapping in a reciprocal teaching strategy for a classical Chinese course. Computers & Education, 116, 64–80. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar