Reading Medium and Epistemic Emotions in the Continued Influence Effect of Misinformation

References

• Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1816–1828. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annisette, L. E., & Lafreniere, K. D. (2017). Social media, texting, and personality: A test of the shallowing hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 154–158. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, R. A., Gottlieb, J., Nyhan, B., Paler, L., Argote, P., & Stainfield, C. J. (2024). Interventions to counter misinformation: Lessons from the Global North and applications to the Global South. Current Opinion in Psychology, 55, 101732. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohn-Gettler, C. M. (2019). Getting a grip: The PET framework for studying how reader emotions influence comprehension. Discourse Processes, 56(5–6), 386–401. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2019.1611174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, R. L., Blackburn, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2020). The narrative arc: Revealing core narrative structures through text analysis. Science Advances, 6(32), eaba2196. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba2196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, T., & Kempley, J. (2021). Individual differences in sharing false political information on social media: Direct and indirect effects of cognitive-perceptual schizotypy and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 182, 111071. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, L., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Feng, Y., & Zhang, X. (2023). Study on factors influencing college students’ digital academic reading behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1007247. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1007247.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton-Lisell, V. (2021). Stop multitasking and just read: Meta-analyses of multitasking’s effects on reading performance and reading time. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(4), 787–816. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton-Lisell, V. (2022). Reading news articles. Pre-registration on Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/8fw3g.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton-Lisell, V., Strouse, G., & Langowski, A. M. (2024). Children’s engagement during shared reading of ebooks and paper books: A systematic review. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 39, 100632. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.100632
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, K., Sandry, J., & Ricker, T. J. (2024). The effects of mind-wandering, cognitive load, and task engagement on working memory performance in remote online experiments. Experimental Psychology, 70(5), 271–284. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerniak, K., Pillai, R., Parmar, A., Ramnath, K., Krocker, J., & Myneni, S. (2023). A scoping review of digital health interventions for combating COVID-19 misinformation and disinformation. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 30(4), 752–760. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, P., & Salmerón, L. (2021). The inattentive on-screen reading: Reading medium affects attention and reading comprehension under time pressure. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101396. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion and its dynamics during device comprehension with breakdown scenarios. Acta Psychologica, 151, 106–116. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.005.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Swire, B., & Chang, D. (2011). Correcting false information in memory: Manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(3), 570–578. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0065-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K., Butler, L. H., & Hamby, A. (2020). You don’t have to tell a story! A registered report testing the effectiveness of narrative versus non-narrative misinformation corrections. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 64. doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00266-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., … Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13–29. doi:10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:10.3758/bf03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38(S1), 127–150. doi:10.1111/pops.12394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers, M., Swire-Thompson, B., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Herzog, S. M., Kozyreva, A., & Hertwig, R. (2024). The online misinformation engagement framework. Current Opinion in Psychology, 55, 101739. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddock, G., Foad, C., Saul, V., Brown, W., & Thompson, R. (2020). The medium can influence the message: Print-based versus digital reading influences how people process different types of written information. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 111(3), 443–459. doi:10.1111/bjop.12415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ithisuphalap, J., Rich, P. R., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2020). Does evaluating belief prior to its retraction influence the efficacy of later corrections? Memory (Hove, England), 28(5), 617–631. doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1752731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N. G., Thacker, I., & Sinatra, G. M. (2022). Here’s hoping it’s not just text structure: The role of emotions in knowledge revision and the backfire effect. Discourse Processes, 59(1–2), 13–35. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2021.1925059.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1420–1436. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Walsh, E. K., Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51(5–6), 374–397. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2014.913961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, E. D., Braasch, J. L. G., & Kardash, C. M. (2021). The contributions of childhood vaccination misconceptions to the evaluation and sharing of information from multiple internet texts. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 281–301. doi:10.1080/02702711.2021.1888357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S., & Zhai, L. (2018). Comparison of reading performance on screen and on paper: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138–149. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latini, N., Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Salmerón, L. (2019). Investigating effects of reading medium and reading purpose on behavioral engagement and textual integration in a multiple text context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101797. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauterman, T., & Ackerman, R. (2014). Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 455–463. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 13(3), 106–131. doi:10.1177/1529100612451018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londra, F., & Saux, G. (2023). The effect of document source trustworthiness on the evaluation and strategic use of embedded sources when reading health information online. Reading Psychology, 44(6), 623–648. doi:10.1080/02702711.2023.2179144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangen, A., & Van der Weel, A. (2016). The evolution of reading in the age of digitisation: An integrative framework for reading research. Literacy, 50(3), 116–124. doi:10.1111/lit.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangen, A., Olivier, G., & Velay, J.-L. (2019). Comparing comprehension of a long text read in print book and on Kindle: Where in the text and when in the story? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 38. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martel, C., Mosleh, M., & Rand, D. G. (2021). You’re definitely wrong, maybe: Correction style has minimal effect on corrections of misinformation online. Media and Communication, 9(1), 120–133. doi:10.17645/mac.v9i1.3519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. C., Adjei, I., & Christensen, H. (2023). The impact of mind wandering on the recall of central ideas. Reading and Writing. doi:10.1007/s11145-023-10495-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M., & Singh, C. A. (2018b). The role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 165–184. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1421465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., & Heddy, B. C. (2015). The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 39, 168–183. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Sinatra, G. M., Pekrun, R., Winne, P. H., Trevors, G., Losenno, K. M., & Munzar, B. (2018a). Main and moderator effects of refutation on task value, epistemic emotions, and learning strategies during conceptual change⋆. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 155–165. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murayama, K., Goetz, T., Malmberg, L.-E., Pekrun, R., Tanaka, A., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Within-person analysis in educational psychology: Importance and illustrations. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, 12, 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2015). Message generalizations that support evidence-based persuasive message design: Specifying the evidentiary requirements. Health Communication, 30(2), 106–113. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.974123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, E., Hwang, S. Y., Kim, D., Manolovitz, T., & Shen, L. (2023). Do you love them now? Use and non-use of academic ebooks a decade later. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(3), 102703. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102703.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259–282). New York, NY: Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). International handbook of emotions in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2012). Academic emotions. In APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 2: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 3–31). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13274-001
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control–value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531–549. doi:10.1037/a0019243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Vogl, E., Muis, K. R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2017). Measuring emotions during epistemic activities: The epistemically-related emotion scales. Cognition & Emotion, 31(6), 1268–1276. doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1204989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2021). More than eight-in-ten Americans get news from digital devices. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/01/12/more-than-eight-in-ten-americans-get-news-from-digital-devices/.
   Google Scholar
• Prike, T., & Ecker, U. K. (2023). Effective correction of misinformation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 54, 101712. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., & Salovich, N. A. (2018). Can’t we just disregard fake news? The consequences of exposure to inaccurate information. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 232–239. doi:10.1177/2372732218785193
   Google Scholar
• Rich, P. R., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2016). The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(1), 62–74. doi:10.1037/xlm0000155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, P. R., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2020). Correcting misinformation in news stories: an investigation of correction timing and correction durability. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(3), 310–322. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. (2020). RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio, PBC. http://www.rstudio.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Saling, L. L., Mallal, D., Scholer, F., Skelton, R., & Spina, D. (2021). No one is immune to misinformation: An investigation of misinformation sharing by subscribers to a fact-checking newsletter. PloS One, 16(8), e0255702. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., Altamura, L., Delgado, P., Karagiorgi, A., & Vargas, C. (2024). Reading comprehension on handheld devices versus on paper: A narrative ­review and meta-analysis of the medium effect and its moderators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(2), 153–172. doi:10.1037/edu0000830
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, J. A., Bowden, V., Swire-Thompson, B., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2023). Listening to misinformation while driving: Cognitive load and the effectiveness of (repeated) corrections. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 12(3), 325–334. doi:10.1037/mac0000057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwabe, A., Lind, F., Kosch, L., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2022). No negative effects of reading on screen on comprehension of narrative texts compared to print: A meta-analysis. Media Psychology, 25(6), 779–796. doi:10.1080/15213269.2022.2070216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood, J. (2011). Mind-wandering while reading: Attentional decoupling, mindless reading and the cascade model of inattention. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(2), 63–77. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00263.x
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, M. L., Whitehead, P. S., Marsh, E. J., & Seli, P. (2022). Prior exposure increases judged truth even during periods of mind wandering. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(5), 1997–2007. doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02101-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susmann, M. W., & Wegener, D. T. (2022). The role of discomfort in the continued influence effect of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 50(2), 435–448. doi:10.3758/s13421-021-01232-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susmann, M. W., & Wegener, D. T. (2023). How attitudes impact the continued influence effect of misinformation: The mediating role of discomfort. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(5), 744–757. doi:10.1177/01461672221077519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swire-Thompson, B., Cook, J., Butler, L. H., Sanderson, J. A., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2021). Correction format has a limited role when debunking misinformation. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 83. doi:10.1186/s41235-021-00346-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevors, G. J., Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., & Muijselaar, M. M. (2017). Exploring the relations between epistemic beliefs, emotions, and learning from texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 116–132. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevors, G., Bohn-Gettler, C., & Kendeou, P. (2021). The effects of experimentally induced emotions on revising common vaccine misconceptions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 74(11), 1966–1980. doi:10.1177/17470218211017840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tveit, Å. K., & Mangen, A. (2014). A joker in the class: Teenage readers’ attitudes and preferences to reading on different devices. Library & Information Science Research, 36(3–4), 179–184. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2014.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogl, E., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., & Loderer, K. (2020). Surprised–curious–confused: Epistemic emotions and knowledge exploration. Emotion (Washington, DC), 20(4), 625–641. doi:10.1037/emo0000578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogl, E., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Loderer, K., & Schubert, S. (2019). Surprise, curiosity, and confusion promote knowledge exploration: Evidence for robust effects of epistemic emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2474. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, N., & Tukachinsky, R. (2020). A meta-analytic examination of the continued influence of misinformation in the face of correction: How powerful is it, why does it happen, and how to stop it? Communication Research, 47(2), 155–177. doi:10.1177/0093650219854600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Wong, R., He, S., Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2020). Is it smart to read on your phone? The impact of reading format and culture on the continued ­influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 48(7), 1112–1127. doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01046-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar